To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

C. Wright Mills

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Charles Wright Mills, famously known as C. Wright Mills.
Charles Wright Mills, famously known as C. Wright Mills.

C. Wright Mills
Born
Charles Wright Mills

(1916-08-28)August 28, 1916
Waco, Texas, US
DiedMarch 20, 1962(1962-03-20) (aged 45)
West Nyack, New York City
Spouse(s)
  • Dorothy Helen Smith (m. 1937; div. 1940; m. 1941; div. 1947)
  • Ruth Harper (m. 1947; div. 1959)
  • Yaroslava Surmach
    (m. 1959)
Academic background
Alma mater
ThesisA Sociological Account of Pragmatism (1942)
Doctoral advisor
Influences
Academic work
DisciplineSociology
Sub-disciplinePolitical sociology
School or traditionNew Left
Institutions
Notable studentsMorris Rosenberg[5]
Notable works
Notable ideas
Influenced

Charles Wright Mills (August 28, 1916 – March 20, 1962) was an American sociologist, and a professor of sociology at Columbia University from 1946 until his death in 1962. Mills was published widely in popular and intellectual journals. He is remembered for several books, such as The Power Elite, which introduced that term and describes the relationships and class alliances among the US political, military, and economic elites; White Collar: The American Middle Classes, on the American middle class; and The Sociological Imagination, which presents a model of analysis for the interdependence of subjective experiences within a person's biography, the general social structure, and historical development.

Mills was concerned with the responsibilities of intellectuals in post–World War II society, and he advocated public and political engagement over disinterested observation. One of Mills's biographers, Daniel Geary, writes that Mills's writings had a "particularly significant impact on New Left social movements of the 1960s era."[14] It was Mills who popularized the term New Left in the US in a 1960 open letter, "Letter to the New Left".[15]

Biography

Early life

Mills was born in Waco, Texas, on August 28, 1916.[16] He lived in Texas until he was 23.[17][page needed] His father, Charles Grover Mills, worked as an insurance salesman, while his mother, Frances Wright Mills, was a housewife.[18] His father had moved to Texas from his home state of Florida, but his mother and maternal grandparents were all born and raised in Texas.[19] His family moved frequently when he was growing up and as a result, Mills lived a relatively isolated life as a child, with few continuous relationships.[20] With his family, Mills spent time living in the following cities (in order): Waco, Wichita Falls, Fort Worth, Sherman, Dallas, Austin, and San Antonio.[21] He graduated from Dallas Technical High School in 1934.[22]

Education

Mills attended Texas A&M University, but left after his first year. He subsequently graduated from the University of Texas at Austin in 1939 with a Bachelor's Degree in sociology and a Master's Degree in philosophy. By the time that he graduated, Mills had already been published in the two leading sociology journals in the US: The American Sociological Review and The American Journal of Sociology.[23]

While studying at Texas, Mills met his first wife, Dorothy Helen Smith,[24] a fellow student seeking a master's degree in Sociology. She had previously attended Oklahoma College for Women, where she graduated with a Bachelor's Degree in commerce.[25] They were married in October 1937.

After their marriage Dorothy Helen, or "Freya", worked as a staff member of the director of the Women's Residence Hall at the University of Texas. She supported the couple while Mills completed his graduate work; she also typed and copy edited much of his work, including his Ph.D. dissertation.[26] There, he met Hans Gerth, a professor in the Department of Sociology. Although Mills did not take any courses with him, Gerth He became a mentor and close friend. In August 1940, Freya divorced Mills, but the couple remarried in March 1941. Their daughter, Pamela, was born on January 15, 1943.[27][page needed]

Mills received his Ph.D. in Sociology from the University of Wisconsin–Madison in 1942. His dissertation was entitled A Sociological Account of Pragmatism: An Essay on the Sociology of Knowledge.[28] Mills left Wisconsin in early 1942, after he had been appointed Professor of Sociology at the University of Maryland, College Park.

