Forest-fire model

In applied mathematics, a forest-fire model is any of a number of dynamical systems displaying self-organized criticality. Note, however, that according to Pruessner et al. (2002, 2004) the forest-fire model does not behave critically on very large, i.e. physically relevant scales. Early versions go back to Henley (1989) and Drossel and Schwabl (1992). The model is defined as a cellular automaton on a grid with L^d cells. L is the sidelength of the grid and d is its dimension. A cell can be empty, occupied by a tree, or burning. The model of Drossel and Schwabl (1992) is defined by four rules which are executed simultaneously:

1. A burning cell turns into an empty cell
2. A tree will burn if at least one neighbor is burning
3. A tree ignites with probability f even if no neighbor is burning
4. An empty space fills with a tree with probability p

The controlling parameter of the model is p/f which gives the average number of trees planted between two lightning strikes (see Schenk et al. (1996) and Grassberger (1993)). In order to exhibit a fractal frequency-size distribution of clusters a double separation of time scales is necessary

${\displaystyle f\ll p\ll T_{\mathrm {smax} }\,}$

where T_smax is the burn time of the largest cluster. The scaling behavior is not simple, however (Grassberger 1993, 2002 and Pruessner et al. 2002, 2004).

A cluster is defined as a coherent set of cells, all of which have the same state. Cells are coherent if they can reach each other via nearest neighbor relations. In most cases, the von Neumann neighborhood (four adjacent cells) is considered.

The first condition ${\displaystyle f\ll p}$ allows large structures to develop, while the second condition ${\displaystyle p\ll T_{\mathrm {smax} }}$ keeps trees from popping up alongside a cluster while burning.

In landscape ecology, the forest fire model is used to illustrate the role of the fuel mosaic in the wildfire regime. The importance of the fuel mosaic on wildfire spread is debated. Parsimonious models such as the forest fire model can help to explore the role of the fuel mosaic and its limitations in explaining observed patterns.

References

• Bak, Per; Chen, Kan; Tang, Chao (1990). "A forest-fire model and some thoughts on turbulence". Physics Letters A. 147 (5–6). Elsevier BV: 297–300. doi:10.1016/0375-9601(90)90451-s. ISSN 0375-9601.
• Chen, Kan; Bak, Per; Jensen, Mogens H. (1990). "A deterministic critical forest fire model". Physics Letters A. 149 (4). Elsevier BV: 207–210. doi:10.1016/0375-9601(90)90328-l. ISSN 0375-9601.
• Drossel, B.; Schwabl, F. (1992-09-14). "Self-organized critical forest-fire model". Physical Review Letters. 69 (11). American Physical Society (APS): 1629–1632. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.1629. ISSN 0031-9007.
• Grassberger, Peter (2002-03-21). "Critical behaviour of the Drossel-Schwabl forest fire model". New Journal of Physics. 4. IOP Publishing: 17–17. arXiv:cond-mat/0202022. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/4/1/317. ISSN 1367-2630.
• Henley, C. L. (1989), "Self-organized percolation: a simpler model." Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 34, 838.
• Henley, Christopher L. (1993-10-25). "Statics of a self-organized percolation model". Physical Review Letters. 71 (17). American Physical Society (APS): 2741–2744. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.2741. ISSN 0031-9007.
• Pruessner, Gunnar; Jeldtoft Jensen, Henrik (2002-05-20). "Broken scaling in the forest-fire model". Physical Review E. 65 (5). American Physical Society (APS): 056707. arXiv:cond-mat/0201306. doi:10.1103/physreve.65.056707. ISSN 1063-651X.
• Zinck, Richard D.; Grimm, Volker (2009). "Unifying Wildfire Models from Ecology and Statistical Physics". The American Naturalist. 174 (5). University of Chicago Press: E170–E185. doi:10.1086/605959. ISSN 0003-0147.

External links

• An HTML 5 demo of the forest fire model

This page was last edited on 28 March 2024, at 00:16