To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Headspace gas chromatography for dissolved gas measurement

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Headspace gas chromatography uses headspace gas—from the top or "head" of a sealed container containing a liquid or solid brought to equilibrium[1]—injected directly onto a gas chromatographic column for separation and analysis. In this process, only the most volatile (most readily existing as a vapor) substances make it to the column.[2] The technique is commonly applied to the analysis of polymers, food and beverages, blood alcohol levels, environmental variables, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical ingredients.[1]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    257 094
    19 087
    582
  • Gas chromatography | Chemical processes | MCAT | Khan Academy
  • Headspace gas chromatography
  • Why do I see two peaks on my EtOH analysis using HS-GC-FID?

Transcription

Have you ever watched a TV show where to catch the criminal they take a sample of the liquid found at the crime scene, run it through this big fancy-looking box, and find out that that liquid was actually some gasoline and are able to suddenly trace the criminal back to the nearest gas station? That fancy looking box you saw is probably something that they were trying to use for gas chromatography, but in real life, gas chromatography doesn't really work like that. It's a slower process for separating out compounds that have different boiling points and a few other properties. But let's take a step back and figure out how does the gas chromatograph work. First, what you need to have is a place to inject your sample. Even though you'll be injecting it as a liquid, what happens is it gets to this box, and it gets vaporized into a gas. When it's in a gas, let's say that this particular mixture was made up of two different kinds of gas. I'll show that as some green dots and some orange gas particles. You can't really see these though, because usually the amount you're injecting is so small, on the order of microliters, in fact. And in gas chromatography, we've talked about how the mobile phase is a gas, which means that you need to have an inert carrier gas to push these through. And it's important that this is inert, because you don't want it to react with whatever it is that you're trying to separate. Once it's passed through that, it'll get heated up and then go through a long tube. In order to make it fit into the box, they usually just coil a long length of tube, and the longer the tube, the better separation you'll get. And once it's finished passing through the tube, there needs to be some kind of detector that picks up how many particles of the green compound were found versus how many particles of the orange compound reached it. And they'll be reaching the detector at different rates, which I'll explain shortly. From there, the detector will be able to take these signals and display them in a way that you can analyze on your computer. Often what you'll get is something that looks like this. This is known as a chromatogram, which is just a way of saying, a graph for gas chromatography, and we'll also be explaining this later on. So to recap, we injected our liquid sample, which was vaporized into gas, then it joined up with the stream of inert gas that was already flowing and was pushed onto the long column. But what's going on inside that coiled column? Let's take a closer look. Pretend that this is stretched out, just into a straight column that's horizontal. It has some liquid coating on the side, because the liquid is serving as the stationary phase as the gas is rushing through it. And what you would observe, perhaps, is something that resembles this. You might see the green dots kind of hanging out on the sides, while the orange dots are clustering more in the middle and maybe even traveling a little bit further than the green dots have. What does that mean? Well, we can't really imply too much from that yet, so let's watch it for a little bit longer. At the next time point, what you might see is that, again, the green dot, or the green compound, kind of staying more to the sides. It's traveled a little bit farther now, but this orange compound has gotten pushed all the way over here, the point that it's almost at the detector already. You can already tell that the orange one is going to reach the detector first, meaning it will produce the first peak. This would probably correspond to this on the graph. But wait, what's that tiny peak next to it? Usually, that represents the solvent that you dissolved your compound in. That solvent is usually something with a pretty low boiling point, so it gets pushed through first. But the second peak that's bigger is usually the first peak that actually represents a compound in your mixture. So that last peak you see probably represents this green compound. But why are they coming out at such different rates? What's the reason for this? And one of the reasons is that in chromatography, it's always an interaction between the two phases. Here it's the vapor phase, or the gas phase, with the liquid phase, also known as the stationary phase. So compounds like this orange one that move really fast, really, really like to interact with the gas. And this is because they probably have pretty low boiling points and are vaporized really readily. Whereas compounds like the green one might have higher boiling points, and prefer to spend their time in the liquid phase, and are not quite as ready to go into the gas phase as the compounds like the orange compound that have lower boiling points. So separation by boiling points is a big part of how gas chromatography works. But wait, there's actually a few other things. What if the green and orange compound had more similar boiling points? Could you still distinguish them? Actually, you could. Let's take another example. If instead originally what you had was something that looks like this, where you had these tiny pink dots, those represent tiny pink particles, along with large purple particles. Again, these have the same boiling point, but why is it that it looks like the pink one is getting carried farther by the gas? That's because it's really small. So just based on its size, what would happen next is you'd see something very similar to what we saw in the second image before, where the purple dot hasn't traveled very much, but the small pink ones are just going so fast, they're almost at the detector. The way to visualize this is, imagine the gas pushing through. Now picture that as a really strong wind. If you have a tiny child in a meadow where there's a strong wind, the kid will feel like they're getting pushed around pretty hard. But if you had a big Sumo wrestler instead, they probably wouldn't move too much no matter how hard the wind blew. So in this case, the pink dot's like the child, and the purple one's like the Sumo wrestler. So we've talked about the size of the particles, or the molecular weight of the compound, along with the boiling points as being ways to discern between compounds in gas chromatography. But let's take a closer look at that chromatogram you see on the computer screen. That chromatogram is actually a plot of intensity on the y-axis, representing how many particles are hitting the detector at a time, versus time on the x-axis shown here. So again, we saw something that looked like this. We said that the very first peak that comes out is probably just the solvent that your sample was originally dissolved in. The next one represented our first actual peak, and it represented again the compound that traveled faster and further. Let's call this compound A. The second peak was the one that was a little bit slower, so compound B. Just by looking at this chromatograph, we can already know a little bit about the relative properties of A versus B. Again, compound A was probably smaller and had a lower boiling point, whereas compound B was probably bigger and had a higher boiling point. But that still doesn't tell us anything about the identities of these exact compounds. What you would really need to do in lab is first run a reference, meaning that earlier you could have run a graph that looked like this and got two peaks. And if you knew that your reference sample was a sample of hexane, and it looked like they came out at about the same time as compound A, you could probably infer that compound A is hexane. Although, it's not quite definitive, which is why gas chromatography is usually coupled with other analytical techniques that can give you even more information about the compound. For example, techniques like mass spectrometry can tell you about the molecular weight, so that makes it even easier to narrow down what the exact compound is. And I know that this can be a pretty tricky process to figure out what the compound is, but for analyzing these GC graphs, what you'll mostly want to look at is the relative difference between the peaks and try to compare compounds qualitatively. Quantitatively, you can also note that the area of each peak is directly proportional to the amount of compound in the mixture. So next time you see on TV that they're trying to use GC, you'll really know what actually goes into it and that you really can't catch a criminal quite that quickly using only this. You'd need to use a lot of other lab techniques.

