To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.

Great ape research ban

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A great ape research ban, or severe restrictions on the use of great apes in research, is currently in place in the Netherlands, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, Sweden, Germany[1] and Austria. These countries have ruled that chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans are cognitively so similar to humans that using them as test subjects is unethical. Austria is the only country in the world where experiments on lesser apes, the gibbons, are completely banned too.[citation needed]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    1 056 000
    1 062 465
    1 612 962
    5 876 413
    6 887
  • Why These Cute Animals Are Illegal To Own
  • Does Human Cloning Already Exist?
  • From The Big Bang To The Present Day - 1080p Documentary HD
  • Ape To Man: Evolution Documentary History Channel
  • Empty Forests: Researching bushmeat in the Congo


If this were TV, we'd start with something like, "Cute, cuddly and deadly. These are the pets you CAN'T own, but wish you could!" Hey everyone, welcome to DNews! I'm Trace and pets are fun, right? Until they're not pets and they're wild animals... but who decides where that line is? The federal government says pets don't include exotic or wild animals, but what is EXOTIC? Well, the definition is SO broad, that there's no easy way to define it. In the Dictionary, it's defined as anything non-native to the region in question -- but that's even BROADER. In the U.S. it comes down to state laws, but then some states classify new cat and dog breeds as exotic pets, while others have zero regulations for a-typical pets. We almost got a ferret when I was a kid. They're regulated or banned in many states and are the poster-child for illegal pets that you just want to cuddle. A ferret is the domesticated version of a European Polecat. They're related to the weasel and the mink and are primarily from, you probably guessed, Europe! They were declared bloodthirsty vermin under the reign of Elizabeth the First, and were almost extinct in Britain -- though they've since rebounded. Owning a ferret as a pet can be tricky, they're cute, but they smell due to natural scent glands on their backsides. In California, they've been illegal since 1933 because they're non-native, but really if a ferret was to get loose and procreate with another ferret or a related species... there wouldn't be a natural predator to control the population and well, that would stink. Other pets like hedgehogs and chinchillas tow the exotic line as well. The African Pygmy hedgehog is the pet you'd usually see on the 'net, and they're illegal to possess in California, Georgia, Pennsylvania and Hawaii and restricted in Maine and Arizona, but most states are cool with them. Being an African species, the worry is their ability to start invasive, non-native populations and overrun the natural environment. Hedgehogs require a lot of socialization when they're young to keep them from stabbing you with their spines when nervous. They might be cute, but they can definitely be a difficult pet to own. One of the most exotic, interesting pets people try to own are chimpanzees. Twenty-one states ban the possession of non-human primates, and 12 more have regulations for their ownership. Even so, many jump in without doing research which can be downright devastating. Chimpanzees share 99% of their genetic information with humans. Getting a chimp is akin to getting a child for 50 to 60 years that is seven times stronger than an adult man, and will never be fully domesticated. They've got their own physical, emotional and mental needs, and when they're not met... terrible things can happen. In 2009, a 55-year-old Connecticut woman was attacked by her friend's pet chimp and was permanently disfigured. The illegal pet trade is kind of ridiculous. For example, there are more tigers kept as pets than there are tigers in the wild! Owning definitively exotic animals have come back to bite in some places. One man in Ohio owned over 50 lions, Bengal tigers, wolves, cheetahs, leopards, monkeys, apes, a grizzly bear, ... he had a lot. In 2011, he freed the animals and committed suicide. Yeah. That being said, there are plenty of people who still crave the feeling of bringing the wild into their home. Some feel it's a connection with nature, others love the uniqueness of owning something no one else has... But wild animals are still wild. And yet there are a lot of exotic beasts that you CAN own, at least in certain states. If you wanna know what some of the weirdest ones are, be sure to check the video on it from our friends over at Animalist News. What exotic pet would you own if you could and why? Tell us down below, and be sure to subscribe for more DNews. Thanks for watching!


