To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Belgium in World War I

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1918 American poster used to encourage the purchase of War Bonds
1918 American poster used to encourage the purchase of War Bonds

The history of Belgium in World War I traces Belgium's role between the German invasion in 1914, through the continued military resistance and occupation of the territory by German forces to the armistice in 1918, as well as the role it played in the international war effort through its African colony and small force on the Eastern Front.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    967 131
    68 246
    158 188
    65 246
    224 298
  • ✪ The Rape of Belgium And The Battle of Tannenberg I THE GREAT WAR - Week 5
  • ✪ Belgium Under German Occupation During WW1 I THE GREAT WAR On The Road
  • ✪ The First Soldier of Belgium - King Albert I I WHO DID WHAT IN WW1?
  • ✪ Belgian Uniforms Of World War 1 I THE GREAT WAR Special
  • ✪ Why Weren't The Germans Allowed to Pass Through Belgium in 1914? I Out Of The Trenches

Transcription

August 28th 1914. Throughout August, 1914, as the war progressed in Belgium, France, and Serbia, the Austrian and German high command either sanctioned or ignored the widespread execution and rape of civilians and the sacking and burning of occupied towns. A shocked and revolted world looked on. My name is Indy Neidell. Welcome to the Great War. Here’s where we stood on the battlefields of Europe at the beginning of the week: In the west, there were three German armies- 750,000 men. The left flank was in Lorraine, and the rest were marching through Belgium at 30 km per day, an amazing speed, and pretty much slaughtering the French armies they encountered, and the British Expeditionary Force under John French was approaching from the west. Okay? In the East, the Germans were on the retreat out of East Prussia and the Russians were advancing. Now, in the west, after all the victories of the past few weeks, things were looking good for the Germans but their reputation was doing anything but that, and the atrocities the German troops committed against civilians in the west grew and grew. In Dinant, German soldiers repairing a bridge were fired on by a few Belgian civilians, and as a reprisal over 600 Belgian men, women, and children were shot. On August 20th, it happened in Andenne. There was even a printed announcement from German General von Bulow, posted in Liege that read the following “The population on Andenne, after manifesting peaceful intentions towards our troops, attacked them in the most treacherous manner. With my authorization the general who commanded these troops has reduced the town to ashes and shot 110 persons.” In Tamines, 384 men were rounded up near the church and shot. In Rossignol 122 people were executed for supposedly supporting the French army, who had just themselves been crushed there in battle. There were dozens more such incidents, known collectively as “the Rape of Belgium”, but in Leuven, though, it was completely out of control. The Germans had occupied Leuven on August 19th, right? On the 25th, the Belgian army, coming from Antwerp, harassed the Germans, but once this was over, the German command decided the people of Leuven were to blame, so for the next five days the German troops executed hundreds of citizens of both sexes, including many clergy, and burned the city and many of its famous medieval buildings. In the international press there were horrible eyewitness accounts and even a headline in the New York Tribune “Germans sack Louvain, women and clergy shot.”10,000 civilians were driven from the city. In total over 6,000 civilians are known to have been killed in cold blood in Belgium and France by Germans in the first weeks of the war. Now, I have to point out that some people today believe that the charges of war crimes against Germany in occupied Belgium and France are greatly exaggerated or even fabricated, but this is completely at odds with contemporary evidence. And it’s important to note that these crimes were not only tolerated by military command, but in many cases even sanctioned by them. Even some of the German newspapers, instead of denying or downplaying what happened, tried to explain and justify civilian executions and town burnings. The results of this were as you’d expect- French and Belgian hearts hardened against the Germans and anti-German sentiment grew all over the world. The stories of German atrocities were particularly abundant in the British papers, where propagandists wanted to move away from the killing of an aristocrat in a far away country to atrocities closer at hand in Belgium as a moral impera tive for fighting the war. This would motivate the British troops enormously when, on August 23, the Germans ran into the British for the first time in the war at the Battle of Mons. Now, the German high command had been mocking the British army for weeks and joking that they should just send the police to arrest them, but the British regulars, the only fully professional army in Europe before the war, held off the numerically superior Germans for many hours, inflicting three times the losses they took themselves. German howitzers arrived in the afternoon, though, with which the British artillery could not compete, and the British began to retreat, parallel to the