To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

London Heavy Brigade, Royal Garrison Artillery

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

London Heavy Brigade, RGA
Active1908–1961
Country United Kingdom
Branch
Territorial Army
TypeArtillery Brigade
RoleHeavy Artillery
Medium Artillery
Heavy Anti-Aircraft Artillery
Size2 Batteries; later 2 Regiments
Garrison/HQIslington
Motto(s)Nulli Secundus ('Second to None') – derived from 2nd Middlesex AVC
EngagementsSecond Boer War
Western Front (World War I)
Battle of France
North African Campaign
Battle of Greece
Battle of Crete
Sicily Campaign
Operation Overlord
North West Europe

The London Heavy Brigade, Royal Garrison Artillery was a unit of the British Territorial Force formed in 1908. It fought on the Western Front during World War I, and its successors served in the Mediterranean and North-West Europe theatres during World War II.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    3 937
    5 106
    35 684
    847
    670
  • Wellington's Worst Scrape
  • War in the Wilderness: Chindit Campaigns of 1943-44
  • A Jungle Too Far: Britain and the Vietnam War
  • Royal Marines
  • Dieppe Raid

Transcription

Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen. One hundred and ninety-nine years ago - had I been here last year, it would have been 200 years ago - to this day, an Anglo-Portuguese and a French army were in battle positions on ground they had fought over already in July, i.e. at Salamanca.  1812 had been, I think we might call it, a glory year for Wellington, for much of the year certainly.  Just to run through very quickly: Ciudad Rodrigo taken in January; Badajoz taken in April; and then, as one French officer put it, on 21 July at Salamanca he had defeated 40,000 men in 40 minutes.  Now, we all know that isn't quite accurate, but that has some effect of the Battle of Waterloo [sic - Salamanca] on French thinking. After the Battle of Salamanca, of course, he had to decide on his next move.  He could pursue the Army of Portugal, under General Clausel after the wounding of Marshal Marmont, north beyond the Ebro. That would be quite a useful achievement because of course it would separate the southern forces of Marshal Soult from the northern forces of Clausel and indeed Caffarelli as well. Alternatively he could move south and deal with Soult in Andalucia. Or, as he chose to do, he could march on Madrid. Just for a moment about the wider situation – because the thing to remember is that it was in Wellington's interest to keep the French apart, because if he allowed them to get together he was going to be seriously outnumbered.  So we have the Army of the South, that is, of course, Marshal Soult, 63,000-strong.  Up in the north we have General Clausel with the Army of Portugal - the Army of Portugal, 52,000-strong.  Further north General Caffarelli, the Army of the North holding the border area and also, of course, Galicia.   Then on the eastern seaboard we have the recently-created Marshal Suchet and finally King Joseph with the Army of the Centre.  Suchet had 66,000 – his was actually the largest of the French armies.  Joseph - with his real commander, Jourdan - had 20,000.  These are actually notional strengths, of course. No army is ever able to put all its men in the field. But the French actually had 190,000 men in Spain under arms, whereas the Anglo-Portuguese Army was 75,000.  So you can see why it was so important for Wellington to keep those armies apart. Having decided on Madrid, it's a political statement and it was one of Napoleon's aims wasn't it whenever he invaded a country to take its capital.  It sends a message. And, although Madrid was not the French capital, it was where the French, of course, had established their power.  As Wellington entered Madrid, or approached Madrid, Joseph fled to join Suchet in Valencia.  Now, interestingly, and I'm sure you all know this, the French marshals did not get on particularly well. They all guarded their own little bits of territory and in actual fact there was quite a fierce dispute between Soult and Joseph as to what Joseph should do.  Soult, who was very, very reluctant to give up his semi-kingdom of Andalucia, wanted Joseph to come down and join him there. Joseph, however, wanted Soult to abandon Andalucia and come and reinforce the French position further north, and there was a little bit of a stalemate actually for quite a time.  Soult prevaricated, he played for time, and he was certainly nowhere around to prevent Wellington enjoying what was a tumultuous entry into Madrid.  Obviously in the time available I can't describe it, but if you read any of the accounts of people who were there, then it was like nothing they'd ever experienced before.  Somebody, one of the officers, actually described it as an ecstasy of the brain, which probably conveys something about it. Of course, once Wellington had taken Madrid there was still the problem of what to do next, and in actual fact the decision was perhaps taken out of his hands by the actions of General Clausel.  Clausel restored this battered Army of Portugal remarkably quickly. One of his most enterprising generals, General Foy, was sent down to relieve various French garrisons in the Douro region: Toro, Zamora - he was too late for Astorga. And Wellington had taken the precaution of leaving the 6th Division in this area at Arevalo. Unfortunately General Clinton, who was in command, proved very passive and Wellington had to accept that Clausel was now his biggest threat. So he changed his plans, or he abandoned any idea of dealing with Soult, and decided to deal with Clausel. His strategy was quite simple.  Off the northern coast of Spain was Admiral Home Popham, a very enterprising sailor, and he, with guerrilla support, was going to keep Caffarelli occupied.  So General Hill with the 2nd Division was to hold the line of the Tagus and prevent Soult from actually being able to advance north. And to help him was General Ballesteros who was something of a gadfly as far as the French were concerned - very good at hit-and-run activities. Now, the map actually goes a little further than we've got so far and you can see that the movement of Soult north, which did eventually happen - he had to give into Joseph's demands. And you can also see Hill moving towards the Tagus, to hold the line of the Tagus. Wellington first advancing on Madrid, which sent Joseph off to Valencia, and then moving up to Burgos but, as we shall see, eventually having to move south. Wellington chose, rather surprisingly, to leave the 3rd, 4th and Light Divisions in Madrid.  Now, whether that means, and this is quite a contentious point, that he at that point was not thinking in terms of taking Burgos is quite difficult to say, but certainly they were his most experienced divisions and there they stayed.  He took with him the 1st, 5th and 7th Divisions along with Anson's cavalry, who then joined the 6th Division at Arevalo, more about that in a minute. General Maitland and Admiral Popham, of course, were to continue their activities as actively as they could just to keep a large part of the French occupied.    To return to those divisions that Wellington chose to take with him, the 5th Division had some, I suppose, kudos in that they were the division that escaladed the San Vicente bastion at Badajoz and were actually the first people to get into the town.  The 6th Division had failed to take the fort at Salamanca and the 1st and 7th Division had no siege experience whatsoever, in fact very little battle experience altogether. Well, Wellington left Madrid on 1 September and advanced very slowly.  Clausel had no intention of fighting and had the time to keep withdrawing, taking up another strong position, withdrawing, and so on.  And the reason why Wellington advanced so slowly was that he was waiting for this man, General Castaños, with the Army of Galicia. Now, Castaños, to give him credit, was about the only Spanish general who willingly and happily worked with Wellington. But he was not a man to hurry himself and so instead of hurrying the French north of the Ebro, the army, complaining all the way I have to say, particularly the officers, had this slow progress up towards Burgos.  The night before Wellington actually reached Burgos, which was 18 September, it seemed there would be a battle, but Clausel very cleverly managed to withdraw his forces - he didn't want to fight a battle, his army was not ready for that yet. Why Burgos is an interesting question.  Remember that Wellington had no siege train with him - that was partly at Ciudad Rodrigo, partly left behind at Madrid.  The first mention I have managed to find of an intention of taking Burgos comes quite late on this leisurely advance in a dispatch to Castaños. But, of course, if he was going to move further and, of course, he did seem to be showing an intention of withdrawing further and further north, then he couldn't go beyond Burgos and leave the fortress in his rear.  And also, if he took Burgos and held it, it was a real obstacle to connections between the French in the south and supplies coming down along the royal road.  