To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Direct product

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In mathematics, one can often define a direct product of objects already known, giving a new one. This generalizes the Cartesian product of the underlying sets, together with a suitably defined structure on the product set. More abstractly, one talks about the product in category theory, which formalizes these notions.

Examples are the product of sets, groups (described below), rings, and other algebraic structures. The product of topological spaces is another instance.[dubious ]

There is also the direct sum – in some areas this is used interchangeably, while in others it is a different concept.

Examples

  • If we think of as the set of real numbers, then the direct product is just the Cartesian product
  • If we think of as the group of real numbers under addition, then the direct product still has as its underlying set. The difference between this and the preceding example is that is now a group, and so we have to also say how to add their elements. This is done by defining
  • If we think of as the ring of real numbers, then the direct product again has as its underlying set. The ring structure consists of addition defined by and multiplication defined by
  • However, if we think of as the field of real numbers, then the direct product does not exist – naively defining addition and multiplication componentwise as in the above example would not result in a field since the element does not have a multiplicative inverse.

In a similar manner, we can talk about the direct product of finitely many algebraic structures, for example, This relies on the fact that the direct product is associative up to isomorphism. That is, for any algebraic structures and of the same kind. The direct product is also commutative up to isomorphism, that is, for any algebraic structures and of the same kind. We can even talk about the direct product of infinitely many algebraic structures; for example we can take the direct product of countably many copies of which we write as

Group direct product

In group theory one can define the direct product of two groups and denoted by For abelian groups which are written additively, it may also be called the direct sum of two groups, denoted by

It is defined as follows:

  • the set of the elements of the new group is the Cartesian product of the sets of elements of that is
  • on these elements put an operation, defined element-wise:

Note that may be the same as

This construction gives a new group. It has a normal subgroup isomorphic to (given by the elements of the form ), and one isomorphic to (comprising the elements ).

The reverse also holds. There is the following recognition theorem: If a group contains two normal subgroups such that and the intersection of contains only the identity, then is isomorphic to A relaxation of these conditions, requiring only one subgroup to be normal, gives the semidirect product.

As an example, take as two copies of the unique (up to isomorphisms) group of order 2, say Then with the operation element by element. For instance, and

With a direct product, we get some natural group homomorphisms for free: the projection maps defined by

are called the coordinate functions.

Also, every homomorphism to the direct product is totally determined by its component functions

For any group and any integer repeated application of the direct product gives the group of all -tuples (for this is the trivial group), for example and

Direct product of modules

The direct product for modules (not to be confused with the tensor product) is very similar to the one defined for groups above, using the Cartesian product with the operation of addition being componentwise, and the scalar multiplication just distributing over all the components. Starting from we get Euclidean space the prototypical example of a real -dimensional vector space. The direct product of and is

Note that a direct product for a finite index is canonically isomorphic to the direct sum The direct sum and direct product are not isomorphic for infinite indices, where the elements of a direct sum are zero for all but for a finite number of entries. They are dual in the sense of category theory: the direct sum is the coproduct, while the direct product is the product.

For example, consider and the infinite direct product and direct sum of the real numbers. Only sequences with a finite number of non-zero elements are in For example, is in but is not. Both of these sequences are in the direct product in fact, is a proper subset of (that is, ).[1][2]

Topological space direct product

The direct product for a collection of topological spaces for in some index set, once again makes use of the Cartesian product

Defining the topology is a little tricky. For finitely many factors, this is the obvious and natural thing to do: simply take as a basis of open sets to be the collection of all Cartesian products of open subsets from each factor:

This topology is called the product topology. For example, directly defining the product topology on by the open sets of (disjoint unions of open intervals), the basis for this topology would consist of all disjoint unions of open rectangles in the plane (as it turns out, it coincides with the usual metric topology).

The product topology for infinite products has a twist, and this has to do with being able to make all the projection maps continuous and to make all functions into the product continuous if and only if all its component functions are continuous (that is, to satisfy the categorical definition of product: the morphisms here are continuous functions): we take as a basis of open sets to be the collection of all Cartesian products of open subsets from each factor, as before, with the proviso that all but finitely many of the open subsets are the entire factor:

The more natural-sounding topology would be, in this case, to take products of infinitely many open subsets as before, and this does yield a somewhat interesting topology, the box topology. However it is not too difficult to find an example of bunch of continuous component functions whose product function is not continuous (see the separate entry box topology for an example and more). The problem which makes the twist necessary is ultimately rooted in the fact that the intersection of open sets is only guaranteed to be open for finitely many sets in the definition of topology.

Products (with the product topology) are nice with respect to preserving properties of their factors; for example, the product of Hausdorff spaces is Hausdorff; the product of connected spaces is connected, and the product of compact spaces is compact. That last one, called Tychonoff's theorem, is yet another equivalence to the axiom of choice.

For more properties and equivalent formulations, see the separate entry product topology.

Direct product of binary relations

On the Cartesian product of two sets with binary relations define as If are both reflexive, irreflexive, transitive, symmetric, or antisymmetric, then will be also.[3] Similarly, seriality of is inherited from Combining properties it follows that this also applies for being a preorder and being an equivalence relation. However if are connected relations, need not be connected; for example, the direct product of on with itself does not relate

Direct product in universal algebra

If is a fixed signature, is an arbitrary (possibly infinite) index set, and is an indexed family of algebras, the direct product is a algebra defined as follows:

  • The universe set of is the Cartesian product of the universe sets of formally:
  • For each and each -ary operation symbol its interpretation in is defined componentwise, formally: for all and each the th component of is defined as

For each the th projection is defined by It is a surjective homomorphism between the algebras [4]

As a special case, if the index set the direct product of two algebras is obtained, written as If just contains one binary operation the above definition of the direct product of groups is obtained, using the notation Similarly, the definition of the direct product of modules is subsumed here.

Categorical product

The direct product can be abstracted to an arbitrary category. In a general category, given a collection of objects and a collection of morphisms from to [clarification needed] with ranging in some index set an object is said to be a categorical product in the category if, for any object and any collection of morphisms from to there exists a unique morphism from to such that and this object is unique. This not only works for two factors, but arbitrarily (even infinitely) many.

For groups we similarly define the direct product of a more general, arbitrary collection of groups for an index set. Denoting the Cartesian product of the groups by we define multiplication on with the operation of componentwise multiplication; and corresponding to the in the definition above are the projection maps

the functions that take to its th component

Internal and external direct product

Some authors draw a distinction between an internal direct product and an external direct product. If and then we say that is an internal direct product of while if are not subobjects then we say that this is an external direct product.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ W., Weisstein, Eric. "Direct Product". mathworld.wolfram.com. Retrieved 2018-02-10.
  2. ^ W., Weisstein, Eric. "Group Direct Product". mathworld.wolfram.com. Retrieved 2018-02-10.
  3. ^ "Equivalence and Order" (PDF).
  4. ^ Stanley N. Burris and H.P. Sankappanavar, 1981. A Course in Universal Algebra. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 3-540-90578-2. Here: Def.7.8, p.53 (=p. 67 in pdf file)

References

This page was last edited on 14 January 2022, at 03:57
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.