File:Riddleinhogwarts.jpg

Summary

Copyright to Warner Bros.

Licensing

This image is a screenshot from a copyrighted film, and the copyright for it is most likely owned by the studio which produced the film, and possibly also by any actors appearing in the screenshot. It is believed that the use of a limited number of low-resolution screenshots for critical commentary and discussion of the film and its contents on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, qualifies as fair use under the Copyright law of the United States. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content for more information.

To the uploader: Please add a detailed non-free use rationale for each article the image is used in, which must also declare compliance with the other parts of the non-free content criteria, as well as the source of the work and copyright information. For example non-free use rationales, see Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. This is only for images which are screenshots from films. To patrollers and administrators: If this image has an appropriate rationale please append |image has rationale=yes as a parameter to the license template. Fair use true

Fair use rationale for Lord Voldemort

This image, Riddleinhogwarts.JPG, is being linked here; though the picture is subject to copyright I feel it is covered by the U.S. fair use laws because:

1. No free alternative can exist given the likeness of Voldemort is a trademark and thus protected;
2. It is a low resolution copy of a movie poster;
3. The image was released to the media to promote the movie in querstion, Harry Potter 2;
4. It does not limit the copyright owner's rights to sell the movie or the book in any way;
5. Copies could not be used to make illegal copies of it, because it is too low-resolution;
6. As JK Rowling refrains from depicting Voldemort / Tom Riddle in her books, no original pix of both are possible, but a picture of his movie version would greatly enhance the article
7. no free alternatives seem to exist