To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Fraser v Children's Court, Pretoria North

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fraser v Children's Court, Pretoria North
CourtConstitutional Court of South Africa
Full case nameFraser v the Children's Court, Pretoria North and Others
Decided5 February 1997 (1997-02-05)
Citation(s)[1997] ZACC 1, 1996 (8) BCLR 1085, 1997 (2) SA 218
Case history
Prior action(s)Referral from the Transvaal Provincial Division in terms of section 102 of the Interim Constitution
Court membership
Judges sittingChaskalson P, Mahomed DP, Ackermann, Didcott, Kriegler, Langa, Madala, Mokgoro, O'Regan & Sachs JJ
Case opinions
Decision byMahomed
Keywords

Fraser v Children's Court, Pretoria North and Others is a 1997 judgment of the Constitutional Court of South Africa which held that, in certain circumstances, the consent of the father is required before a child born out of wedlock may be adopted. In a unanimous decision, the court held that the provisions of the Child Care Act, 1983, which required only the mother's consent, were unconstitutional, but suspended its order for two years so that Parliament could amend the law accordingly.[1]

Facts

During the period for which the applicant, Fraser, and second respondent, Naude, lived together, the latter became pregnant. She decided to give the child up for adoption. The applicant did not agree with this decision and so launched series of unsuccessful applications to prevent the child being given up for adoption, and to be given custody of his child. He was denied this opportunity, as section 18(4)(d) of the Child Care Act only required the consent of the mother to give up children born out of wedlock for adoption.

Judgment

The court declared this to be unconstitutional, as it discriminated against fathers of children born out of wedlock on the basis of their gender. The Constitutional Court ordered Parliament to bring this provision of the Child Care Act in line with the Constitution within two years.

References

  1. ^ "Media Summary: Fraser v Children's Court, Pretoria North and Others" (PDF). Constitutional Court. 5 February 1997. Retrieved 6 May 2013.

External links


This page was last edited on 6 July 2023, at 05:39
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.