Gödel's β function

In mathematical logic, Gödel's β function is a function used to permit quantification over finite sequences of natural numbers in formal theories of arithmetic. The β function is used, in particular, in showing that the class of arithmetically definable functions is closed under primitive recursion, and therefore includes all primitive recursive functions.

The β function was introduced without the name in the proof of the first of Gödel's incompleteness theorems (Gödel 1931). The β function lemma given below is an essential step of that proof. Gödel gave the β function its name in (Gödel 1934).

Definition

The ${\displaystyle \beta }$ function takes three natural numbers as arguments. It is defined as

${\displaystyle \beta (x_{1},x_{2},x_{3})=\mathrm {rem} (x_{1},1+(x_{3}+1)\cdot x_{2})=\mathrm {rem} (x_{1},(x_{3}\cdot x_{2}+x_{2}+1)),}$

where ${\displaystyle \mathrm {rem} (x,y)}$ denotes the remainder after integer division of ${\displaystyle x}$ by ${\displaystyle y}$ (Mendelson 1997:186).

Special schema without parameters

The β function is arithmetically definable in an obvious way, because it uses only arithmetic operations and the remainder function which is arithmetically definable. It is therefore representable in Robinson arithmetic and stronger theories such as Peano arithmetic. By fixing the first two arguments appropriately, one can arrange that the values obtained by varying the final argument from 0 to n run through any specified (n+1)-tuple of natural numbers (the β lemma described in detail below). This allows simulating the quantification over sequences of natural numbers of arbitrary length, which cannot be done directly in the language of arithmetic, by quantification over just two numbers, to be used as the first two arguments of the β function.

For example, if f is a function defined by primitive recursion on a recursion variable n, say by f(0) = c and f(n+1) = g(n, f(n)), then to express f(n) = y one would like to say: there exists a sequence a₀, a₁, ..., a_n such that a₀ = c, a_n = y and for all i < n one has g(i, a_i) = a_i+1. While that is not possible directly, one can say instead: there exist natural numbers a and b such that β(a,b,0) = c, β(a,b,n) = y and for all i < n one has g(i, β(a,b,i)) = β(a,b,i+1).

General schema with parameters

The primitive recursion schema as given may be replaced by one which makes use of fewer parameters. Let ${\displaystyle w}$ be an elementary pairing function, and ${\displaystyle \pi _{1},\pi _{2}}$ be its projection functions for inversion.

Theorem: Any function constructible via the clauses of primitive recursion using the standard primitive recursion schema is constructible when the schema is replaced with the following.

• ${\displaystyle f'(x,0)=g'(x)}$
• ${\displaystyle f'(x,y+1)=h'(f'(x,y))}$

This is proven by providing two intermediate schemata for primitive recursion, starting with a function defined via the standard schema, and translating the definition into terms of each intermediate schema and finally into terms of the above schema. The first intermediate schemata is as follows:

• ${\displaystyle f_{1}(x,0)=g_{1}(x)}$
• ${\displaystyle f_{1}(x,y+1)=h_{1}(x,y,f_{1}(x,y))}$

Translation of the standard definition of a primitive recursive function to the intermediate schema is done inductively, where an elementary pairing function ${\displaystyle w}$ is used to reinterpret the definition of a ${\displaystyle k+1}$-ary primitive recursive function into a ${\displaystyle k}$-ary primitive recursive function, terminating the induction at ${\displaystyle k=1}$.

The second intermediate schema is as follows, with the ${\displaystyle x}$ parameter eliminated.

• ${\displaystyle f_{2}(x,0)=g_{2}(x)}$
• ${\displaystyle f_{2}(x,y+1)=h_{2}(y,f_{2}(x,y))}$

Translation to it is accomplished by pairing ${\displaystyle x}$ and ${\displaystyle f_{1}(x,y)}$ together to use one parameter for handling both, namely by setting ${\displaystyle g_{2}(x)=w(x,g_{1}(x))}$, ${\displaystyle h_{2}(x,z)=w(\pi _{1}z,h_{1}(\pi _{1}z,x,\pi _{2}z))}$, and recovering ${\displaystyle f_{1}(x,y)}$ from these paired images by taking ${\displaystyle \pi _{2}(f_{2}(x,y))}$.

Finally, translation of the intermediate schema into the parameter-eliminated schema is done with a similar pairing and unpairing of ${\displaystyle y}$ and ${\displaystyle f_{2}(x,y)}$. Composing these three translations gives a definition in the original parameter-free schema.^[1]

The β function lemma

The utility of the β function comes from the following result (Gödel 1931, Hilfssatz 1, p. 192-193), which is the purpose of the β function in Gödel's incompleteness proof. This result is explained in more detail than in Gödel's proof in (Mendelson 1997:186) and (Smith 2013:113-118).

β function lemma. For any sequence of natural numbers (k₀, k₁, ..., k_n), there are natural numbers b and c such that, for every natural number 0  ≤  i ≤ n, β(b, c, i) = k_i.

As an example, the sequence (2,0,2,1) can be encoded by b=3412752 and c=24, since

${\displaystyle {\begin{array}{llllll}\mathrm {rem} (3412752,(1+(0+1)*24))&=&\mathrm {rem} (3412752,25)&=&2&,\\\mathrm {rem} (3412752,(1+(1+1)*24))&=&\mathrm {rem} (3412752,49)&=&0&,\\\mathrm {rem} (3412752,(1+(2+1)*24))&=&\mathrm {rem} (3412752,73)&=&2&,{\text{ and}}\\\mathrm {rem} (3412752,(1+(3+1)*24))&=&\mathrm {rem} (3412752,97)&=&1&.\\\end{array}}}$

The proof of the β function lemma makes use of the Chinese remainder theorem.

See also

• Gödel numbering for sequences
• Gödel's incompleteness theorems
• Diagonal lemma

References

• Martin Davis, ed. (1965). The Undecidable – Basic Papers on Undecidable Propositions, Unsolvable Problems and Computable Functions. Dover Publications. ISBN 9-780-48643-2281.
• Kurt Gödel (1931). "Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der "Principia Mathematica" und verwandter Systeme I". Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik (in German). 28: 173–198. in (Gödel 1986)
• Kurt Gödel (1934). "On undecidable propositions of formal mathematical systems". Notes taken by Stpehen C. Kleene and John B. Rosser during lectures given at the Institute for Advanced Study. Reprinted in (Davis 1965)
• Kurt Gödel (1986). Solomon Feferman; John W. Dawson Jr; Stephen C. Kleene; Gregory H. Moore; Robert M. Solovay; Jean van Heijenoort (eds.). Kurt Gödel – Collected Works (in German and English). Vol. I – Publications 1929-1936. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-195-14720-0.
• Elliott Mendelson (1997). Introduction to Mathematical Logic (4th ed.). CRC Press. ISBN 0-412-80830-7.
• Wolfgang Rautenberg (2010). A Concise Introduction to Mathematical Logic (3rd ed.). New York: Springer Science+Business Media. p. 244. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1221-3. ISBN 978-1-4419-1220-6.
• Peter Smith (2013). An Introduction to Gödel's Theorems (2nd ed.). UK: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-02284-3.

This page was last edited on 2 March 2024, at 22:31