To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Fission products (by element)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fission product yields by mass for thermal neutron fission of U-235 and Pu-239 (the two typical of current nuclear power reactors) and U-233 (used in the thorium cycle)

This page discusses each of the main elements in the mixture of fission products produced by nuclear fission of the common nuclear fuels uranium and plutonium. The isotopes are listed by element, in order by atomic number.

Neutron capture by the nuclear fuel in nuclear reactors and atomic bombs also produces actinides and transuranium elements (not listed here). These are found mixed with fission products in spent nuclear fuel and nuclear fallout.

Neutron capture by materials of the nuclear reactor (shielding, cladding, etc.) or the environment (seawater, soil, etc.) produces activation products (not listed here). These are found in used nuclear reactors and nuclear fallout. A small but non-negligible proportion of fission events produces not two, but three fission products (not counting neutrons or subatomic particles). This ternary fission usually produces a very light nucleus such as helium (about 80% of ternary fissions produce an alpha particle) or hydrogen (most of the rest produce tritium or to a lesser extent deuterium and protium) as the third product. This is the main source of tritium from light water reactors. Another source of tritium is Helium-6 which immediately decays to (stable) Lithium-6. Lithium-6 produces tritium when hit by neutrons and is one of the main sources of commercially or militarily produced tritium. If the first or only step of nuclear reprocessing is an aqueous solution (as is the case in PUREX) this poses a problem as tritium contamination cannot be removed from water other than by costly isotope separation. Furthermore, a tiny fraction of the free neutrons involved in the operation of a nuclear reactor decay to a proton and a beta particle before they can interact with anything else. Given that protons from this source are indistinguishable from protons from ternary fission or radiolysis of coolant water, their overall proportion is hard to quantify.

Half-lives (example: Gd)
145Gd < 1 day
149Gd 1–10 days
146Gd 10–100 days
153Gd 100 days–10 a
148Gd 10–10,000 a
150Gd 10 ka–700 Ma
152Gd > 700 Ma
158Gd Stable

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    176 376
    495 051
    400 390
    3 169 038
    4 523
  • Nuclear Waste: Fission Products & Transuranics from Thorium & Uranium - "Th" Documentary
  • Nuclear Reactions, Radioactivity, Fission and Fusion
  • Nuclear Fission
  • Nuclear Reactor - Understanding how it works | Physics Elearnin
  • Nuclear Waste: Fission Products, Decay Products, Transuranics - TR2016c 4h22m27s25f