Early career

Timeline of Mills' life. Click the image for greater detail.
Timeline of Mills' life. Click the image for greater detail.

During his work as an Associate Professor of Sociology from 1941 until 1945 at the University of Maryland, College Park, Mills's awareness and involvement in American politics grew. During World War II, Mills became friends with historians Richard Hofstadter, Frank Freidel, and Ken Stampp. The four academics collaborated on many topics, and each wrote about contemporary issues surrounding the war and how it affected American society.[29]

In the mid-1940s, while he was still at Maryland, Mills began contributing "journalistic sociology" and opinion pieces to intellectual journals such as The New Republic, The New Leader, and Politics, the journal established by his friend Dwight Macdonald in 1944.[30][31]

In 1945, Mills moved to New York after securing a research associate position at Columbia University's Bureau of Applied Social Research. He separated from Freya with this move, and the couple divorced in 1947.[32]

Mills was appointed Assistant Professor in the University's sociology department in 1946.[32] Mills received a grant of $2,500 from the Guggenheim Foundation in April 1945 to fund his research in 1946. During that time, he wrote White Collar, which was finally published in 1951.[33]

In 1946, Mills published From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, a translation of Weber's essays co-authored with Hans Gerth.[29] In 1953, the two published a second work, Character and Social Structure: The Psychology of Social Institutions.[34]

In 1947, Mills married his second wife, Ruth Harper, a statistician at the Bureau of Applied Social Research. She worked with Mills on New Men of Power (1948), White Collar (1951), and The Power Elite (1956). In 1949, Mills and Harper went to Chicago so that Mills could serve as a visiting professor at the University of Chicago. Mills returned to teaching at Columbia University after a semester at the University of Chicago and was promoted to Associate Professor of Sociology on July 1, 1950. Their daughter, Kathryn, was born on July 14, 1955.

Mills was promoted to Professor of Sociology at Columbia on July 1, 1956. From 1956 to 1957, the family moved to Copenhagen, where Mills acted as a Fulbright lecturer at the University of Copenhagen. Mills and Harper separated in December 1957, when Mills returned from Copenhagen alone. They were divorced in 1959.[35][page needed]

Later career

Mills married his third wife, Yaroslava Surmach, an American artist of Ukrainian descent, and settled in Rockland County, New York, in 1959. Their son, Nicholas Charles, was born on June 19, 1960.[36][page needed]

In August 1960, Mills spent time in Cuba, where he worked on developing his text Listen, Yankee. He spent time in Cuba interviewing President Fidel Castro, who claimed to have read and studied Mills's The Power Elite.[37]

Mills was described as a man in a hurry. Aside from his hurried nature, he was largely known for his combativeness. Both his private life – four marriages to three women, a child from each, and several affairs – and his professional life, which involved challenging and criticizing many of his professors and coworkers, have been characterized as "tumultuous". He wrote a fairly obvious, though slightly veiled, essay in criticism of the former chairman of the Wisconsin department, and he called the senior theorist there, Howard P. Becker, a "real fool".[38]

On one special occasion, when Mills was honored during a visit to the Soviet Union as a major critic of American society, he criticized censorship in the Soviet Union through his toast to an early Soviet leader who was "purged and murdered by the Stalinist." He said, "To the day when the complete works of Leon Trotsky are published in the Soviet Union!"[38]

Grave of C. Wright Mills, located in Waco, Texas.
Grave of C. Wright Mills, located in Waco, Texas.