Introduction

Chemists often use the phrase "standard temperature and pressure" or "STP" to convey that they are working at a temperature of 0 °C and one atmosphere of pressure (International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry). There are three states of matter under these conditions: solids, liquids, and gases. Although all three are distinct states, both solids and gases can dissolve (or disperse) in liquids. The most commonly occurring liquid in the biosphere is water. All components of the atmosphere are capable of dissolving in water to some degree. The bulk of the stable natural components of the atmosphere are nitrogen, oxygen, carbon dioxide, gaseous water, argon, and other trace gases.

Materials that exist primarily in the gas phase at STP (i.e., "evaporates more than 95% by weight within six months under ambient evaporation testing conditions"[3]) are referred to as "volatile."[1] Many natural and man-made (anthropogenic) materials are stable in two states at STP, earning them the title "semivolatile." A naturally occurring volatile that is sometimes found in aqueous solution is methane; water itself is semivolatile. Man-made or anthropogenic chemicals also occur in these classes. Examples of volatile anthropogenic chemicals include the refrigerants chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and hydrofluorocarbons (HCFCs). Semivolatile anthropogenics can exist as mixtures, such as petroleum distillates or as pure chemicals like trichloroethylene (TCE).

There is a need to analyze the dissolved gas content of aqueous solutions. Dissolved gases can directly interact with aquatic organisms[4] or can volatilize from solution (the latter described by Henry's law). These processes can result in exposure that, depending on the nature of the dissolved material, can have negative health effects. There is natural occurrence of various dissolved gases in groundwater and can be a measure of health for lakes, streams, and rivers. Dissolved gases also occur as a result of human contamination from fuel and chlorinated spill sites. As such, headspace gas chromatography offers a method for determining if there is natural biodegradation processes occurring in contaminated aquifers.[5] For example, fuel hydrocarbons will break down into methane. Chlorinated solvents such as trichloroethylene, break down into ethene and chloride. Detecting these compounds can determine if biodegradation processes are occurring and possibly at what rate.[5] Natural gas extracted from the earth also contains many low molecular weight hydrocarbon compounds such as methane, ethane, propane, and butane. For example, methane has been found in many water wells in West Virginia.[6]