Transcription

The idea of splitting matter and creating other particles, you're getting into a lot of alchemical realms. Scientists as God territory that people, I think naturally are concerned about. As a recent nuclear physics major in college, our current nuclear has a huge waste stream. And I was appalled by it. Uri Gat of Oak Ridge taught me about molten salt reactors and that reignited my passion in nuclear because to me, it solves the waste problem. All you need is about 800 kilos of Thorium feed per year, you know, per gigawatt of electricity. Out of that, you get 799.-something kilos of fission products. Well, the missing mass turned into energy. E equals MC-squared. It turned it into energy. 800 kilograms of Thorium, you have 799 uh... Point something... Of fission products... Of fission products. You have some fissile nuclei. That means this is a nucleus that if you hit it with a neutron... The nucleus begins to distend, and a piece comes off into smaller pieces about... 30 or 40 percent the original mass of the nucleus, and the larger fission product is basically what was left over. What this leads to a double-humped distribution in the masses of the fission products. On this table, you see the smaller fission product highlighted in yellow, and then the heavier fission product highlighted in green. Then there is this gap for a while where there are things that simply are not made by fission. Tungsten, gold, mercury, none of those are made by fission. Then when you get to thallium, now you're getting to what's called the decay products. These are not formed by fission. They're formed when you leave uranium and thorium, plutonium alone for hundreds or thousands of years. They will decay into these products. Those are shown in this chart in a pink color. Then there is what's called the trans-uranics. That's what happens when the uranium absorbs neutron and doesn't fission. It turns into plutonium and americium and curium and a few others. Most of it's plutonium. The overwhelming majority of trans-uranics are plutonium. You get a lot of different things from fission, but you don't get everything. That's significant. It's not as if you're dumping the whole periodic table out when you make fission. You get certain elements in a preponderance, and you get some very rarely and you get some not at all, from instance. You can't make gold from fission. When we first load nuclear fuel in a uranium-fueled reactor, it is entirely uranium and most of that uranium 238. As it burns down first of the year, two years then three years, you see the formation of other things. These are the fission products as well as some of the trans-uranics. The hatch at the bottom gives away the fact that most of the rod is still uranium-238. The overwhelming majority is still this unburned uranium-238. Still most of that potential energy remains to be exploited. In fact, the only fraction that has been truly burned is the fraction that you see in those light pastel colors. Those are the fission products. But the remainder of the material is unrealized energy. Xenon is the most common of the fission products. Some of these fission products have a really, really big propensity to eat neutrons. They call it a cross section. It's a term that we use to describe how probable is a reaction going to be. And here is xenon-135 cross section, relative to two nuclear fuels. See these little bitty guys, so imagine we're playing darts or something and throwing them. Which ones are we gonna hit? We're gonna hit the big red dot. When xenon-135 forms from fission, it really wants to eat your neutron. You split an atom, you get smaller atoms that can poison the fuel itself and kill fission. Unless the poisons can come out of the fuel. This becomes a problem for real nuclear reactors. This was one of the first reactors that was ever built. This was the Hanford reactor. They turned it on and everything seemed to be going, and after about a day or two of running it, all of a sudden the power went [sound] and dropped. Like almost to zero. And they left it alone and after about 12, 18 hours, all of a sudden it went [sound] and it came back up, to power again and it held there. What? And pretty soon it goes [sound] and it drops off again. And I'm going, this makes no sense, we're not doing anything! The thing's like turning on and it's turning off. And it's turning on and it's turning off. Well what was going on was the reactor would turn on and xenon-135 would begin to build up. And as it built up, it would start eating all those neutrons, right? And then went [sound] and it would take the reactor back down again. And then after a while it would decay away. And once it decayed away [sound] the reactor would come back on again. So it was following this up and down effect. Just crazy. These guys didn't even know what xenon-135 was. This was one of the first nuclear reactors ever built. This actually was a contributing effect to the Chernobyl disaster, was the presence of xenon-135. I have a friend I've made online who is a nuclear reactor operator and he's goes "I'm always fighting Xenon in my reactor. That's like all we do as operators is try to deal with this stuff." And it's really hard to deal with in solid fuel reactors. Gases have a really hard time escaping from solids when you're trying to go in between the atoms. My name is Dr. Steven Boyd. I am a solid state chemist. All of a sudden, there is an atom of xenon gas where there wasn't one. What did that just do to the surrounding atoms that pushed them on a mesoscopic level? It cracks the crystals. The solid fuel will begin to swell and crack. Having that trapped and having that the most abundant fission product in there is kind of disastrous. You begin to get this central void. This is actually a gap in the fuel. Now, you have a structural integrity problem that's starting to break down. In my opinion, that's not a good design. Xenon is a gas. What happens to gases in a liquid? They come right out of solution. We need to build nuclear reactors that are based on liquid fuel, because liquid fuel is going to be a whole lot better at doing a bunch of things. What is easier? Running a liquid past a solid in order to transfer the heat or having the fuel be a liquid and use that in and of itself. I would argue that actually combining the two is easier. Sure, it's more chemistry, but so what? I'm a chemist. There are lots and lots of chemists. A lot of them are a hell of a lot smarter than I am. Go solve the problem. There's a lot of good going to having fission in a solution. It's so controllable. Fission solid form sucks. Solids are a bitch. They're a pain to dissolve an acid. These fluorides flow at moderately low temperatures, and they are just a piece of cake to process compared to solid oxides. There's no free lunch. There's no free lunch. There is always a cost-benefit analysis that needs to be done, always. There's no such thing as a waste-free energy source. With that waste, sits think carefully about that waste. NASA uses xenon to throw out the back side of an ion engine. There is a spacecraft in the asteroid belt now called Dawn, which is using xenon ion engines to propel itself extremely efficiently. We used to joke at NASA that xenon was one of the few things worth launching into space because it actually cost about as much as it cost to put up in space. One man's waste is another man's treasure. If you come up with clever ways of utilizing that waste, you could help a lot of people and you can monetize that waste. And you can do it safely. You can do it, in some cases for very strategic reasons. Molybdenum is another common fission product. Molybdenum-99 will decay a technetium-99. A technetium-99 in turn is used in a variety of different diagnostic procedures. How is your heart performing, also your bones, liver, your lungs. It's really a remarkable diagnostic tool. Our power reactors today make lots and lots of molybdenum, but it's not extractable. If you want to get