In a biography of Mills by Irving Louis Horowitz, the author writes about Mills's acute awareness of his heart condition. He speculates that it affected the way he lived his adult life. Mills was described as someone who worked fast, yet efficiently. That is argued to be a result of his knowing that he would not live long due to his heart health. Horowitz describes Mills as "a man in search of his destiny".[39]

Death

Mills suffered from a series of heart attacks throughout his life and his fourth[38] attack led to his death on March 20, 1962, in West Nyack, New York.[40]

Relationships to other theorists

Who Mills was influenced by

C. Wright Mills was strongly influenced by pragmatism, specifically the works of George Herbert Mead, John Dewey, Charles Sanders Peirce, and William James.[41] The social structure aspects of Mills's works is shaped largely by Max Weber and the writing of Karl Mannheim, who followed Weber's work closely. Mills also acknowledged a general influence of Marxism; he noted that Marxism had become an essential tool for sociologists and therefore all must naturally be educated on the subject; any Marxist influence was then a result of sufficient education. Neo-Freudianism also helped shape Mills's work.[42]

Mills was an intense student of philosophy before he became a sociologist. His vision of radical, egalitarian democracy was a direct result of the influence of ideas from Thorstein Veblen, John Dewey, and Mead.[43] During his time at the University of Wisconsin, Mills was deeply influenced by Hans Gerth, a sociology professor from Germany. Mills gained an insight into European learning and sociological theory from Gerth.[44]

Who Mills influenced[citation needed]

Stanley Cohen: was a sociologist and criminologist, Professor of Sociology at the London School of Economics, known for breaking academic ground on "emotional management", including the mismanagement of emotions in the form of sentimentality, overreaction, and emotional denial.

G. William Domhoff: is a Distinguished Professor Emeritus and research professor of psychology and sociology at the University of California, Santa Cruz, and a founding faculty member of UCSC's Cowell College.

Tom Hayden: was an American social and political activist, author, and politician.

Rosabeth Moss Kanter: is the Ernest L. Arbuckle professor of business at Harvard Business School; Her book Men and Women of the Corporation won the 1977 C. Wright Mills Award for the year's outstanding book on social issues.

Arnold Kaufman: was a French engineer, professor of Applied Mechanics and Operations Research at the Mines ParisTech in Paris, at the Grenoble Institute of Technology and the Université catholique de Louvain , and scientific advisor at Bull Group .

Ralph Miliband: was a British sociologist and has been described as "one of the best known academic Marxists of his generation",

Teodor Shanin: was a British sociologist who was for many years Professor of Sociology at the University of Manchester.

William Appleman Williams: was one of the 20th century's most prominent revisionist historians of American diplomacy.

Jock Young: was a British sociologist and an influential criminologist

Outlook

"I do not believe that social science will 'save the world' although I see nothing at all wrong with 'trying to save the world' ... If there are any ways out of the crises of our period by means of intellect, is it not up to the social scientist to state them? ... It is on the level of human awareness that virtually all solutions to great problems must now lie" - Mills 1959:193[45]

There has long been debate over Mills's intellectual outlook. Mills is often seen as a "closet Marxist" because of his emphasis on social classes and their roles in historical progress and attempt to keep Marxist traditions alive in social theory. Just as often however, others argue that Mills more closely identified with the work of Max Weber, whom many sociologists interpret as an exemplar of sophisticated (and intellectually adequate) anti-Marxism and modern liberalism. However, Mills clearly gives precedence to social structure described by the political, economic and military institutions and not culture, which is presented in its massified form as means to ends sought by the power elite, which puts him firmly in the Marxist and not Weberian camp, so much that in his collection of classical essays, Weber's Protestant Ethic is not included. Weber's idea of bureaucracy as internalized social control was embraced by Mills as was the historicity of his method, but far from liberalism (being its critic), Mills was a radical who was culturally forced to distance himself from Marx while being "near" him.

While Mills never embraced the "Marxist" label, he told his closest associates that he felt much closer to what he saw as the best currents of a flexible humanist Marxism than to its alternatives. He considered himself as a "plain Marxist" working in the spirit of young Marx as he claims in his collected essays: "Power, Politics and People" (Oxford University Press, 1963). In a November 1956 letter to his friends Bette and Harvey Swados, Mills declared "[i]n the meantime, let's not forget that there's more [that's] still useful in even the Sweezy[a] kind of Marxism than in all the routineers of J. S. Mill[b] put together."

