To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Modal clausal form

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Modal clausal form, also known as separated normal form by modal levels (SNFml)[1] and Mints normal form,[2] is a normal form for modal logic formulae.

Such a normal form is commonly used for automated theorem proving using tableau calculi and resolution calculi techniques due to its benefits of better space bounds and improved decision procedures. In normal modal logic, any set of formulae can be transformed into an equisatisfiable set of formulae in this normal form.[3]

In multimodal logic where a represents an agent corresponding to an accessibility relation function in Kripke semantics, a formula in this normal form is a conjunction of clauses labelled by the modal level (i.e., the number of nested modalities). Each modal level consists of three forms as follows.

  • Literal clause: a disjunction of propositional literals .
  • Positive a-clause: where and are propositional literals.
  • Negative a-clause: where and are propositional literals.

These three forms are also called cpl-clauses, box-clauses and dia-clauses respectively.[4] Note that any clause in conjunctive normal form (CNF) is also a literal clause in this normal form.

References

  1. ^ Nalon, Cláudia; Hustadt, Ullrich; Dixon, Clare (8 November 2015). A Modal-Layered Resolution Calculus for K. TABLEAUX 2015: Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods, Wrocław, Poland. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 9323. Cham: Springer. pp. 185–200. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24312-2_13. ISBN 978-3-319-24312-2.
  2. ^ Mints, Grigori (1990). Gentzen-type systems and resolution rules part I propositional logic. COLOG 1988: International Conference on Computer Logic. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 417. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/3-540-52335-9_55. ISBN 978-3-540-46963-6.
  3. ^ Goré, Rajeev; Nguyen, Linh Anh (12 August 2009). "Clausal Tableaux for Multimodal Logics of Belief". Fundamenta Informaticae. 94 (1). Polish Mathematical Society, IOS Press: 21–40. doi:10.3233/FI-2009-115.
  4. ^ Goré, Rajeev; Kikkert, Cormac (6 September 2021). CEGAR-Tableaux: Improved Modal Satisfiability via Modal Clause-Learning and SAT. TABLEAUX 2021: Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods, Birmingham, UK. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 12842. Cham: Springer. pp. 74–91. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86059-2_5. ISBN 978-3-030-86059-2.


This page was last edited on 15 April 2024, at 17:34
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.