it out, you'd have to shut the reactor down, depressurize it, cool it, extract the fuel, reprocess it. By the time you did that, the molybdenum's all gone. It's only got a CC6 hour halfway. You can't do it fast enough. Bismuth-213 could be connected to an antibody. These antibodies can be tailored to go and hunt down specific cells, in this case, cancer cells. Bismuth only has a half life of 45 minutes. It's very radioactive, and it's going away quickly. In that time, that antibody can go and find a cancer cell. I got bismuth connected to the bismuth decays, and alpha particle goes through the cell, and it kills the cancer cell. I sometimes even lay in bed thinking, "If my kid had leukemia, how hard would I be working on getting this therapy ready for them?" The radiation techniques we're using cancer therapy today, they're all based on beta-emitting isotopes not on alpha-emitting isotopes. Betas, they have a big kill radius. They're not very directible. It's OK, but it's really not a smart bomb. You'll look at this, and you think, "There's got to be good alpha emitters." Turns out there's not. Bismuth-213, which is the favored one, exists on a decay chain that no longer exists in nature than altunium decay chain. It's hard to get the right kind, the right chemical one that will lock onto the right thing that's close enough to being stable that even after decays, it doesn't just decay 10 more times in the body. Bismuth-213 is one decay away from being done, and that's what you want. You want one that's just on its very last decay. We, in the course of pursuing a thorium-powered world, we created this decay chain about 50 years ago. People have known about it for a long time. Look at the time on this report. March 2001. Actinium and bismuth-213 are currently extracted from purified thorium-229. The only practical way is to get this from the natural decay of thorium-229. It's very potent. We only need on the order of a billionth of a gram to treat a patient. It's especially good against dispersed cancers like leukemia, cancer of the blood, not tumorous cancers where there's a big hard lump, stuff that's hard to get to, pancreatic cancer. You get pancreatic cancer, you're probably looking at a death sentence. We can do both at the same time. We can make electrical power, and we can make this useful medical isotope. We need to get this stuff in the hands of doctors to treat deadly diseases like acute myeloid leukemia and other cancers. If we had this material, I really think it would lead to a revolution in fighting cancer. In reactors today, there's basically two categories of the waste. There's the fission-product waste then there's the trans-uranic waste. That's what happens when the uranium absorbs the neutron it does in fission. Plutonium and the americium, the Curium. By using the thorium cycle and using it efficiently, we can eliminate that category, the production of trans-uranics. We can just about eliminate that so we're not making that in the first place. We are still making the fission products, and a number of those I mentioned can be extracted usefully. By extracting the first four fission products, xenon, neodymium, zirconium and molybdenum... Right away, you've reduced the waste stream considerably. What about the rest? The true troublemakers are strontium and cesium. Strontium-90 has a half life of 30 years. Cesium-137 has a half life of 30 years. Even those two could have very useful applications. Strontium-90 could be fabricated into little heating modules. Cesium-137 could be used to radiate food. Food irradiation does not cause the food to become radioactive. It doesn't happen. By irradiating strawberries or lettuce or other leafy vegetables, you can kill E. coli, and E. coli does kill people. In fact, it kills a lot of people each year. Think of your home. Think of your pantry. Imagine taking everything out of your pantry and pouring it on the floor. Your sugar and your cornflakes and your flour and your baked beans and everything is in a big pile on the floor. How valuable is that giant mix to you? It's not valuable at all. It's worthless. It's completely worthless. All you'd do is you shovel it up and you throw it in the trash. Now, you've had the same stuff you had a minute ago. Now, it's all been mixed together. What makes the stuff in your pantry valuable is the fact that it is separated. The sugars in one container and the flour's in another and your cornflakes are in another altogether. What we got with nuclear with nuclear waste is we got that pile of everything mixed together. If we could partition it, we could put it back in its separate categories, we would find it almost every one of those things as useful if isolated and separated from everything else. With about 30 different elements in the fission product distribution, not every one of those will be worth extracting. If you apply this to 10, you would probably find you had some very, very valuable materials coming out of that. Right now, all mixed together, worthless, worthless and dangerous. Partitioned, they could be very, very valuable. [sound effects] [background music] The rods generate energy by transforming some of the uranium into different elements. Over time, fission products start to build up. We need chemistry to separate them out. Since the fission products are thoroughly mixed with the uranium... Pyro processing... A nifty technology invented by argon scientists. See, they call it pyro processing, but it's a molten salt process. They're dissolving this thing in a molten salt, and they're doing electrochemistry on it. After chopping the fuel rods into small pieces, you submerge them in a vat of molten salts. When you run an electric current through the vat, the uranium and trans-uranics, separate out and forms crystals on the electrodes. Molten salt can not only be a fuel, it's a way to reprocess or process nuclear fuels and clean them up for reuse. I looked carefully at so-called pyro processing. There are obvious improvements that can be made with respect to the actual pyro processing techniques. We can do this in a much more streamlined fashion. The dirty metals and the dirty metal oxides that have been spent, if they were fluorinated with some really safe fluorinating agent, it could turned into to liquid fluorides and separated far easier. On the other side of the coin is you're going to use thorium as your base load fuel, so to speak, you have to have a kick start with uranium-235 that's still left over, the plutonium-239. But hey, that is not a great way to get rid of these materials, because we've got all this waste. Here in the United States, we've got 70,000 metric tons of this waste. That's terrible. For me, as an entrepreneur and a scientist, I know that I can save lives by using those isotopes. I know that I can make money and better society with those isotopes. Take some of the wastes that's really been created in our uranium-fuel reactors and potentially destroy those long-lived trans-uranics through fission. Waiting them out to decay is a very slow process. Plutonium-239, for instance, has a 24,000-year half life. That's a long time you're going to be waiting for that to decay. On the other hand, you can fission it, and then those fission products will decay very rapidly, and you also get an energy release and a neutron release, which is -- both of which are good. You hate nuclear waste, so do I. These reactors can eat nuclear waste. The United States has no plans to recycle the valuable platting or all that uranium that's in those used nuclear pellets. 70,000 tons of American nuclear waste. You're going to need, let's say, a ton to run an experimental molten salt reactor, a ton of fissile fuel. If the reactor works, we've opened a door to remediating all nuclear waste. If the reactor doesn't work, we've added one ton to a 70,000-ton pile to see, if we can re-mediate all of it on the whole planet forever. We hate nuclear waste too, but what we really hate is we hate wasting it.

