In statistics, a central tendency (or measure of central tendency) is a central or typical value for a probability distribution.^{[1]} It may also be called a center or location of the distribution. Colloquially, measures of central tendency are often called averages. The term central tendency dates from the late 1920s.^{[2]}
The most common measures of central tendency are the arithmetic mean, the median and the mode. A central tendency can be calculated for either a finite set of values or for a theoretical distribution, such as the normal distribution. Occasionally authors use central tendency to denote "the tendency of quantitative data to cluster around some central value."^{[2]}^{[3]}
The central tendency of a distribution is typically contrasted with its dispersion or variability; dispersion and central tendency are the often characterized properties of distributions. Analysis may judge whether data has a strong or a weak central tendency based on its dispersion.
YouTube Encyclopedic

1/5Views:227 834173 191108 621482 2081 109 741

✪ Mean, Median, and Mode: Measures of Central Tendency: Crash Course Statistics #3

✪ Average or Central Tendency: Arithmetic Mean, Median, and Mode

✪ Mean, Median, & Mode  Measures of Central Tendency

✪ 001 Statistics  Measures of Central Tendency  Arithmetic Mean

✪ Math Antics  Mean, Median and Mode
Transcription
Hi I’m Adriene Hill, and welcome to Crash Course Statistics. In the last video we tried to make sense of ginormous numbers. And teenytiny numbers. Today we’re going to talk about less showy numbers. The numbers stuck in the middle. The averages. The medians. The modes. They may not seem as mindblowing. Or all that flashy. But, turns out they are really, really important. Those middle numbers are often the ones that get ALL the press attention. Get tossed back in forth in political debate. And...they give us this little fun bit of trivia… What’s the average...or mean... number of feet people have? It’s not 2. Turns out the average number of feet people has is a little less than 2. Cause the average takes into account the small number of people out there with fewer than 2 feet. So, if you have two feet, you have more than the average number of feet. `And wIth that...let’s get what into “measures of central tendency” are, and why they’re useful. INTRO If your boss asks you for a report on this quarter’s sales numbers but is rushing to a meeting and only has time to listen to one piece of information about the data, that piece of information you give her should probably be a measure of central tendency. The center of a bunch of data points is usually a good example (or summary) of the type of data we can expect from the group as a whole. One common measure of the middle is the mean. You’ve likely heard it called the averagethough all of these measures are sometimes called “averages”. Some people call it the “expectation” of a set of data. The mean...or average...takes the sum of all the numbers in a data set, and divides by the number of data points. So, if 10 pregnant dogs give birth to 50 total puppiesthe average litter size is 5 puppies. Each data point, in this case each litter of puppies, contributes equally to the calculation. Awwwww. Here’s another example. Say you you have ten dollars and your best friend has 20 dollars, the mean amount of cash you two have is 15 dollars. Tenplustwentydivided by two. But saying that the mean is fifteen dollarsdoesn’t mean you each can buy that 12dollar BFF necklace you’ve been eyeing...the one with the halfaheart that fits together. You personally only have ten dollars in your pocket. The average of a set of data points tells us something about the data as a whole, but it doesn’t tell us about individual data points. The mean is good at measuring things that are relatively “normally” distributed. “Normal” means a distribution of data that has roughly the same amount of data on either side of the middle, and has its most common values around the middle of the data. Data that are distributed normally will have a symmetrical bell shape that you’ve probably seen before. A distribution shows us how often each value occurs in our data set, which is also known as their frequency. Imagine you are trying to impress your new college dorm mates by guessing how many times they’ve each seen Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone. Your mom is in the entertainment industry and you overheard, at her last dinner party, that 18 year olds, on average, had seen the movie five times each. That’s a lot of quidditch. So you should guess your new friends have seen the movie five times each. (Unless you can clearly see Slytherin tattoos.) You won’t be right each time, but it’s your best guess. It might not be the best way to impress them though. It’s not a great party trick. Sometimes the mean is misleading. For instance: life expectancy in the Middle Ages. As we explored in Crash Course World History, there was an incredibly high rate of infant mortality in the days before modern medicine, but the people who made it to adulthood lived relatively long lives. Because of the high rate of infant and child mortality, the average life expectancy was about thirty years. But things weren’t nearly as dire as all that. Not if you actually made it to 30. In the 13th century a male who lived to 30was likely to make it into his fifties! To give unusually large or