To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Kompetenz-kompetenz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Kompetenz-kompetenz, or competence-competence, is a jurisprudential doctrine whereby a legal body, such as a court or arbitral tribunal, may have competence, or jurisdiction, to rule as to the extent of its own competence on an issue before it. The concept arose in the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany.[1] Since then, kompetenz-kompetenz has often been important in international arbitration.[2][3]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    4 915
    527
    14 383
  • Kompetenz Kompetenz doctrine simplified | Arbitration Law explained | Lex Animata by Hesham Elrafei
  • Die Kompetenz-Kompetenz (einfach erklärt)
  • Kompetenz ⭐️⭐️⭐️ was das ist und wie du es bekommst

Transcription

Origin

In arbitration

The doctrine of kompetenz-kompetenz is enshrined in the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration and Arbitration Rules.[4][5] Article 16(1) of the Model Law and article 23(1) of the Arbitration Rules both dictate that "[t]he arbitral tribunal shall have the power to rule on its own jurisdiction, including any objections with respect to the existence or validity of the arbitration agreement."[6][7] United States arbitration law does not expressly address the principle of kompetenz-kompetenz, but courts have consistently recognised such a power where the parties have granted it to the tribunal.[8]

See also

References

  1. ^ Lo, P. Y. (2004). "Master of One's Own Court". Hong Kong Law Journal. 34: 54. 34 Hong Kong L.J. 47, 54 – via HeinOnline, citing Hartley, Trevor C. (1999). Constitutional Problems of the European Union. Hart. pp. 152–153. ISBN 9781901362466.
  2. ^ Dulic, Adrianna (2002). "First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan and the Kompetenz-Kompetenz Principle". Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal. 2 (1): 77–97. 2 Pepp. Disp. Resol. L.J. 77 – via HeinOnline.
  3. ^ Oehmke, Thomas H.; with Joan M. Brovins. "International Arbitration". Commercial Arbitration. Vol. 2 (3rd ed.). § 41:65.
  4. ^ Bantekas, Ilias. An introduction to international arbitration. New York. p. 109. ISBN 9781316275696. OCLC 917009113.
  5. ^ Croft, Clyde Elliott; Kee, Christopher; Waincymer, Jeff (2013). A guide to the UNCITRAL arbitration rules. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 249. ISBN 9781107336209. OCLC 842929920.
  6. ^ UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (PDF). United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. 1994. art. 16(1). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-09-27. Retrieved 2019-09-12.
  7. ^ UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (with new article 1, paragraph 4, as adopted in 2013) (PDF). United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. 2014. art. 23(1).
  8. ^ "Arbitration Procedures and Practice in the United States: Overview". Thomson Reuters Practical Law. Retrieved 10 July 2021.


This page was last edited on 2 June 2023, at 22:53
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.