To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Counterplanning

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Counterplanning in conflict resolution is the process through which an actor reaches his or her goals by formulating plans that account for the plans and goals of others (e.g. enemies, neutrals, or friends).[1]

When the plans and goals of one actor interfere with those of another actor, a conflict exists. These conflicts lead to second- and third-order undesired effects. The best counterplanning techniques to be used in a given situation vary based on the characteristics of the conflict. Counterplanning techniques are common in everyday life and in military planning.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    942
    725
    9 288
  • MBC, Counterplan For Imitation Program (MBC, '중국판 짝퉁 무한도전에 대응 방안 검토 중')
  • [I Love You, Tones] Teamwork Among Actors ([사랑해 톤즈] 김재희가 말하는 이재원· 레이나 연기 호흡은?)
  • That’s My Amboy: The troublemakers

Transcription

Goal conflicts

Goal conflicts arise when the desired world states of one or more actors cannot co-exist.[2] This can be resolved by a number of techniques, which fall into three types of strategies.

General strategies

  • Block competing coal: One actor prevents the other from achieving its goal.
  • Priority scheduling: One actor places time priority on its goal, achieving it before the other actor realizes its goal.
  • Goal schedule interference: One actor delays the other actor's goal achievement.

Diversion strategies

  • Threatening higher level goals: One actor causes a goal of another actor that is more important than the mutually exclusive goal to no longer be satisfied. This causes the other actor to focus on the higher priority goal.
  • Dissipation of effort: One actor threatens goals of another actor, causing the other actor to apply its effort to fixing the disrupted goals rather than achieving the mutually exclusive goal.

Diversion strategies can either be applied directly or applied by deceiving the other actor into thinking certain goals are threatened.

Compromise strategies

  • Partial fulfillment: Each actor partially achieves its goal.
  • Goal substitution: One actor changes its goal to a non-mutually exclusive goal.
  • Cooperation by mutual need: The actors can partially fulfill their goals only by working together.
  • Mutual goal abandonment: If preventing the other actor from achieving its goal is more important than achieving the actor's own goal, one may convince the other to abandon its goal.

One must also account for counterplanning techniques applied by other actors. A goal conflict counterplanning technique called "Expected Blocking" involves preventing another actor from applying the techniques described above.

Plan conflicts

Plan conflicts occur when the actions of one or more actors prevent other actions from achieving their desired effect. Plan conflicts can be analyzed on the following dimensions:

  • Accidental versus intentional: An accidental plan conflict is when carrying out a plan inadvertently prevents another actor from completing its plan. An intentional plan conflict is when an actor carries out a plan, knowing that it will prevent another actor's plan from succeeding.
  • Competitive versus cooperative: A competitive plan conflict occurs between actors, each of which benefit by preventing the other's success. A cooperative plan conflict occurs between actors who benefit from each other's success.
  • Inconvenience versus total blockage: An inconvenient plan conflict can be resolved if one actor switches to an alternate plan which is capable of achieving the goal in question. A total blockage exists when there is no viable alternative.
  • No underlying goal conflict versus underlying goal conflict: A plan conflict without an underlying goal conflict occurs when there is no disagreement about goal states, but accidental plan interference (as in the accidental plan conflict example above). When an underlying goal conflict exists, goal conflict mitigation strategies must be used (as in the intentional plan conflict example above).
  • Internally versus externally motivated: An internally motivated plan conflict arises between the actors without external interference. An externally motivated plan conflict arises when outside forces place actors in conflict.
  • Important goal threatened versus insignificant goal threatened: Actors are more likely to focus on resolving plan conflicts when the threatened goal is important.

See also

References

  1. ^ Carbonell, J. G. (1979). The Counterplanning Process. Proceedings of the 6th International Joint Conference On Artificial Intelligence, 1979, Tokyo Japan.
  2. ^ Schank, R and Abelson, R. (1977) Scripts, Plans Goals and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
This page was last edited on 10 February 2024, at 13:27
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.