New Zealand

New Zealand granted strong protections to all the great ape species in 1999, but these protections have not been explicitly recognized as rights. The use of great apes is now forbidden in research, testing or teaching.[2]

United States

The United States is the world's largest user of chimpanzees for biomedical research, with approximately 1,200 individual subjects currently in U.S. labs.[3] On December 15, 2011, the U.S. Institute of Medicine (IOM) declared in a report[4]) that ‘most current use of chimpanzees for biomedical research is unnecessary,’ and recommended to curtail government-funded research on humans' closest relative.[5] On the same day Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), announced that he had accepted the recommendations and will develop an implementation plan which includes the formation of an expert committee to review all submitted grant applications and projects already underway involving the use of chimpanzees.[6] Furthermore, no new grant applications using chimpanzees will be reviewed until further notice.[5][6] On 21 September 2012, the NIH announced that 110 chimpanzees owned by the government will be retired. The NIH owns about 500 chimpanzees for research, and this move signifies the first step to wind down its investment in chimpanzee research, according to Collins. Currently housed at the New Iberia Research Center in Louisiana, 10 of the retired chimpanzees will go to the chimpanzee sanctuary Chimp Haven while the rest will go to Texas Biomedical Research Institute in San Antonio.[7] However, concerns over the chimpanzees' status in the Texas Biomedical Research Institute as ‘research ineligible’ rather than ‘retired’ prompted the NIH to reconsider the plan. On 17 October 2012 it announced that as many chimpanzees as possible will be relocated to Chimp Haven by August 2013, and that eventually all 110 will move there.[8]

On 22 January 2013, an NIH task force released a report calling for the government to retire most of the chimpanzees under U.S. government support. The panel concluded that the animals provide little benefit in biomedical discoveries except in a few disease cases which can be supported by a small population of 50 primates for future research. It suggested that other approaches, such as genetically altered mice, should be developed and refined instead.[9][10] On 13 November 2013, Congress and the Senate passed ‘The Chimpanzee Health Improvement, Maintenance and Protection Act’, which approved funding to expand the capacity of Chimp Haven and other chimpanzee sanctuaries, allowing for the transfer of almost all of the apes owned by the federal government to live in a more natural and group environment. The transfer is expected to take up to five years, at which point all but 50 chimpanzees will have been successfully ‘retired’.[11]

On 11 June 2013, the US Fish and Wildlife Service proposed to list captive chimpanzees as endangered, matching its existing classification for wild chimpanzees. Until the Fish and Wildlife proposal, chimpanzees were the only species with a split listing that did not also classify captive members of the species as endangered.[12] If the proposal gains final approval, it is unclear what effect it would have on laboratory research.[12]

Two years later, on 12 June 2015, the USFWS completed the proposal and listed all chimpanzees, captive and wild, as endangered.[13]

In January 2014, Merck & Co. announced that the company will not use chimpanzees for research, joining over 20 pharmaceutical companies and contract laboratories that have made the commitment. As the trend continues, it is estimated the remaining non-government owned 1,000 chimpanzees will be retired to sanctuaries around 2020.[14][15]

United Kingdom

Announcing the UK’s ban in 1986, the British Home Secretary said: "[T]his is a matter of morality. The cognitive and behavioural characteristics and qualities of these animals mean it is unethical to treat them as expendable for research." Britain continues to use other primates in laboratories, such as macaques and marmosets. In 2006 the permanency of the UK ban was questioned by Colin Blakemore, head of the Medical Research Council. Blakemore, while stressing he saw no "immediate need" to lift the ban, argued "that under certain circumstances, such as the emergence of a lethal pandemic virus that only affected the great apes, including man, then experiments on chimps, orang-utans and even gorillas may become necessary." The British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection described Blakemore's stance as "backward-looking." [16][17][18]

