To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Faithless electors in the 2016 United States presidential election

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The namesake of the Hamilton Electors, Alexander Hamilton
The namesake of the Hamilton Electors, Alexander Hamilton

In the 2016 United States presidential election, ten members of the U.S. Electoral College voted or attempted to vote for a candidate different from whom they were pledged.[1] This movement, dubbed the "Hamilton Electors", was co-founded by Michael Baca of Colorado and Bret Chiafalo of Washington. The movement attempted to find 37 Republican electors willing to vote for a more moderate Republican in an effort to put country above party. Three of these votes were invalidated by their respective states, and the elector either subsequently voted for the pledged candidate or was replaced by someone who did.[2][3][4] Although there had been a combined total of 167 instances of individual electors voting faithlessly in over two centuries of previous US presidential elections,[5] 2016 was the first election in over a hundred years in which multiple electors worked to alter the result of the election in order to "vote their conscience for the good of America" in accordance with Alexander Hamilton's Federalist Paper No. 68.[6] Electors were subjected to public pressure, including death threats.[7]

As a result of the seven successfully cast faithless votes, the Democratic Party nominee, Hillary Clinton, lost five of her pledged electors while the Republican Party nominee and then president-elect, Donald Trump, lost two. Three of the faithless electors voted for Colin Powell while John Kasich, Ron Paul, Bernie Sanders, and Faith Spotted Eagle each received one vote.[8] The defections fell well short of the number needed to change the result of the election; only 2 of the 7 defected from the winner, when 35 were needed to defect in order to force a contingent election in Congress (a tally of less than 270).

The seven validated faithless votes for president were the most to defect from presidential candidates who were still alive in electoral college history, surpassing the six electors who defected from James Madison in the 1808 election.[9] This number of defections has been exceeded only once. In 1872, a record 63 of 66 electors originally pledged to losing candidate Horace Greeley cast their votes for someone else (Greeley had died between election day and the meeting of the Electoral College). The six faithless vice-presidential votes in 2016 are short of the record for that office, without considering whether the vice-presidential candidates were still living, as multiple previous elections have had more than six faithless vice-presidential votes; in 1836, faithless electors moved the vice-presidential decision to the U.S. Senate, though this did not affect the outcome.[10]

Background

The electors themselves are named on the presidential ballots of only eight states.[11]
The electors themselves are named on the presidential ballots of only eight states.[11]
  In the indicated states, laws exist which either impose a fine on an elector who fails to vote according to the state-specified rules, force the elector to vote for the candidate they pledged to vote for, or disqualify the elector and provide a replacement.[12]
  In the indicated states, laws exist which either impose a fine on an elector who fails to vote according to the state-specified rules, force the elector to vote for the candidate they pledged to vote for, or disqualify the elector and provide a replacement.[12]

In the unique system of presidential elections of the United States of America, the president is not determined directly by the popular vote of the national electorate, but indirectly through the mechanism of the Electoral College determined by cumulative wins of the popular votes of state electorates. In this system of representative democracy, a presidential candidate is deemed to have won a presidential race if that candidate wins a simple majority of the electoral college vote.

Electors are selected on a state-by-state basis: in 48 states and DC all electors are pledged to the winner of the statewide popular vote; in Nebraska and Maine the winner of each congressional district receives one elector and the statewide winner receives two. The electors, once selected, are free under federal law to vote for a candidate other than the one for whom they were pledged. Twenty-nine states, however, have state laws requiring their electors to vote for their pledged candidate, and courts have issued conflicting opinions regarding the constitutionality of those laws (see below). The supremacy clause established by the Constitution provides that state courts are bound by federal law and the U.S. Constitution in the event that state law were to contradict them.

Only four times in American history (1876, 1888, 2000 and 2016) has a presidential candidate lost the popular vote but achieved the electoral college majority, thereby assuming the presidency; in the last three such cases, no candidate polled an absolute majority of the popular vote.

In the event that no one candidate receives a majority of the Electoral College vote, the selection of the president is made by the House of Representatives under certain constitutional guidelines. In 1824 the candidate with the highest popular vote (Andrew Jackson) also had the most electoral votes but, crucially, did not have a majority in the Electoral College. Despite John Quincy Adams having lost the popular vote and having received fewer electoral votes than Andrew Jackson, the House of Representatives chose Adams to become President.