There is an important quotation from Letters to Tovarich (an autobiographical essay) dated Fall 1957 titled "On Who I Might Be and How I Got That Way":

You've asked me, 'What might you be?' Now I answer you: 'I am a Wobbly.' I mean this spiritually and politically. In saying this I refer less to political orientation than to political ethos, and I take Wobbly to mean one thing: the opposite of bureaucrat. ... I am a Wobbly, personally, down deep, and for good. I am outside the whale, and I got that way through social isolation and self-help. But do you know what a Wobbly is? It's a kind of spiritual condition. Don't be afraid of the word, Tovarich. A Wobbly is not only a man who takes orders from himself. He's also a man who's often in the situation where there are no regulations to fall back upon that he hasn't made up himself. He doesn't like bosses—capitalistic or communistic—they are all the same to him. He wants to be, and he wants everyone else to be, his own boss at all times under all conditions and for any purposes they may want to follow up. This kind of spiritual condition, and only this, is Wobbly freedom.[46][c]

These two quotations are the ones chosen by Kathryn Mills for the better acknowledgement of his nuanced thinking.

It appears that Mills understood his position as being much closer to Marx than to Weber but influenced by both, as Stanley Aronowitz argued in "A Mills Revival?".[47]

Mills argues that micro and macro levels of analysis can be linked together by the sociological imagination, which enables its possessor to understand the large historical sense in terms of its meaning for the inner life and the external career of a variety of individuals. Individuals can only understand their own experiences fully if they locate themselves within their period of history. The key factor is the combination of private problems with public issues: the combination of troubles that occur within the individual's immediate milieu and relations with other people with matters that have to do with institutions of an historical society as a whole.

Mills shares with Marxist sociology and other "conflict theorists" the view that American society is sharply divided and systematically shaped by the relationship between the powerful and powerless. He also shares their concerns for alienation, the effects of social structure on the personality, and the manipulation of people by elites and the mass media. Mills combined such conventional Marxian concerns with careful attention to the dynamics of personal meaning and small-group motivations, topics for which Weberian scholars are more noted.

Mills had a very combative outlook regarding and towards many parts of his life, the people in it, and his works. In that way, he was a self-proclaimed outsider: "I am an outlander, not only regionally, but deep down and for good."[48][page needed]

C. Wright Mills gave considerable study to the Soviet Union. Invited there, where he was acknowledged for his criticism of American society, Mills used the opportunity to attack Soviet censorship. He did hold the controversial notion that the US and the Soviet Union were ruled by similar bureaucratic power elites and thus were convergent rather than divergent societies.

Above all, Mills understood sociology, when properly approached, as an inherently political endeavor and a servant of the democratic process. In The Sociological Imagination, Mills wrote:

It is the political task of the social scientist – as of any liberal educator – continually to translate personal troubles into public issues, and public issues into the terms of their human meaning for a variety of individuals. It is his task to display in his work – and, as an educator, in his life as well – this kind of sociological imagination. And it is his purpose to cultivate such habits of mind among the men and women who are publicly exposed to him. To secure these ends is to secure reason and individuality, and to make these the predominant values of a democratic society.[49][page needed]

— C. Wright Mills, The Sociological Imagination, page 187

Contemporary American scholar Cornel West argued in his text American Evasion of Philosophy that Mills follows the tradition of pragmatism. Mills shared Dewey's goal of a "creative democracy" and emphasis on the importance of political practice but criticized Dewey for his inattention to the rigidity of power structure in the US. Mills's dissertation was titled Sociology and Pragmatism: The Higher Learning in America, and West categorized him along with pragmatists in his time Sidney Hook and Reinhold Niebuhr as thinkers during pragmatism's "mid-century crisis."