Germanium-72, 73, 74, 76

72Ge 73Ge 74Ge 76Ge

If Germanium-75 is produced, it quickly decays to Arsenic. Germanium-76 is essentially stable, only decaying via extremely slow double beta decay to 76
Se
.

Arsenic-75

75As

While arsenic presents no radiological hazard, it is extremely chemically toxic. If it is desired to get rid of arsenic (no matter its origin), thermal neutron irradiation of the only stable isotope 75
As
will yield short lived 76
As
which quickly decays to stable 76
Se
. If Arsenic is irradiated with sufficient fast neutrons to cause notable "knockout" (n,2n) or even (n,3n) reactions, Isotopes of germanium will be produced instead.

Selenium-77, 78, 79, 80, 82

77Se 78Se
79Se
80Se 82Se

Se-79, half-life of 327k years, is one of the long-lived fission products. Given the stability of its next lighter and heavier isotopes and the high cross section those isotopes exhibit for various neutron reactions, it is likely that the relatively low yield is due to Se-79 being destroyed in the reactor to an appreciable extent.

Bromine-81

81Br

The other stable isotope 79
Br
is "shadowed" by the long half life of its more neutron rich isobar 79
Se
.

Krypton-83, 84, 85, 86

83Kr 84Kr
85Kr
86Kr

Krypton-85, with a half-life 10.76 years, is formed by the fission process with a fission yield of about 0.3%. Only 20% of the fission products of mass 85 become 85Kr itself; the rest passes through a short-lived nuclear isomer and then to stable 85Rb. If irradiated reactor fuel is reprocessed, this radioactive krypton may be released into the air. This krypton release can be detected and used as a means of detecting clandestine nuclear reprocessing. Strictly speaking, the stage which is detected is the dissolution of used nuclear fuel in nitric acid, as it is at this stage that the krypton and other fission gases like the more abundant xenon are released. Despite the industrial applications of Krypton-85 and the relatively high prices of both Krypton and Xenon, they are not currently extracted from spent fuel to any appreciable extent even though Krypton and Xenon both become solid at the temperature of liquid nitrogen and could thus be captured in a cold trap if the flue gas of a voloxidation process were cooled by liquid nitrogen.

Increase of fission gases above a certain limit can lead to fuel pin swelling and even puncture, so that fission gas measurement after discharging the fuel from the reactor is most important to make burn-up calculations, to study the nature of fuel inside the reactor, behaviour with pin materials, for effective utilization of fuel and also reactor safety. In addition to that, they are a nuisance in a nuclear reactor due to being neutron poisons, albeit not to the same extent as isotopes of xenon, another noble gas produced by fission.

Rubidium-85, 87

85Rb 87Rb

Rubidium-87 has such a long half life as to be essentially stable (longer than the age of the Earth). Rubidium-86 quickly decays to stable Strontium-86 if produced either directly, via (n,2n) reactions in Rubidium-87 or via neutron capture in Rubidium-85.

Strontium-88, 89, 90

Medium-lived
fission products[further explanation needed]
t½
(year)
Yield
(%)
Q
(keV)
βγ
155Eu 4.76 0.0803 252 βγ
85Kr 10.76 0.2180 687 βγ
113mCd 14.1 0.0008 316 β
90Sr 28.9 4.505   2826 β
137Cs 30.23 6.337   1176 βγ
121mSn 43.9 0.00005 390 βγ
151Sm 88.8 0.5314 77 β
88Sr 89Sr 90Sr

The strontium radioisotopes are very important, as strontium is a calcium mimic which is incorporated in bone growth and therefore has a great ability to harm humans. On the other hand, this also allows 89Sr to be used in the open source radiotherapy of bone tumors. This tends to be used in palliative care to reduce the pain due to secondary tumors in the bones.

Strontium-90 is a strong beta emitter with a half-life of 28.8 years. Its fission product yield decreases as the mass of the fissile nuclide increases - fission of 233
U
produces more 90
Sr
than fission of 239
Pu
with fission of 235
U
in the middle. A map of 90Sr contamination around Chernobyl has been published by the IAEA.[1] Due to its very small neutron absorption cross section, Strontium-90 is poorly suited for thermal neutron induced nuclear transmutation as a way of disposing of it.

Strontium-90 has been used in radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs) in the past because of its relatively high power density (0.95 Wthermal/g for the metal, 0.46 Wthermal/g for the commonly used inert perovskite form Strontium titanate) and because it is easily extracted from spent fuel (both native Strontium metal and Strontium oxide react with water by forming soluble Strontium hydroxide). However, the increased availability of renewable energy for off-grid applications formerly served by RTGs as well as concern about orphan sources has led to a nigh-total abandonment of 90
Sr
in RTGs. The few (largely space based) applications for RTGs that still exist are largely supplied by 238
Pu
despite its higher cost, as it has a higher power density, longer half life and is easier shielded since it is an alpha emitter while Strontium-90 is a beta emitter.

Yttrium-88 to 91

88Y
89Y
90Y
91Y

The only stable yttrium isotope, 89Y, will be found with yield somewhat less than 1% in a fission product mixture which has been allowed to age for months or years, as the next-longest lived yttrium isotopes have half-lives of only 107 days (88Y) or 59 days (91Y). However, a small amount of yttrium-90 will be found in secular equilibrium with its parent strontium-90 unless the two elements are separated from each other.