It seems, though, almost to have been a... well Burgos is here, I'll have a go at taking it. Burgos was not a major fortress; it was not a Badajoz.  Napoleon had actually given orders when he was in Spain that the defences should be strengthened, but in fact these had never happened.  It was outside the town, which made it perhaps an easier objective. However, Colonel Robe wrote to Dickinson that it was going to be a hard nut to crack.  He could see there would be problems - probably he was thinking being an artillery man that there weren't the adequate guns for the siege.  I'm going to run through the siege very quickly because, obviously with time being limited, and try and focus on what went wrong and why this was actually Wellington's worst scrape. He decided that the two divisions - or two units, if you like - that would actually undertake the siege were the 1st Division and Pack's Portuguese.  Now, Pack's Portuguese had been very much involved in the taking of Ciudad Rodrigo so they at least had some experience.  The 6th Division and the Galician Army were to take the suburbs and they would also be used for work like digging trenches, etc, etc.  The 5th and the 7th Division, Bradford's Portuguese and some part of the Galicians were to create a covering force to keep the French who had moved far north up to Briviesca to keep them well away from Burgos. As you can see from that, up here we have the hornwork of San Miguel - an outwork incomplete, but a reasonably tough target. Then we actually have three defensive lines within the fortress itself - as you can see they are labelled - and two churches. We have the church of La Blanca and then outside the church of San Roman. All of those are going to be part of the discussion of the siege. To turn to the French for the moment, the commander was a certain General Dubreton.  Now Dubreton was quite an enterprising fellow.  He had actually managed to get the garrison out of Santander when it came under attack from Popham and Spanish guerrillas, the complete garrison without losing a man.  He was now left in the fortress with a garrison of 2,000 men, including a lot of sharpshooters who were going to give the Allies quite a lot of trouble.  He had nine heavy guns, 11 field pieces and six mortars or howitzers.  In comparison with that, taking the artillery first, Wellington had three 18-pounders, five 24-pounders, but that wasn't a siege train.  Even more seriously he had five engineers only with ten volunteers.  These were officers, of course, who volunteered for the duty but were not trained in any specific way. And also, he had only eight rank-and-file artificers plus 81 volunteers, so he didn't really have the resources, I think it has to be said, for a successful siege.  And there was another issue, the weather.  We are talking about September.  September in Spain is normally pleasant, sunny and dry.  The rain started during the advance up to Burgos and it virtually didn't stop until the end of November and siege work was hated by troops anyway.  Siege work in these sort of conditions with all the mud, of course, that rain causes were beyond anything awful, I think it's fair to say - certainly as far as the men were concerned.  Interestingly, one thing Wellington was depending on was that it would rain in the south.  He actually told Hill in several despatches that Hill's job would be made easier because the rivers would fill and therefore Soult would find it much harder to move north from Andalucia.  Well, of course, ironically, it didn't rain in the south; it only rained in the north. Because I'm running through the siege very fast I thought perhaps it was a good idea just to pick out the main events that happened.  On 18 September the hornwork was attacked by escalade. Escalading had been tried before - it was successful in the castle at Badajoz, it was successful at San Vicente bastion at Badajoz - so it must have seemed like a good idea. Unfortunately, this main attack failed - I'll come back to why in a minute.  However, Major Cox, one of the most enterprising of Wellington's officers, was successful with what was meant to be a secondary attack. But as soon as San Miguel had been taken the complaints, the criticisms started and the biggest criticisms were: firstly Wellington had not used enough troops; and secondly he had used them in detachments, which meant of course you had men in mixed units without their familiar officers and that really was thought to be bad practice.  I'll come back to why I think Wellington did that. On 22 September the guns went into number one battery at the hornwork and work began on number two battery and there was another escalade on the outer line, which failed.  Again detachments were used, again there were recriminations.  There is no doubt that this whole event at Burgos was conducted in bad humour.  I think that's the only way to put it.  Nobody, I think, was enjoying themselves and everybody was ready to criticise everybody else.  The artillery, the engineers, Wellington, they all came in for criticism. Wellington then decided that he would mine the outer wall.  He had no miners except those that were coincidentally in the ranks and had been miners. He had no appropriate tools, but possibly it was the right decision - it would have been a better decision with the miners and tools, I suppose.  On 29 September the first mine was fired, but unfortunately it went off in the wrong place.  I'll come back to that.  What the miners had thought was the foundations of the outer line proved to be the foundations of an old wall that had long since disappeared.  Nevertheless, as the mine exploded the detachments went in and the only ones that actually got through, because it was quite a small breach and as I say not in the right place, were a sergeant and four men.  Interestingly, when they arrived, the French fled. Presumably they thought these were the forerunners of a large force.  Of course, when they realised there were only five men there they came back - as far as I can make out - gave the five men a thorough beating and then drove them out. By 1 October battery number three was ready, but it was never unmasked because of the heavy and accurate French artillery fire.  On 2 October battery number four, which was in process, was destroyed. And then on 4 October a second mine was fired and this time a lodgement was secured.  Indeed, Ensign Mills of the Coldstream, who was a witness, said, 'The explosion of the mine and the storming were so instantaneous that they [the French] had no time to do anything before the men were in, and then it was too late.' Now, one of the points I am going to make is that Dubreton was a particularly bold governor.  So the Allies had formed a lodgement in the early hours of the 4th. On the night of the 4th Dubreton re-took this breach, destroyed the gabions, stole the entrenching tools - which, of course, were always in short supply in the British Army - and although this was retaken by the 2nd Queen's Regiment, there were more recriminations.  Why hadn't more men been sent to hold the position? Right, so let's continue the siege then.  By 7 October, as you can see from that, the first and second batteries were finally inflicting damage.  On 8 October there was another French attack on that lodgement - 200 allied losses including Major Cox.  As I'm sure you know, Wellington was only noted to weep on a very few occasions. One had been when he saw the dead in the breaches at Badajoz. Another was the funeral of Major Cox.  He actually wrote to Major Cox's father, 'I consider his loss as one of the greatest importance to this army and to His Majesty's service.'  Certainly, when one looks at all the actions of the siege, Cox probably showed more initiative than anybody else. On 9 October attempts were made to fire the church of La Blanca with hot shot.  Unfortunately, it failed and the villain of the piece this time was the weather because as soon as they got the fires going to heat the shot, the rain put the fires out.  So there was a constant delay allowing the French time to put the fires that did take hold in the church out, before the next lot of hot shot came.  So that was another attempt to take the place that failed. On 15 October the French outgunned number two battery and damaged number one battery.  However, by this time there was another mine in place.  This time under this church here, the church of San Roman. And also, before being put completely out of action, the guns had made a practicable breach.  So on 18 October the mine was fired at 4 o'clock in the afternoon. This was synchronised with the attack on the third breach. The Spanish and the Portuguese successfully took the church of San Roman. The guards and the KGL [King's German Legion] failed at the breach.  They fought very, very hard but, as Mills pointed out, 'The failure was caused by our want of men. 'Had we had double the number we could have maintained ourselves, but they dropped off so fast and, none coming to supply their places, we failed from sheer weakness.'  