Mills's critique of sociology at the time

Seeing as though he was a sociologists himself, some may be surprised to learn that Mills was quite critical of the Sociological approach during his time. In fact, scholars saw The Sociological Imagination as "Mills's final break with academic sociology."[50] In this work, Mills was critical of specific people, such as Parsons and Paul Lazarsfeld, a member of his department at Columbia. While Mills did have frustrations with Parsons's theories and the Columbia department, his arguments in The Sociological Imagination are based in more than retaliatory remarks.[51]

While The Sociological Imagination was and is still sometimes read as "an attack on empirical research" when it is really "a critique of a certain research style.[52]" Mills was worried about sociology falling into the traps of normative thinking and ceasing to be a critic of social life. Throughout his academic career, Mills fought with mainstream sociology about different conflicting sociological styles.[53] Mills was primarily worried about social sciences being susceptible to the "power and prestige of normative culture" and veering away from its original objective.[54] It is difficult to say whether or not sociology moved in the direction that Mills feared, however, scholars do know that until his death, Mills fought to maintain what he thought was the integrity of sociology.

Books

From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (1946) was edited and translated in collaboration with Gerth.[55][page needed] Mills and Gerth had began collaborating in 1940, selected a few of Weber's original German text, and translated them into English.[56] The preface of the book begins by explaining the disputable difference of meaning that English words give to German writing. The authors attempt to explain their devotion to being as accurate as possible in translating Weber's writing.

The New Men of Power: America's Labor Leaders (1948) studies the "Labor Metaphysic" and the dynamic of labor leaders cooperating with business officials. The book concludes that the labor movement had effectively renounced its traditional oppositional role and become reconciled to life within a capitalist system.

The Puerto Rican Journey (1950) was written in collaboration with Clarence Senior and Rose Kohn Goldsen. It documents a methodological study and does not address theoretical sociological framework.

White Collar: The American Middle Classes (1951) offers a rich historical account of the middle classes in the United States and contends that bureaucracies have overwhelmed middle-class workers, robbing them of all independent thought and turning them into near-automatons, oppressed but cheerful. Mills states there are three types of power within the workplace: coercion or physical force; authority; and manipulation.[57][page needed] Through this piece, the thoughts of Mills and Weber seem to coincide in their belief that Western Society is trapped within the iron cage of bureaucratic rationality, which would lead society to focus more on rationality and less on reason.[57][page needed] Mills's fear was that the middle class was becoming "politically emasculated and culturally stultified," which would allow a shift in power from the middle class to the strong social elite.[58][page needed] Middle-class workers receive an adequate salary but have become alienated from the world because of their inability to affect or change it.

Character and Social Structure (1953) was co-authored with Gerth. This was considered his most theoretically sophisticated work. Mills later came into conflict with Gerth, though Gerth positively referred to him as, "an excellent operator, a whippersnapper, promising young man on the make, and Texas cowboy à la ride and shoot."[38] Generally speaking, Character and Social Structure combines the social behaviorism and personality structure of pragmatism with the social structure of Weberian sociology. It is centered on roles, how they are interpersonal, and how they are related to institutions.[59][page needed]

The Power Elite (1956) describes the relationships among the political, military, and economic elites, noting that they share a common world view; that power rests in the centralization of authority within the elites of American society.[57][page needed] The centralization of authority is made up of the following components: a "military metaphysic", in other words a military definition of reality; "class identity", recognizing themselves as separate from and superior to the rest of society; "interchangeability" (they move within and between the three institutional structures and hold interlocking positions of power therein); cooperation/socialization, in other words, socialization of prospective new members is done based on how well they "clone" themselves socially after already established elites. Mills's view on the power elite is that they represent their own interest, which include maintaining a "permanent war economy" to control the ebbs and flow of American Capitalism and the masking of "a manipulative social and political order through the mass media."[58][page needed]

The Causes of World War Three (1958) and Listen, Yankee (1960) were important works that followed. In both, Mills attempts to create a moral voice for society and make the power elite responsible to the "public".[60][page needed] Although Listen, Yankee was considered highly controversial, it was an exploration of the Cuban Revolution written from the viewpoint of a Cuban revolutionary and was a very innovative style of writing for that period in American history.[61][page needed]