90Sr decays into 90Y which is a beta emitter with a half-life of 2.67 days. 90Y is sometimes used for medical purposes and can be obtained either by the neutron activation of stable 89Y or by using a device similar to a technetium cow.

As the half lives of the unstable Yttrium isotopes are low (88
Y
being the longest at 106 days), yttrium extracted from strontium-free moderately aged spent fuel has negligible radioactivity. However, the strong gamma emitter 90
Y
will be present as long as its parent nuclide 90
Sr
is. Should a nonradioactive sample of Yttrium be desired, care must be taken to remove all traces of strontium and sufficient time to let the short lived Y-90 (64 hours half life) decay must be allowed before the product can be used.

Zirconium-90 to 96

90Zr
91Zr 92Zr 93Zr 94Zr 95Zr 96Zr

A significant amount of zirconium is formed by the fission process; some of this consists of short-lived radionuclides (95Zr and 97Zr which decay to molybdenum), while almost 10% of the fission products mixture after years of decay consists of five stable or nearly stable isotopes of zirconium plus 93Zr with a halflife of 1.53 million years which is one of the 7 major long-lived fission products. Zirconium is commonly used in cladding of fuel rods due to its low neutron cross section. However, a small share of this zirconium does capture neutrons and contributes to the overall inventory of radioactive zirconium isotopes. Zircalloy cladding is not commonly reused and neither is fission product zirconium, which could be used in cladding as its relatively weak radioactivity would be of no major concern inside a nuclear reactor. Despite its high yield and long live, Zr-93 is generally not deemed to be of major concern as it is not chemically mobile and emits little radiation.

In PUREX plants the zirconium (regardless of source or isotope) sometimes forms a third phase which can be a disturbance in the plant. The third phase is the term in solvent extraction given to a third layer (such as foam and/or emulsion) which forms from the two layers in the solvent extraction process. The zirconium forms the third phase by forming small particles which stabilise the emulsion which is the third phase.

Zirconium-90 mostly forms by successive beta decays out of Strontium-90. A nonradioactive Zirconium sample can be extracted from spent fuel by extracting Strontium-90 and allowing enough of it to decay (e.g. In an RTG). The Zirconium can then be separated from the remaining strontium leaving a very isotopically pure Zr-90 sample.

Niobium-95

95Nb

Niobium-95, with a half-life of 35 days, is initially present as a fission product. The only stable isotope of niobium has mass number 93, and fission products of mass 93 first decay to long-lived zirconium-93 (half-life 1.53 Ma). Niobium-95 will decay to molybdenum-95 which is stable.

Molybdenum-95, 97, 98, 99, 100

95Mo 97Mo 98Mo 99Mo 100Mo

The fission product mixture contains significant amounts of molybdenum. Molybdenum-99 is of enormous interest to nuclear medicine as the parent nuclide to 99m
Tc
but its short half life means it'll usually be decayed long before the spent fuel is reprocessed. 99
Mo
can be produced both by fission followed by immediate reprocessing (usually only done in small scale research reactors) or in particle accelerators. As Molybdenum-100 only decays extremely slowly via double beta decay (half life longer than the age of the universe) the molybdenum content of spent fuel will be essentially stable after a few days have passed to allow the Molybdenum-99 to decay.

Technetium-99

Nuclide t12 Yield Q[a 1] βγ
(Ma) (%)[a 2] (keV)
99Tc 0.211 6.1385 294 β
126Sn 0.230 0.1084 4050[a 3] βγ
79Se 0.327 0.0447 151 β
135Cs 1.33 6.9110[a 4] 269 β
93Zr 1.53 5.4575 91 βγ
107Pd 6.5   1.2499 33 β
129I 15.7   0.8410 194 βγ
  1. ^ Decay energy is split among β, neutrino, and γ if any.
  2. ^ Per 65 thermal neutron fissions of 235U and 35 of 239Pu.
  3. ^ Has decay energy 380 keV, but its decay product 126Sb has decay energy 3.67 MeV.
  4. ^ Lower in thermal reactors because 135Xe, its predecessor, readily absorbs neutrons.
99Tc

99Tc, half-life 211k years, is produced at a yield of about 6% per fission; see also the main fission products page. It is also produced (via the short lived nuclear isomer Technetium-99m) as a decay product of Molybdenum-99. Technetium is particularly mobile in the environment as it forms negatively charged pertechnetate-ions and it presents the biggest radiological hazard among the long lived fission products. Despite being a metal, Technetium usually doesn't form positively charged ions, but Technetium halides like Technetium hexafluoride exist. TcF6 is a nuisance in uranium enrichment as its boiling point (328.4 K (55.3 °C; 131.4 °F)) is very close to that of uranium hexafluoride (329.6 K (56.5 °C; 133.6 °F)). The issue is known to enrichment facilities because spontaneous fission also yields small amounts of Technetium (which will be in secular equilibrium with its parent nuclides in natural uranium) but if fluoride volatility is employed for reprocessing, a significant share of the "uranium" fraction of fractional distillation will be contaminated with Technetium requiring a further separation step.

