To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Epistemic cultures

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Epistemic cultures (often used in plural form) is a concept developed in the nineties by anthropologist Karin Knorr Cetina in her book Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge.[1] Opposed to a monist vision of scientific activity (according to which, would exist a unique scientific method), Knorr Cetina defines the concept of epistemic cultures as a diversity of scientific activities according to different scientific fields, not only in methods and tools, but also in types of reasonings, ways to establish evidence, and relationships between theory and empiry. Knorr Cetina's work is seminal in questioning the so-called unity of science.[citation needed]

Knorr Cetina's anthropology

In practice, Knorr Cetina compares two contemporary important scientific fields:[1] High energy physics and molecular biology. She worked as an anthropologist within two laboratories, along the line of the laboratory anthropology work by Latour and Woolgar.[2] Her anthropological work is comparative and the two chosen scientific fields are highly mediaticized and easily distinguishable.

Epistemic cultures as a philosophical concept has been perused by numerous philosophical, anthropological or historical studies of science.[3][4]

Two distinct publication regimes

High energy physics and molecular biology are very different as scientific fields belonging to two different epistemic cultures. They also are very different in terms of academic authorship. Biagioli describes this difference in terms of publications culture regarding number of authors per paper, distribution of contributorship within authors, preprint policy and he precisely chooses to oppose the very same domains.[5]

References

  1. ^ a b (Karin), Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674258932. OCLC 39539508.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  2. ^ Latour, Bruno; Woolgar, Steve (1986). Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. ISBN 9781400820412.
  3. ^ Wray, K. Brad (February 2009). "The Epistemic Cultures of Science and Wikipedia: A Comparison". Episteme. 6 (1): 38–51. doi:10.3366/E1742360008000531. ISSN 1750-0117. S2CID 170888570.
  4. ^ Heidler, Richard (2017-09-01). "Epistemic Cultures in Conflict: The Case of Astronomy and High Energy Physics". Minerva. 55 (3): 249–277. doi:10.1007/s11024-017-9315-3. ISSN 1573-1871. S2CID 151582516.
  5. ^ Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science. Biagioli, Mario, 1955-, Galison, Peter, 1955-. New York, NY: Routledge. 2003. ISBN 0415942934. OCLC 51342797.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)


This page was last edited on 18 March 2024, at 18:35
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.