To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.

Charles Bennett Smith

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Charles Bennett Smith
Charles Bennett Smith 2.jpg
Member of the U.S. House of Representatives
from New York's 41st district
In office
March 4, 1913 – March 3, 1919
Preceded byDistrict created
Succeeded byClarence MacGregor
Member of the U.S. House of Representatives
from New York's 36th district
In office
March 4, 1911 – March 3, 1913
Preceded byDe Alva S. Alexander
Succeeded bySereno E. Payne
Personal details
Born(1870-09-14)September 14, 1870
Sardinia, New York
DiedMay 21, 1939(1939-05-21) (aged 68)
Wilmington, New York
Resting placeMount Olivet Cemetery
Political partyDemocratic

Charles Bennett Smith (September 14, 1870 – May 21, 1939) was a U.S. Representative from New York.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    6 157 913
    4 659 606
    3 160 430
  • What Is Life? Is Death Real?
  • Is War Over? — A Paradox Explained
  • Atoms As Big As Mountains — Neutron Stars Explained


Life is fundamentally different from dead stuff—or is it? Physicist Erwin Schrödinger defined life this way: Living things avoid decay into disorder and equilibrium. What does this mean? Let’s pretend that your download folder is the universe. It started orderly and got more and more chaotic over time. By investing energy, you can create order and clean it up. This is what living things do. But what is life? Every living thing on this planet is made of cells. Basically, a cell is a protein-based robot too small to feel or experience anything. It has the properties we just assign to life: it has a wall that separates it from the surroundings, creating order; it regulates itself and maintains a constant state; it eats stuff to stay alive; it grows and develops; it reacts to the environment; and it’s subject to evolution; and it makes more of itself. But of all the stuff that makes up a cell, no part is alive. Stuff reacts chemically with other stuff, forming reactions that start other reactions which start other reactions. In a single cell, every second several million chemical reactions take place, forming a complex orchestra. A cell can build several thousand types of protein: some very simple, some complex micromachines. Imagine driving a car at 100 km/h while constantly rebuilding every single part of it with stuff you collect from the street. That is what cells do. But no part of the cell is alive; everything is dead matter moved by the laws of the universe. So is life the aggregate of all these reaction processes that are taking place? Eventually, every living thing will die. The goal of the whole process is to prevent this by producing new entities; and by this, we mean DNA. Life is, in a way, just a lot of stuff that carries genetic information around. Every living thing is subject to evolution, and the DNA that develops the best living thing around it will stay in the game. So, is DNA life, then? If you take DNA out of its hull, it certainly is a very complex molecule, but it can’t do anything by itself. This is where viruses make everything more complicated. They are basically strings of RNA or DNA in a small hull and need cells to do something. We’re not sure if they count as living or dead. And still, there are 225,000,000 m³ of viruses on Earth. They don’t seem to care what we think of them. There are even viruses that invade dead cells and reanimate them so they can be a host for them, which blurs the line even more. Or mitochondria. They are the power plants of most complex cells and were previously free living bacteria that entered a partnership with bigger cells. They still have their own DNA and can multiply on their own, but they are not alive anymore; they are dead. So they traded their own life for the survival of their DNA, which means living things can evolve into dead things as long as it’s beneficial to their genetic code. So, maybe life is information that manages to ensure its continued existence. But what about AI (artificial intelligence)? By our most common definitions, we are very close to creating artificial life in computers. It’s just a question of time before the technology we build gets there. And this is not science fiction, either; there are a lot of smart people actively working on this. You could already argue that computer viruses are alive. Hm, okay. So what is life, then? Things, processes, DNA, information? This got confusing very fast. One thing is for sure: the idea that life is fundamentally different from non-living things because they contain some non-physical element or are governed by different principles than inanimate objects turned out to be wrong. Before Charles Darwin, humans drew a line between themselves and the rest of living things; there was something magical about us that made us special. Once we had to accept we are like every living being, a product of evolution, we drew a different line. But the more we learn about what computers can do and how life works, the closer we get to creating the first machine that fits our desciption of life, the more our image of ourselves is in danger again. And this will happen sooner or later. And here’s another question for you: if everything in the universe is made of the same stuff, does this mean everything in the universe is dead or that everything in the universe is alive? That it’s just a question of complexity? Does this mean we can never die because we were never alive in the first place? Is life and death an irrelevant question and we haven’t noticed it yet? Is it possible we are much more part of the universe around us than we thought? Don’t look at us; we don’t have any answers for you. Just questions for you to think about. After all, it’s thinking about questions like this that makes us feel alive and gives us some comfort. Subtitles by the community


Born in Sardinia, New York, Smith attended the district schools, and in 1886 graduated from Arcade Academy in Arcade, New York. He farmed, and subsequently became a railroad telegraph operator.

He was a reporter for the Buffalo Courier from 1890 to 1893, and he became managing editor of the Buffalo Times in 1894. He later served as editor of the Buffalo Evening Enquirer and the Buffalo Morning Courier.

Smith was appointed a member of the Buffalo Board of School Examiners and served two years as its chairman.

Smith was elected as a Democrat to the Sixty-second and to the three succeeding Congresses (March 4, 1911 – March 3, 1919). In his first election in 1910 he won by one vote.[1]

He served as chairman of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (Sixty-second Congress), Committee on Expenditures in the Department of Commerce (Sixty-fourth Congress), Committee on Patents (Sixty-fifth Congress). He was an unsuccessful candidate for reelection in 1918 to the Sixty-sixth Congress.

He engaged in commercial and industrial pursuits in Buffalo, New York. He was the state Superintendent of Standards and Purchases from 1935 until his death in Wilmington, New York, May 21, 1939.

He was interred in Mount Olivet Cemetery, Tonawanda, New York.

Smith was married to Frances G. Stanton (1871-1931), who worked with him as a newspaper reporter and editor, and served as New York's Civil Service Commissioner from 1929 until her death.


  1. ^ "By One Vote: Smith, on Three Tickets, Wins Out for Congress". The Scranton Republican. November 11, 1910. p. 1.

External links

U.S. House of Representatives
Preceded by
De Alva S. Alexander
Member of the U.S. House of Representatives
from New York's 36th congressional district

Succeeded by
Sereno E. Payne
New district Member of the U.S. House of Representatives
from New York's 41st congressional district

Succeeded by
Clarence MacGregor

 This article incorporates public domain material from the Biographical Directory of the United States Congress website

This page was last edited on 9 December 2020, at 17:59
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.