Technetium-99 is suitable for nuclear transmutation by slow neutrons as it has a sufficient thermal neutron cross section and as it has no known stable isotopes. Under neutron irradiation, Tc-99 forms Tc-100 which quickly decays to stable 100
Ru
a valuable platinum group metal.

Ruthenium-101 to 106

101Ru 102Ru 103Ru 104Ru 105Ru 106Ru

Plenty of radioactive ruthenium-103, ruthenium-106, and stable ruthenium are formed by the fission process. The ruthenium in PUREX raffinate can become oxidized to form volatile ruthenium tetroxide which forms a purple vapour above the surface of the aqueous liquor. The ruthenium tetroxide is very similar to osmium tetroxide; the ruthenium compound is a stronger oxidant which enables it to form deposits by reacting with other substances. In this way the ruthenium in a reprocessing plant is very mobile, difficult to stabilize, and can be found in odd places. It has been called extremely troublesome[2] and has a notorious reputation as an especially difficult product to handle during reprocessing.[3] Voloxidation combined with cold trap collection of the flue gases could recover the volatile ruthenium tetroxide before it can become a nuisance in further processing. After the radioactive isotopes have had time to decay, recovered ruthenium could be sold at its relatively high market value.

In addition, the ruthenium in PUREX raffinate forms a large number of nitrosyl complexes which makes the chemistry of the ruthenium very complex. The ligand exchange rate at ruthenium and rhodium tends to be long, hence it can take a long time for a ruthenium or rhodium compound to react.[quantify]

At Chernobyl, during the fire, the ruthenium became volatile and behaved differently from many of the other metallic fission products. Some of the particles which were emitted by the fire were very rich in ruthenium.

As the longest-lived radioactive isotope ruthenium-106 has a half-life of only 373.59 days, it has been suggested that the ruthenium and palladium in PUREX raffinate should be used as a source of the metals after allowing the radioactive isotopes to decay.[4][5] After ten half life cycles have passed over 99.96% of any radioisotope is stable. For Ru-106 this is 3,735.9 days or about 10 years.

Rhodium-103, 105

103Rh
105Rh

While less rhodium than ruthenium and palladium is formed (around 3.6% yield), the mixture of fission products still contains a significant amount of this metal. Due to the high prices of ruthenium, rhodium, and palladium, some work has been done on the separation of these metals to enable them to be used at a later date. Because of the possibility of the metals being contaminated by radioactive isotopes, they are not suitable for making consumer products such as jewellery. However, this source of the metals could be used for catalysts in industrial plants such as petrochemical plants.[6]

A dire example of people being exposed to radiation from contaminated jewellery occurred in the United States. It is thought that gold seeds used to contain radon were recycled into jewellery. The gold indeed did contain radioactive decay products of 222Rn.[7][8]

Some other rhodium isotopes exist as "transitory states" of ruthenium decaying before further decaying towards stable isotopes of Palladium. If the low level radioactivity of Palladium (see below) is deemed excessive - for example for use as an investment or jewelry - either of its predecessors can be extracted from relatively "young" spent fuel and allowed to decay before extracting the stable end-product of the decay series.

Palladium-105 to 110

105Pd 106Pd
107Pd
108Pd 109Pd 110Pd

Much palladium forms during the fission process. In nuclear reprocessing, not all of the fission palladium dissolves; also some palladium that dissolves at first comes out of solution later. Palladium-rich dissolver fines (particles) are often removed as they interfere with the solvent extraction process by stabilising the third phase.

The fission palladium can separate during the process in which the PUREX raffinate is combined with glass and heated to form the final high level waste form. The palladium forms an alloy with the fission tellurium. This alloy can separate from the glass.

107Pd is the only long-living radioactive isotope among the fission products and its beta decay has a long half life and low energy, this allows industrial use of extracted palladium without isotope separation.[9]

Palladium-109 will most likely have decayed to stable silver-109 by the time reprocessing happens. Before reaching silver-109, a nuclear isomer will be reached; 109m
Ag
. However, unlike for 99m
Tc
there is no current use for 109m
Ag
.

Silver-109

109Ag
111Ag

While the radioactive silver isotopes that are produced quickly decay away leaving only stable silver, extracting it for use is not economical, unless as byproduct of platinum group metal extraction.

Cadmium-111 to 116

111Cd
112Cd
113Cd
114Cd
115Cd
116Cd

Cadmium is a strong neutron poison and in fact control rods are often made out of cadmium, making the accumulation of cadmium in fuel of particular concern for the maintenance of stable neutron economy. Cadmium is also a chemically poisonous heavy metal, but given the number of neutron absorptions required for transmutation, it is not a high priority target for deliberate transmutation.

Indium-115

115In

While Indium-115 is very slightly radioactive, its half life is longer than the age of the universe and indeed a typical sample of Indium on earth will contain more of this "unstable" isotope than of "stable" Indium-113.

