To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Local homeomorphism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In mathematics, more specifically topology, a local homeomorphism is a function between topological spaces that, intuitively, preserves local (though not necessarily global) structure. If is a local homeomorphism, is said to be an étale space over Local homeomorphisms are used in the study of sheaves. Typical examples of local homeomorphisms are covering maps.

A topological space is locally homeomorphic to if every point of has a neighborhood that is homeomorphic to an open subset of For example, a manifold of dimension is locally homeomorphic to

If there is a local homeomorphism from to then is locally homeomorphic to but the converse is not always true. For example, the two dimensional sphere, being a manifold, is locally homeomorphic to the plane but there is no local homeomorphism

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    22 425
    957
    61 931
    2 915
    32 451
  • Topological Homeomorphisms Part 1
  • C. Leininger - Teichmüller spaces and pseudo-Anosov homeomorphism (Part 1)
  • Topological spaces - some heavily used invariants - Lec 05 - Frederic Schuller
  • Homeomorphism / Most important theorem / Topology / Mathematics for M.sc, M.A, by Vibhor tyagi.
  • Manifolds #1 - Introducing Manifolds

Transcription

Formal definition

A function between two topological spaces is called a local homeomorphism[1] if every point has an open neighborhood whose image is open in and the restriction is a homeomorphism (where the respective subspace topologies are used on and on ).

Examples and sufficient conditions

Local homeomorphisms versus homeomorphisms

Every homeomorphism is a local homeomorphism. But a local homeomorphism is a homeomorphism if and only if it is bijective. A local homeomorphism need not be a homeomorphism. For example, the function defined by (so that geometrically, this map wraps the real line around the circle) is a local homeomorphism but not a homeomorphism. The map defined by which wraps the circle around itself times (that is, has winding number ), is a local homeomorphism for all non-zero but it is a homeomorphism only when it is bijective (that is, only when or ).

Generalizing the previous two examples, every covering map is a local homeomorphism; in particular, the universal cover of a space is a local homeomorphism. In certain situations the converse is true. For example: if is a proper local homeomorphism between two Hausdorff spaces and if is also locally compact, then is a covering map.

Local homeomorphisms and composition of functions

The composition of two local homeomorphisms is a local homeomorphism; explicitly, if and are local homeomorphisms then the composition is also a local homeomorphism. The restriction of a local homeomorphism to any open subset of the domain will again be a local homomorphism; explicitly, if is a local homeomorphism then its restriction to any open subset of is also a local homeomorphism.

If is continuous while both and are local homeomorphisms, then is also a local homeomorphism.

Inclusion maps

If is any subspace (where as usual, is equipped with the subspace topology induced by ) then the inclusion map is always a topological embedding. But it is a local homeomorphism if and only if is open in The subset being open in is essential for the inclusion map to be a local homeomorphism because the inclusion map of a non-open subset of never yields a local homeomorphism (since it will not be an open map).

The restriction of a function to a subset is equal to its composition with the inclusion map explicitly, Since the composition of two local homeomorphisms is a local homeomorphism, if and are local homomorphisms then so is Thus restrictions of local homeomorphisms to open subsets are local homeomorphisms.

Invariance of domain

Invariance of domain guarantees that if is a continuous injective map from an open subset of then is open in and is a homeomorphism. Consequently, a continuous map from an open subset will be a local homeomorphism if and only if it is a locally injective map (meaning that every point in has a neighborhood such that the restriction of to is injective).

Local homeomorphisms in analysis

It is shown in complex analysis that a complex analytic function (where is an open subset of the complex plane ) is a local homeomorphism precisely when the derivative is non-zero for all The function on an open disk around is not a local homeomorphism at when In that case is a point of "ramification" (intuitively, sheets come together there).

Using the inverse function theorem one can show that a continuously differentiable function (where is an open subset of ) is a local homeomorphism if the derivative is an invertible linear map (invertible square matrix) for every (The converse is false, as shown by the local homeomorphism with ). An analogous condition can be formulated for maps between differentiable manifolds.

