To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Feedback vertex set

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In the mathematical discipline of graph theory, a feedback vertex set (FVS) of a graph is a set of vertices whose removal leaves a graph without cycles ("removal" means deleting the vertex and all edges adjacent to it). Equivalently, each FVS contains at least one vertex of any cycle in the graph. The feedback vertex set number of a graph is the size of a smallest feedback vertex set. The minimum feedback vertex set problem is an NP-complete problem; it was among the first problems shown to be NP-complete. It has wide applications in operating systems, database systems, and VLSI chip design.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    1 395
    34 361
    849
    4 036
    646
  • Matthias Mnich: Improved Approximation Algorithm for Minimum Feedback Vertex Sets in Tournaments
  • Independent Vertex Sets | Graph Theory, Maximal and Maximum Independent Sets
  • mod03lec14 - Iterative Compression III: Feedback Vertex Set and 3-Hitting Set
  • What are Vertex Separating Sets? | Graph Theory
  • mod03lec13 - Iterative Compression II: Vertex Cover and Tournament Feedback Vertex Set

Transcription

Definition

The FVS decision problem is as follows:

INSTANCE: An (undirected or directed) graph and a positive integer .
QUESTION: Is there a subset with such that, when all vertices of and their adjacent edges are deleted from , the remainder is cycle-free?

The graph that remains after removing from is an induced forest (resp. an induced directed acyclic graph in the case of directed graphs). Thus, finding a minimum FVS in a graph is equivalent to finding a maximum induced forest (resp. maximum induced directed acyclic graph in the case of directed graphs).

NP-hardness

Karp (1972) showed that the minimum FVS problem for directed graphs is NP-complete. The problem remains NP-complete on directed graphs with maximum in-degree and out-degree two, and on directed planar graphs with maximum in-degree and out-degree three.[1]

Karp's reduction also implies the NP-completeness of the FVS problem on undirected graphs, where the problem stays NP-hard on graphs of maximum degree four. The FVS problem can be solved in polynomial time on graphs of maximum degree at most three.[2]

Exact algorithms

The corresponding NP optimization problem of finding the size of a minimum feedback vertex set can be solved in time O(1.7347n), where n is the number of vertices in the graph.[3] This algorithm actually computes a maximum induced forest, and when such a forest is obtained, its complement is a minimum feedback vertex set. The number of minimal feedback vertex sets in a graph is bounded by O(1.8638n).[4] The directed feedback vertex set problem can still be solved in time O*(1.9977n), where n is the number of vertices in the given directed graph.[5] The parameterized versions of the directed and undirected problems are both fixed-parameter tractable.[6]

In undirected graphs of maximum degree three, the feedback vertex set problem can be solved in polynomial time, by transforming it into an instance of the matroid parity problem for linear matroids.[7]

Approximation

The undirected problem is APX-complete. This follows from the following facts.

The best known approximation algorithm on undirected graphs is by a factor of two.[10]

By contrast, the directed version of the problem appears to be much harder to approximate. Under the unique games conjecture, an unproven but commonly used computational hardness assumption, it is NP-hard to approximate the problem to within any constant factor in polynomial time. The same hardness result was originally proven for the closely related feedback arc set problem,[11] but since the feedback arc set problem and feedback vertex set problem in directed graphs are reducible to one another while preserving solution sizes,[12] it also holds for the latter.

Bounds

According to the Erdős–Pósa theorem, the size of a minimum feedback vertex set is within a logarithmic factor of the maximum number of vertex-disjoint cycles in the given graph.[13]

Related concepts

  • Instead of vertices, one can consider a feedback edge set - a set of edges in an undirected graph, whose removal makes the graph acyclic. The size of a smallest feedback edge set in a graph is called the circuit rank of the graph. In contrast to the FVS number, the circuit rank can be easily computed: it is , where C is the set of connected components of the graph. The problem of finding a smallest feedback edge set is equivalent to finding a spanning forest, which can be done in polynomial time.
  • The analogous concept in a directed graph is the feedback arc set (FAS) - a set of directed arcs whose removal makes the graph acyclic. Finding a smallest FAS is an NP-hard problem.[9]

Applications

  • In operating systems, feedback vertex sets play a prominent role in the study of deadlock recovery. In the wait-for graph of an operating system, each directed cycle corresponds to a deadlock situation. In order to resolve all deadlocks, some blocked processes have to be aborted. A minimum feedback vertex set in this graph corresponds to a minimum number of processes that one needs to abort.[14]
  • The feedback vertex set problem has applications in VLSI chip design.[15]
  • Another application is in complexity theory. Some computational problems on graphs are NP-hard in general, but can be solved in polynomial time for graphs with bounded FVS number. Some examples are graph isomorphism[16] and the path reconfiguration problem.[17]

Notes

  1. ^ unpublished results due to Garey and Johnson, cf. Garey & Johnson (1979): GT7
  2. ^ Ueno, Kajitani & Gotoh (1988); Li & Liu (1999)
  3. ^ Fomin & Villanger (2010)
  4. ^ Fomin et al. (2008).
  5. ^ Razgon (2007).
  6. ^ Chen et al. (2008).
  7. ^ Ueno, Kajitani & Gotoh (1988).
  8. ^ Dinur & Safra 2005
  9. ^ a b Karp (1972)
  10. ^ Becker & Geiger (1996). See also Bafna, Berman & Fujito (1999) for an alternative approximation algorithm with the same approximation ratio.
  11. ^ Guruswami, Venkatesan; Manokaran, Rajsekar; Raghavendra, Prasad (2008). "Beating the Random Ordering is Hard: Inapproximability of Maximum Acyclic Subgraph". 2008 49th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. pp. 573–582. doi:10.1109/FOCS.2008.51. ISBN 978-0-7695-3436-7. S2CID 8762205.
  12. ^ Even, G.; (Seffi) Naor, J.; Schieber, B.; Sudan, M. (1998). "Approximating Minimum Feedback Sets and Multicuts in Directed Graphs". Algorithmica. 20 (2): 151–174. doi:10.1007/PL00009191. ISSN 0178-4617. S2CID 2437790.
  13. ^ Erdős & Pósa (1965).
  14. ^ Silberschatz, Galvin & Gagne (2008).
  15. ^ Festa, Pardalos & Resende (2000).
  16. ^ Kratsch, Stefan; Schweitzer, Pascal (2010). "Isomorphism for Graphs of Bounded Feedback Vertex Set Number". In Kaplan, Haim (ed.). Algorithm Theory - SWAT 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 6139. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 81–92. Bibcode:2010LNCS.6139...81K. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13731-0_9. ISBN 978-3-642-13731-0.
  17. ^ Algorithms and Data Structures (PDF). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 11646. 2019. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-24766-9. ISBN 978-3-030-24765-2. S2CID 198996919.

References

Research articles

Textbooks and survey articles

This page was last edited on 11 December 2023, at 01:00
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.