Tin-117 to 126

117Sn
118Sn
119Sn
120Sn
121Sn
122Sn
123Sn
124Sn
125Sn
126Sn

In a normal thermal reactor, tin-121m has a very low fission product yield; thus, this isotope is not a significant contributor to nuclear waste. Fast fission or fission of some heavier actinides will produce 121mSn at higher yields. For example, its yield from U-235 is 0.0007% per thermal fission and 0.002% per fast fission.[10]

Antimony-121, 123, 124, 125

123Sb 125Sb

Antimony-125 decays with a half life of over two years to 125m
Te
which itself decays with a half life of almost two months via isomeric transition to the ground state. While its relatively short half life and the significant gamma emissions (144.77 keV) of its daughter nuclide make usage in an RTG less attractive, Sb-125 could deliver a relatively high power density of 3.4 Wthermal/g.

Fluoride volatility can recover antimony as the mildly volatile (solid at room temperature) Antimony trifluoride or the more volatile (boiling point 422.6 K (149.5 °C; 301.0 °F)) Antimony pentafluoride.

Tellurium-125 to 132

125Te
126Te
127Te
128Te
129Te
130Te
131Te
132Te

Tellurium-128 and -130 are essentially stable. They only decay by double beta decay, with half lives >1020 years. They constitute the major fraction of natural occurring tellurium at 32 and 34% respectively. Tellurium-132 and its daughter 132I are important in the first few days after a criticality. It was responsible for a large fraction of the dose inflicted on workers at Chernobyl in the first week.

The isobar forming 132Te/132I is: Tin-132 (half-life 40 s) decaying to antimony-132 (half-life 2.8 minutes) decaying to tellurium-132 (half-life 3.2 days) decaying to iodine-132 (half-life 2.3 hours) which decays to stable xenon-132.

The creation of tellurium-126 is delayed by the long half-life (230 k years) of tin-126.

Iodine-127, 129, 131

127I 129I 131I

131I, with a half-life of 8 days, is a hazard from nuclear fallout because iodine concentrates in the thyroid gland. See also Radiation effects from Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster#Iodine-131 and Downwinders#Nevada.

In common with 89Sr, 131I is used for the treatment of cancer. A small dose of 131I can be used in a thyroid function test while a large dose can be used to destroy the thyroid cancer. This treatment will also normally seek out and destroy any secondary tumor which arose from a thyroid cancer. Much of the energy from the beta emission from the 131I will be absorbed in the thyroid, while the gamma rays are likely to be able to escape from the thyroid to irradiate other parts of the body.

Large amounts of 131I was released during an experiment named the Green Run[11] in which fuel which had only been allowed to cool for a short time after irradiation was reprocessed in a plant which had no iodine scrubber in operation.

129I, with a half-life almost a billion times as long, is a long-lived fission product. It is among the most troublesome because it accumulates in a relatively small organ (the thyroid) where even its comparatively low radiation dose can cause great damage as it has a long biological half life. For this reason, Iodine is often considered for transmutation despite the presence of stable 127
I
in spent fuel. In the thermal neutron spectrum, more Iodine-129 is destroyed than newly created since Iodine-128 is short lived and the isotope ratio is in favor of 129
I
. Depending on the design of the transmutation apparatus, care must be taken as Xenon, the product of Iodine's beta decay, is both a strong neutron poison and a gas that is nigh impossible to chemically "fix" in solid compounds, so it will either escape to the outside air or put pressure on the vessel containing the transmutation target.

127I is stable, the only one of the isotopes of iodine that is nonradioactive. It makes up only about 16 of the iodine in spent fuel, with I-129 about 56.

Xenon-131 to 136

131Xe
132Xe
133Xe
134Xe 135Xe 136Xe

In reactor fuel, the fission product xenon tends to migrate to form bubbles in the fuel. As caesium 133, 135, and 137 are formed by the beta particle decay of the corresponding xenon isotopes, this causes the caesium to become physically separated from the bulk of the uranium oxide fuel.

Because 135Xe is a potent nuclear poison with the largest cross section for thermal neutron absorption, the buildup of 135Xe in the fuel inside a power reactor can lower the reactivity greatly. If a power reactor is shut down or left running at a low power level, then large amounts of 135Xe can build up through decay of 135I. When the reactor is restarted or the low power level is increased significantly, 135Xe will be quickly consumed through neutron capture reactions and the reactivity of the core will increase. Under some circumstances, control systems may not be able to respond quickly enough to manage an abrupt reactivity increase as the built-up 135Xe burns off. It is thought that xenon poisoning was one of the factors which led to the power surge which damaged the Chernobyl reactor core.

Caesium-133, 134, 135, 137

133Cs
134Cs
135Cs
137Cs

Caesium-134 is found in spent nuclear fuel but is not produced by nuclear weapon explosions, as it is only formed by neutron capture on stable Cs-133, which is only produced by beta decay of Xe-133 with a half-life of 3 days. Cs-134 has a half-life of 2 years and may be a major source of gamma radiation in the first 20 years after discharge.

Caesium-135 is a long-lived fission product with much weaker radioactivity. Neutron capture inside the reactor transmutes much of the xenon-135 that would otherwise decay to Cs-135.

