To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Judgement of Paris (mosaic)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Judgment of Paris (from the Atrium House triclinium in Antioch-on-the-Orontes (Turkey).)
Note that this extract excludes the mosaic's elaborate floral frame.

The Judgement of Paris is the theme of a mosaic from the early second century AD, discovered in 1932 in Antioch.[1] It is one of the most important mosaics from the ancient city, which was located a short distance from the site of modern Antakya (Antioch). The mosaic is normally housed in Paris at the Louvre (Ma 3443), although it has been known to go on tour.[1] In 2007 it was scheduled to feature in an itinerant exhibition of important pieces that the Louvre organised in the United States.[2]

The mosaic depicts the Judgement of Paris, one in a series of incidents which led to the Trojan War. Paris is shown seated in the middle of the scene, where he is required to determine which of the three goddesses, Hera, Athena or Aphrodite, is the most beautiful. The goddesses stand to the right. Over on the left Hermes watches: above him Psyche looks on from a rock, while on the right side, above and behind the divine contestants, Eros looks down from the top of an appropriately positioned pillar. The composition is framed with a rich floral pattern in which vine leaves feature prominently.[2]

The mosaic is square in shape. The sides are 1,860 mm (73 in) long. Originally it was part of a large floor mosaic featuring five different images. It formed the floor of the dining room in a large atrium house. The Judgement of Paris was the central and largest image, with two others on each side. The other four are housed in other museums as follows:[1]

The archeologist-scholar Doro Levi saw a certain impressionistic effect in the work, especially in respect of the interplay between the light and the shadows.

"The Judgment of Paris" was a popular theme in antiquity. Around six examples have been identified among the wall paintings at Pompeii. Only two other surviving mosaic depictions have been found, however. These are on Kos and at Casariche in Spain.[3]


YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/1
    Views:
    12 143
  • Velázquez, Los Borrachos (The Drunks), 1628-1629

Transcription

(jazzy music) Male: We're in the Prado in Madrid and we're looking at a great early Velazquez, The Triumph of Bacchus. The painting is unnervingly vivid, almost more than photographic. Female: Bacchus, the god of wine, looks beautiful and he's sort of bathed in light. Male: That young central figure. Female: He's sitting on a jug of wine. Male: (chuckles) Yes, appropriately. Female: He's the god of wine. Male: He's got grape leaves in his hair. Female: He's come down to earth to bring men wine, which relieves life's sufferings. And relieving it, it is! Everyone's having a really good time. There's a figure kneeling down, one of Bacchus' followers. He's having a crown placed on his head. There's a feeling of revelry and partying and fun. Bacchus looks away, but that other figure just to the right Male: With the hat. Female: He feels like someone we've all seen in a bar somewhere. Male: Exactly right. He's got this bowl of wine that he's about to bring to his lips, which, I dont' know about for you, but to me, I feel as if I can just feel the coolness of that liquid. It is so transparent, I can feel it sort of waft Female: The glistening surface. Male: The glistening surface, I can feel it sort of edge side to side. I can see his anticipation, but he's looked up at us. So it's not just the vividness of the contrast of light and shadow across his face, but it's the way in which he smiles directly at us so that we are there. We are right there ready to partake. Female: Yeah, I think that's what sort of uncomfortable about it. He's a kind of seedy character. Male: Yes, he is. Female: I mean, he looks sort of like he's lived a hard life, and the figures around him, too; a kind of leathery skin and clothing that looks very poor. Male: Especially in contrast to the god. Female: When he looks out at us, it sort of implies that we're like him. I've sort of become a rowdy reveler in a half-drunken state, sort of partying it up and not feeling life's pain anymore. Male: There is a kind of guilt by association. I think that that's exactly right. We are drawn in. It's interesting that we're drawn in not only because of the scale of the figures and the sense of proximity, but we're drawn in by a kind of almost moral equivalency. Female: There is kind of lovely frieze of the figures. They're all very much close to the foreground in a kind of very Baroque way, and occupy all kind of the same plane across that foreground, taking up much of the space of the painting. There's a real directness about the figures. They're very much in our space. Male: There's also a really interesting set of contrasts. You have the, as you described, the very beautiful body, and young and sort of perfect body, of Bacchus. You've then got this hater just over his shoulder. Those two mythological figures, and perhaps the third crouching down in the foreground in the shadow, are so contrasted against the figures of our reality who are on the right. One of the things that I think makes this painting feel so vivid and so engaging is the variation in sort of degrees of focus that Velasquez brings to the canvas. In other words, look at the background. It couldn't be sort of more unfinished. The figure in the foreground in the lower left that we mentioned in shadow feels almost incomplete. So that really draws our eye right to those center figures. There is something very interesting about the contrast, again. You mentioned it before, between the directness of the man with a hat and the way in which Bacchus himself looks off to the side, so that our eye has to go to the man that we don't want to go to, in a sense. Female: There's a kind of realism that Velasquez is bringing to a mythological subject and intentionally not representing it in a kind of Classical manner. Male: He gives us a few handles, actually quite literally. If you look at the jugs down at the bottom, in the center, there is a kind of vividness there. We feel as if we can literally reach in and grab one of those an it will be poured full of wine for us. There are these sort of points of entrance and these points of physical reality that give us access to the mythological in a way that I don't think we're used to. Female: It's very much like the way that Caravaggio would paint religious subjects in Italy, with that kind of immediacy and realism and physicality and the down-to-earthness of the figures and the way that everything is happening very close to us. I think what we're seeing is a kind of Caravaggio-inspired approach applied to a mythological subject. (jazzy music)

References

  1. ^ a b c "Mosaic of the Judgment of Paris". Department of Greek, Etruscan, and Roman Antiquities: Roman Art. Musée du Louvre, Paris. Retrieved 23 June 2016.
  2. ^ a b ACRM-MAPA (June 2006). "Exposition du 24 juin au 15 octobre 2006" (PDF). Musée départemental Arles antique. Retrieved 23 June 2016.
  3. ^ "Mosaico Juicio de Paris". Ayuntamiento de Casariche (Sevilla). Retrieved 23 June 2016.
This page was last edited on 2 March 2024, at 22:09
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.