To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Boxgrove Man
Tibia from Boxgrove Man
Common nameBoxgrove Man
SpeciesHomo, species uncertain
Age480,000 years
Place discoveredBoxgrove, England, United Kingdom
Date discovered1993
Discovered byMark Roberts

Boxgrove Man is a name given to three fossils of early humans, found at Boxgrove in Sussex, and dated to about 480,000 years old. One piece of the tibia (shinbone) and two teeth were found. The tibia was of a mature well-built man, perhaps from the common ancestor of modern humans and Neanderthals, and the teeth are thought to be of early Neanderthals. They are the oldest fossils of the genus homo found in Britain.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/2
    Views:
    512
    18 420
  • 480,000 year old Boxgrove Archaeological Site
  • At home with the Neanderthals: Excavations at La Cotte de St Brelade

Transcription

Fossils

The site at Boxgrove in Sussex dates to the late Cromerian Stage, around 500,000 years ago, and it is the earliest site in Britain with fossils of the genus homo.[1] The tibia was discovered in 1993 by archaeologist Mark Roberts and his team of the Institute of Archeology at University College London.[2] The two teeth were found in 1995 and 1996 on returns to the site in the hope, which was realised, of finding further remains. The tibia was originally about 40 centimetres (1 ft 4 in) long and is of a well-built male with a height of 177–182 centimetres (5 ft 10 in – 6 ft 0 in). The teeth were lower incisors found about a metre apart and are thought to belong to the same individual, a mature adult.[3] The exceptional structural strength suggests a cold-adapted body with proportions paralleling those of the Neanderthals.[4] Archaeological evidence indicates that these early humans had the ability to hunt or at least scavenge with stone tools as the team discovered hundreds of Acheulean flint tools at the site.[5] The two teeth found show scratches, suggesting an eating technique in which food was cut with a tool whilst gripped between the jaws.[6]

The site

Boxgrove in this period evolved from coastal mudflats beneath chalk cliffs to a mosaic of habitats as the sea retreated. There were then areas of grassland, pools, scrub and woodland, with diverse prey and supplies of flint which made the area attractive to early humans. Prey included horse and probably deer.[7] Other mammal fossils were of extinct species of rhinoceros, bears, and voles.[8] It is most likely that H. heidelbergensis hunted these animals for sustenance with the aid of the stone tools also discovered at this site. There is clear evidence on the animal remains that they were butchered, but it cannot be proven that the species whose fossil was found in association with them hunted these animals or scavenged them. Teeth marks on the tibia fossil may be evidence that he or she was scavenged as well, either by cannibalism or scavenging by another animal.[9]

Comparative study

The discovery of the fossils of 29 individuals of a similar age at Sima de los Huesos in Spain has allowed scientists to gain a much greater understanding of the Boxgrove fossils by a comparative study in 2022. The tibia was found in a higher stratigraphical level than the teeth, and is unlikely to come from the same individual. The 2022 study has found that the teeth fit in the morphological range of the Sima de los huesos fossils, which have been identified by aDNA as early Neanderthals. The tibia falls outside the Sima de los huesos range, and would fit the last common ancestor of modern humans and Neanderthals. The Boxgrove fossils were dated to around 480,000 years ago.[10][11]

See also

References

  1. ^ Ashton, Nick (2017). Early Humans. London, UK: William Collins. pp. 53, 63, 104. ISBN 978-0-00-815035-8.
  2. ^ Roberts, M. B.; Stringer, C. B.; Parfitt, S. A. (1994). "A hominid tibia from Middle Pleistocene sediments at Boxgrove, UK". Nature. 369 (6478): 311–313. Bibcode:1994Natur.369..311R. doi:10.1038/369311a0. PMID 8183368. S2CID 29743115.
  3. ^ Ashton, Early Humans, p. 104
  4. ^ Stringer, C. B.; Trinkaus, E.; Roberts, M. B. (May 1998). "The Middle Pleistocene human tibia from Boxgrove". Journal of Human Evolution. 34 (5): 509–547. doi:10.1006/jhev.1998.0215. PMID 9614636.
  5. ^ Stout, Dietrich; Apel, Jan; Commander, Julia; Roberts, Mark (2014-01-01). "Late Acheulean technology and cognition at Boxgrove, UK". Journal of Archaeological Science. 41: 576–590. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2013.10.001. ISSN 0305-4403.
  6. ^ Neil Oliver (2012). A History of Ancient Britain. United Kingdom: W&N. p. 480. ISBN 978-0753828861.
  7. ^ Ashton, Early Humans, p. 105
  8. ^ "500000 BC - Boxgrove - Current Archaeology". Current Archaeology. 2007-05-24. Retrieved 2018-01-30.
  9. ^ A History of Britain, Richard Dargie (2007), p. 8–9
  10. ^ Lockey, Annabelle; et al. (November 2022). "Comparing the Boxgrove and Atapuerca (Sima de los Huesos) human fossils: Do they represent distinct paleodemes?" (PDF). Journal of Human Evolution. 172: 103253. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2022.103253. PMID 36162354. S2CID 252505383.
  11. ^ "Reanalysing the bones from Boxgrove". Current Archaeology (395): 11. February 2023.
This page was last edited on 10 January 2024, at 17:18
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.