To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Borromean rings

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In mathematics, the Borromean rings[a] consist of three topological circles which are linked and form a Brunnian link (i.e., removing any ring results in two unlinked rings). In other words, no two of the three rings are linked with each other as a Hopf link, but nonetheless all three are linked.

Borromean rings

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    396 383
    269 752
    3 021
    175 905
    623
  • Borromean Olympic Rings - Numberphile
  • Borromean Ribbons - Numberphile
  • New IMU Logo based on the tight Borromean rings
  • Neon Knots and Borromean Beer Rings - Numberphile
  • Borromean rings

Transcription

BRADY HARAN: So that's the Eurostar bringing people from the continent here to London for the Olympics. And if you're in London, you can't far without seeing these. Now, the Olympic rings are pretty cool, but they're joined in a bit of a disappointing way, each one joined to the one next to it. It's not very creative. Here at Numberphile, we like our rings joined in a bit more of a clever way. JOHN HUNTON: We all know how two rings can be linked. So if I've got one ring and I can link it with another one. And that's how I can start to form a chain. And I can't pull those two rings apart. But the cute idea of a Borromean ring is that you end up with three rings. Let's see if I can draw. So that's going to be my first ring. And my second ring isn't linked to it. Like that. See that one, if I filled in the gaps, would be just sitting on top of this one. And then I put a third ring in. And this third ring is going to go underneath my first one and over my second one. Now. If you made that out of physical pieces of metal, you'd find that you couldn't pull it apart. Because take any two of those rings, and it looks like they could be pulled apart. But the third one acts as some sort of tie joining them together in a way that they can never be physically expanded. And I've got one here. I took a course in silver smithing some years ago, so I used to make things like this. And here we have three rings. Arrange it like that so they're each at 90 degrees to each other. And each one goes outside one ring and inside the other. But as you go around the rings one, two, three, each is inside outside, outside inside, and so on. So the whole thing hones together, and you can't take them apart. So this is an example of what mathematicians call the higher linkage. So this is a more complicated way in which three things could be band together, than the two rings. No two rings are linked together in this sense. BRADY HARAN: Does this only work with the number three? JOHN HUNTON: No. Once you start playing with these things, you realize you could make a corresponding entity out of any odd number of rings. It has to be odd. Yes, it gets a bit fiddly if you try to go beyond five, unless you're making it much bigger. The other thing that you might want to know about it is this is much more familiar as a braid. And everyone knows how to braid three strips, three wires. So if I had three ropes and I braid by taking the middle one, putting it over onto the outer ones. And then I will swap over down this row, won't I? So by that stage, I've swapped everything around once. I've got two overlaps. Under, and then back to there. So if you chase this blue one, this first blue one. So it's gone all the way to the other side and all the way back. So this one is an under. This other outer one going all the way around here, and that's come back to its end. If I now join it up, if I solder this end to this end, and that end to that end, and that end to that end, I'd have three rings, and they'd be linked in exactly the same fashion. BRADY HARAN:I tell you what I take from that. I think the professor is much better at making rings than he is at braiding hair. JOHN HUNTON: Yes. BRADY HARAN: If you want to see a bit more about interlinking rings, I've actually done another video just last week about how chemicals can link like this as well. Hopefully floating there, you can see a little preview of the video, and you can click on it. There will also be a link under the video. So have a look at that one also. So I'm here in London, and I'm going to beat up Henry.

Contents

Mathematical properties

Impossibility of perfectly circular rings

Although the typical picture of the Borromean rings (above right picture) may lead one to think the link can be formed from geometrically ideal circular rings, they cannot be. Freedman and Skora (1987) prove that a certain class of links, including the Borromean links, cannot be exactly circular. Alternatively, this can be seen from considering the link diagram: if one assumes that circles 1 and 2 touch at their two crossing points, then they either lie in a plane or a sphere. In either case, the third circle must pass through this plane or sphere four times, without lying in it, which is impossible; see (Lindström & Zetterström 1991).

A realization of the Borromean rings as ellipses
A realization of the Borromean rings as ellipses
3D image of Borromean Rings
3D image of Borromean Rings

It is, however, true that one can use ellipses (right picture). These may be taken to be of arbitrarily small eccentricity; i.e. no matter how close to being circular their shape may be, as long as they are not perfectly circular, they can form Borromean links if suitably positioned; as an example, thin circles made from bendable elastic wire may be used as Borromean rings.

Relationship to the octahedral graph

Apart from indicating which strand crosses over the other, link diagrams use the same notation to show two strands crossing, as graph diagrams use to show four edges meeting at a common vertex. Accordingly, the graph of the regular octahedron may be converted into a link diagram by prescribing that, as a strand follows successive edges, it alternates between passing over a vertex and passing under the next. The result has three separate loops, linked together as Borromean rings.[1]

Linking

In knot theory, the Borromean rings are a simple example of a Brunnian link: although each pair of rings is unlinked, the whole link cannot be unlinked. There are a number of ways of seeing this.