RSKSOP-175 analysis method

One of the most widely used methods for headspace analysis is described by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Originally developed by the R.S. Kerr USEPA Laboratory in Ada, Oklahoma as a "high quality, defendable, and documented way to measure" methane, ethane, and ethene,[7][8] RSKSOP-175 is a standard operating procedure (SOP) and an unofficial method employed by the USEPA to detect and quantify dissolved gases in water. This method has been used to quantify dissolved hydrogen, methane, ethylene, ethane, propane, butane, acetylene, nitrogen, nitrous oxide, and oxygen. The method uses headspace gas injected into a gas chromatographic column (GC) to determine the original concentration in a water sample.[9]

A sample of water is collected in the field in a vial without headspace and capped with a Teflon septum or crimp top to minimize the escape of volatile gases. It is beneficial to store the bottles upside down to further minimize loss of analytes. Before analysis begins, the sample is brought to room temperature and temperature is recorded. In the laboratory, a headspace is created by displacing water with high purity helium. The bottle is then shaken upside down for a minimum of five minutes in order to equilibrate the dissolved gases into the headspace. It’s important to note that the bottle must be kept upside down for the remainder of analysis if manually injected. A known volume of headspace gas is then injected onto a gas chromatographic column. An automated process can also be utilized. Individual components (gases) are separated and detected by either a thermal conductivity detector (TCD), a flame ionization detector (FID), or an electron capture detector (ECD). Using the known temperature of the sample, the bottle volume, the concentrations of gas in the headspace (as determined by GC), and Henry's law constant, the concentration of the original water sample is calculated.[9]

Phases of a headspace vial used in gas chromatography

Calculations

Using the known temperature of the sample, the bottle volume, the concentrations of gas in the headspace (as determined by GC), and Henry's law constant, the concentration of the original water sample is calculated. Total gas concentration (TC) in the original water sample is calculated by determining the concentration of headspace and converting this to the partial pressure and then solving for the aqueous concentration which partitioned in the gas phase (CAH) and the concentration remaining in the aqueous phase (CA). The total concentration of gas in original sample (TC) is the sum of the concentration partitioned in the gas phase (CAH) and the concentration remaining in the aqueous phase (CA):

Henry's law states that the mole fraction of a dissolved gas (xg) is equal to the partial pressure of the gas (pg) at equilibrium divided by Henry's law constant (H). Gas solubility coefficients are used to calculate Henry's law constant:

After manipulating equations and substituting volumes of each phase, the molar concentration of water (55.5 mol/L) and the molecular weight of the gas analyte (MW), a final equation is solved:

Where Vb is the bottle volume and Vh is the volume of headspace. Cg is the volumetric concentration of gas. For full calculation examples, reference RSK-175SOP.[9]

Practical considerations

One of the major concerns for this method is reproducibility. Due to the nature of calculations, this method is reliant on temperatures to be constant and volumes to be exact. When gases are spiked manually into the GC, the speed and technique in which an analyst does this plays a role in reproducibility. If one analyst is faster in removing gas from the vial and injecting it onto the instrument, then it is important to have the same analyst run on the calibration they prepped, otherwise error will more than likely be introduced. A headspace auto-sampler may remove some of this error, but constant heat and variable temperature on the instrument becomes an issue.[original research?]

Other methods and techniques

Prior to RSKSOP-175, the EPA used Method 3810 (1986), which before that was Method 5020.[10][11][12] However, Method 3810 is still used by some laboratories.[13][14]

Other headspace GC methods include:

  • ASTM D4526-12[15] and ASTM D8028-17[16]
  • EPA 5021A[8][17]
  • Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PA-DEP) 3686 (#BOL 6019)[8][18][19]

Further reading

  • Sithersingh, M.J.; Snow, N.H. (2012). "Chapter 9: Headspace-Gas Chromatography". In Poole, C. (ed.). Gas Chromatography. Elsevier. pp. 221–34. ISBN 9780123855404.

