| Fox v. Vice | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued March 22, 2011 Decided June 6, 2011 | |
| Full case name | Ricky D. Fox, Petitioner v. Judy Ann Vice, as Executrix of the Estate of Billy Ray Vice, et al. |
| Docket no. | 10-114 |
| Citations | 563 U.S. 826 (more) 131 S. Ct. 2205; 180 L. Ed. 2d 45 |
| Argument | Oral argument |
| Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
| Holding | |
| Reasonable fees may be granted to the defendant in a suit that involves both frivolous and non-frivolous claims, but only for costs resulting from the frivolous claims. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Kagan, joined by unanimous |
Fox v. Vice, 563 U.S. 826 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that reasonable fees may be granted to the defendant in a suit that involves both frivolous and non-frivolous claims, but only for costs resulting from the frivolous claims.[1]
YouTube Encyclopedic
-
1/2Views:38 6091 568 105
-
Simpson + Miami vice Special FOX
-
Neil deGrasse Tyson schools former GM exec Lutz on climate change
Transcription
Notes
See also
References
- Supreme Court of the United States (June 2011). "Fox v. Vice (Syllabus)".
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - Supreme Court of the United States (June 2011). "Fox v. Vice (Opinion)".
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help)
External links
- Text of Fox v. Vice, 563 U.S. 826 (2011) is available from: CourtListener Google Scholar Justia Oyez (oral argument audio) Supreme Court (slip opinion) (archived)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
This page was last edited on 13 September 2023, at 02:14