It really was like battering your head against a brick wall, I think. This, in fact, was the end of the siege.  Very little success - taking the hornwork, but not much else to crow about I suppose, really.  And the reason the siege ended was that the Army of Portugal, now under General Souham who had replaced General Clausel, had been threatening the covering force for some time. And on the 18th Souham actually attacked the outposts of that covering force.  Furthermore, he had been reinforced with Caffarelli's Army of the North.  So the Army of Portugal, with that detachment from the Army of the North, was now 50,000-strong and that's 50,000 men under arms. Wellington had 35,000.  So it was time, of course, I think, to pack up and move. Before we actually try and decide why things went so horribly wrong, it's worth pointing out what Lieutenant Colonel John Jones, an engineer, who was actually wounded at Burgos, had to say:  'A siege is one of the most arduous undertakings on which troops can be employed, an undertaking in which fatigue, hardship and personal risk are the greatest, one in which the prize can only be gained by complete victory and where failure is usually attended with severe loss or dire disaster.' That probably sums of Burgos fairly effectively.  So what went wrong? Well, I suppose, to start with we have to concede that Wellington had inadequate resources.  No siege train, not enough engineers and by the end of the siege he was down to just two fit engineers, so there weren't enough engineers to go round, as it were, to guide the men when they were actually going into action.  Wellington had already complained about the lack of trained artificers. After Burgos he complained even more loudly and by the time of San Sebastian in 1813 he had actually got a reasonable supply. But no artificers to speak of, no miners, not enough tools, not the way to approach a siege. And then there was the attitude of the troops.  Now, the officers certainly grumbled, but then a lot of Wellington's officers habitually grumbled, so perhaps one shouldn't take it too seriously. But the men were undoubtedly demoralised.  The weather, as I said, was atrocious.  They hadn't been paid since the beginning of the year.  The food supplies were rather hit and miss - the commissariat were not doing their job particularly well, but I will hold fire on that one until a little bit later.  They were in uniforms falling to pieces, infested with lice. They were having to work in mud and nothing was going right. So you have a demoralised army.  Wellington was quite surprised by this.  Several of his despatches, which he sends to Hill and other people, make the point he can't understand what's happened to his army.  I think when you've been taking places, alright with heavy losses, but successfully and when you've had a great victory like Salamanca it doesn't take much to shift the mood, and things certainly did shift. Then there was the use of detachments.  This was criticised right from the beginning and it's interesting that it's not until halfway through the siege that Wellington abandons it.  He was using limited numbers for the assaults and that, combined with the lack of commitment, was a fairly disastrous combination.  It's interesting to wonder why and, I don't know, one can only speculate, but I think if one remembers how Wellington reacted to Badajoz then there is some understanding as to why he was cautious with his men. He didn't want to see another scene like the scenes that he saw at Badajoz. However, we mustn't forget Dubreton.  There is no doubt that Dubreton conducted a masterly defence.  The French situation was absolutely dire.  By the end of the siege they were on quarter rations.  A lot of the men were out in the open and it was raining on them just as it was raining on the allied army.  Losses were quite high, but so was commitment and it seems to me that the trump card that Dubreton played was keeping the men busy.  There was no time for them to sit around and mope about their condition, whereas of course the allied soldiers had quite a lot of time to do that.  He found things for them to do and I think all praise to Dubreton - he really did show just want a French general was capable of. Well, Wellington had no choice now. He had to retreat. And if he had to retreat he couldn't leave Hill stranded on the Tagus.  And indeed, Hill was actually facing a crisis in the south.  Soult and Joseph had joined forces in Valencia - remember that is where Joseph had fled - and this was a threat to Hill's position and, of course, ultimately, if they joined up with the Army of Portugal, a very serious threat to the whole allied army.  To make matters worse, General Ballesteros, who had a good record against Soult, he was very good at striking - whenever Soult moved to point A, Ballesteros would strike at point B, which would bring Soult back, of course, and then Ballesteros would just melt into the mist ready for the next attack. Now, in September Wellington had been made commander in chief of the Spanish Army.  Ballesteros - well, I was going to say he threw his toys out of his cot - he really believed he should have been given that position. And admittedly Wellington did once write that he thought Ballesteros was the best of the Spanish generals. He did go on and say that that's not actually saying very much - he did have a very low opinion of them.  Ballesteros's defection actually upset Wellington's plans because Ballesteros's purpose in the Granada area was to slow down Soult's advance.  I think Wellington knew that Soult would have to leave and I suppose it could be said that fate was also against Wellington.  The fortress of Chinchilla actually blocks the road from Andalucia up to the Tagus.  It was held by a very determined Spanish general.  It's on a very high summit - it's very difficult to see how the French would ever have been able to take it.  Unfortunately, on 9 October there was the most violent storm which actually struck the fortress, including the governor and indeed quite a lot of the defenders.  In fact, quite a lot of them were killed.  It was thought that the governor was killed, but he wasn't. But he was hit - his sword presumably took the force of it - and you can imagine he was left in a pretty bad state.  And, of course, with Chinchilla out of the way, Soult could just march happily up to the Tagus. So, Wellington instructed Hill to hold the Tagus for as long as possible, bringing the Madrid divisions forward, and then, if he had no choice, he would have to abandon Madrid and join Wellington, and so we get a double retreat.  Sorry, I should have shown that one earlier. That is the French position inside Burgos.  This is actually Wellington's line of retreat from Burgos, as you can see back to Salamanca.  It was not a comfortable retreat because it was still raining, the food was still in short supply. You'll see from the images that I'm going to show you that bridges were very important. Wellington actually withdrew his forces on 22 October.  He had originally hoped to turn the siege into a blockade, but, I suppose, the determination of Souham convinced him that he wasn't strong enough to face the Army of Portugal in battle and it was better to retire.  He withdrew during the night of the 22nd from Burgos, and actually gained a day's march on the Army of Portugal.  However, the following day there was a running cavalry fight from Celada del Camino to Villodrigo - it was a cavalry fight, it has to be said, where the French got the better of it. But finally the Light Battalions of the King's German Legion in the 7th Division formed square, held the French cavalry and the French finally withdrew. On 23 October the allied army for the most part, all except the 5th Division and the Galicians, was at Torquemada.  Torquemada is in a wine-growing area - you're probably getting the picture already. The wine vats were full and during the night our enterprising British and, I imagine, Portuguese soldiers broke into the wine vats and the result was mass drunkenness. There are some amazing scenes and it sounds like something out of Hieronymus Bosch, actually, some of the descriptions of the scenes at Torquemada.  Alexander Dixon of the Portuguese Artillery actually wrote, 'such a scene of drunkenness as would have disgraced a Billingsgate rabble'.  Well, I don't know what a Billingsgate rabble is like, but it sounds pretty bad. So on the 24th this drunken crew had to be marched further on - the French were quite close by. I have to say, by the way, that the Allies didn't drink all the wine and when the French moved in they finished off what the Allies had started, which may have significance. On 25 October General Foy - as I've said, one of the perhaps most enterprising of the French generals - took Palencia. It was this bridge, Roman bridge - you may well know it if you've been to Palencia -was supposed to have been blown up and fortunately the charge failed. The French were able to get across and the Royals on the far side had no choice but to move fast back to where the rest of the 5th Division... Remember, they were sober - we can't blame the Royals for being drunk because they hadn't been at Torquemada, they had been elsewhere where there was no wine.  