Local homeomorphisms and fibers

Suppose is a continuous open surjection between two Hausdorff second-countable spaces where is a Baire space and is a normal space. If every fiber of is a discrete subspace of (which is a necessary condition for to be a local homeomorphism) then is a -valued local homeomorphism on a dense open subset of To clarify this statement's conclusion, let be the (unique) largest open subset of such that is a local homeomorphism.[note 1] If every fiber of is a discrete subspace of then this open set is necessarily a dense subset of In particular, if then a conclusion that may be false without the assumption that 's fibers are discrete (see this footnote[note 2] for an example). One corollary is that every continuous open surjection between completely metrizable second-countable spaces that has discrete fibers is "almost everywhere" a local homeomorphism (in the topological sense that is a dense open subset of its domain). For example, the map defined by the polynomial is a continuous open surjection with discrete fibers so this result guarantees that the maximal open subset is dense in with additional effort (using the inverse function theorem for instance), it can be shown that which confirms that this set is indeed dense in This example also shows that it is possible for to be a proper dense subset of 's domain. Because every fiber of every non-constant polynomial is finite (and thus a discrete, and even compact, subspace), this example generalizes to such polynomials whenever the mapping induced by it is an open map.[note 3]

Local homeomorphisms and Hausdorffness

There exist local homeomorphisms where is a Hausdorff space but is not. Consider for instance the quotient space where the equivalence relation on the disjoint union of two copies of the reals identifies every negative real of the first copy with the corresponding negative real of the second copy. The two copies of are not identified and they do not have any disjoint neighborhoods, so is not Hausdorff. One readily checks that the natural map is a local homeomorphism. The fiber has two elements if and one element if Similarly, it is possible to construct a local homeomorphisms where is Hausdorff and is not: pick the natural map from to with the same equivalence relation as above.

Properties

A map is a local homeomorphism if and only if it is continuous, open, and locally injective. In particular, every local homeomorphism is a continuous and open map. A bijective local homeomorphism is therefore a homeomorphism.

Whether or not a function is a local homeomorphism depends on its codomain. The image of a local homeomorphism is necessarily an open subset of its codomain and will also be a local homeomorphism (that is, will continue to be a local homeomorphism when it is considered as the surjective map onto its image, where has the subspace topology inherited from ). However, in general it is possible for to be a local homeomorphism but to not be a local homeomorphism (as is the case with the map defined by for example). A map is a local homomorphism if and only if is a local homeomorphism and is an open subset of

Every fiber of a local homeomorphism is a discrete subspace of its domain

A local homeomorphism transfers "local" topological properties in both directions:

As pointed out above, the Hausdorff property is not local in this sense and need not be preserved by local homeomorphisms.

The local homeomorphisms with codomain stand in a natural one-to-one correspondence with the sheaves of sets on this correspondence is in fact an equivalence of categories. Furthermore, every continuous map with codomain gives rise to a uniquely defined local homeomorphism with codomain in a natural way. All of this is explained in detail in the article on sheaves.

Generalizations and analogous concepts

The idea of a local homeomorphism can be formulated in geometric settings different from that of topological spaces. For differentiable manifolds, we obtain the local diffeomorphisms; for schemes, we have the formally étale morphisms and the étale morphisms; and for toposes, we get the étale geometric morphisms.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ The assumptions that is continuous and open imply that the set is equal to the union of all open subsets of such that the restriction is an injective map.
  2. ^ Consider the continuous open surjection defined by The set for this map is the empty set; that is, there does not exist any non-empty open subset of for which the restriction is an injective map.
  3. ^ And even if the polynomial function is not an open map, then this theorem may nevertheless still be applied (possibly multiple times) to restrictions of the function to appropriately chosen subsets of the domain (based on consideration of the map's local minimums/maximums).

Citations

  1. ^ Munkres, James R. (2000). Topology (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-13-181629-2.

References

This page was last edited on 10 October 2023, at 18:28
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.