Simplest is that the fundamental group of the complement of two unlinked circles is the free group on two generators, a and b, by the Seifert–van Kampen theorem, and then the third loop has the class of the commutator, [ab] = aba−1b−1, as one can see from the link diagram: over one, over the next, back under the first, back under the second. This is non-trivial in the fundamental group, and thus the Borromean rings are linked.

Another way is that the cohomology of the complement supports a non-trivial Massey product, which is not the case for the unlink. This is a simple example of the Massey product and further, the algebra corresponds to the geometry: a 3-fold Massey product is a 3-fold product which is only defined if all the 2-fold products vanish, which corresponds to the Borromean rings being pairwise unlinked (2-fold products vanish), but linked overall (3-fold product does not vanish).

In arithmetic topology, there is an analogy between knots and prime numbers in which one considers links between primes. The triple of primes (13, 61, 937) are linked modulo 2 (the Rédei symbol is −1) but are pairwise unlinked modulo 2 (the Legendre symbols are all 1). Therefore, these primes have been called a "proper Borromean triple modulo 2"[2] or "mod 2 Borromean primes".[3]

Hyperbolic geometry

The Borromean rings are a hyperbolic link: the complement of the Borromean rings in the 3-sphere admits a complete hyperbolic metric of finite volume. The canonical (Epstein-Penner) polyhedral decomposition of the complement consists of two regular ideal octahedra. The volume is 16Л(π/4) = 7.32772… where Л is the Lobachevsky function.[4]

History

The name "Borromean rings" comes from their use in the coat of arms of the aristocratic Borromeo family in Northern Italy. The link itself is much older and has appeared in the form of the valknut on Norse image stones dating back to the 7th century.

The Borromean rings as a symbol of the Christian Trinity, from a 13th-century manuscript.
The Borromean rings as a symbol of the Christian Trinity, from a 13th-century manuscript.

The Borromean rings have been used in different contexts to indicate strength in unity, e.g., in religion or art. In particular, some have used the design to symbolize the Trinity. The psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan famously found inspiration in the Borromean rings as a model for his topology of human subjectivity, with each ring representing a fundamental Lacanian component of reality (the "real", the "imaginary", and the "symbolic").

The rings were used as the logo of Ballantine beer, and are still used by the Ballantine brand beer, now distributed by the current brand owner, the Pabst Brewing Company.

The Borromean rings, especially their mathematical properties, were featured by Martin Gardner in his September 1961 "Mathematical Games column" in Scientific American.

In 2006, the International Mathematical Union decided at the 25th International Congress of Mathematicians in Madrid, Spain to use a new logo based on the Borromean rings.[5]

A stone pillar at Marundeeswarar Temple in Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, has such a figure dating to before 6th century.[6][7]

Partial rings

In medieval and renaissance Europe, a number of visual signs are found that consist of three elements interlaced together in the same way that the Borromean rings are shown interlaced (in their conventional two-dimensional depiction), but the individual elements are not closed loops. Examples of such symbols are the Snoldelev stone horns and the Diana of Poitiers crescents. An example with three distinct elements is the logo of Sport Club Internacional. Less-related visual signs include the Gankyil and the Venn diagram on three sets.

Similarly, a monkey's fist knot is essentially a 3-dimensional representation of the Borromean rings, albeit with three layers, in most cases.

Using the pattern in the incomplete Borromean rings, one can balance three knives on three supports, such as three bottles or glasses, providing a support in the middle for a fourth bottle or glass.[8]

Multiple rings

The Discordian "mandala", containing five Borromean rings configurations
The Discordian "mandala", containing five Borromean rings configurations

Some knot-theoretic links contain multiple Borromean rings configurations; one five-loop link of this type is used as a symbol in Discordianism, based on a depiction in the Principia Discordia.

Connection with braids

The standard 3-strand braid corresponds to the Borromean rings.
The standard 3-strand braid corresponds to the Borromean rings.

If one cuts the Borromean rings, one obtains one iteration of the standard braid; conversely, if one ties together the ends of (one iteration of) a standard braid, one obtains the Borromean rings. Just as removing one Borromean ring unlinks the remaining two, removing one strand of the standard braid unbraids the other two: they are the basic Brunnian link and Brunnian braid, respectively.

In the standard link diagram, the Borromean rings are ordered non-transitively, in a cyclic order. Using the colors above, these are red over green, green over blue, blue over red – and thus after removing any one ring, for the remaining two, one is above the other and they can be unlinked. Similarly, in the standard braid, each strand is above one of the others and below the other.

