To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

GNOME Screensaver

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GNOME Screensaver
Developer(s)GNOME developers
Stable release
3.6.1[1] / October 16, 2012 (2012-10-16)[1]
Preview release
3.5.5[2] / August 6, 2012 (2012-08-06)[2]
Repository
Operating systemCross-platform
TypeScreensaver
LicenseGPL
Websitewiki.gnome.org/Projects/GnomeScreensaver

Up until GNOME 3.5, GNOME Screensaver was the GNOME project's official screen blanking and locking framework. With the release of GNOME 3.5.5, screen locking functionality became a function of GDM and GNOME Shell by default.[3]

History

GNOME Screensaver continued to be used by the GNOME Fallback mode[2] until GNOME Fallback was deprecated with the release of GNOME 3.8.[4] GNOME Screensaver continues to be used in the GNOME Flashback session, a continuation of the GNOME Fallback mode. In October 2014, a member of the GNOME Flashback team requested maintainer-ship of GNOME Screensaver which would allow it to officially become part of the GNOME Flashback project.[5]

On some GNOME-based Linux distributions, GNOME Screensaver was used instead of the framework that is a part of XScreenSaver. On these systems, the screen savers themselves still came from the XScreenSaver collection, GNOME Screensaver just provided the interface.

The GNOME Screensaver interface was designed for improved integration with the GNOME desktop, including themeability, language support, and human interface guidelines compliance. However, it no longer runs any screensavers and is more properly referred to as a screen blanker.

Compared to the front end included with XScreenSaver, GNOME Screensaver has a simplified interface but less customizability. For instance, users may not select which screensavers to select at random – either only one is selected or the program randomly selects from the whole list. In addition, the inability to configure individual screensavers and the developers' response to this issue has been criticized by some users.[6] It also lacks a setting to control cycling through different screensavers.

In GNOME 3, GNOME Screensaver was drastically simplified, supporting only screen blanking and no graphical screen savers.[7]

References

  1. ^ a b "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2014-11-17.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  2. ^ a b c "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2014-11-29. Retrieved 2014-11-17.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  3. ^ "ThreePointFive/Features/ScreenLock - GNOME Wiki!". Wiki.gnome.org. 2012-08-21. Retrieved 2016-08-07.
  4. ^ "Fallback Mode (Classic Session) To Be Dropped From GNOME 3.8 ~ Web Upd8: Ubuntu / Linux blog". Webupd8.org. 2012-11-08. Retrieved 2016-08-07.
  5. ^ "maintainership of gnome-screensaver and notification-daemon". Mail.gnome.org. 2014-10-17. Retrieved 2016-08-07.
  6. ^ "Bug 316654 - no ability to configure the different screensavers", Bugzilla, The GNOME Project, 2005-09-18, retrieved 2011-12-11
  7. ^ Campagna, Giovanni (2011-03-21). "Re: What is the status of the screensaver in GNOME3?". gnome-shell (Mailing list).

External links

This page was last edited on 8 January 2024, at 13:26
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.