References

  1. ^ a b c Sithersingh, M.J.; Snow, N.H. (2012). "Chapter 9: Headspace-Gas Chromatography". In Poole, C. (ed.). Gas Chromatography. Elsevier. pp. 221–34. ISBN 9780123855404.
  2. ^ Omar, Jone; Olivares, Maitane; Alonso, Ibone; Vallejo, Asier; Aizpurua-Olaizola, Oier; Etxebarria, Nestor (April 2016). "Quantitative Analysis of Bioactive Compounds from Aromatic Plants by Means of Dynamic Headspace Extraction and Multiple Headspace Extraction-Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry: Quantitative analysis of bioactive compounds…". Journal of Food Science. 81 (4): C867–C873. doi:10.1111/1750-3841.13257. PMID 26925555. S2CID 21443154.
  3. ^ Võ, Uyên-Uyên T.; Morris, M.P. (2013). "Nonvolatile, semivolatile, or volatile: Redefining volatile for volatile organic compounds". Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. 64 (6): 661–9. doi:10.1080/10962247.2013.873746. PMID 25039200. S2CID 20869499.
  4. ^ USGS. "Lower Columbia River Dissolved Gas Monitoring Network". Oregon Water Science Center. Retrieved 16 April 2019.
  5. ^ a b Kampbell, D.H.; Vandergrift, S.A. (1998). "Analysis of Dissolved Methane, Ethane, and Ethylene in Ground Water by a Standard Gas Chromatographic Technique". Journal of Chromatographic Science. 36 (5): 253–56. doi:10.1093/chromsci/36.5.253. PMID 9599433.
  6. ^ USGS (January 2006). "Methane in West Virginia Ground Water". Fact Sheet 2006-3011. Retrieved 16 April 2019.
  7. ^ Pace Analytical. "Advanced Tools for Subsurface Sampling and Analysis" (PDF). p. 7. Retrieved 16 April 2019.
  8. ^ a b c Neslund, C. (5 October 2014). "Dissolved Methane Sampling and Analysis Techniques" (PDF). Eurofins Lancaster Laboratories Environmental. Retrieved 16 April 2019.
  9. ^ a b c Hudson, F. (May 2004). "RSKSOP-175: Sample Preparation and Calculations for Dissolved Gas Analysis in Water Samples Using a GC Headspace Equilibration Technique" (PDF). EPA. Retrieved 16 April 2019.
  10. ^ "Method 3810" (PDF). Environmental Protection Agency. September 1986. Retrieved 16 April 2019.
  11. ^ Parnell, J.M. (1995). "Screening For Volatile Organic Compounds In Soil And Groundwater By Use Of A Portable Gas Chromatograph During Field Investigations At An Air Force Installation In Ohio" (PDF). USGS. Retrieved 16 April 2019.
  12. ^ Minnich, M. (1993). "Section 7: Analytical Methodology". Behavior and Determination of Volatile Organic Compunds in Soil: A Literature Review. Environmental Protection Agency. pp. 64–72.
  13. ^ Pace Analytical. "Testing for Methane, Ethane and Ethene in Water by Headspace Analysis Utilizing Method 3810 - Modified" (PDF). Retrieved 16 April 2019.
  14. ^ Fugitt, R. (16 April 2014). "Communication of Methane Analysis Results and Mitigation Information to Private Well Owners in Ohio" (PDF). American Institute of Professional Geologists. Retrieved 16 April 2019.
  15. ^ ASTM International (2012). "ASTM D4526-12: Standard Practice for Determination of Volatiles in Polymers by Static Headspace Gas Chromatography". Standards & Publications. doi:10.1520/D4526-12. Retrieved 16 April 2019.
  16. ^ ASTM International (2017). "ASTM D8028-17: Standard Test Method for Measurement of Dissolved Gases Methane, Ethane, Ethylene, and Propane by Static Headspace Sampling and Flame Ionization Detection (GC/FID)". Standards & Publications. doi:10.1520/D8028-17. Retrieved 16 April 2019.
  17. ^ EPA (July 2014). "Method 5021A - Volatile Organic Compounds in Various Sample Matrices Using Equilibrium Headspace Analysis, Revision 2" (PDF). p. 31. Retrieved 16 April 2019.
  18. ^ Valentine, N. (25 February 2013). "Alternative Methods to RSK 175 Using Purge and Trap Concentration and Automated Headspace for the Analysis of Dissolved Gases in Drinking Water" (PDF). Teledyne Tekmar. Retrieved 16 April 2019.
  19. ^ "PA-DEP 3686, Rev. 1, Light Hydrocarbons in Aqueous Samples via Headspace and Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detection (GC/FID)" (PDF). Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. October 2012. p. 13. Retrieved 16 April 2019.
This page was last edited on 19 June 2023, at 23:13
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.