The Sociological Imagination (1959), which is considered Mills's most influential book,[d] describes a mindset for studying sociology, the sociological imagination, that stresses being able to connect individual experiences and societal relationships. Three components form the sociological imagination are history, biography, and social structure. Mills asserts that a critical task for social scientists is to "translate personal troubles into public issues".[63][page needed] The distinction between troubles and issues is that troubles relate to how a single person feels about something while issues refer to how a society affects groups of people. For instance, a man who cannot find employment is experiencing a trouble, while a city with a massive unemployment rate makes it not just a personal trouble but an issue.[64] Sociologists, then, rightly connect their autobiographical, personal challenges to social institutions. Social scientists should then connect those institutions to social structures and locate them within a historical narrative.

The version of Images of Man: The Classic Tradition in Sociological Thinking (1960) worked on by C. Wright Mills is simply an edited copy with the addition of an introduction written himself.[65][page needed] Through this work, Mills explains that he believes the use of models is the characteristic of classical sociologists, and that these models are the reason classical sociologists maintain relevance.[59][page needed]

The Marxists (1962) takes Mills's explanation of sociological models from Images of Man and uses it to criticize modern liberalism and Marxism. He believes that the liberalist model does not work and cannot create an overarching view of society, but rather it is more of an ideology for the entrepreneurial middle class. Marxism, however, may be incorrect in its overall view, but it has a working model for societal structure, the mechanics of the history of society, and the roles of individuals. One of Mills's problems with the Marxist model is that it uses units that are small and autonomous, which he finds too simple to explain capitalism. Mills then provides discussion on Marx as a determinist.[59][page needed]

Legacy

While he is now gone, Mills's ideas and works continue to live on. Mills presented his ideas as a way to keep American society from falling into the trap of what is known as "mass society". Many scholars argue that Mills' ideas sparked the radical movements of the 1960s, which ultimately took place after he died. Not only was his work recognized in the United States but it was also greatly appreciated abroad.

Stephen Scanlan and Liz Grauerholz touch on the legacy of Mills in their work titled 50 Years of C. Wright Mills and "The Sociological Imagination." Looking at this work, the authors first note how Mills's theory on private troubles and public issues served as a turning point in the way that scholars looked at issues in the world. By showing the intersection of troubles and issues, Mills was able to show how interconnected our world is, and how public problems are a culmination of many private troubles. Another component of his theories in this work was his analysis of how biography and history impact one's trajectory in life. The authors explain how not only did this theory impact scholars writ large, but it also impacted the way they interacted with and taught their students.[66] Scanland and Grauerholz present the example of a professor who had to reorient herself and her teaching style when she moved from "an urban campus in Chicago to a small liberal arts college in rural Maine."[67] Mills's work resulted in a shift in academia, a shift that is still felt today. Scanlan and Grauerholz share that the "International Sociological Association recognized The Sociological Imagination as second on its list of the 'Books of the Century'".[68] The importance of this work has not dwindled – it has stood the test of time and has been used as a means to interpret social issues in the world.

Mills's legacy can be most deeply felt through the printed compilation of his letters and other works called C Wright Mills: Letters and Autobiographical Writings, edited by two of his children, Kathryn and Pamela Mills. In the book's introduction, Dan Wakefield states that Mills's sociological vision of American society is one that transcends the field of sociology. Above all else, Wakefield remembers Mills's character most as being surrounded by controversy:

In that era of cautious professors in gray flannel suits, Mills came roaring into Morningside Heights on his BMW motorcycle, wearing plaid shirts, old jeans, and work boots, carrying his books in a duffel bag strapped across his broad chest .... In the classroom as well as in the pages of his widely read books, Mills was a great teacher. His lectures matched the flamboyance of his personal image, as he managed to make entertaining the heavyweight social theories of Karl Mannheim, Max Weber, and José Ortega y Gasset. He shocked us [students] out of our "silent generation" student torpor by pounding his desk and proclaiming that each man should build his own house (as he did himself) and that, by God, with the proper study, we should each be able to build our own car![69]

In 1964, the Society for the Study of Social Problems established the C. Wright Mills Award for the book that "best exemplifies outstanding social science research and a great mutual understanding the individual and society in the tradition of the distinguished sociologist, C. Wright Mills."[70] This award has been given to many and serves as a sign that while he is no longer with, the ideas and theories of C. Wright Mills are timeless.