Realizations

Crystal structure of molecular Borromean rings reported by Stoddart et al. (Science 2004)[9]
Crystal structure of molecular Borromean rings reported by Stoddart et al. (Science 2004)[9]

Molecular Borromean rings are the molecular counterparts of Borromean rings, which are mechanically-interlocked molecular architectures. In 1997, biologists Chengde Mao and coworkers of New York University succeeded in constructing a set of rings from DNA.[10] In 2003, chemist Fraser Stoddart and coworkers at UCLA utilised coordination chemistry to construct a set of rings in one step from 18 components.[9] Borromean ring structures have been shown to be an effective way to represent the structure of certain atomically precise noble metal clusters which are shielded by a surface layer of thiolate ligands (-SR), such as Au25(SR)18 and Ag25(SR)18.[11] A library of Borromean networks has been synthesized by design by Giuseppe Resnati and coworkers via halogen bond driven self-assembly.[12]

A quantum-mechanical analog of Borromean rings is called a halo state or an Efimov state (the existence of such states was predicted by physicist Vitaly Efimov, in 1970). For the first time the research group of Rudolf Grimm and Hanns-Christoph Nägerl from the Institute for Experimental Physics (University of Innsbruck, Austria) experimentally confirmed such a state in an ultracold gas of caesium atoms in 2006, and published their findings in the scientific journal Nature.[13] A team of physicists led by Randall Hulet of Rice University in Houston achieved this with a set of three bound lithium atoms and published their findings in the online journal Science Express.[14] In 2010, a team led by K. Tanaka created an Efimov state within a nucleus.[15]

See also

Notes

References

  1. ^ N. L. Biggs (1 March 1981). "T. P. Kirkman Mathematician". Bull. London Math. Soc. 13 (2): 116. doi:10.1112/blms/13.2.97. Retrieved 24 January 2017.
  2. ^ Denis Vogel (13 February 2004), Massey products in the Galois cohomology of number fields, urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-opus-44188
  3. ^ Masanori Morishita (22 April 2009), Analogies between Knots and Primes, 3-Manifolds and Number Rings, arXiv:0904.3399, Bibcode:2009arXiv0904.3399M
  4. ^ William Thurston (March 2002), "7. Computation of volume" (PDF), The Geometry and Topology of Three-Manifolds, p. 165
  5. ^ ICM 2006
  6. ^ Arul Lakshminarayan (May 2007). "Borromean Triangles and Prime Knots in an Ancient Temple" (PDF). Indian Academy of Sciences. Retrieved 18 September 2014.
  7. ^ Blog entry by Arul Lakshminarayan
  8. ^ Comments on Knives And Beer Bar Trick: Amazing Balance
  9. ^ a b Kelly S. Chichak; Stuart J. Cantrill; Anthony R. Pease; Sheng-Hsien Chiu; Gareth W. V. Cave; Jerry L. Atwood; J. Fraser Stoddart (28 May 2004). "Molecular Borromean Rings". Science. 304 (5675): 1308–1312. Bibcode:2004Sci...304.1308C. doi:10.1126/science.1096914. PMID 15166376.
  10. ^ C. Mao; W. Sun; N. C. Seeman (1997). "Assembly of Borromean rings from DNA". Nature. 386 (6621): 137–138. Bibcode:1997Natur.386..137M. doi:10.1038/386137b0. PMID 9062186.
  11. ^ Natarajan, Ganapati; Mathew, Ammu; Negishi, Yuichi; Whetten, Robert L.; Pradeep, Thalappil (2015-12-02). "A Unified Framework for Understanding the Structure and Modifications of Atomically Precise Monolayer Protected Gold Clusters". The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 119 (49): 27768–27785. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b08193. ISSN 1932-7447.
  12. ^ Vijith Kumar; Tullio Pilati; Giancarlo Terraneo; Franck Meyer; Pierangelo Metrangolo; Giuseppe Resnati (2017). "Halogen bonded Borromean networks by design: topology invariance and metric tuning in a library of multi-component systems". Chemical Science. 8 (3): 1801–1810. doi:10.1039/C6SC04478F. PMC 5477818. PMID 28694953.
  13. ^ T. Kraemer; M. Mark; P. Waldburger; J. G. Danzl; C. Chin; B. Engeser; A. D. Lange; K. Pilch; A. Jaakkola; H.-C. Nägerl; R. Grimm (2006). "Evidence for Efimov quantum states in an ultracold gas of caesium atoms". Nature. 440 (7082): 315–318. arXiv:cond-mat/0512394. Bibcode:2006Natur.440..315K. doi:10.1038/nature04626. PMID 16541068.
  14. ^ Clara Moskowitz (December 16, 2009), Strange Physical Theory Proved After Nearly 40 Years, Live Science
  15. ^ K. Tanaka (2010), "Observation of a Large Reaction Cross Section in the Drip-Line Nucleus 22C", Physical Review Letters, 104 (6): 062701, Bibcode:2010PhRvL.104f2701T, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.062701, PMID 20366816

Further reading

External links

This page was last edited on 25 November 2018, at 19:16
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.