So the Royals had to join the 5th Division who were at Villamuriel. And remember, these are the only sober troops. You've got the 5th Division and the Galicians, and you've got both Foy and Maucune ready to attack their position. This time the bridge was successfully blown up and what followed was a fire fight on either side of the River Carrion.  The French eventually found a way across.  Napier has a lovely story, actually, that a French cavalry officer rode his horse into the river and claimed that he wanted to desert and couldn't get across, the river was too deep, where was the ford.  And the soldiers obligingly told him.  Now, I think... there's no other evidence for this.  Napier wasn't there and all the accounts that do exist make no reference to that at all.  I think the French managed to work out where the fords were because they found the point where the Allies were most heavily posted - Portuguese Caçadores in one position and the 9th in another - and eventually they got across. Initially, the French were very successful.  They were actually able to push the 5th Division - the Galicians were some way back - back towards the canal. If you've ever been to Villamuriel, it's an interesting place because you've got the River Carillion and running parallel with it you've got the canal which fortunately was empty at this point and you've got the village in between.  The 5th Division then took up positions in the canal. The Spanish were brought forward and a very strong effort drove Maucune back across the river. And the 5th Division were able to hold the position long enough for the rest of the army, presumably recovering now from their drunkenness, to actually effect their retreat. I've mentioned quite a lot about General Foy.  I have to say, he's my favourite French general - a very good writer and very entertaining and, as we shall see, very open minded as well.  Foy was leading the pursuit of the Allies and he came to Tordesillas, which you will see is another bridge.  This bridge, again, had been successfully blown up.  On the allied side there was a strong detachment of Brunswick Jaegers and not very far away was the whole of the 7th Division.  How do you get across a river when the bridge has been blown up? Well, you listen to an officer who says, 'If we all strip naked we can swim across the river.  All we will need is a little raft to put our muskets on, and when we get to the other side we will take the muskets and we will deal with the black-coated Brunswickers who are supposed to be keeping watch.'  They clearly weren't.  And I imagine the sight of naked men rising out of a river might have been enough to unsettle anybody. Anyway, the result was that the Brunswickers fled, the 7th Division had to make a hasty retreat and Tordesillas was firmly in French hands.  Interestingly though, that's as far as Souham went.  He was waiting to see what Soult was doing. On 7 November Wellington was back at Salamanca waiting for Hill. And just to very quickly run through Hill's experiences: By 28 October he had to abandon that line on the Tagus.  On the 30th yet another of these bridge actions - this is Puente Larga where a very small detachment, men that had come up from Cadiz, managed to hold Soult, again long enough for Hill's forces to get safely back to Madrid. On 31 October they left Madrid causing great sadness, marched over the Guadarrama mountains with the French very close behind. They had no food at all, their commissariat had broken down completely.  However, Soult didn't push the pursuit. He kept within distance, but at no point did he threaten to overwhelm Hill's forces and by 10 November Hill's forces were at Alba de Tormes. You're not going to be surprised, but another bridge.  Again, this bridge was held by a brigade of the 2nd Division and Hamilton's Portuguese. It was held for two days and Soult realised he actually couldn't get across.  He gave up, he went somewhere else.  And that brings me, of course, to 14 November - you have both armies in battle order at Salamanca and there is no doubt that both sides, as far as the men and officers were concerned, wanted a battle.  But Soult was strangely reluctant to fight.  Again, if we're looking for reasons, remember that Soult's most recent experience of fighting an allied army had been at Albuera, the bloodiest battle of the Peninsular War.  The battle that Soult claimed he had won, but unfortunately his opponents hadn't recognised the fact.  There may well be good reason why he decided that if he could get the allied army out of Spain, which is what he had been instructed to do by Napoleon, then he would have achieved what he set out to achieve. At about 2 o'clock on the 15th Wellington realised that Soult was manoeuvring to cut off his retreat to Portugal, which is as good a way as any to make somebody retreat, and so he gave the order to withdraw.  Interestingly it had been a very grey drizzly day.  At the moment that the order was given to withdraw, the drizzle turned to torrential rain and that torrential rain was to last for the next three days.  There we can see the line of retreat back to Ciudad Rodrigo - that is where Wellington was aiming for. If you read the accounts of people who were on the Corunna retreat and the Burgos retreat, interestingly nobody says that Corunna was worse, and several people say that Burgos was worse.  It's interesting to consider why.  Well, they had no food at all.  The Quartermaster General, Sir James Willoughby Gordon, had sent the food on a different route - the one he thought that Wellington was going to take, and he hadn't bothered to check.  He had been fairly inefficient anyway and this was, I suppose, the final straw.  The men were eating acorns.  One of the French cavalry, because the French cavalry were sent in pursuit, actually made the comment that Spanish acorns fortunately tasted rather better than French acorns, because they hadn't got any food either.  The men stole pigs - some men were hanged for stealing pigs.  They managed to find cabbages, they managed to find potatoes, but there was a problem: it was so wet you couldn't light the fires.  There was no bread.  There were a few half-starved oxen, but what's the point of meat if you can't cook it.  It's not a good idea to eat it raw.  Mud to the knees. Men, women and children just falling by the wayside, horses collapsing, and all the time a very determined pursuit by the French cavalry. This is the scene of the last action - no bridge you will notice - And this is San Muñoz. Again the French were held, held by the 7th Division, which enabled everybody else to get safely back to Ciudad Rodrigo, a place they knew well, of course. So, very quickly, conclusions. Soult had done what he was told to do and he had driven the Allies into Portugal. He hadn't driven them into the sea, but that was asking a big much. But of course he hadn't defeated them.  Interestingly he said this, 'Wherever you find the British Army in retreat, let them alone and they will go to the devil in their own way. 'But if you go near them they will get into their places and give you such a drubbing as you have never had before.' It probably explains why he decided that pursuit was better than battle. As for Wellington, well, we can't deny, can we, Burgos was a mistake.  He admitted it himself - his worst scrape. He did congratulate himself on getting everybody safely out.  A heavy cost in manpower, although not as heavy - I've been through all the casualty returns, so I can say this with confidence - not as heavy as people like Napier thought it was.  Many of the wounded, of course, recovered. Many of the missing returned.  In fact, I found in the musters of the 4th Foot people who had even got to England. They were presumably prisoners that got away and they got to England, then they came back to the Peninsula to join the regiment.  What Wellington couldn't do anything about was the weather, the lack of food, the old uniforms - lice-ridden, of course, means typhus, fever - and the sickness.  If you look at what McGrigor had to say - James McGrigor, of course, his surgeon-general - he just feels these were things that could not have been gainsaid. Perhaps I'll give the last word to General Foy. 'The campaign is over.  'Lord Wellington retires undefeated with the glory of the laurels of the Arapiles [Salamanca,of course] subsequently having returned to the Spanish the country to the south of the Tagus after we had to destroy our magazines, our materiel, our fortifications - in a word everything which was a product of our conquest and could ensure its continuation.' Foy had no doubt that the losers in Wellington's worst scrape were not Wellington and his Anglo-Portuguese Army, but the French. And of course he was right. The French never regained the initiative and 1813 was a very different story. Thank you.