Caesium-137, with a half-life of 30 years, is the main medium-lived fission product, along with Sr-90. Cs-137 is the primary source of penetrating gamma radiation from spent fuel from 10 years to about 300 years after discharge. It is the most significant radioisotope left in the area around Chernobyl.[12]

Barium-138, 139, 140

138Ba 139Ba 140Ba

Barium is formed in large amounts by the fission process. A short-lived barium isotope was confused with radium by some early workers. They were bombarding uranium with neutrons in an attempt to form a new element. But instead they caused fission which generated a large amount of radioactivity in the target. Because the chemistry of barium and radium the two elements could be coseparated by for instance a precipitation with sulfate anions. Because of this similarity of their chemistry the early workers thought that the very radioactive fraction which was separated into the "radium" fraction contained a new isotope of radium. Some of this early work was done by Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassmann.

Lanthanides (lanthanum-139, cerium-140 to 144, neodymium-142 to 146, 148, 150, promethium-147, and samarium-149, 151, 152, 154)

A diagram showing the isotope signatures of natural neodymium (blue) and fission product neodymium from uranium-235 which had been subjected to thermal neutrons (red)
139La 140La
140Ce 141Ce 142Ce 143Ce 144Ce
141Pr 143Pr
143Nd 144Nd 145Nd 146Nd 147Nd 148Nd 149Nd 150Nd
147Pm 149Pm 151Pm
147Sm 149Sm 151Sm 152Sm 153Sm 154Sm
153Eu
154Eu
155Eu 156Eu
155Gd 156Gd 157Gd 158Gd 159Gd 160Gd
159Tb 161Tb
161Dy

A great deal of the lighter lanthanides (lanthanum, cerium, neodymium, and samarium) are formed as fission products. In Africa, at Oklo where the natural nuclear fission reactor operated over a billion years ago, the isotopic mixture of neodymium is not the same as 'normal' neodymium, it has an isotope pattern very similar to the neodymium formed by fission.

In the aftermath of criticality accidents, the level of 140La is often used to determine the fission yield (in terms of the number of nuclei which underwent fission).

Samarium-149 is the second most important neutron poison in nuclear reactor physics. Samarium-151, produced at lower yields, is the third most abundant medium-lived fission product but emits only weak beta radiation. Both have high neutron absorption cross sections, so that much of them produced in a reactor are later destroyed there by neutron absorption.

Lanthanides are a problem in nuclear reprocessing because they are chemically very similar to actinides and most reprocessing aims at separating some or all of the actinides from the fission products or at least the neutron poisons among them.

External links

References

  1. ^ Distribution of Surface Ground Contamination by Strontium-90 Released in the Chernobyl Accident and Deposited in the Byelorussian SSR, the Russian SSR, and the Ukrainian SSR (December 1989), IAEA, 1991
  2. ^ Singh, Khushboo; Sonar, N.L.; Valsala, T.P.; Kulkarni, Y.; Vincent, Tessy; Kumar, Amar (2014). "Removal of ruthenium from high-level radioactive liquid waste generated during reprocessing of spent fuel". Desalination and Water Treatment. 52 (1–3): 514–525. doi:10.1080/19443994.2013.848655.
  3. ^ "Ruthenium decontamination method".
  4. ^ Electrochemical Separation of Rare Metal Fission Products From High-Level Liquid Waste of Spent Nuclear Fuel, Masaki Ozawa and Tetsuo Ikegami, apan Nuclear Cycle Development Institute, Ooarai Engineering Center, Japan, 2001
  5. ^ "Recovery of Noble Metals (Palladium, Rhodium, Ruthenium, Silver) from Radioactive and Other Wastes". Archived from the original on December 20, 2005. Retrieved March 12, 2006.
  6. ^ Potential Applications of Fission Platinoids in Industry, Zdenek Kolarik, Platinum Metals Review, 2005, 49, April (2).
  7. ^ https://www.orau.org/health-physics-museum/collection/health-physics-posters/other/poster-issued-by-the-new-york-department-of-health.html Poster Issued by the New York Department of Health (ca. 1981-1983)
  8. ^ https://web.archive.org/web/20111110135736/http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Magazines/Bulletin/Bull413/article9.pdf A CENTURY'S CHALLENGES: HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF RADIATION SOURCES IN THE USA, JOEL O. LUBENAU
  9. ^ Fang, Shengqiang; Fu, Lian; Pang, Changang (February 1996). "Recovery of palladium from basic reprocessing waste of spent nuclear fuel". Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry. 203 (1): 143–149. doi:10.1007/BF02060389. S2CID 95393714.
  10. ^ M. B. Chadwick et al, "Evaluated Nuclear Data File (ENDF) : ENDF/B-VII.1: Nuclear Data for Science and Technology: Cross Sections, Covariances, Fission Product Yields, and Decay Data", Nucl. Data Sheets 112(2011)2887. (accessed at https://www-nds.iaea.org/exfor/endf.htm)
  11. ^ "1944-1951: 727,900 curies of radioactive iodine released, John Stang, Tri-Cty Herald, 1999". Archived from the original on May 8, 2006. Retrieved March 12, 2006.
  12. ^ Distribution of Surface Ground Contamination by Caesium-137 Released in the Chernobyl Accident and Deposited in the Byelorussian SSR, the Russian SSR, and the Ukrainian SSR (December 1989), IAEA, 1991
This page was last edited on 10 March 2024, at 16:11
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.