small values, also called outliers, less influence on our measure of where the center of our data is, we can use the median. Unlike the mean, the median doesn’t use the value of every data point in it’s calculation. The median is the middle number if we lined up our data from smallest to largest. For example, if you have two cats, Julian has one cat, and Erik has three cats, the median number of cats in your little catloving group would be two. When we put the number of cats in order from least to most cats, two is in the middle. But what if there’s no middle number? You invite Will to join your cat group. He has an impressive ...or is it excessive...total of fourteen cats. Now there are four cat owners. There is no one middle number; both two and three are in the middle. In this case there are differing opinions on how to calculate the median, but most often we take the mean of the two middle numbers, so our median would be 2.5 cats. Meow. Meow Me…. Let’s go to the thought bubble. Imagine ten artists have been working for years, together, to come up with a new, fresh way to tie macrame knots. The standard square knot...just wasn’t inspiring them the way it used to. And finally. They do. Viola! The abracadabradoolittle knot! So these 10 artists go out to celebrate. And they go to a relatively modestly priced restaurant...cause macrame artists don’t make all that much money. Each of them pulls in about $20,000 a year. So the average...or mean... income in around the table is twentythousand dollars. And the median income is also twentythousand dollars. Now, let’s imagine that Elon Musk gets wind of this macrame milestone. Turns out...he’s a huge macrame fan himself. Beauty in design. He couldn’t miss up a chance to celebrate...So he decides to show up at the restaurant. Musk’s total annual compensation...including his salary and stock options...is reportedly in the neighborhood of 100million dollars. As soon as Musk walks in the door. The average income in the room...skyrockets...to a little over 9 million dollars. But...nobody else in the room is ACTUALLY richer...nobody feels any richer. The median income of the macrame artists and Musk is still $20,000 because most of our group is still making $20,000. And...this isn’t just the stuff of makebelieve macrame world...it happens in REAL life too...the “average” is distorted by outliers. Thanks Thought Bubble! Alright, now say there’s a controversial book on Amazon called Pineapple Belongs on Pizza, with 400 reviews; 200 fivestar reviews, and 200 onestar reviews. The mean number of stars given was 3, but no one in our sample actually gave the book 3 stars, just like no one could actually have the median of 2.5 cats. In both of these situations, it can be useful to look at the mode. The word mode comes from the Latin word modus, which means “manner, fashion, or style” and gives us the French expression a la mode, meaning fashionable. Just like the most popular and fashionable trends, the mode is the most popular value. But not popular like Despacito. When we refer to the “mode” of our data, we mean the value that appears most in our data set. For our Amazon book review of Pineapple Belongs on Pizza the modes are both 5 and 1, which give us a better understanding of how people feel about the book. These reviews are called “bimodal” because there are two values that are most common. Bimodal data is an example of “Multimodal” data which has many values that are similarly common. Usually multimodal data results from two or more underlying groups all being measured together. In the case of our book, the two groups were the “love it” fivestar group, and the “hate it” onestar group. Or for another example, if we made a graph of the times customers went to INNOUT, we’d probably see two peaks because there’s two groups of people: one around lunch time, and one around dinnertime. The mode is useful here because it’s an actual value that occurs in our data set, unlike the median and mean which can give us numbers that wouldn’t actually occur and don’t describe our data very well. The mean time people come into InNOut may very well be 3:30pm, but that doesn't suggest you should expect an overflowing restaurant in the middle of the afternoon. You should be able to get your animal style burger ...without too much of a wait. The mode is most useful when you have a relatively large sample so that you have a large number of the popular values. One other benefit of the mode is that it can be used with data that isn't numeric. Like, if I ask everyone their favorite color, I could have a mode of “blue”. There’s no such thing as a “mean” or average favorite color. The relationship between the mean, median, and mode can tell us a lot about the distribution of data. In normal distribution that we mentioned earlier they’re all the same. We know that the middle value of the data (the median) is also the most common (the mode) and is the peak of the distribution. The fact that the median and mean are the same tells us that the distribution is symmetric: there’s equal amounts of data on either side of the median, and equal amounts on either side of the mean. Statisticians say the normal distribution has zero skew, since the mean and median are the same. When the median and mean are different, a distribution is skewed, which is a way of saying that there are some unusually extreme values on one side of our