To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lad mag was a term principally used in the UK in the 1990s and early 2000s to describe a then-popular type of lifestyle magazine for younger, heterosexual men, focusing on "sex, sport, gadgets and grooming tips".[1] The lad mag was notable as a new type of magazine; previously, lifestyle magazines had been almost entirely bought by women. It was the central cultural component of 1990s lad culture. The rapid decline of the lad mag in the late 1990s/early 2000s is generally associated with the rise of the Internet which provided much of the same content for free.[2][3]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    85 977
    7 015
    3 412
  • 2023 Supercross Round 3 in San Diego | EXTENDED HIGHLIGHTS | 1/21/23 | Motorsports on NBC
  • #SundayGunday: Henry All Weather Big Boy .44 Mag
  • It's A Bad Boy! Fistful Of 44 Mag

Transcription

Emergence of lad mags

Through the 1980s, efforts were made to create a market for lifestyle magazines for younger men, without success: magazines such as Cosmo Man and The Hit were short lived failures.[4] In 1994, linked to the wider development of lad culture, two new magazines found a formula that worked: IPC's Loaded and EMAP Metro's FHM. Both magazines were selling hundreds of thousands of copies shortly after launch/relaunch.[4]

Status as pornography

Reporting on multiple studies of the content of lad mags, academics Coy and Horvath reported in 2011 that that the "prominent themes are of female nudity and self-centred pleasure seeking." A 2005 study of the content of the magazine Nuts found each issue typically had over 70 images of women with a third topless. Nonetheless, lad mags were generally accepted as not pornography: even Coy and Horvath writing in the journal Feminism and Psychology are careful to state that they recognise "the differences between lad mags and pornography".[5]

Similarly, in UK law, the lad mags were not pornography. That meant photos of women's naked breasts could be shown in the magazines (though not on the cover, only inside the magazine) but not full nudity. This was a critical issue for sales: unlike pornographic magazines, lad mags could be sold to under 18s and did not have to be placed on the top shelf of newsagents, out of the reach of children. Instead, they were typically positioned on the shelves at a central position, in the lifestyle category.[6]

The covers of lad mags typically showed a very scantily dressed woman. A contributing factor to the decline of the magazines was successful anti-sexism campaigns in the early 2010s. Campaigners persuaded major newsagents that—due to the highly sexualized images of women on the covers—the magazines needed to be sold in opaque bags.[7]

In gender studies

The lad mag was at the time seen as distinct from magazines targeted at the stereotypical new man. Contrasting the two gender constructs, Tim Edwards, a sociologist at the University of Leicester, describes the new man as pro-feminist, albeit narcissistic, and the new lad as pre-feminist, and a reaction to second-wave feminism.[8][9] The new man image failed to appeal to a wide readership whereas the more adolescent lad culture appeals more to the ordinary man, says Edwards.[8] Edwards also points out that lad culture men's magazines of the 21st century contain little that is actually new. Referring to a study of the history of Esquire magazine, he observed that there is little substantially different between the new man Arena and GQ and the new lad Loaded. Both address assumed men's interests of cars, alcohol, sport, and women, and differ largely in that the latter have a more visual style. From this he infers that "the New Man and the New Lad are niches in the market more than anything else, often defined according to an array of lifestyle accessories", and concludes that the new lad image dominates the new man image simply because of its greater success at garnering advertising revenue for men's magazines.

See also

References

  1. ^ "Sex doesn't sell as lads mags suffer". BBC News. 16 August 1999. Retrieved 19 December 2021.
  2. ^ Hand, Dinah (2013). Design for media : a handbook for students and professionals in journalism, PR, and advertising. Harlow: Pearson. p. 8. ISBN 978-1-317-86402-8 – via Google Books.
  3. ^ Nazaryan, Alexander (9 July 2013). "Nobody Wants to Buy Maxim: How the Lad Mags Met Their End". The Wire. Retrieved 19 December 2021 – via The Atlantic.
  4. ^ a b Growse, Nick (15 November 2012). "The Reluctant Patriarch: The Emergence of Lads and Lad Mags in the 1990s". InMedia. OpenEdition (2). doi:10.4000/inmedia.428.
  5. ^ Coy, Maddy; Horvath, Miranda AH (21 October 2010). "Lads' Mags, Young Men's Attitudes towards women and acceptance of myths about sexual aggression" (PDF). Feminism & Psychology. SAGE Publications. 21 (1): 144–150. doi:10.1177/0959353509359145. ISSN 0959-3535. S2CID 73579596.
  6. ^ Bloomfield, Steve (26 March 2006). "Lads' mags banished to the top shelf". The Independent. Retrieved 4 September 2022.
  7. ^ "Death of the Lad Mags: Loaded Magazine Bids Farewell". The Independent. 2013.
  8. ^ a b Edwards, Tim (2006). Cultures of Masculinity. Routledge. pp. 39–42. ISBN 0-415-28480-5.
  9. ^ Pamela Abbott; Claire Wallace; Melissa Tyler (2005). An Introduction to Sociology: Feminist Perspectives.
This page was last edited on 23 June 2023, at 08:41
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.