Origin

When the Territorial Force was created in 1908 by the Haldane Reforms, each infantry division was allocated a heavy battery of the Royal Garrison Artillery (RGA). London provided two divisions, whose heavy batteries were manned by converting the existing 1st London Engineer Volunteer Corps (EVC) into the 1st London Heavy Brigade, RGA. The 1st London EVC had been raised in 1862 as the 1st City of London Engineer Volunteer Corps, nicknamed 'Old Jewry' from the quarter of the City of London where it was initially based, though the unit moved to the Barbican in 1868 and then to Islington in North London in 1877. From 1863 to 1868 it was attached for administrative purposes to the 1st Middlesex EVC based at the South Kensington museums.[1][2][3][4][5][6]

The engineer unit sent a detachment of one officer and 25 other ranks to assist the regular REs during the Second Boer War in 1900, and a second section the following year.[7]

The RGA brigade formed in 1908 was an administrative unit for the 1st and 2nd London Heavy Batteries, assigned to the 1st and 2nd London Divisions respectively. Its drill hall was at Offord Road in Islington.

World War I

The two London divisions had just begun their annual training on Salisbury Plain when war was declared in August 1914: they promptly returned to their drill halls to mobilise. Both London heavy batteries were equipped with four 4.7-inch guns.[8][9]

1/1st London Heavy Battery

During the autumn of 1914, the 1st London Division sent most of its infantry battalions to relieve Regular troops in Malta or to supplement the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) in France. By January 1915, what remained of the division in the UK was broken up and its support units, including 1st London Heavy Battery, were assigned to a new 2nd Line division (the 2/1st London) that was being organised. The battery organised its own 2nd Line unit, designated 2/1st.[9][10]

Transport limbers gallop past a battery of British 4.7 inch guns on the Somme

The new division, now numbered 58th (2/1st London) Division, spent 1915 and the early part of 1916 training around Ipswich. On 11 February 1916, the 1/1st London Heavy Battery left the division and moved to Woolwich to prepare for independent service overseas, the 2/1st London Heavy Battery having already joined 58th Division the previous September. The 1/1st Bty disembarked at Le Havre on 3 March 1916 and joined XXVII Heavy Artillery Group, RGA. Subsequently, it passed from one mobile or mixed-gun Heavy Artillery Group (HAG) to another, supporting the various armies of the BEF as operations dictated.[10]

On 12 February 1917, the four-gun battery was made up to six guns when it was joined by a section from 193rd Heavy Battery, a New Army unit that had just arrived from England.[a] By now, the heavy batteries on the Western Front had adopted the 60-pounder in place of the 4.7-inch. The battery was finally posted to 42nd HAG (later 42nd Heavy Brigade) on 23 December 1917 and remained with it (apart from short detachments) for the rest of the war.[13][14][12]

1/2nd London Heavy Battery

The 2nd London Heavy Battery also formed 1st and 2nd Line units. The 1/2nd Bty landed in France with 2nd London Division (soon afterwards renamed 47th (1/2nd London) Division) on 15 March 1915. However, artillery policy in the British Expeditionary Force was to withdraw heavy batteries from the divisions and allocate them to HAGs.[13] The 1/2nd Bty therefore transferred from the division to I Group, Heavy Artillery Reserve, on 31 March.[8][15] It joined the 13th HAG, supporting V Corps, on 19 April 1915.[12]

Kitchener's Wood

German soldiers with captured British QF 4.7 inch gun during World War I, apparently in Belgium

On 22 April, the battery was camped at 'Kitchener's Wood' en route to Ypres to be attached to the Indian Corps when the Germans launched a surprise attack (the 2nd Battle of Ypres) behind a gas cloud and broke through the French defenders. Although reportedly armed with only seven rifles, the Londoners fought a stubborn rearguard action as the Germans entered the wood, allowing the gunners to remove the breechblocks and firing pins from their 4.7s before escaping. The guns were recaptured by the 2nd Canadian Division but the position could not be held and the guns were abandoned.[16][17] The Germans subsequently reported their capture of the guns marked 'London', causing 'considerable anxiety in London, from the impression thereby created that the London Division had been at Ypres in the gas attack, and had been driven back to such an extent as to lose their heavy guns'.[18]

The battery was subsequently re-equipped. On 1 March 1917, it was made up to six guns when a section joined from 199th Heavy Battery.[b] Like the 1/1st, the 1/2nd London Heavy Battery moved from one HAG to another as required until 8 July 1917, when it returned to become a permanent part of the mobile 13th HAG (later 13th Heavy Brigade) for the rest of the war.[13][14][12]

2/1st London Heavy Battery

Raised in 1914 from volunteers, this battery joined 58th (2/1st London) Division at Ipswich on 24 September 1915, initially serving alongside its 1st Line battery. In July 1916, 2/1st and 2/2nd London Heavy Batteries formed part of 'C' Brigade of RGA heavy batteries attached to Southern Army defending Eastern England.[19] The battery did not accompany 58th Division when it went to France in January 1917. Instead, it joined the newly formed 71st Division on 9 March 1917. On 12 February 1918, it formed part of 226th Mixed Brigade when it was transferred to 67th (2nd Home Counties) Division, and the battery served as a training unit with this formation until the end of the war, without leaving the UK.[20]

2/2nd London Heavy Battery

This battery served with 60th (2/2nd London) Division from 9 April 1915 until 24 January 1916, when it transferred to 61st (2nd South Midland) Division. It did not accompany the division to France in June 1916 but, like 2/1st Battery, it was part of 'C' Brigade RGA in Southern Army and then joined 71st Division.[21] From then on its career was the same as the 2/1st Battery.

Interwar

The brigade re-formed at Offord Road in 1920 as 14th (London) Medium Brigade, RGA, soon being renumbered as 53rd (London) Medium Brigade, in the Territorial Army. The reformed brigade now had four batteries, having absorbed the pre-war III London Brigade, Royal Field Artillery, (numbered CCLXXXII, or 282 Brigade during the war), which had been founded as the 2nd Middlesex Artillery Volunteers in 1861. It served as 'Army Troops' in 47th (2nd London) Divisional Area with the following composition:[4][5][22][23]

  • 209 (London) Battery
  • 210 (London) Battery (Howitzer)
  • 211 (London) Battery (Howitzer)
  • 212 (London) Battery (Howitzer)

There were minor changes in designation, in 1924 when the RGA was absorbed by the Royal Artillery (RA), and in 1938 when RA brigades were redesignated as regiments. Just before the outbreak of war in 1939, 211 and 212 (London) Batteries were split off to form a duplicate regiment, numbered "64th Medium Regiment".[4]

World War II

53rd (London) Medium Regiment

On the outbreak of war in September 1939, the regiment formed part of London District.[24][25][26] Once again, orders to mobilise arrived during the regiment's annual summer camp. The regiment was to be included in the first contingent of the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) to go to France, so it returned to Offord Road for mobilisation. On the day war was declared (3 September), it moved to Kempton Park Racecourse, where drafts of reservists arrived to replace the men who were under-age or unfit for overseas service. It embarked on 2 October.[27][28]

Dunkirk

The regiment formed part of II Corps of the BEF.[27][29][30][31][32] The BEF was deployed along the Franco-Belgian border during the months of the Phoney War, but when the Germans attacked Belgium on 10 May 1940 it began a carefully planned advance to the line of the River Dyle. 53rd Medium Regiment was in position behind this line by 15 May, firing its first shots in support of 7th Guards Brigade.[27][33] But the Germans had penetrated the French line on the River Meuse on the night of 12/13 May, and on 16 May the BEF began retiring to avoid being cut off. By 21 May, II Corps artillery, including 53rd Medium Regt, was in position to support the infantry dug in along the River Escaut and attempting to hold off the Germans.[27][34]

However, because of pressure elsewhere, the Escaut line could not be held and the BEF continued its retreat to the Ypres–Comines Canal where it halted again. The 53rd Regiment reached Marcq on 26 May. By now, German troops had broken through to the coast to the south on 20 May, and the BEF was encircled. It began a withdrawal to the seaports. The British artillery put down harassing fire to delay the German forces following up, but ammunition was running short. On the night of 26 May the Corps Commander RA (CRA) ordered the 53rd to fire off as much ammunition as possible and then put its guns out of action. The regiment joined the retreat the following day.[27][35][36]