Notes

  1. ^ Paul M. Sweezy was the founder of Monthly Review magazine, "an independent socialist magazine".
  2. ^ a liberal intellectual.
  3. ^ Wobblies are members of the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), and the direct action they are favouring includes passive resistance, strikes, and boycotts. They want to build a new society according to general socialist principles but they are refusing to endorse any socialist party or any other kind of political party.
  4. ^ The Sociological Imagination ranked second (outranked only by Max Weber's Economy and Society) in a 1997 survey asking members of the International Sociological Association to identify the books published in the 20th century most influential on sociologists.[62]

References

Footnotes

  1. ^ C. W. Mills 2000a, p. 139.
  2. ^ Wallerstein 2008.
  3. ^ Tilman 1979, p. 481.
  4. ^ Tilman 1979, pp. 491–493.
  5. ^ Elliott 2001, p. 12.
  6. ^ Feeley & Simon 2011, p. 40.
  7. ^ Moody, Kim (July 8, 2018). "Turning to the Working Class". Jacobin. Interviewed by Maisano, Chris. New York. Retrieved May 5, 2019.
  8. ^ Finnegan, Michael (October 23, 2016). "'The Radical Inside the System': Tom Hayden, Protester-Turned-Politician, Dies at 76". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved May 5, 2019.
  9. ^ Potia, Zeenat; Ely, Robin; Kanter, Rosabeth Moss (September 12, 2018). "Celebrating a Landmark Book on Gender in the Workplace". Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School. Retrieved May 5, 2019.
  10. ^ Ross 2015.
  11. ^ T. Mills 2015, p. 33.
  12. ^ Mattson 2001, p. 22.
  13. ^ Young 2014, p. 357.
  14. ^ Geary 2009, p. 1.
  15. ^ C. W. Mills 1960.
  16. ^ Geary 2009, p. 16.
  17. ^ C. W. Mills 2000a, p. 248.
  18. ^ C. W. Mills 2000a; Ritzer 2011, pp. 215–217.
  19. ^ C. W. Mills 2000a, p. 21.
  20. ^ Crossman, Ashley (2019). "Biography of C. Wright Mills: His Life and Contributions to Sociology". ThoughtCo. Dotdash. Retrieved May 5, 2019.
  21. ^ C. W. Mills 2000a, p. 25.
  22. ^ Philips 2005, p. 1705.
  23. ^ Horowitz 1983, p. 40.
  24. ^ Geary 2009, p. 4.
  25. ^ C. W. Mills 2000a, p. 34.
  26. ^ C. W. Mills 2000a, p. 35.
  27. ^ C. W. Mills 2000a, p. 344.
  28. ^ C. W. Mills 2000a, p. 77.
  29. ^ a b C. W. Mills 2000a, p. 47.
  30. ^ Horowitz 1983, pp. 67–71.
  31. ^ Elson, John (April 4, 1994). "No Foolish Consistency". Time. Vol. 143 no. 14. New York. Archived from the original on January 21, 2013. Retrieved May 5, 2019.
  32. ^ a b Geary 2009, p. 76.
  33. ^ C. W. Mills 2000a, p. 81.
  34. ^ C. W. Mills 2000a, p. 93.
  35. ^ C. W. Mills 2000a, p. 259.
  36. ^ C. W. Mills 2000a, p. 346.
  37. ^ C. W. Mills 2000a, p. 312.
  38. ^ a b c d Ritzer 2011, pp. 215–217.
  39. ^ Horowitz 1983, p. 81.
  40. ^ Geary 2009, p. 216.
  41. ^ Oakes & Vidich 1999, p. 1.
  42. ^ Miller, John E. (November 2018). "The Continuing Relevance of C. Wright Mills: His Approach to Research and What We Can Learn From It". Studies in Midwestern History. 4 (2): 1–31.
  43. ^ Tilman 1984, p. 1.
  44. ^ C. W. Mills 2000a, p. 39.
  45. ^ Mills, C. Wright (1959). The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 193.
  46. ^ C. W. Mills 2000a, p. 252.
  47. ^ Aronowitz 2003.
  48. ^ Horowitz 1983, p. 84.
  49. ^ C. W. Mills 2000b.
