To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Biology Direct

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Biology Direct
DisciplineBiology
LanguageEnglish
Edited byEugene Koonin, Laura Landweber, David J. Lipman
Publication details
Publisher
4.04 (2013)
Standard abbreviations
ISO 4Biol. Direct
Indexing
ISSN1745-6150
Links

Biology Direct is an online open access scientific journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed research papers, reviews, hypotheses, comments and discovery notes in biology. The journal is published by BioMed Central.

The journal follows a peer review system which is different from the traditional peer review system, which aims to give more responsibility to authors, and reduce sources of bias. Published articles include signed reviewer reports, and responses to the reports from the authors, to provide readers with an additional guide to the article.[1]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    75 517
    9 558
    296 145
  • CAREERS IN BIOLOGY SCIENCE – B.Sc,M.Sc,Science technician, Research,Job Opportunities,Salary Package
  • CAREERS IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY – B.SC,M.Sc,P.Hd,Institutions,Research,Laboratory
  • ELISA test

Transcription

Purpose

Based on the information presented on their website: "Biology Direct's key aim is to provide authors and readers with an alternative to the traditional model of peer review. This includes making the author responsible for selecting potentially suitable reviewers for their manuscript, from the journal's Editorial Board; making the peer review process open rather than anonymous; and making the reviewers' reports public, thus increasing the responsibility of the referees and eliminating sources of abuse in the refereeing process."[2]

References

  1. ^ Koonin, E.; Landweber, L.; Lipman, D. (2006). "A community experiment with fully open and published peer review". Biology Direct. 1: 1. doi:10.1186/1745-6150-1-1. PMC 1397803. PMID 16542032.
  2. ^ "Biology Direct". Biology Direct. Retrieved 2020-07-29.

External links

This page was last edited on 25 December 2023, at 21:04
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.