French retreat as the Germans quickly pushed through Belgium and slaughtered the unprepared French army. There was heavy fighting for the British along the retreat over the next few days, especially when they turned and held their ground on August 26th at Le Cateau, long enough for thousands of men to withdraw in good order, A British General, Sir Horace Smith-Dorrien, had decided to stop and fight as the Germans were so close and the rearguard divisions were becoming so scattered that a catastrophic battle was otherwise inevitable. Smith-Dorrien was a general who had seen a lot of action, for over 30 years all over the world with the British Colonial Army, and he knew what he was doing. Although the action that day would prove deadlier for the British army than the D-Day invasion 30 years later, Smith-Dorrien would give his army a 12 hour start on the Germans, but the troops were exhausted, and there was now even talk in the air that the war would indeed be over by Christmas, but with Germany the victor. Although on the Eastern front, things to that point hadn’t been going well at all for the Germans, especially after their recent defeat at Gumbinnen, which caused the German retreat. After this, German army chief of staff von Moltke dismissed his paranoid General von Prittwitz and brought General von Hindenburg out of retirement to replace him. Hindenburg had retired in 1911, but unlike many of the European generals so far this war, Hindenburg had seen action going as far back as the 1860s. Now, on the surface, things looked good for the Russians, but they had colossal logistical and communications problems. They didn’t even encode their telegrams so all wire communications could be monitored by anyone, and one tiny event occurred that had huge later repercussions: After the battle of Gumbinnen, a note was found on a dead Russian officer that outlined most of the Russian plans for their offensive. Armed with this knowledge, Hindenburg and his second in command Ludendorff broke off the German retreat and decided to go on the attack. It’s the little things, you know? On August 24th, the Russians collided with the Germans and the Russian center made great progress, but it was a complete illusion. On the 26th, the German western flank cut through the Russian left and cut off communications, and on the 27th the German Eastern flank did the same to the Russian right flank. The Russian army was trapped in the middle, running out of basically everything, and on August 28th they began surrendering in droves, nearly 100,000 men with 50,000 more killed or wounded over the course of several days. This was the most spectacular defeat of the war and made Hindenburg a German national hero, even if much of the credit rightly belonged to the ironically named German General Francois. There was a village nearby named Tannenberg, where in a medieval battle the Slavs had defeated the Teutonic Knights[ad], and this village gave its name to the battle, which would become a big symbol of German pride. This was a big moment, because it put East Prussia now totally under German control. But further south, Germany’s ally Austria-Hungary was having huge difficulties with control, which the Austrian army used as an excuse for wartime atrocities of their own. The Austro-Hungarian Empire had launched this war in the first place to teach Serbia a lesson or even end her existence, and there was no love lost between the two, so when Austria-Hungary invaded it provoked widespread Serbian civilian resistance to the invading army- guerilla warfare- and this really upset the Austrians, particularly their stuck-in-the-past aristocratic military leaders, who wanted the war conducted on their terms, and they decreed that they would deal with civilian resistance ruthlessly. And they did, shooting, hanging, and bayonetting Serbian civilians, most of whom were innocent- men, women, and even children. But the Serbian guerillas were good at creating chaos in the Austrian lines, often waiting for them to pass before sniping them with rifles from behind. This was effective but it had its cost- an estimated 3,500 Serbian civilians were executed during just the first two weeks of the August campaign. And we have a lot of evidence of this because executing Serbian civilians was not something the Austrians tried to hide. In fact, Austrian army chief of staff Conrad von Hotzendorf wanted people to see these punishments, so many of the executions of civilians were photographed and the photos were published. Mass executions and mass graves. And here we are at the end of the week, with Germany ascendant in both the east and the west, and a terrified citizenry- including over a million Belgians- fleeing from the invaders. Many formerly anti-war people decided this week that the war was, after all, justified, and that Germany must be stopped at all costs to preserve civilization in Europe, and we see years later that the massacres of civilians by the Germans in August 1914 were a direct factor in the harsh conditions imposed on Germany after the war which indirectly, or maybe even directly led to Nazism and the Second World War. That’s all for this week. Click subscribe to get each and every episode. If you want more Background Information on our programm or more history info about WORLD WAR 1 than follow us on Facebook or Twitter. And share us on those plattform if you like.