  50. ^ McQuarie, Donald. 1989. “The Sociological Imagination: Reclaiming a Vision?” American Sociologist. 20(3):291. https://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=122793b5-aa4e-4755-b987-9a70c40d083a%40sessionmgr4007&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=5329323&db=sih
  51. ^ McQuarie, Donald. 1989. “The Sociological Imagination: Reclaiming a Vision?” American Sociologist. 20(3):292. https://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=122793b5-aa4e-4755-b987-9a70c40d083a%40sessionmgr4007&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=5329323&db=sih
  52. ^ McQuarie, Donald. 1989. “The Sociological Imagination: Reclaiming a Vision?” American Sociologist. 20(3):292. https://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=122793b5-aa4e-4755-b987-9a70c40d083a%40sessionmgr4007&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=5329323&db=sih
  53. ^ McQuarie, Donald. 1989. “The Sociological Imagination: Reclaiming a Vision?” American Sociologist. 20(3):293. https://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=122793b5-aa4e-4755-b987-9a70c40d083a%40sessionmgr4007&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=5329323&db=sih
  54. ^ McQuarie, Donald. 1989. “The Sociological Imagination: Reclaiming a Vision?” American Sociologist. 20(3):294. https://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=122793b5-aa4e-4755-b987-9a70c40d083a%40sessionmgr4007&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=5329323&db=sih
  55. ^ C. W. Mills 2000a, p. 206.
  56. ^ Oakes & Vidich 1999, p. 6.
  57. ^ a b c Mann 2008.
  58. ^ a b Sim & Parker 1997.
  59. ^ a b c Scimecca 1977.
  60. ^ C. W. Mills 2000a; Scimecca 1977.
  61. ^ C. W. Mills 2000a, p. 365.
  62. ^ "Books of the Century". International Sociological Association. Archived from the original on September 18, 2015. Retrieved September 22, 2015.
  63. ^ C. W. Mills 2000b, p. 187.
  64. ^ C. W. Mills 2012, pp. 13–18.
  65. ^ C. W. Mills 2000a, p. 207.
  66. ^ Scanlan, Stephen J. and Grauerholz, Liz. 2009. “50 Years of C. Wright Mills and The Sociological Imagination.” Teaching Sociology. 37(1):4. Retrieved October 16, 2021.https://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=085dd531-c054-4fe5-9135-2e84b3f9069c%40sdc-v-sessmgr02&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=36283002&db=sih
  67. ^ Scanlan, Stephen J. and Grauerholz, Liz. 2009. “50 Years of C. Wright Mills and The Sociological Imagination.” Teaching Sociology. 37(1):4. Retrieved October 16, 2021.https://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=085dd531-c054-4fe5-9135-2e84b3f9069c%40sdc-v-sessmgr02&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=36283002&db=sih
  68. ^ Scanlan, Stephen J. and Grauerholz, Liz. 2009. “50 Years of C. Wright Mills and The Sociological Imagination.” Teaching Sociology. 37(1):3. Retrieved October 16, 2021.https://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=085dd531-c054-4fe5-9135-2e84b3f9069c%40sdc-v-sessmgr02&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=36283002&db=sih
  69. ^ C. W. Mills 2000a, p. 6.
  70. ^ "C. Wright Mills Award". Knoxville, Tennessee: Society for the Study of Social Problems. Retrieved April 12, 2012.

Bibliography

Further reading

External links

This page was last edited on 15 November 2021, at 04:30
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.