Sir Murray Stuart-Smith, KCMG, PC (born 18 November 1927) is a former English barrister and Appeal Court judge.[1] His 1997 re-examination of Lord Taylor's report into the Hillsborough disaster is seen today as a "debacle".[2]
YouTube Encyclopedic
-
1/3Views:18 016686 8195 802
-
What The Drug Companies Won't Tell You with Dr. Michael Murray
-
Iconic Roles That Were Meant For Someone Else
-
Pay Attention - The Stuart Collection at UC San Diego
Transcription
Early life
Stuart-Smith was educated at Radley College and at Corpus Christi College, Cambridge.[1]
Stuart-Smith was called to the bar by Gray's Inn in 1952 and was made a Bencher 1978. He was appointed Queen's Counsel in 1970, and as judge of the High Court of Justice (Queen's Bench Division) in 1981. He was appointed to the Court of Appeal in 1987, and retired in 2000. He later served as President of the Court of Appeal of Gibraltar from 2007, and as Justice of the Court of Appeal of Bermuda from 2004.[1]
Hillsborough Report
In retirement Sir Murray was appointed to re-examine Lord Taylor's report into the Hillsborough disaster, together with the wider question of whether the inquest process had been satisfactory. Sir Murray broadly concluded that there were no problems with the way that the inquiry had been handled. Lord Falconer later stated "I am absolutely sure that Sir Murray Stuart-Smith came completely to the wrong conclusion".[3] Falconer added: "It made the families in the Hillsborough disaster feel after one establishment cover-up, here was another."[3]
There was massive criticism of the Stuart-Smith inquiry, including outrage after the judge quipped during a meeting with families: “Have you got a few of your people or are they like the Liverpool fans, turn up at the last minute?”[4]
Criminologist Professor Phil Scraton has remained highly critical of the Stuart-Smith scrutiny, describing it as a "debacle".[2] Speaking in October 2012, Scraton said the findings of the Hillsborough Independent Panel – which disclosed that 41 of the 96 who died had the potential to survive had there been a more effective response to the emergency – showed "just how wrong he (LJ Stuart-Smith) was."[5]
Judgments
Notable judicial decisions of Stuart-Smith include:
- Johnstone v Bloomsbury HA [1992] QB 333, [1991] 2 WLR 1362, [1991] 2 All ER 293, an English contract law case, concerning implied terms and unfair terms under the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977.
- Midland Bank plc v Cooke [1995] 4 All ER 562, constructive trusts.
- Smith v Lloyds TSB Group plc [2001] QB 541, liability of a bank on a forged cheque.
- Stewart Gill Ltd v Horatio Myer & Co Ltd [1992] EWCA 6, another case on the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977.
- Re Selectmove Ltd [1993] EWCA Civ 8, part payments of debt.
- Barry v Davies (Trading As Heathcote Ball & Co) [2000] 1 WLR 1962, CA
Family
Sir Murray is the father of Jeremy Stuart-Smith, also a judge, and the landscape architect and garden designer Tom Stuart-Smith.[6]
Footnotes
- ^ a b c "Rt Hon Sir Murray Stuart-Smith". Debrett's. Retrieved 26 April 2016.
- ^ a b Scraton, Phil (2009). Hillsborough: The Truth. United Kingdom: Mainstream Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84596-495-5.
- ^ a b "Hillsborough inquiry by Blair government criticised". BBC News. 25 October 2011.
- ^ "Jack Straw says "I wish I could turn the clock back" after failing to expose Hillsborough cover-up". Liverpool Echo. 29 April 2016.
- ^ "Liverpool Echo". 24 October 2012. Retrieved 13 January 2013.
- ^ "Stuart-Smith, Thomas Richard Stephen Peregrine, (Born 14 Feb. 1960), landscape architect; Director, Tom Stuart-Smith LTD, since 1998". Who's Who. 2014. doi:10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.U272538. ISBN 978-0-19-954088-4.
  | This United Kingdom law-related biographical article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
This page was last edited on 9 November 2023, at 22:24