To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.

Lehmann–Scheffé theorem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In statistics, the Lehmann–Scheffé theorem is a prominent statement, tying together the ideas of completeness, sufficiency, uniqueness, and best unbiased estimation.[1] The theorem states that any estimator which is unbiased for a given unknown quantity and that depends on the data only through a complete, sufficient statistic is the unique best unbiased estimator of that quantity. The Lehmann–Scheffé theorem is named after Erich Leo Lehmann and Henry Scheffé, given their two early papers.[2][3]

If T is a complete sufficient statistic for θ and E(g(T)) = τ(θ) then g(T) is the uniformly minimum-variance unbiased estimator (UMVUE) of τ(θ).


Let be a random sample from a distribution that has p.d.f (or p.m.f in the discrete case) where is a parameter in the parameter space. Suppose is a sufficient statistic for θ, and let be a complete family. If then is the unique MVUE of θ.


By the Rao–Blackwell theorem, if is an unbiased estimator of θ then defines an unbiased estimator of θ with the property that its variance is not greater than that of .

Now we show that this function is unique. Suppose is another candidate MVUE estimator of θ. Then again defines an unbiased estimator of θ with the property that its variance is not greater than that of . Then

Since is a complete family

and therefore the function is the unique function of Y with variance not greater than that of any other unbiased estimator. We conclude that is the MVUE.

Example for when using a non-complete minimal sufficient statistic

An example of an improvable Rao–Blackwell improvement, when using a minimal sufficient statistic that is not complete, was provided by Galili and Meilijson in 2016.[4] Let be a random sample from a scale-uniform distribution with unknown mean and known design parameter . In the search for "best" possible unbiased estimators for , it is natural to consider as an initial (crude) unbiased estimator for and then try to improve it. Since is not a function of , the minimal sufficient statistic for (where and ), it may be improved using the Rao–Blackwell theorem as follows:

However, the following unbiased estimator can be shown to have lower variance:

And in fact, it could be even further improved when using the following estimator:

See also


  1. ^ Casella, George (2001). Statistical Inference. Duxbury Press. p. 369. ISBN 978-0-534-24312-8.
  2. ^ Lehmann, E. L.; Scheffé, H. (1950). "Completeness, similar regions, and unbiased estimation. I." Sankhyā. 10 (4): 305–340. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-1412-4_23. JSTOR 25048038. MR 0039201.
  3. ^ Lehmann, E.L.; Scheffé, H. (1955). "Completeness, similar regions, and unbiased estimation. II". Sankhyā. 15 (3): 219–236. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-1412-4_24. JSTOR 25048243. MR 0072410.
  4. ^ Tal Galili & Isaac Meilijson (31 Mar 2016). "An Example of an Improvable Rao–Blackwell Improvement, Inefficient Maximum Likelihood Estimator, and Unbiased Generalized Bayes Estimator". The American Statistician. 70 (1): 108–113. doi:10.1080/00031305.2015.1100683. PMC 4960505. PMID 27499547.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
This page was last edited on 19 May 2020, at 10:18
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.