To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Gevorkyan v. Moshkov

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Maxim Moshkov
Maxim Moshkov

Gevorkyan v. Moshkov (Russian: Геворкян против Мошкова) was a landmark case that established the precedent for the application of the Russian copyright law to the online services.

Background

Maksim Moshkow is the owner of the website Lib.ru also known as the Moshkov library created in 1994. The site is free and supported by advertisements and private donations. The project started as a bulletin board system and kept the bulletin board approach to the copyright matters: the site publishes all notable books uploaded there but removes books by the first request from the authors. The policy was in obvious contradiction with the Russian copyright law, but for more than ten years nobody objected. Indeed, many authors and publishing houses considered placements of their works in the Moshkov library beneficial to the sales of the paper copies of the books.[1]

The Kirill i Mefody company (named after the Cyril and Methodius) started in 1995 was the creator of the Large KM Encyclopedia and other multimedia products. In 1998 they created the portal KM Online that gave paying users internet access to their Encyclopedia and their own collection of online books. Unlike Moshkov, Kirill i Mefody library offered the copyright holders up to 20% of its revenue from the downloads of E-books from paying users. In exchange it required an exclusive rights over internet publications. The revenue from the paid downloads was low, since most of the E-books offered by Kirill i Mefody for fee-paying users were freely available on the sites like the Moshkov library.

In 2004 Kirill i Mefody requested Moshkov library to remove access to a long list of books, claiming that they have exclusive internet rights on the books. Among the authors in the list were authors who died in 1920s and 1930s e.g. Nikolay Gumilyov that were usually considered public domain in Russia. The rationale as explained by Kirill i Mefody was that victims of the political repression in the Soviet Union could not enjoy the copyright privileges before their official rehabilitation, thus, their heirs are entitled to offer Kirill i Mefody an exclusive rights in internet even after the legal 50 years after the author's death. Moshkov refused to honor the request and the lawsuit ensued. It was the first Russian lawsuit regarding the rights for internet distribution in Russia. The movements of KM were supported by the National Society for Digital Technologies (Национальное общество по цифровым технологиям (НОЦИТ)), a Russian organization for the promotion copyright in computer-related areas.

The lawsuit

The case was heard in Ostankino Court of Moscow. Originally the KM asked for $500,000 as a compensation for their exclusive rights, but the court did not take the case. The contracts for the exclusive internet rights were considered invalid. The KM took an alternative route and filed applications on behalf of the authors: Alexandra Marinina, Vasily Golovachyov, Eduard Gevorkyan and Elena Kasatonova. All of them except the sci-fi writer Eduard Gevorkyan later retracted their signatures claiming that they were not aware of the lawsuits on their behalf.

Eduard Gevorkyan's claimed losses of 1mln roubles (approximately $30,000) due to the Moshkov publication his novel Rules of the game without rule on his internet site. He also sued the Internet provider Nexter, who hosted Moshkov library. The final verdict of the court on May 31, 2005 was that the internet provider is not responsible for the copyright violations of the site and that Moshkov's responsibility is much less - only 3,000 roubles (approximately $100).

Both sides claimed victory. On one side the court recognized some sort of responsibility of free internet services, on the other side the claim amount was vastly reduced from $500,000 to $100 and generated a great deal of negative publicity for the claimant.

After the lawsuit

Part of the Lib.ru library, namely some materials from the site "Samizdat", are included in the Federal List of Extremist Materials under the number 381 by the decision of the Cherepovets Municipal Court of the Vologda Region on April 13, 2009. At that moment part of the providers completely block access to the site and not to specific materials. The site was forced to change the domain to samlib.ru, access to which is also blocked by some Russian providers as of 2015.[2][3]

Subsequently in an unrelated incident, the private credentials of KM Online's email service were spilled online in 2016.[4]

See also

References

  1. ^ Vladimir Abramovich Vul (2003): Who and why?, Bibliotechnoye Delo(Librarianship) 2(2) [1] (Russian)
  2. ^ https://ru.wikisource.org/wiki/%D0%A0%D0%B5%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%A7%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%86%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE_%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%81%D1%83%D0%B4%D0%B0_%D0%BE%D1%82_13_%D0%B0%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8F_2009_%D0%B3._%D0%BF%D0%BE_%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%83_%E2%84%96_2-1613
  3. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2010-08-19. Retrieved 2017-07-25.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  4. ^ https://archive.li/20170725171023/https://read01.com/JmR0xK.html

External links

This page was last edited on 20 February 2020, at 10:54
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.