To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A civil wrong or wrong is a cause of action under civil law. Types include tort, breach of contract and breach of trust.[1]

Something that amounts to a civil wrong is wrongful. A wrong involves the violation of a right because wrong and right are contrasting terms.[2] An 1860 legal ruling stated that: "It is essential to an action in tort that the act complained of should under the circumstances be legally wrongful as regards the party complaining; that is, it must prejudicially affect him in some legal right".[3]

The law that relates to civil wrongs is part of the branch of the law that is called the civil law.[4] A civil wrong can be followed by civil proceedings.[5] It is a misnomer to describe a civil wrong as a "civil offence".[6] The law of England recognised the concept of a wrong before it recognised the distinction between civil wrongs and crimes in the 13th century.[7]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    3 664
    18 116
    421
  • What is CIVIL Law & What is CRIMINAL Law | Difference between CIVIL Wrong & CRIMINAL Wrong?
  • DIFFERENCE CIVIL & CRIMINAL
  • Difference between Civil law and Criminal law | Civil Wrong vs Criminal Wrong | Private & Public law

Transcription

See also

References

  1. ^ Williams (1982), pp. 9–10.
  2. ^ Clerk (1989), para. 1–14 at p. 12.
  3. ^ Rogers v Rajendro Dutt (1860) 13 Moo P C 209, 9 WR 149, 15 ER 78, quoted in House of Lords, Watkins (Respondent) v. Home Office (Appellants) and others, [2006] UKHL 17.
  4. ^ Williams (1982), p. 2.
  5. ^ Williams (1982), p. 3.
  6. ^ Williams (1982), p. 4.
  7. ^ Phillips (1960), pp. 207, 208, 213.

Further reading

  • Clerk, J. F. (1989). Clerk and Lindsell on Torts (16 ed.). Sweet & Maxwell. ISBN 9780421377608.
  • Phillips, O. Hood (1960). A First Book of English Law (4 ed.). London: Sweet & Maxwell.
  • Williams, Glanville (1982). Learning the Law (11 ed.). London: Stevens. ISBN 9780420463005.
This page was last edited on 9 January 2022, at 13:55
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.