 Design for Hector 26 April 1858
| |
| Class overview | |
|---|---|
| Name | Hector class |
| Builders | Rijkswerf (Amsterdam) |
| Operators |  Royal Netherlands Navy |
| Succeeded by | Haarlemmermeer class |
| Completed | 2 |
| Scrapped | 2 |
| General characteristics | |
| Type | Gunvessel |
| Tonnage | 230[2] |
| Displacement | 383 tons[1] |
| Length | 34.60 m (113 ft 6 in)[1] |
| Beam | 7.40 m (24 ft 3 in)[1] |
| Draught | 3.20 m (10 ft 6 in)[1] |
| Installed power |
|
| Complement |
|
The Hector class was a class of 2 gunvessels of the Royal Netherlands Navy. The class proved a failure.
Context
High demand for gunboats and gunvessels
In 1855 the Dutch navy designed the sail-only Pro Patria class gunboats, in Dutch: 'Verdedigingsvaartuigen'. The class was 20 m long, had a draught of less than 2 m, two masts and mounted four 30-pounder cannon and a mortar. At least 13 of these gunboats were built. For river and coastal defense these would have to be supplemented with steam gunvessels, in Dutch: stoomflottille vaartuigen. Meanwhile, a lot schooners, schoonerbrigs and small paddle steamers in the Dutch East Indies were expected to become unfit in a few years.
Dual purpose gunvessels
When the United Kingdom sent some gunvessels to China, the Dutch got an idea to solve the high demand for steam gunvessels. A high pressure steam engine took less space than a low pressure one. Using a high-pressure steam engine would allow construction of a small screw gunvessel. For service in the Indies the ships would have to be loaded with many supplies, and have a deep draught. For service in home waters they would not have to be loaded so heavily, and would therefore have a shallower draught required for coastal and river defense. The ships would furthermore have to mount a heavy battery, and have to be good sailers. By October 1857 the plans were in progress.[3]
Characteristics
General
A design drawing of the Hector class dated October 1857 called for a vessel of three masts, 30 m long, and with a draft of 2.4 m in home service and 3.2 m in the Indies. The armament would consist of four 36-pounders or four 30-pounders long No 4. This drawing is titled 'Verdedigingsvaartuig met Stoomvermogen' and was (is) stored together with the drawings of the Pro Patria class. This design or a slightly different one of these dimension was approved on 27 February 1858.
Shortly after the approval of 27 February 1858 the navy decided to lengthen the ship by resolution of 26 April 1858. In the new drawings the Hector got the title 'Stoom-flottille vaartuig'.
Propulsion
An essential feature of the Hector design was the use of high-pressure steam engines. These took much less space than low-pressure engines. The designers therefore thought it feasible to build ships with the same battery as the Vesuvius-class sloops, but with less draught, and much smaller. The objective was a vessel armed like the Vesuvius, but costing far less.[4] The design proved a failure even before the first of the Hector class was commissioned. In East Asia the English gun vessels with high pressure were in continuous repair, and so the Dutch did not send the Hector class to the East Indies.[4]
Armament
In 1861 the armament of the Hector and Vulkaan was given as 8 guns.[5] In view of the statement that the class was to carry the same battery as the Vesuvius class, this could have been four medium 30-pdr SBML and four 12-pdr SBML. In 1869 the armament was given as only 4 long 30-pounders.[6]
Criticism
The Hector and Vulkaan drew a lot of criticism in the 1862 investigation of the navy by the Dutch house of representatives. Captain-lieutenant J. Andrea called the Hector and Vulkaan: 'failed, even though they might be put to some use.' K.L. Turk, chief engineer of naval construction, said: 'Only the Hector and Vulkaan are less suitable, because too many demands had been made.' Captain-lieutenant J.A.H. Schreuder said: 'the flotilla vessels are failures for their purpose, and of no use. They have too much rigging, are too tight, and draw too much water for coastal defense'. Captain-lieutenant R.L. de Haes considered the small vessels that had been built recently to be 'a failed experiment'.[7]
After the Hector class the Dutch navy hastily returned to using low-pressure steam engines in ships meant for the East Indies. The Haarlemmermeer class that followed would prove that the high pressure engine was not the only flaw in the Hector design.
Ships in the class
Construction
| Name | Laid down | Launched | Commissioned | Fate | Built by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <i>Hector</i> | 1 May 1858[6] | 22 June 1859[8] | 16 April 1860[9] | Rijkswerf Amsterdam | |
| <i>Vulkaan</i> | 1 May 1858[6] | 20 May 1859[10] | 1 May 1865[11] | Sold 3 January 1912[12] | Rijkswerf Amsterdam |
Notes
- ^ a b c d e Tideman 1880, p. 2e afd p. 7.
- ^ a b Tweede Kamer 1875.
- ^ "Tweede Kamer". Nieuwe Rotterdamsche courant. 7 October 1857.
- ^ a b "Staatsbegrooting voor 1860". Nieuw Amsterdamsch handels- en effectenblad. 29 November 1859.
- ^ Departement van Marine 1861, p. 87.
- ^ a b c Departement van Marine 1869, p. 112.
- ^ "Enquête omtrent de Zeemagt die Nederland behoeft". Middelburgsche courant. 16 October 1862.
- ^ "Binnenlandsche Berigten". Nederlandsche Staatscourant. 23 June 1859.
- ^ "Binnenland". Nieuwe Rotterdamsche courant. 18 April 1860.
- ^ "Binnenlandsche Berigten". Nederlandsche Staatscourant. 21 May 1859.
- ^ "Hellevoetsluis, 27 April". Algemeen Handelsblad. 1 May 1865.
- ^ "Marine". Nederlandsche staatscourant. 15 December 1911.
References
- Tideman, B.J. (1880), Memoriaal van de Marine, Van Heteren Amsterdam
- Departement van Marine (1861), Koninklijke Nederlandsche Marine op den 19 Februarij 1861, Gebroeders van Cleef, p. 86
- Departement van Marine (1869), Koninklijke Nederlandsche Marine op den 1sten Januarij 1869, Gebroeders van Cleef, p. 103
- Tweede Kamer (1875), Bijlagen van het verslag der Handelingen, Nederlandsche Staatscourant, p. Bijlage A: Algemeen overzicht der schepen en vaartuigen van oorlog op den 1sten Augustus 1875
This page was last edited on 12 February 2024, at 07:28