Contents

Background

German invasion

A British cartoon from Punch in 1914 depicting "little" Belgium barring "big" Germany's path
A British cartoon from Punch in 1914 depicting "little" Belgium barring "big" Germany's path
Part of a series on the
History of Belgium
Leo Belgicus
Timeline
Flag of Belgium.svg
Belgium portal

When World War I began, Germany invaded neutral Belgium and Luxembourg as part of the Schlieffen Plan, in an attempt to capture Paris quickly by catching the French off guard by invading through neutral countries. It was this action that technically caused the British to enter the war, as they were still bound by the 1839 agreement to protect Belgium in the event of war. On 2 August 1914, the German government demanded that German armies be given free passage through Belgian territory, although this was refused by the Belgian government on 3 August.[1] The Belgian King Albert I addressed his Parliament on 4 August, saying "Never since 1830 has a graver hour sounded for Belgium. The strength of our right and the need of Europe for our autonomous existence make us still hope that the dreaded events will not occur."[2] The same day German troops invaded Belgium[3] crossing the frontier at dawn. Liège was attacked on 4 August and fell on 7 August.[2]

It is widely claimed that the Belgian army's resistance during the early days of the war, with the army – around a tenth the size of the German army – holding up the German offensive for nearly a month, gave the French and British forces time to prepare for the Marne counteroffensive later in the year.[4] In fact, the German advance on Paris was almost exactly on schedule.[5]

The German invaders treated any resistance—such as demolition of bridges and rail lines—as illegal and subversive, shooting the offenders and burning buildings in retaliation.[6]

Flanders was the main base of the British army and it saw some of the greatest loss of life on both sides of the Western Front.

German occupation 1914–18

German stamp, overprinted with Belgien (Belgium) for use in the occupied country
German stamp, overprinted with Belgien (Belgium) for use in the occupied country

The Germans governed the occupied areas of Belgium (over 95% of the country) while a small area around Ypres remained under Belgian control. An occupation authority, known as the General Government, was given control over the majority of the territory although the two provinces of East and West Flanders were given separate status as a war zone under the direct control of the German army. Elsewhere martial law prevailed. For the majority of the occupation, the German military governor was Moritz von Bissing (1914–17). Beneath the governor was a network of regional and local German kommandanturen and each locality was under the ultimate control of a German officer.[7]

Many civilians fled the war zones to safer parts of Belgium. Many refugees from all over the country went to the Netherlands (which was neutral) and about 300,000 to France. Over 200,000 went to Britain, where they resettled in London and found war jobs. The British and French governments set up the War Refugees Committee (WRC) and the Secours National, to provide relief and support; there were an additional 1,500 local WRC committees in Britain. The high visibility of the refugees underscored the role of Belgium in the minds of the French and British.[8][9] In the spring of 1915, German authorities started construction on the Wire of Death, a lethal electric fence along the Belgian-Dutch border which would claim the lives of between 2,000 and 3,000 Belgian refugees trying to escape the occupied country.[10]

On the advice of the Belgian government in exile, civil servants remained in their posts for the duration of the conflict, carrying out the day-to-day functions of government. All political activity was suspended and Parliament shut down. While farmers and coal miners kept up their routines, many larger businesses largely shut down, as did the universities. The Germans helped set up the first solely Dutch-speaking university in Ghent. The Germans sent in managers to operate factories that were underperforming. Lack of effort was a form of passive resistance; Kossmann says that for many Belgians the war years were "a long and extremely dull vacation."[11] Belgian workers were conscripted into forced labour projects; by 1918, the Germans had deported 120,000 Belgian workers to Germany.[12]

The Rape of Belgium

The Germans Arrive by the American artist George Bellows depicting the 1914 German atrocities in Belgium.
The Germans Arrive by the American artist George Bellows depicting the 1914 German atrocities in Belgium.