distribution, either large or small in our data set. With a skewed distribution, the mode will still be the highest point on the distribution, and the median will stay in the middle, but the mean will be pulled towards the unusual values. So, if the mean is a lot higher than the median and mode, that tells you that there’s a value (or values) that are relatively large in your data set. And a mean that’s a lot lower than your median and mode tells you that there’s a value (or values) that are relatively small in your dataset. Let’s go to the News Desk. The average income of a US family GREW 4 percent between 2010 and 2013. Those average paychecks expanded from 84thousanddollars to over 87thousand dollars. But not everyone is cheering. The median income FELL five percent during those same years. Median family income dropped from 49thousand dollars to just over 46 and a half thousand dollars. This really happened, back in the years after the financial crisis. The mean income rose at the same time the median income fell. That’s because families at the tiptop of the income distribution...we’re making more money. And pushing the mean up. While many other families were making less. And even though unscrupulous politicians could accurately claim “average incomes are rising”and pat themselves on the backit would be misleading. For most Americans during that stretch incomes were flat or falling. This points to another really important point about statistics, a point we’ll come back to time and time again during this series. Statistics can be simultaneously true ...and deceptive. And an important part of statistics is understanding which questions you are trying to answer. And whether or not the information you have is answering those questions. Statistics can help us make decisions. But we’ve all gotta use our common sense. And a little skepticism. Thanks for watching. I’ll see you next time.
Contents
Measures
The following may be applied to onedimensional data. Depending on the circumstances, it may be appropriate to transform the data before calculating a central tendency. Examples are squaring the values or taking logarithms. Whether a transformation is appropriate and what it should be, depend heavily on the data being analyzed.
 Arithmetic mean or simply, mean
 the sum of all measurements divided by the number of observations in the data set.
 Median
 the middle value that separates the higher half from the lower half of the data set. The median and the mode are the only measures of central tendency that can be used for ordinal data, in which values are ranked relative to each other but are not measured absolutely.
 Mode
 the most frequent value in the data set. This is the only central tendency measure that can be used with nominal data, which have purely qualitative category assignments.
 Geometric mean
 the nth root of the product of the data values, where there are n of these. This measure is valid only for data that are measured absolutely on a strictly positive scale.
 Harmonic mean
 the reciprocal of the arithmetic mean of the reciprocals of the data values. This measure too is valid only for data that are measured absolutely on a strictly positive scale.
 Weighted arithmetic mean
 an arithmetic mean that incorporates weighting to certain data elements.
 Truncated mean or trimmed mean
 the arithmetic mean of data values after a certain number or proportion of the highest and lowest data values have been discarded.
 Interquartile mean
 a truncated mean based on data within the interquartile range.
 Midrange
 the arithmetic mean of the maximum and minimum values of a data set.
 Midhinge
 the arithmetic mean of the first and third quartiles.
 Trimean
 the weighted arithmetic mean of the median and two quartiles.
 Winsorized mean
 an arithmetic mean in which extreme values are replaced by values closer to the median.
Any of the above may be applied to each dimension of multidimensional data, but the results may not be invariant to rotations of the multidimensional space. In addition, there are the
 Geometric median
 which minimizes the sum of distances to the data points. This is the same as the median when applied to onedimensional data, but it is not the same as taking the median of each dimension independently. It is not invariant to different rescaling of the different dimensions.
 Quadratic mean (often known as the root mean square)
 useful in engineering, but not often used in statistics. This is because it is not a good indicator of the center of the distribution when the distribution includes negative values.
 Simplicial depth
 the probability that a randomly chosen simplex with vertices from the given distribution will contain the given center
 Tukey median
 a point with the property that every halfspace containing it also contains many sample points
Solutions to variational problems
Several measures of central tendency can be characterized as solving a variational problem, in the sense of the calculus of variations, namely minimizing variation from the center. That is, given a measure of statistical dispersion, one asks for a measure of central tendency that minimizes variation: such that variation from the center is minimal among all choices of center. In a quip, "dispersion precedes location". This center may or may not be unique. In the sense of L^{p} spaces, the correspondence is:
L^{p}  dispersion  central tendency 