II Corps' flank was now threatened by the retreat and later surrender of Belgian forces and on 28 May the Germans reached the extreme left of the BEF's perimeter at Nieuwpoort. Brigadier Hon E.F. Lawson, the CRA of 48th (South Midland) Division was given the task of shoring up the perimeter. Lawson seized on the gunners of 53rd Medium Regiment who were marching that way. Fighting as infantry alongside other II Corps artillery and engineer units and some French detachments, they were the only troops available to defend the line. They endured heavy mortar and machine-gun fire, and the Germans established a bridgehead in Nieuwpoort, but the gunners repulsed all subsequent attacks that day until relieved by 4th Division. This prevented a German breakthrough to the beaches east of Dunkirk where General Headquarters was positioned and where the evacuation of the BEF (Operation Dynamo) was proceeding.[37][38][39] II Corps withdrew for evacuation on the night of 31 May/1 June, destroying and abandoning all its guns, transport and equipment.[40]

Home defence

For the next four years, 53 Medium Regiment served in Home Forces, initially in Southern Command to defend the British Isles,[41] later preparing for the liberation of Continental Europe as part of 4th Army Group Royal Artillery (AGRA) in I Corps.[42] The regiment supplied a cadre of experienced officers and gunners when the infantry of 8th Battalion, Buffs, were converted into 9th Medium Regiment on 1 December 1942.[27][43]

D-Day

In May 1944, the regiment was assigned to 21st Army Group for Operation Overlord.[26] For D-Day itself, the Regimental HQ of 53 Medium Regiment was attached to 3rd Division in I Corps, assaulting Sword Beach, making it the leading medium artillery unit of Second Army.[44][45] It supported 6th Airborne Division in the fighting on the Orne Canal.

The regiment then served in 4th AGRA during the campaign in North West Europe.[46][47] In the first week of December, single guns were being used to knock down windmills and church towers that might have been used as enemy observation posts. In late January 1945, the regiment fired in support of Operation Elephant, an attack to flatten out an enemy bridgehead across the River Maas. On 15 April, it supported 49th (West Riding) Division's attack on Arnhem. The regiment was in Germany on VE-day.[48]

53rd Medium Regiment was placed in suspended animation in 1946.[4]

64th (London) Medium Regiment

6-inch 26 cwt Howitzer on World War II pneumatic tyres at Firepower - The Royal Artillery Museum

This regiment (the 'London' was added to the title in 1942) was created in London District just before the outbreak of war from two batteries (211 and 212 (London)) of 53rd Medium Regiment.[4][24][25] By July 1940, the regiment had been assigned to IV Corps, first at Tetbury, later at High Wycombe. Initially, it was equipped with iron-tyred 6-inch howitzers, but in August it re-equipped with the 4.5-inch Gun Mk I (relined 60-pounders on Carriage Mk4P) for 211 Bty, and 6-inch howitzers on Carriage Mk1P for 212 Bty. By the end of August, during the Battle of Britain, it was placed on aerodrome defence, with RHQ at Haddenham, Cambridgeshire, 211 Bty less B Trp at Herringswell, Suffolk, B Trp at Hardwick, Cambridgeshire, and 212 Bty at St Ives, Cambridgeshire. The regiment reassembled at High Wycombe at the end of September.[49]

Capture of Tobruk

British battery of 6-inch howitzers in action at Tobruk, 23 January 1941

In late 1940, the regiment sailed for Egypt, joining British Troops Egypt (BTE) in January 1941 before moving out into Libya as part of XIII Corps during the capture of Tobruk.[42][49][50]

Greece

In March 1941, the 64th was one of two medium regiments sent to Greece with I Australian Corps as part of 'W Force' in Operation Lustre to support the Greek Army in the Greco-Italian War. Before it sailed, 64th Medium Rgt exchanged 212 Bty with 234 Bty from 68th (4th West Lancashire) Medium Rgt, so that the whole regiment was equipped with 4.5-inch guns. (212 (London) Bty served with 68 Medium Rgt in Eritrea.)[49][51]

The Germans invaded Greece and Yugoslavia at dawn on 6 April, beginning the Battle of Greece. The Commonwealth commander, Lt-Gen Henry Maitland Wilson, had anticipated the German advance through Yugoslavia, and had placed a force to protect this dangerous flank. Known as the Amyntaion detachment, it included 64 Medium Regiment (less one Troop) alongside 3rd Royal Tank Regiment, 27th New Zealand Machine-Gun Battalion and 1st Australian Anti-Tank Regiment (less one battery), initially under the commander of the Corps medium artillery, Brig E.A. Lee.[52]

As the campaign developed, Wilson expanded the Amyntaion detachment to cover the Greek retreat: on 10 April it shelled the advancing Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler Brigade.[53] But within days 'Force W' was withdrawing to the Thermopylae position. The roads over the Pindus mountains were entrusted to Brig Stanley Savige of 17th Australian Infantry Brigade, whose 'Savige Force' included 64th Medium Regiment as well as New Zealand field guns and Australian anti-tank guns.[54] On the night of 17/18 April Savige Force withdrew towards Larissa. Germans tanks appeared in front of the New Zealand rearguard at mid-day on 18 April, and were engaged for the rest of the day by a troop of 64th Medium Regiment.[55]

The decision to withdraw the Commonwealth forces was made on 21 April and evacuation was carried out over the following week. When ordered to evacuate, most of the regiment was taken off the beaches at Marathon by HMS Carlisle and landed at Suda Bay, Crete, but some were taken by other ships back to Egypt.[49] The guns were lost.

Crete

On Crete, 234 (West Lancashire) Bty and A Trp of 211 (London) Bty were equipped with captured Italian 100 mm howitzers and 72 mm guns to defend Heraklion airfield. The rest of the regiment was stationed near Canea as infantry.[49] The Germans launched an airborne attack on Crete on 20 May 1941, launching the Battle of Crete, and after fierce fighting the Commonwealth forces were once again forced to evacuate. The gun party of 64 Medium Rgt from Heraklion were evacuated on the night of 29/30 May, while the remainder marched over the mountains to Sphakia, where they were evacuated the following night.[49]

Middle East

After the regiment had been evacuated to Egypt, 234 Bty rejoined 68 Medium Rgt. 212 (London) Bty, which had participated in the campaign in Eritrea, returned, and 64th Medium Rgt re-assembled in Syria under the command of I Australian Corps when it was re-equipped with 6-inch howitzers.[42][49][56] In October, the regiment returned to Egypt, where it joined Eighth Army in December, with 211 Bty attached to 2nd South African Division during the capture of Bardia.[42][49][57]

North Africa

212 Battery firing 155mm Howitzers in North Africa 1942

In February 1942, the regiment was re-equipped with 16 French-built 155mm howitzers obtained from the US under Lend-Lease and its first two of the new Mk 2 4.5-inch guns.[49][58]

It was with X Corps in June 1942 and fought with the 2nd New Zealand Division at the Battle of Mersa Matruh, when the division was surrounded and had to break out. 211 Bty was reduced to five guns and 212 to four guns; the regiment lost over 250 men during the withdrawal. At Ruweisat Ridge, 211 Bty had received three new 4.5-inch guns, but 212 lost two more to air attack and was withdrawn to Cairo to refit, where it was issued with the new 5.5-inch gun. In August, 212 Bty was with 44th (Home Counties) Infantry Division at the Battle of Alam Halfa [49]

