To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.

Functor category

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In category theory, a branch of mathematics, a functor category is a category where the objects are the functors and the morphisms are natural transformations between the functors (here, is another object in the category). Functor categories are of interest for two main reasons:

  • many commonly occurring categories are (disguised) functor categories, so any statement proved for general functor categories is widely applicable;
  • every category embeds in a functor category (via the Yoneda embedding); the functor category often has nicer properties than the original category, allowing certain operations that were not available in the original setting.


Suppose is a small category (i.e. the objects and morphisms form a set rather than a proper class) and is an arbitrary category. The category of functors from to , written as Fun(, ), Funct(,), , or , has as objects the covariant functors from to , and as morphisms the natural transformations between such functors. Note that natural transformations can be composed: if is a natural transformation from the functor to the functor , and is a natural transformation from the functor to the functor , then the collection defines a natural transformation from to . With this composition of natural transformations (known as vertical composition, see natural transformation), satisfies the axioms of a category.

In a completely analogous way, one can also consider the category of all contravariant functors from to ; we write this as Funct().

If and are both preadditive categories (i.e. their morphism sets are abelian groups and the composition of morphisms is bilinear), then we can consider the category of all additive functors from to , denoted by Add(,).


  • If is a small discrete category (i.e. its only morphisms are the identity morphisms), then a functor from to essentially consists of a family of objects of , indexed by ; the functor category can be identified with the corresponding product category: its elements are families of objects in and its morphisms are families of morphisms in .
  • An arrow category (whose objects are the morphisms of , and whose morphisms are commuting squares in ) is just , where 2 is the category with two objects and their identity morphisms as well as an arrow from one object to the other (but not another arrow back the other way).
  • A directed graph consists of a set of arrows and a set of vertices, and two functions from the arrow set to the vertex set, specifying each arrow's start and end vertex. The category of all directed graphs is thus nothing but the functor category , where is the category with two objects connected by two parallel morphisms (source and target), and Set denotes the category of sets.
  • Any group can be considered as a one-object category in which every morphism is invertible. The category of all -sets is the same as the functor category Set. Natural transformations are -maps.
  • Similar to the previous example, the category of K-linear representations of the group is the same as the functor category VectK (where VectK denotes the category of all vector spaces over the field K).
  • Any ring can be considered as a one-object preadditive category; the category of left modules over is the same as the additive functor category Add(,) (where denotes the category of abelian groups), and the category of right -modules is Add(,). Because of this example, for any preadditive category , the category Add(,) is sometimes called the "category of left modules over " and Add(,) is the "category of right modules over ".
  • The category of presheaves on a topological space is a functor category: we turn the topological space into a category having the open sets in as objects and a single morphism from to if and only if is contained in . The category of presheaves of sets (abelian groups, rings) on is then the same as the category of contravariant functors from to (or or ). Because of this example, the category Funct(, ) is sometimes called the "category of presheaves of sets on " even for general categories not arising from a topological space. To define sheaves on a general category , one needs more structure: a Grothendieck topology on . (Some authors refer to categories that are equivalent to as presheaf categories.[1])


Most constructions that can be carried out in can also be carried out in by performing them "componentwise", separately for each object in . For instance, if any two objects and in have a product , then any two functors and in have a product , defined by for every object in . Similarly, if is a natural transformation and each has a kernel in the category , then the kernel of in the functor category is the functor with for every object in .

As a consequence we have the general rule of thumb that the functor category shares most of the "nice" properties of :

  • if is complete (or cocomplete), then so is ;
  • if is an abelian category, then so is ;

We also have:

  • if is any small category, then the category of presheaves is a topos.

So from the above examples, we can conclude right away that the categories of directed graphs, -sets and presheaves on a topological space are all complete and cocomplete topoi, and that the categories of representations of , modules over the ring , and presheaves of abelian groups on a topological space are all abelian, complete and cocomplete.

The embedding of the category in a functor category that was mentioned earlier uses the Yoneda lemma as its main tool. For every object of , let be the contravariant representable functor from to . The Yoneda lemma states that the assignment

is a full embedding of the category into the category Funct(,). So naturally sits inside a topos.

The same can be carried out for any preadditive category : Yoneda then yields a full embedding of into the functor category Add(,). So naturally sits inside an abelian category.

The intuition mentioned above (that constructions that can be carried out in can be "lifted" to ) can be made precise in several ways; the most succinct formulation uses the language of adjoint functors. Every functor induces a functor (by composition with ). If and is a pair of adjoint functors, then and is also a pair of adjoint functors.

The functor category has all the formal properties of an exponential object; in particular the functors from stand in a natural one-to-one correspondence with the functors from to . The category of all small categories with functors as morphisms is therefore a cartesian closed category.

See also


  1. ^ Tom Leinster (2004). Higher Operads, Higher Categories. Cambridge University Press. Archived from the original on 2003-10-25.
This page was last edited on 20 December 2022, at 16:26
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.