Number of intended faithless electors

In the 2016 election cycle, the threshold of 270 electoral votes to win the presidency outright could have been thwarted by garnering a minimum of at least 12% of all Republican electors to become faithless, that is, 37 of 306 Republican electors. However, critics have noted, garnering this many electors would be extremely unlikely,[13][14] as electors vote more than 99% of the time as pledged.[15]

As of December 5, 2016, several members of the electoral college, seven from the Democratic Party[16] and one from the Republican Party,[17] publicly stated their intention to vote for a Republican other than the nominee Donald Trump at the Electoral College vote on December 19, 2016. Texas Republican elector Christopher Suprun publicly pledged to not cast his vote for Donald Trump as allowed by Texas state law.[18] Suprun indicated that he had also been in confidential contact with several Republican electors who planned to vote faithlessly, stating that they would be "discussing names specifically and see who meets the [fitness for president] test that we could all get behind."[19]

By December 5, 2016, two Republican electoral college members who publicly stated their intention to not vote for Trump had resigned. Texas Republican elector Art Sisneros willingly resigned in November rather than vote for Trump.[20][21] Georgia Republican elector Baoky Vu had resigned in August in the face of reaction to his public statement that he would not vote for Trump.[22] Both Sisneros and Vu served in states that lacked any laws preventing electors from voting their conscience.[23]

Although it is difficult to ascertain how many more electors, especially Republican electors, considered becoming faithless and voting for a Republican other than Trump, it was reported that at least an additional 20 Republican electors had already accepted the free-of-charge anonymous legal counsel and support provided for Republican faithless electors to assist them in voting against Trump.[24]

On December 13, 2016, Lawrence Lessig claimed that up to 20 Republican electors would be willing to vote against then President-elect Donald Trump,[25][26] or more.[27] However he did not provide evidence to corroborate this number.[28][29]

The Republican National Committee mounted an expansive whip operation to ensure that all those electors selected to vote for the Republican nominee indeed did so.[30]

On December 14, multiple Republican members of the electoral college stated under condition of anonymity that they were being coerced with "threats of political reprisal," adding "that the Donald Trump campaign is putting pressure on Republican electors to vote for him based on . . . future political outcomes based on whether they vote for Donald Trump or not."[31][32]

One Democratic Colorado elector intended to cast a faithless vote for John Kasich but was replaced with an alternate in accordance with state law, and two others planning to also do so stayed faithful following the replacement.

Public outreach to electors

On December 14, the Unite For America campaign released a video[33] published on YouTube and other media addressed directly to Republican electors urging that each of them individually, plus 36 of their colleagues (at least 37 Republican electors in total), vote for a Republican other than Donald Trump for President. The video featured numerous public figures[34] including Debra Messing, Martin Sheen and Bob Odenkirk, urging Republican electors to prevent a Trump Presidency, expressing several times the message: "I'm not asking you to vote for Hillary Clinton". In electing an alternative Republican, the featured speakers ask the elector to become an "American hero" by using the elector's constitutional "authority" to give "service and patriotism to the American people" through a vote of "conscience."[33]

Daniel Brezenoff's anti-Trump Change.org petition became the largest in that organization's history with nearly five million signatures, and on December 14, full-page ads funded by Brezenoff's related GoFundMe campaign ran in the Washington Post, Philadelphia Inquirer, Austin American-Statesman, Salt Lake Tribune and the Tampa Bay Times. Full-page ads ran the next day, December 15, in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution and the Wisconsin State Journal.[35]

On December 11, Democratic U.S. Representative Jim Himes (CT) wrote on Twitter that Trump is "completely unhinged" and "the Electoral College must do what it was designed for."[36] Himes said he made the plea to the Electoral College because Trump refused to say that the Russians hacked Democrats during the election.[37]

Legal counsel and advocacy

Lawrence Lessig
Lawrence Lessig

On December 6, 2016, the Hamilton Electors' website was established to advocate the election of an alternative Republican as the next President of the United States. Lawrence Lessig, a prominent Harvard University law professor (and former candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination himself), announced that he was "teaming with a California-based law firm to offer legal support for any members of the Electoral College seeking to oppose President-elect Donald Trump." Lessig said the counsel and support (namely Laurence Tribe, who has argued before the Supreme Court thirty-six times)[38] would be provided anonymously.[39] Litigation is a component of Lessig's Equal Citizens movement.

