In modern U.S. usage, forfeiture is deprivation or destruction of a right in consequence of the non-performance of some obligation or condition.[1] It can be accidental, and therefore is distinguished from waiver. In the law of England and Wales, the forfeiture rule is the rule of law which prevents a killer from inheriting the estate of a person they have unlawfully killed.[2] The term also refers to the rule in English law under which an insured person who makes a fraudulent insurance claim loses their claim: this rule was derived from common law until the passage of the Insurance Act 2015, which "puts the common law rule of forfeiture on a statutory footing".[3]
YouTube Encyclopedic
-
1/3Views:4314685 313
-
California Asset Forfeiture Law
-
Houston Criminal Attorney: Asset Seizure and Forfeiture
-
Quick Explanation of Notice of Seizure Form By Asset Forfeiture Law Firm
Transcription
United States usage
Historically, forfeiture of a convict's land and other assets followed on from conviction for certain serious offences (and thus resulted from criminal activity rather than from a failure to act).[citation needed] A striking illustration of the practical effects of this rule is Giles Corey’s refusal to plead, in the Salem Witch Trials, instead dying under peine forte et dure. By refusing to plead he avoided the jurisdiction of the court and thus avoided conviction and the consequent forfeiture of his estate. Instead it passed to his sons.[4]
Forfeiture is broadly defined as the loss of property for failing to obey the law, and that property is generally lost to the state. A person may have a vested interest in property to be forfeit in two ways: In personum jurisdiction and in rem jurisdiction. In personum actions are against the owner of property, whereas in rem actions are taken directly against the object. In rem forfeiture actions may lead to unusual or even comedic case names, such as United States v. One Solid Gold Object in Form of a Rooster. The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act provides for modern forfeiture actions in the United States with regards to criminal prosecution. This allows for forfeiture absent an in rem action. Any enterprise used to commit a crime under the RICO act may be seized. For example, a hotel owner who runs a prostitution business from his hotel and has bribed local officials to stay quiet could be subject to forfeiture under the act.[5]
See also
References
- ^ Connellan v. Federal Life & Casualty Co., 134 ME 104 (1935).
- ^ Law Commission, The Forfeiture Rule and the Law of Succession, Cm 6625, p. 2, published July 2005, accessed 22 September 2023
- ^ UK Legislation, Insurance Act 2015: Explanatory Notes: Commentary on Sections - Part 4: Fraudulent Claims, accessed 22 September 2023
- ^ Hill, Frances (2002). A delusion of Satan: the full story of the Salem witch trials. Karen Armstrong (Second ed.). New York: Da Capo Press. pp. 184–185. ISBN 0-306-81159-6. OCLC 54477464.
- ^ Gifis, Steven H. (2003). Law dictionary (Fifth ed.). Hauppauge, N.Y.: Barron's. p. 210. ISBN 0-7641-1996-6. OCLC 51900420.
| Authority control databases: National |
|---|
 | This law-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
This page was last edited on 26 February 2024, at 00:11