To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Diminishment is the legal process by which the United States Congress can reduce the size of an Indian reservation.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    77 480
    349
    352
  • resize me (giantess game) part 1
  • How To Say Diminishment
  • Human activities responsible for diminishment of ecosystems-std 8-Ls no.18 by Swapnali Bhosale mam

Transcription

History

In 1984, the United States Supreme Court held in Solem v. Bartlett, 465 U.S. 463 (1984), that "only Congress may diminish the boundaries of an Indian reservation, and its intent to do so must be clear."[1] This was noted in the Court's 2016 case Nebraska v. Parker, 577 U.S. ___ (2016), in which the Court held that an 1882 Act passed by Congress did not diminish the Omaha Reservation.

The Solem case established a "diminishment doctrine" that U.S. courts could use when evaluating whether diminishment had taken place.[2]

In the 1994 case Hagen v. Utah, 510 U.S. 399 (1994), the Supreme Court held that Congress's 1902 Act had diminished the Uintah Reservation.[3] The Court applied its doctrine established in the Solem case.

See also

Notes

Diminishment commonly refers to the reduction in size of a reservation. A finding of diminishment generally suggests that a discrete, easily identifiable parcel of land has been removed from reservation status.[4]

References

  1. ^ Nebraska v. Parker, No. 14–1406, 577 U.S. ____ (2016).
  2. ^ Solem V. Bartlett | ENRD | Department of Justice
  3. ^ Hagen v. Utah, 510 U.S. 399 (1994).
  4. ^ BIRKHOLD, MATTHEW H. "JUDGING "INDIAN CHARACTER"? THE SUPREME COURT'S OPPORTUNITY IN NEBRASKA V. PARKER" (PDF). Wisconsin Law Review. Retrieved 7 February 2017.


This page was last edited on 26 November 2023, at 18:19
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.