Lessig and Boston attorney R.J. Lyman created a nonprofit organization called Electors Trust to provide potential faithless electors with pro bono legal assistance.[40][25][41]

Litigation prior to the vote

In states with laws against faithlessness, depending on the particular state voting faithlessly despite the laws may incur anything from no prescribed punishment, to simple removal and replacement of the intended faithless elector, to fines and the potential imprisonment of the elector. Democratic electors filed lawsuits in Colorado, Washington, and California, but federal judges declined to issue injunctions blocking these laws, and there was insufficient time to appeal to the Supreme Court before the electoral college vote.[42] However, in Baca v. Hickenlooper a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit declared in a footnote that any attempt to remove electors "after voting has begun" would be "unlikely in light of the text of the Twelfth Amendment."[43]

While the constitutionality of faithless electors has never been addressed by the Supreme Court, in Ray v. Blair, 343 U.S. 214 (1952) the Court ruled in favor of state laws requiring electors to pledge to vote for the winning candidate in order to be certified as electors, as well as removing electors who refuse to pledge. Nevertheless, the court also wrote:[44]

However, even if such promises of candidates for the electoral college are legally unenforceable because violative of an assumed constitutional freedom of the elector under the Constitution, Art. II, § 1, to vote as he may choose [emphasis added] in the electoral college, it would not follow that the requirement of a pledge in the primary is unconstitutional.

— U.S. Supreme Court, Ray v. Blair, 1952

In his dissent, Justice Robert H. Jackson wrote: "no one faithful to our history can deny that the plan originally contemplated what is implicit in its text – that electors would be free agents, to exercise an independent and nonpartisan judgment as to the men best qualified for the Nation's highest offices."

Recorded faithless electors

Validated

State Party Pledged to Presidential vote Vice presidential vote Name of Elector References
Hawaii Clinton/Kaine Bernie Sanders (I-VT) Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) David Mulinix [45]
Texas Trump/Pence John Kasich (R-OH) Carly Fiorina (R-VA) Christopher Suprun [46][47][48]
Trump/Pence Ron Paul (R-TX) Mike Pence (R-IN) Bill Greene
Washington Clinton/Kaine Colin Powell (R-VA)[52] Maria Cantwell (D-WA) Levi Guerra [53][44][54][55]
Clinton/Kaine Colin Powell (R-VA) Susan Collins (R-ME) Esther John
Clinton/Kaine Colin Powell (R-VA) Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) Peter Bret Chiafalo
Clinton/Kaine Faith Spotted Eagle (D-SD) Winona LaDuke (G-MN) Robert Satiacum Jr.

Invalidated

State Party Pledged to Presidential vote Vice presidential vote Name of Elector Outcome References
Maine Clinton/Kaine Bernie Sanders (I-VT) Tim Kaine (D-VA) David Bright Changed vote to Clinton [56]
Minnesota Clinton/Kaine Bernie Sanders (I-VT) Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) Muhammad Abdurrahman Replaced by alternate elector [56][57]
Colorado Clinton/Kaine John Kasich (R-OH) barred from voting Michael Baca Replaced by alternate elector [58][59]

Recipients of votes

President
Vice President

Aftermath

The four faithless electors from Washington were each fined $1000 for breaking their pledge.[60] Three of electors appealed the fines, which were upheld by the Washington Supreme Court in May 2019 by an 8–1 vote.[61][62] On October 7, 2019, the electors appealed their case to the U.S. Supreme Court.[63][64]

In Colorado, three of the electors filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. The case, Baca v. Colorado Department of State, was dismissed by Judge Wiley Young Daniel on April 10, 2018. The electors filed an appeal with the 10th Circuit and oral arguments were held on January 24, 2019.[65] On August 20, 2019, a three-judge panel ruled 2–1 in favor of the electors.[59][65][66] On October 16, 2019, Colorado appealed the 10th Circuit's decision to the Supreme Court.[67][68]

