To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

In dubio pro reo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The page of Egidio Bossi's treatise containing the words ″in dubio pro reo″

The principle of in dubio pro reo (Latin for "[when] in doubt, rule for the accused")[1][2] means that a defendant may not be convicted by the court when doubts about their guilt remain.

The rule of lenity is the doctrine that ambiguity should be resolved in favour of the more lenient punishment.[3]

To resolve all doubts in favour of the accused is in consonance with the principle of presumption of innocence.[3]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    4 565
    2 162
    2 411
  • IN DUBIO PRO REO
  • Latin Maxim: In Dubio Pro Reo
  • PRO REO PRINCIPLE | RULE OF LENITY | Explained in 5 minutes!!!! | Criminal Law Lecture Series

Transcription

Origin

The main principle in the sentence was part of Aristotle's interpretation of the law and shaped the Roman law: Favorabiliores rei potius quam actores habentur (Digest of Justinian I, D.50.17.125),[4] meaning "The condition of the defendant is to be favored rather than that of the plaintiff."[5] However, the phrase was not spelled out word for word until the Milanese jurist Egidio Bossi (1487–1546) related it in his treatises.

National peculiarities

In German law, the principle is not codified but has constitutional status and is derived from Article 103(2) of the Basic Law, Article 6 of the ECHR, and Section 261 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The common use of the phrase in the German legal tradition was documented in 1631 by Friedrich Spee von Langenfeld.

In Canadian law, the leading case establishing how to decide criminal cases where the guilt of the accused depends on contradictory witness accounts is R. v. W.(D.) (1991).

See also

References

  1. ^ Beard, Henry (2004-08-19). Latin for All Occasions: From Cocktail-Party Banter to Climbing the Corporate Ladder to Online Dating-- Everything You'll Ever Need to Say in Perfect Latin. Avery. ISBN 978-1592400805.
  2. ^ Henry Beard (2008-06-01). "Famous Latin Proverbs and Sayings". Latin for All Occasions. Archived from the original on 2013-07-18.
  3. ^ a b Corona, J. "G.R. No. 173473 – PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES versus BETH TEMPORADA". Republic of the Philippines: SUPREME COURT Manila. Retrieved 2018-10-21.
  4. ^ "OMINI NOSTRI SACRATISSIMI PRINCIPIS IUSTINIANI IURIS ENUCLEATI EX OMNI VETERE IURE COLLECTI DIGESTORUM SEU PANDECTARUM" (in Latin). The Latin Library. Retrieved 2018-10-21.
  5. ^ "defendant". Academic: Law dictionary. 2017. Retrieved 2018-10-21.


External links

This page was last edited on 17 January 2024, at 09:03
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.