To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

The Literary Digest

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Literary Digest
LiteraryDigest-19210219.jpg
Cover of the 19 February 1921 edition of The Literary Digest
FounderIsaac Kaufmann Funk
First issue 1890 (1890-month)
Final issue1938
CompanyFunk & Wagnalls
CountryUnited States
Based inNew York City
LanguageEnglish

The Literary Digest was an influential American general interest weekly magazine published by Funk & Wagnalls. Founded by Isaac Kaufmann Funk in 1890, it eventually merged with two similar weekly magazines, Public Opinion and Current Opinion.

History

Beginning with early issues, the emphasis was on opinion articles and an analysis of news events. Established as a weekly newsmagazine, it offered condensations of articles from American, Canadian and European publications. Type-only covers gave way to illustrated covers during the early 1900s. After Isaac Funk's death in 1912, Robert Joseph Cuddihy became the editor.[1] In the 1920s, the covers carried full-color reproductions of famous paintings. By 1927, The Literary Digest climbed to a circulation of over one million. Covers of the final issues displayed various photographic and photo-montage techniques. In 1938, it merged with the Review of Reviews, only to fail soon after. Its subscriber list was bought by Time.[1]

A column in The Digest, known as "The Lexicographer's Easy Chair", was produced by Frank Horace Vizetelly.[2] Ewing Galloway was assistant editor at the publication.[3]

Presidential poll

The Literary Digest is best-remembered today for the circumstances surrounding its demise.

From 1916, it conducted a poll regarding the likely outcome of the quadrennial presidential election. Prior to the 1936 election, the poll had always correctly predicted the winner.

In 1936, the poll concluded that the Republican candidate, Governor Alfred Landon of Kansas, was likely to be the overwhelming winner against incumbent President Franklin Delano Roosevelt.[4]

In November, Roosevelt won the election in an unprecedented landslide, winning every state except Maine and Vermont while also winning the popular vote by 24.26%. The magnitude of the magazine's error - 19.54% for the popular vote for Roosevelt v Landon, and even more in some states - destroyed the magazine's credibility, and it folded within 18 months of the election.

In hindsight, the polling techniques employed by the magazine were faulty: although it had polled ten million individuals (of whom 2.27 million responded, an astronomical total for any opinion poll),[5] it had surveyed its own readers first, a group with disposable incomes well above the national average of the time (shown in part by their ability to afford a magazine subscription during the depths of the Great Depression), and two other readily available lists, those of registered automobile owners and that of telephone users, both of which were also wealthier than the average American at the time.

It is also notable that every other poll made at or around this time predicted Roosevelt would defeat Landon, albeit not to the extent that he ultimately did: most of these polls also expected Roosevelt to receive a maximum of 360 electoral votes.

Subsequent research concluded that as expected, this sampling bias was a factor, but non-response bias was the primary source of the error - that is, people who disliked Roosevelt had strong feelings and were more willing to take the time to mail back a response.[6][7]

George Gallup's American Institute of Public Opinion achieved national recognition by correctly predicting the result of the 1936 election. Gallup also correctly predicted the (quite different) results of the Literary Digest poll to within 1.1%, using a much smaller sample size of just 50,000, [5] while Gallup's final poll before the election predicted Roosevelt would receive 56% of the popular vote and 481 electoral votes: the official tally saw Roosevelt receive 60.8% and 523.

This debacle led to a considerable refinement of public opinion polling techniques, and later came to be regarded as ushering in the era of modern scientific public opinion research.[8]

See also

References

  • Freedman, David; Pisani, Robert; Purves, Roger (2007). Statistics (4th ed.). New York: Norton. ISBN 978-0-393-92972-0.
  1. ^ a b "Press: Digest Digested". Time. 23 May 1938. Archived from the original on August 26, 2010. Retrieved 8 March 2010.
  2. ^ "A word a day Man: a biography". Biographical essay. Centre d'études du 19e siècle français Joseph Sablé. Archived from the original on 6 August 2010. Retrieved 18 October 2010.
  3. ^ "Ewing Galloway Collection of Photographs". Special Collections Research Center. Syracuse University Library. Retrieved 4 June 2013.
  4. ^ Straw Vote Fight Arouses Interest The Pittsburgh Press; November 2, 1936
  5. ^ a b Freedman, et al.: 335-336
  6. ^ Squire, Peverill (January 1988). "Why the 1936 Literary Digest Poll Failed". Public Opinion Quarterly. 52 (1): 125. doi:10.1086/269085.
  7. ^ Lusinchi, Dominic (January 2016). ""President" Landon and the 1936 Literary Digest Poll: Were Automobile and Telephone Owners to Blame?". Social Science History. 36 (1): 23–54. doi:10.1017/S014555320001035X. ISSN 0145-5532.
  8. ^ Crossen, Cynthia (2006-10-02). "Fiasco in 1936 Survey Brought 'Science' To Election Polling". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved 2022-01-27.

External links

This page was last edited on 15 April 2022, at 10:41
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.