See also

References

  1. ^ https://www.fairvote.org/faithless_electors
  2. ^ "Electoral College Faithless Elector Foiled Trying To Vote For Bernie Sanders". Huffington Post. December 19, 2016. Retrieved September 26, 2018.
  3. ^ "'Faithless elector' dismissed, Minnesota's 10 votes go to Clinton". MPR News. February 15, 2016. Retrieved September 26, 2018.
  4. ^ Eason, Brian. "Colorado's electoral votes go to Hillary Clinton after one is replaced". The Denver Post. Retrieved September 26, 2018.
  5. ^ "Faithless Electors". Fair Vote.
  6. ^ O'Donnell, Lilly (November 21, 2016). "Meet the 'Hamilton Electors' Campaigning for an Electoral College Revolt". The Atlantic.
  7. ^ Sherlock, Ruth (December 18, 2016). "Thousands send letters, death threats, to pressure Electoral College to avert outcome of presidential election".
  8. ^ Julia Boccagno. "Which candidates did the seven "faithless" electors support?". CBS News.
  9. ^ "Electoral College sees record-breaking defections". POLITICO. Retrieved December 20, 2016.
  10. ^ Sabato, Larry J.; Ernst, Howard R. (May 14, 2014). Encyclopedia of American Political Parties and Elections. Infobase Publishing. p. 133. ISBN 978-1-4381-0994-7. Retrieved November 15, 2016. in 1836...the Virginia electors abstained rather than vote for Democratic vice presidential nominee Richard Johnson
  11. ^ "2004 Electors for President and Vice President of the United States". TheGreenPapers.com. 2004.
  12. ^ "THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE". National Conference of State Legislatures.
  13. ^ "No, the Electoral College won't make Clinton president instead of Trump". Vox.
  14. ^ "Will There Be Faithless Electors In 2016? It's Unlikely They'll Change The Election's Outcome". Bustle.
  15. ^ "How Does the Electoral College Work?". New York Times.
  16. ^ Pilkington, Ed (November 30, 2016). "Teen becomes seventh 'faithless elector' to protest Trump as president-elect". The Guardian.
  17. ^ Pilkington, Ed (December 5, 2016). "First Republican 'faithless elector' announces intent to vote against Trump". The Guardian.
  18. ^ Suprun, Christopher (December 5, 2016). "Why I Will Not Cast My Electoral Vote for Donald Trump".
  19. ^ Gradison, Robin (December 9, 2016). "'Rogue' GOP Elector Says Others Will Join in Opposing Trump". ABC News.
  20. ^ Zimmerman, Neetzan (November 28, 2016). "Republican elector chooses to resign rather than vote for Trump". The Hill.
  21. ^ Steve Inskeep, host (December 7, 2016). "Texas Elector Resigns, Saying He Can't Vote For Trump In Electoral College". NPR. Retrieved December 29, 2016.
  22. ^ Galloway, Jim (August 3, 2016). "An Electoral College revolt against Donald Trump is quickly quashed in Georgia". Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
  23. ^ "How 'faithless electors' are messing with our electoral maps, explained". The Washington Post.
  24. ^ Cheney, Kyle (December 5, 2016). "Lessig, lawyers to offer support to anti-Trump electors". Politico.
  25. ^ a b "Lessig: 20 Trump electors could flip". POLITICO. Retrieved December 18, 2016.
  26. ^ Rozsa, Matthew. "The Hamilton Electors don't have enough Republicans to stop Trump — but they're getting there". Salon. Retrieved December 18, 2016.
  27. ^ Richardson, Valerie (December 14, 2016). "Harvard prof advising electors says 20+ Republicans may vote against Trump". The Washington Times.
  28. ^ "Harvard law professor says Republican electors close to blocking Trump win". The Independent. December 14, 2016. Retrieved December 18, 2016.
  29. ^ "Why an electoral college coup to stop Donald Trump isn't at all likely, Part 59". The Washington Post. Retrieved December 18, 2016.
  30. ^ Cheney, Kyle (December 13, 2016). "RNC keeps close tabs on Electoral College vote: GOP effort makes sure Republican electors don't go wobbly on Trump". Politico.
  31. ^ Rozsa, Matthew. "Source: Donald Trump's campaign is threatening "political reprisal" for defecting Republican electors". Salon.
  32. ^ Broomfield, Matt (December 14, 2016). "Donald Trump is "threatening" rebel Republican politicians". The Independent.
  33. ^ a b Unite For America (December 14, 2016). A Message for Electors to Unite For America. YouTube.
  34. ^ "Watch Debra Messing, Martin Sheen and Other Stars Urge Electors to Prevent a Trump Presidency". December 15, 2016.
  35. ^ Cheney, Kyle (December 14, 2016). "Full-page ads turn up the heat on Trump electors A pro-Clinton activist is running newspaper ads in Philadelphia, Austin, Salt Lake City and Tampa Bay".
  36. ^ Himes, James (December 11, 2016). "Jim Himes Status/808116879558660098". Twitter. We're 5 wks from Inauguration & the President Elect is completely unhinged. The electoral college must do what it was designed for.