On 7 February 2014 the UK Department of Health released a policy paper outlining the ‘3R’ (replacement, refinement and reduction) strategy to reduce animal testing in research and develop in biosciences. Using new non-animal technologies such as tissue engineering, stem cells, noninvasive imaging and mathematical modeling, the press release stated, the benefits will include not only improvement in animal welfare but also reduction in cost for the industry. The latter derives from the potentially higher successful rate using these cutting-edge technologies in early drug development while results from animal studies sometimes fail to duplicate in human.[19]


A 2013 amendment to the Animal Welfare Act with special regulations for monkeys results in the near total ban on the use of great apes as laboratory animals.[1] As of 2015, the last time great apes were used in laboratory experiments in Germany was 1991.[20][21]

See also


  1. ^ a b "BMEL - German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture - Improving animal welfare in Germany". Retrieved 2017-03-28. "One key element in this regard is the near total ban on the use of apes as laboratory animals." (more precisely great apes, according to the German version)
  3. ^ Federal Bill Introduced to End Invasive Research on Chimpanzees
  4. ^ "Chimpanzees in Biomedical and Behavioral Research: Assessing the Necessity". Institute of Medicine. December 15, 2011. Retrieved December 19, 2011. 
  5. ^ a b Wadman, Meredity (December 16, 2011). "US Chimpanzee Research to be Curtailed". Retrieved December 19, 2011. 
  6. ^ a b "Statement by NIH Director Dr. Francis Collins on the Institute of Medicine report addressing the scientific need for the use of chimpanzees in research". National Institutes of Health. December 15, 2011. Retrieved December 19, 2011. 
  7. ^ Greenfieldboyce, Nell (21 September 2012). "Government Officials Retire Chimpanzees From Research". NPR. Retrieved 24 September 2012. 
  8. ^ Lisa Myers; Diane Beasley (17 October 2012). "Goodall praises NIH decision to remove some chimps from research, but controversy erupts over their next home". Retrieved 22 October 2012. 
  9. ^ Flinn, Ryan (23 January 2013). "U.S. Panel Calls for Limits on Medical Use of Chimpanzees". Retrieved 15 February 2013. 
  10. ^ Working Group on the Use of Chimpanzees in National Institutes of Health (NIH)-Supported Research (22 January 2013). "Council of Councils Working Group on the Use of Chimpanzees in NIH-Supported Research Report" (PDF). NIH. 
  11. ^ Dizard, Wilson (15 November 2013). "Federal government to transfer laboratory chimps to sanctuaries". Aljazeera America. Retrieved 3 December 2013. 
  12. ^ a b Fears, Darryl (11 June 2013). "Fish and Wildlife proposes endangered listing for captive chimpanzees". The Washington Post. Retrieved 12 June 2013. 
  13. ^ Kauffman, Vanessa (12 June 2015). "U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Finalizes Rule Listing All Chimpanzees as Endangered Under the Endangered Species Act". Retrieved 7 July 2015. 
  14. ^ The Associated Press (30 January 2014). "Merck joins other drugmakers, contract research labs vowing not to do research on chimpanzees". Associated Press. Retrieved 20 February 2014. 
  15. ^ Press Release (30 January 2014). "Top Pharmaceutical Company Stops Chimpanzee Use in Research". The Humane Society of the United States. Retrieved 20 February 2014. 
  16. ^ Steve Connor (June 3, 2006). "Scientists 'should be allowed to test on apes'". The Independent. 
  17. ^ "Ban all experiments on the higher primates". The Independent. March 28, 2001. 
  18. ^ Helene Guldberg (March 29, 2001). "The great ape debate". Spiked online. 
  19. ^ Mullin, Emily (10 February 2014). "U.K. pledges to reduce use of animals for bioscience research". Retrieved 4 March 2014. 
  20. ^ Research on primates - Max Planck Institutes - Research on great apes is not permitted; it has not been performed in Germany since 1991.
  21. ^ German Ministry of Food and Agriculture - Use of laboratory animals 2015 (German)"Menschenaffen wurden in Deutschland zuletzt 1991 für wissenschaftliche Zwecke verwendet."

External links

This page was last edited on 3 April 2018, at 05:59.
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.