64th Medium Rgt was attached to XXX Corps for the Second Battle of El Alamein, by which time it had been fully re-equipped with eight 4.5-inch and eight 5.5-inch guns.[42][59] During the pursuit after Alamein, 211 Bty operated with 2nd New Zealand Division during November, detaching B Trp to 4th Light Armoured Brigade. The regiment then fought its way across North Africa and into Tunisia under Eighth Army, including the Battle of the Mareth Line.[49]

By now, Eighth Army was forming its medium artillery into Army Groups Royal Artillery (AGRAs). In Tunisia, 64th Medium Rgt joined 5th AGRA, and remained with this headquarters for the rest of the war apart from a short spell with 1st AGRA in May 1943.[49]

Sicily

For the Allied invasion of Sicily in July 1943, 5th AGRA supported 51st (Highland) Division, attacking towards the Gerbini airfields and Randazzo. At the close of the campaign, XXX Corps did not participate in the invasion of mainland Italy, but was withdrawn to prepare for Operation Overlord. 64th Medium Rgt handed over its heavy equipment and embarked on 9 November for Algeria, re-embarking on 29 November for the UK and landing at Liverpool on 9 December.[42][49]

Normandy

When the Normandy landings took place in June 1944, there were only two batteries of 4.5-inch guns in 21st Army Group: 211 Bty of 64th Medium Rgt, and one battery of 7th Medium Rgt. The gun had a lighter shell but longer range than the 5.5-inch, and XXX Corps wanted both batteries landed first. 211 Battery was therefore exchanged with 25/26 Bty of 7th Medium for the assault phase, returning to 64th by 11 June.[49][60]

As part of 5th AGRA, 64th Medium Rgt supported 21st Army Group throughout the Normandy campaign and the advance across Belgium.[42][46][49][61]

Arnhem

On 20 September 1944, the regiment was ordered to move up behind the advancing troops of XXX Corps, and the following day it assembled four miles south of Nijmegen. Here it picked up wireless transmissions from the RA of 1st Airborne Division, which was isolated at Arnhem with few working radios. The regiment responded to appeals for fire support with the 4.5-inch battery, firing at extreme range. The battery moved up about 4000 yards about midday to shorten the range, while a 155 mm battery was being hurried up the road and attached to 64 Medium Rgt about 16.00, while an officer was sent out with a relay wireless as far forward as possible. The following day the regiment engaged 31 targets for 1st Airborne, and the regiment's 5.5-inch battery, which had been supporting the advance of XXX Corps, was brought up and positioned with the 4.5s by first light on 23 September. A battery of 3.7 inch Heavy Anti-Aircraft guns and a further 4.5-inch battery came under command, but the road behind them had been cut, so ammunition supply became a problem, as 25 targets were engaged. By the night of 25 September, 1st Airborne could hold out no longer, and the remnants were evacuated across the Nederrijn under cover of a heavy barrage from 64 Medium Rgt and its attached guns.[62][63]

Rhineland

5.5-inch gun of 64 Med Rgt firing at Bremen, 24 April 1945.

64th Medium Rgt continued to support 21st Army Group as part of 5th AGRA until the end of the war in Europe.[49] For example, it was part of XXX Corps' artillery concentration for the clearance of the Reichswald (Operation Veritable),[64] After VE Day, the regiment handed in its guns and undertook occupation duties in Germany. 64th Medium Regiment was placed in suspended animation on 1 April 1946 and was formally disbanded in 1947.[4][49]

Postwar

When the TA was reformed in 1947, 53 Medium Regiment was reconstituted at Islington as 353 Heavy Anti-Aircraft Regiment (London), and was adopted by the Borough of Islington. It formed part of 97 (AA) AGRA based at Chelsea.[65][66][67] The regiment returned to the medium artillery role in 1954 as 353 (London) Medium Regiment, and in 1956 it absorbed the Essex batteries of 415 (Thames & Medway) Coast Regiment. Finally, in 1961, the regiment (less one Essex battery) merged with 264 (7th London) Field Regiment, 290 (City of London) Field Regiment, and 452 (London) Heavy Anti-Aircraft Regiment to form 254 (City of London) Field Regiment. The remaining battery at Canvey Island and Southend-on-Sea joined 304 (Essex Yeomanry RHA) Field Regiment.[4][68][69]

Memorials

The artilleryman depicted on the London Troops Memorial.

The 1st and 2nd Heavy Batteries RGA are listed on the City and County of London Troops Memorial in front of the Royal Exchange, with architectural design by Sir Aston Webb and sculpture by Alfred Drury.[70][71] The left-hand (northern) bronze figure flanking this memorial depicts a Royal Artilleryman representative of the various London Artillery units.

Memorial to the London Heavy Brigade and its successor units in St Mary Magdalene Church

All the units listed on the London Troops Memorial received a small bronze representation of the memorial. In the case of the London Heavy Artillery, this is now in St Mary Magdalene Church, Holloway Road, on the north interior wall of the nave. It is mounted on a wooden board, surmounted by the RA badge and flanked by bronze panels listing the men of the 1st and 2nd batteries (32 and 35 names respectively) who died during World War I. On the wall, flanking this board, are two further bronze panels listing the dead of 53rd and 64th Medium Regiments during World War II. Underneath is a brass plate bearing the inscription:[72][73][74]

IN MEMORY OF ALL RANKS/ OF THE/ 53RD (LONDON) MEDIUM REGIMENT RA (T.A.)/ 1/1ST AND 1/2ND LONDON HEAVY BATTERIES R.G.A./ 64TH MEDIUM REGIMENT RA (TA) WHO DIED ON ACTIVE SERVICE./ FORMED AS THE 2ND MIDDLESEX ARTILLERY VOLUNTEERS ON 9TH APRIL 1861 THE 53RD (LONDON) MEDIUM REGIMENT WAS FINALLY DISBANDED/ ON 31ST MARCH 1967. THIS MEMORIAL, FIRST ERECTED IN THE REGIMENT'S DRILL HALL AT OFFORD ROAD, BARNSBURY, N1 WAS ADOPTED BY THIS CHURCH/ AND RE-DEDICATED BY THE REV. W A CURTIS HCF ON REMEMBRANCE SUNDAY 12TH NOVEMBER 1967. "NULLI SECUNDUS"

Note that in 1967 the regiment laid claim to the foundation date of the 2nd Middlesex Artillery Volunteers and to their motto Nulli secundus ('Second to None').

Honorary Colonels

Brevet-Col A.E. Marnham, MC, TD, was appointed Honorary Colonel of the regiment on 17 June 1931.[5]

Footnotes

  1. ^ 193rd Heavy Bty had been formed at Ewshot on 21 June 1916; its other section was posted to 1/1st Lancashire Heavy Bty.[11][12]
  2. ^ 199th Heavy Bty had been formed at Woolwich on 24 June 1916; its other sections were posted to 1/1st Warwickshire and 133rd (2nd County Palatine) Hvy Btys.[11][12]