  37. ^ Halper, Daniel (December 12, 2016). "Congressman begs Electoral College voters to block Trump". New York Post.
  38. ^ Cheney, Kyle. "Lessig, lawyers to offer support to anti-Trump electors".
  39. ^ Cheney, Kyle. "Lessig: 20 Trump electors could flip". Politico.
  40. ^ "Inside The Psychology Of The Rebel Electors Who Seek To Overturn Trump's Election". Fast Company. December 15, 2016. Retrieved December 18, 2016.
  41. ^ "Lawrence Lessig Offers Free Legal Aid To Anti-Trump Electors". NPR.org. Retrieved December 18, 2016.
  42. ^ Cheney, Kyle (December 16, 2016). "Judge deals critical blow to anti-Trump Electoral College fight".
  43. ^ Cheney, Kyle (December 17, 2016). "Court: Removing 'faithless' electors may be unconstitutional".
  44. ^ a b Brunner, Jim (December 19, 2016). "Four Washington state electors break ranks and don't vote for Clinton". The Seattle Times. Retrieved December 20, 2016.
  45. ^ Hellmann, Jessie (December 19, 2016). "Democratic elector in Hawaii votes for Sanders". Retrieved December 20, 2016.
  46. ^ Walsh, Sean Collins (December 19, 2016). "All but 2 Texas members of the Electoral College choose Donald Trump". Statesman. Retrieved December 24, 2016.
  47. ^ Texas electors cast 36 votes for Trump, 1 for Kasich, 1 for Ron Paul. Texas Tribune (December 19, 2016). Retrieved December 19, 2016.
  48. ^ Which candidates did the seven "faithless" electors support? CBS News (December 21, 2016). Retrieved December 21, 2016.
  49. ^ "Gen. Colin Powell Sells His $2.8M Upper West Side Condo". May 24, 2016.
  50. ^ "Emails detail Colin Powell's substantial role at City College".
  51. ^ "General Colin L. Powell - Informatio". December 20, 2016. Archived from the original on December 20, 2016.CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link)
  52. ^ Powell has several homes, including one in NYC (still)[49] and also one in DC, but is officially a VA resident per WikiLeaks emails,[50] and per his 'verified' social media account.[51]
  53. ^ (King5), Liza Javier. "VicePresidentBallots". www.documentcloud.org.
  54. ^ La Corte, Rachel (December 19, 2016). "4 Washington State electors pick candidates other than Clinton". Associated Press. Archived from the original on December 21, 2016. Retrieved December 20, 2016 – via The Olympian.
  55. ^ "Meet Faith Spotted Eagle, who received one Washington state elector's presidential vote". December 19, 2016.
  56. ^ a b Electoral College Faithless Elector Foiled Trying To Vote For Bernie Sanders. Huffington Post (December 19, 2016). Retrieved December 19, 2016.
  57. ^ Bakst, Brian (December 19, 2016). 'Faithless elector' dismissed, Minnesota's 10 votes go to Clinton. Minnesota Public Radio. Retrieved December 19, 2016.
  58. ^ "Colorado's electoral votes go to Hillary Clinton after one is replaced". The Denver Post. Retrieved December 20, 2016.
  59. ^ a b Flynn, Meagan (August 22, 2019). "He tried to stop Trump in the electoral college. A court says his 'faithless' ballot was legal". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 29, 2019.
  60. ^ La Corte, Rachel (December 23, 2016). "Four state electors to be fined $1,000 for vote". Kitsap Sun. Retrieved December 25, 2016.
  61. ^ Lane, Charles (October 28, 2019). "A nightmare scenario for 2020: A tie that can't be broken. It's conceivable". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 29, 2019.
  62. ^ Cornfield, Jerry (May 24, 2019). "State high court upholds $1,000 fines on 'faithless electors'". Seattle Weekly. Retrieved October 29, 2019.
  63. ^ "Supreme Court asked to decide whether electors must vote for state popular vote winner". Jurist. Retrieved October 18, 2019.
  64. ^ "Petition for writ of certiorari" (PDF). Equal Citizens. Retrieved October 18, 2019.
  65. ^ a b Paul, Jesse (August 21, 2019). "Colorado's presidential electors don't have to vote for candidate who wins the state, federal appeals court rules". The Colorado Sun. Archived from the original on August 22, 2019. Retrieved August 28, 2019. The decision in the "faithless electors" case could have major ramifications for future presidential elections in the U.S. and could ultimately go to the U.S. Supreme Court for review
  66. ^ Gabriel, Trip (August 22, 2019). "Electoral College Members Can Defy Voters' Wishes, Court Rules". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved October 29, 2019.
  67. ^ [On October 16, 2019, the Colorado appealed "Colorado asks U.S. Supreme Court to overturn decision allowing presidential electors to vote for whomever they want"] Check |url= value (help). Colorado Sun.
  68. ^ "Petition for writ of certiorari" (PDF). Colorado Attorney General. Retrieved October 18, 2019.

External links

This page was last edited on 29 October 2019, at 03:31
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.