In the mathematical field of knot theory, a knot invariant is a quantity (in a broad sense) defined for each knot which is the same for equivalent knots. The equivalence is often given by ambient isotopy but can be given by homeomorphism. Some invariants are indeed numbers, but invariants can range from the simple, such as a yes/no answer, to those as complex as a homology theory . Research on invariants is not only motivated by the basic problem of distinguishing one knot from another but also to understand fundamental properties of knots and their relations to other branches of mathematics.
From the modern perspective, it is natural to define a knot invariant from a knot diagram. Of course, it must be unchanged (that is to say, invariant) under the Reidemeister moves. Tricolorability is a particularly simple example. Other examples are knot polynomials, such as the Jones polynomial, which are currently among the most useful invariants for distinguishing knots from one another, though currently it is not known whether there exists a knot polynomial which distinguishes all knots from each other. However, there are invariants which distinguish the unknot from all other knots, such as Khovanov homology and knot Floer homology.
Other invariants can be defined by considering some integervalued function of knot diagrams and taking its minimum value over all possible diagrams of a given knot. This category includes the crossing number, which is the minimum number of crossings for any diagram of the knot, and the bridge number, which is the minimum number of bridges for any diagram of the knot.
Historically, many of the early knot invariants are not defined by first selecting a diagram but defined intrinsically, which can make computing some of these invariants a challenge. For example, knot genus is particularly tricky to compute, but can be effective (for instance, in distinguishing mutants).
The complement of a knot itself (as a topological space) is known to be a "complete invariant" of the knot by the Gordon–Luecke theorem in the sense that it distinguishes the given knot from all other knots up to ambient isotopy and mirror image. Some invariants associated with the knot complement include the knot group which is just the fundamental group of the complement. The knot quandle is also a complete invariant in this sense but it is difficult to determine if two quandles are isomorphic.
By Mostow–Prasad rigidity, the hyperbolic structure on the complement of a hyperbolic link is unique, which means the hyperbolic volume is an invariant for these knots and links. Volume, and other hyperbolic invariants, have proven very effective, utilized in some of the extensive efforts at knot tabulation.
In recent years, there has been much interest in homological invariants of knots which categorify wellknown invariants. Heegaard Floer homology is a homology theory whose Euler characteristic is the Alexander polynomial of the knot. It has been proven effective in deducing new results about the classical invariants. Along a different line of study, there is a combinatorially defined cohomology theory of knots called Khovanov homology whose Euler characteristic is the Jones polynomial. This has recently been shown to be useful in obtaining bounds on slice genus whose earlier proofs required gauge theory. Khovanov and Rozansky have since defined several other related cohomology theories whose Euler characteristics recover other classical invariants. Catharina Stroppel gave a representation theoretic interpretation of Khovanov homology by categorifying quantum group invariants.
There is also growing interest from both knot theorists and scientists in understanding "physical" or geometric properties of knots and relating it to topological invariants and knot type. An old result in this direction is the Fary–Milnor theorem states that if the total curvature of a knot K in satisfies
where is the curvature at p, then K is an unknot. Therefore, for knotted curves,
An example of a "physical" invariant is ropelength, which is the amount of 1inch diameter rope needed to realize a particular knot type.
YouTube Encyclopedic

1/3Views:1 755577342

Trefoil knot

Factorization Homology  John Francis  25.03.2016  Talk 02

Factorization Homology  John Francis  25.03.2016  Talk 04
Transcription
Other invariants
 Linking number
 Finite type invariant (or Vassiliev or Vassiliev–Goussarov invariant)
 Stick number
Further reading
 Rolfsen, Dale (2003). Knots and Links. Providence, RI: AMS. ISBN 0821834363.
 Adams, Colin Conrad (2004). The Knot Book: an Elementary Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of Knots (Repr., with corr ed.). Providence, RI: AMS. ISBN 0821836781.
 Burde, Gerhard; Zieschang, Heiner (2002). Knots (2nd rev. and extended ed.). New York: De Gruyter. ISBN 3110170051.
External links
 J. C. Cha and C. Livingston. "KnotInfo: Table of Knot Invariants", Indiana.edu. 09:10, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 "Invariants", The Knot Atlas.