Notes

  1. ^ Beckett, Appendix IX.
  2. ^ Westlake, p. 11.
  3. ^ Barnes, Appendices III & IV.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g Litchfield pp. 162–3.
  5. ^ a b c Monthly Army Lists.
  6. ^ Post Office London Directories.
  7. ^ Watson, pp. 42–3.
  8. ^ a b Becke, Pt 2a, pp. 69–75.
  9. ^ a b Becke, Pt 2a, pp. 141-7.
  10. ^ a b Becke, Pt 2b, pp. 9–15.
  11. ^ a b Frederick, pp. 699–701.
  12. ^ a b c d e 'Allocation of Heavy Batteries RGA' and 'Allocation of HA Groups', The National Archives (TNA), Kew, file WO 95/5494.
  13. ^ a b c Farndale, Annex E.
  14. ^ a b Farndale, Annex M.
  15. ^ Maude, Appendix C.
  16. ^ McWilliams & Steel, p. 47.
  17. ^ Sir John French's despatch at FirstWorldWar.com
  18. ^ Maude, p. 12.
  19. ^ TNA file WO 33/765.
  20. ^ Becke, Pt 2b, p. 104.
  21. ^ Becke, Pt 2b, p. 27.
  22. ^ Litchfield, pp. 151–2.
  23. ^ Titles and Designations.
  24. ^ a b British London District on 3 September 1939 at Patriot Files
  25. ^ a b London District 1939 at British Military History
  26. ^ a b 53 Med Rgt at RA 39–45.
  27. ^ a b c d e f Chronology at 53rd Regt website.
  28. ^ BBC People's War
  29. ^ Joslen, p. 462.
  30. ^ Ellis, France & Flanders, Appendix I
  31. ^ II Corps 1940 at British Military History
  32. ^ 2 Corps at RA 39–45.
  33. ^ Ellis, France & Flanders, Ch. 3 [1].
  34. ^ Ellis, France & Flanders, Ch. IV [2].
  35. ^ Ellis, France & Flanders, Ch. VIII [3].
  36. ^ Ellis, France & Flanders, Ch. IX [4].
  37. ^ Butler & Bradford, pp. 158–9.
  38. ^ Bryant, pp. 144–5, 149.
  39. ^ Ellis, France & Flanders, Ch. XIII [5].
  40. ^ Ellis, France & Flanders, Ch. XV [6].
  41. ^ Southern Command at RA 39–45.
  42. ^ a b c d e f g British Artillery in World War 2.
  43. ^ Frederick, p. 739.
  44. ^ Joslen, p. 585.
  45. ^ "3 Div at RA 39–45".
  46. ^ a b Joslen, p. 463.
  47. ^ Ellis, Victory, Vol I, Appendix IV & Vol II, Appendix I.
  48. ^ 53 Med Rgt at RA Netherlands
  49. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q 64 Med Rgt at RA 39–45 Archived 2010-06-10 at the Wayback Machine
  50. ^ Joslen, pp. 479, 484-5.
  51. ^ Playfair, Vol II, p. 79.
  52. ^ Playfair, p. 80.
  53. ^ Playfair, p. 87.
  54. ^ Playfair, p. 90.
  55. ^ Playfair, p. 93.
  56. ^ Joslen, p. 482.
  57. ^ Joslen, p. 486.
  58. ^ 8th Army Medium Artillery stats at the Crusader Project.
  59. ^ Joslen, p. 574.
  60. ^ Ellis, Victory, Vol I, p. 542.
  61. ^ Ellis, Victory, Vol 1, Appendix IV & Vol II Appendix IV.
  62. ^ 64 Med Rgt at RA Netherlands
  63. ^ Support 1st Airborne at RA Netherlands.
  64. ^ Ellis, Victory, Vol II, pp. 256 & 269.
  65. ^ Litchfield, pp. 162, 330.
  66. ^ AGRA at British Army units from 1945 on Archived 2016-03-03 at the Wayback Machine
  67. ^ Territorial Army 1947 at Orbat.com Archived 2013-12-05 at the Wayback Machine
  68. ^ Barnes, Appendix V.
  69. ^ 289–322 Regts at British Army units from 1945 on
  70. ^ IWM WMA Ref 11796
  71. ^ 'Sir Aston Webb' and 'Alfred Drury' in Quinlan.
  72. ^ IWM WMA Ref 12652
  73. ^ IWM WMA Ref 12653
  74. ^ Cherry & Pevsner, p. 658.

References

  • Maj R. Money Barnes, The Soldiers of London, London: Seeley Service, 1963.
  • Maj A.F. Becke,History of the Great War: Order of Battle of Divisions, Part 2a: The Territorial Force Mounted Divisions and the 1st-Line Territorial Force Divisions (42–56), London: HM Stationery Office, 1935/Uckfield: Naval & Military Press, 2007, ISBN 1-847347-39-8.
  • Maj A.F. Becke, History of the Great War: Order of Battle of Divisions, Part 2b: The 2nd-Line Territorial Force Divisions (57th–69th), with the Home-Service Divisions (71st–73rd) and 74th and 75th Divisions, London: HM Stationery Office, 1937/Uckfield: Naval & Military Press, 2007, ISBN 1-847347-39-8.
  • Ian F. W. Beckett, Riflemen Form: A study of the Rifle Volunteer Movement 1859–1908, Aldershot: Ogilby Trusts, 1982, ISBN 0-85936-271-X.
  • Sir Arthur Bryant, The Turn of the Tide, 1939–1943, London: Collins, 1957.
  • Lt-Col Ewan Butler and Maj J.S. Bradford, The Story of Dunkirk, London: Hutchinson/Arrow, nd.
  • Bridget Cherry & Nikolaus Pevsner, The Buildings of England: London 4: North, new edn, London: Yale University Press, 1999, ISBN 0-300-09653-4.
  • Major L. F. Ellis, History of the Second World War, United Kingdom Military Series: The War in France and Flanders 1939–1940, London: HM Stationery Office, 1954. (Online at [7].)
  • Major L. F. Ellis, History of the Second World War, United Kingdom Military Series: Victory in the West, Vol I: The Battle of Normandy, London: HM Stationery Office, 1962/Uckfield: Naval & Military, 2004, ISBN 1-845740-58-0.
  • Major L. F. Ellis, History of the Second World War, United Kingdom Military Series: Victory in the West, Vol II: The Defeat of Germany, London: HM Stationery Office, 1968/Uckfield: Naval & Military, 2004, ISBN 1-845740-59-9.
  • Gen Sir Martin Farndale, History of the Royal Regiment of Artillery: Western Front 1914–18, Woolwich: Royal Artillery Institution, 1986, ISBN 1-870114-00-0.
  • J.B.M. Frederick, Lineage Book of British Land Forces 1660–1978, Vol II, Wakefield: Microform Academic, 1984, ISBN 1-85117-009-X.
  • Joslen, H. F. (2003) [1960]. Orders of Battle: Second World War, 1939–1945. Uckfield, East Sussex: Naval and Military Press. ISBN 978-1-84342-474-1.
  • Norman E.H. Litchfield, The Territorial Artillery 1908–1988 (Their Lineage, Uniforms and Badges), Nottingham: Sherwood Press, 1992, ISBN 0-9508205-2-0.
  • Alan H. Maude (ed.), The History of the 47th (London) Division 1914–1919, London: Amalgamated Press, 1922/Uckfield: Naval & Military Press, 2002, ISBN 1-84342-205-0.
  • J. McWilliams & R.J. Steel, Gas! The Battle for Ypres, 1915, St Catharines, Ontario: Vanwell Publishing, 1985, ISBN 0-920277-01-2.
  • Mark Quinlan, Sculptors and Architects of Remembrance, Sandy: Authors Online, 2007, ISBN 978-0755203-98-7.
  • Titles and Designations of Formations and Units of the Territorial Army, London: War Office, 7 November 1927. (RA units reprinted as Appendix 4 in Litchfield).
  • Col Sir Charles M. Watson, History of the Corps of Royal Engineers, Vol III, Chatham: Institution of Royal Engineers, reprint 1954.
  • R.A. Westlake, Royal Engineers (Volunteers) 1859–1908, Wembley: R.A. Westlake, 1983, ISBN 0-9508530-0-3.

External links

This page was last edited on 14 February 2024, at 05:33
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.