L^{0}  variation ratio  mode 
L^{1}  average absolute deviation  median 
L^{1}  average absolute deviation  geometric median 
L^{2}  standard deviation  mean 
L^{∞}  maximum deviation  midrange 
The associated functions are called pnorms: respectively 0"norm", 1norm, 2norm, and ∞norm. The function corresponding to the L^{0} space is not a norm, and is thus often referred to in quotes: 0"norm".
In equations, for a given (finite) data set X, thought of as a vector , the dispersion about a point c is the "distance" from x to the constant vector in the pnorm (normalized by the number of points n):
Note that for and these functions are defined by taking limits, respectively as and . For the limiting values are and for , so the difference becomes simply equality, so the 0norm counts the number of unequal points. For the largest number dominates, and thus the ∞norm is the maximum difference.
Uniqueness
The mean (L^{2} center) and midrange (L^{∞} center) are unique (when they exist), while the median (L^{1} center) and mode (L^{0} center) are not in general unique. This can be understood in terms of convexity of the associated functions (coercive functions).
The 2norm and ∞norm are strictly convex, and thus (by convex optimization) the minimizer is unique (if it exists), and exists for bounded distributions. Thus standard deviation about the mean is lower than standard deviation about any other point, and the maximum deviation about the midrange is lower than the maximum deviation about any other point.
The 1norm is not strictly convex, whereas strict convexity is needed to ensure uniqueness of the minimizer. Correspondingly, the median (in this sense of minimizing) is not in general unique, and in fact any point between the two central points of a discrete distribution minimizes average absolute deviation.
The 0"norm" is not convex (hence not a norm). Correspondingly, the mode is not unique – for example, in a uniform distribution any point is the mode.
Information geometry
The notion of a "center" as minimizing variation can be generalized in information geometry as a distribution that minimizes divergence (a generalized distance) from a data set. The most common case is maximum likelihood estimation, where the maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) maximizes likelihood (minimizes expected surprisal), which can be interpreted geometrically by using entropy to measure variation: the MLE minimizes cross entropy (equivalently, relative entropy, Kullback–Leibler divergence).
A simple example of this is for the center of nominal data: instead of using the mode (the only singlevalued "center"), one often uses the empirical measure (the frequency distribution divided by the sample size) as a "center". For example, given binary data, say heads or tails, if a data set consists of 2 heads and 1 tails, then the mode is "heads", but the empirical measure is 2/3 heads, 1/3 tails, which minimizes the crossentropy (total surprisal) from the data set. This perspective is also used in regression analysis, where least squares finds the solution that minimizes the distances from it, and analogously in logistic regression, a maximum likelihood estimate minimizes the surprisal (information distance).
Relationships between the mean, median and mode
For unimodal distributions the following bounds are known and are sharp:^{[4]}
where μ is the mean, ν is the median, θ is the mode, and σ is the standard deviation.
For every distribution,^{[5]}^{[6]}
See also
References
 ^ Weisberg H.F (1992) Central Tendency and Variability, Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, ISBN 0803940076 p.2
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} Upton, G.; Cook, I. (2008) Oxford Dictionary of Statistics, OUP ISBN 9780199541454 (entry for "central tendency")
 ^ Dodge, Y. (2003) The Oxford Dictionary of Statistical Terms, OUP for International Statistical Institute. ISBN 0199206139 (entry for "central tendency")
 ^ Johnson NL, Rogers CA (1951) "The moment problem for unimodal distributions". Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22 (3) 433–439
 ^ Hotelling H, Solomons LM (1932) The limits of a measure of skewness. Annals Math Stat 3, 141–114
 ^ Garver (1932) Concerning the limits of a mesuare of skewness. Ann Math Stats 3(4) 141–142