The German army was outraged at how Belgium had frustrated the Schlieffen Plan to capture Paris. From top to bottom there was a firm belief that the Belgians had unleashed illegal saboteurs (called "francs-tireurs") and that civilians had tortured and maltreated German soldiers. The response was a series of multiple large-scale attacks on civilians and the destruction of historic buildings and cultural centers. The German army executed between 5,500 and 6,500[13] French and Belgian civilians between August and November 1914, usually in near-random large-scale shootings of civilians ordered by junior German officers. Individuals suspected of partisan activities were summarily shot. Historians researching German Army records have discovered 101 "major" incidents—where ten or more civilians were killed—with a total of 4,421 executed. Historians have also discovered 383 "minor" incidents that led to the deaths of another 1,100 Belgians. Almost all were claimed by Germany to be responses to guerrilla attacks.[14] In addition some high-profile Belgian figures, including politician Adolphe Max and historian Henri Pirenne, were imprisoned in Germany as hostages.

The German position was that widespread sabotage and guerrilla activities by Belgian civilians were wholly illegal and deserved immediate harsh collective punishment. Recent research that systematically studied German Army sources has demonstrated that they in fact encountered no irregular forces in Belgium during the first two and a half months of the invasion. The Germans were responding instead to a phantom fear they had unconsciously created themselves.[15]

Bryce Report and international response

The British were quick to tell the world about German atrocities. Britain sponsored the "Committee on Alleged German Outrages" known as the Bryce Report. Published in May 1915, the Report provided elaborate details and first-hand accounts, including excerpts from diaries and letters found on captured German soldiers. The Report was a major factor in changing public opinion in neutral countries, especially the United States. After Britain shipped 41,000 copies to the US, the Germans responded with their own report on atrocities against German soldiers by Belgian civilians.[16]

The Bryce Report was ridiculed in the 1920s and 1930s and afterwards as highly exaggerated wartime propaganda. It relied too heavily on unproven allegations of refugees and distorted interpretations of diaries of German soldiers.[17] Recent scholarship has not tried to validate the statements in the Bryce Report. Instead research has gone into the official German records and have confirmed that the Germans committed large-scale deliberate atrocities in Belgium.[18]

International relief

Belgian Cardinal Mercier became a hero; his visits to the US inspired American Catholics and strengthened Belgian pride
Belgian Cardinal Mercier became a hero; his visits to the US inspired American Catholics and strengthened Belgian pride

Belgium faced a food crisis and an international response was organized by an American engineer based in London, Herbert Hoover, on the request of Émile Francqui, whose Comité National de Secours et d'Alimentation (CNSA) realized that the only way to avoid a famine in Belgium was through imports from overseas.[19] Hoover's Commission for Relief in Belgium (CRB) received the permission of both Germany and the Allies for their activities.[20] As chairman of the CRB, Hoover worked with Francqui to raise money and support overseas, transporting food and aid to Belgium which was then distributed by the CNSA. The CRB purchased and imported millions of tons of foodstuffs for the CN to distribute, and watched over the CN to make sure the German army did not appropriate the food. The CRB became a veritable independent republic of relief, with its own flag, navy, factories, mills, and railroads. Private donations and government grants (78%) supplied an $11-million-a-month budget.[21]

At its peak, the American arm, the American Relief Administration (ARA) fed 10.5 million people daily. Great Britain became reluctant to support the CRB, preferring instead to emphasize Germany's obligation to supply the relief; Winston Churchill led a military faction that considered the Belgian relief effort "a positive military disaster."[22]

Internal politics

The prewar Catholic ministry remained in office as a government in exile with Charles de Broqueville continuing as prime minister and also taking on the war portfolio. Viscount Julien Davignon continued as foreign minister until 1917, when de Broqueville gave up the war ministry and took over foreign affairs. The government was broadened to include all parties, as politics were suspended for the duration; of course, no elections were possible. The two main opposition leaders, Paul Hymans of the Liberals and Emile Vandervelde of the Labour party, became ministers without portfolio in 1914. In a cabinet shakeup in May 1918, de Broqueville was excluded altogether. The government was based in the French city of Le Havre, but communications with the people behind German lines were difficult and roundabout. The government in exile did not govern Belgium, and so its politicians instead squabbled endlessly, and plotted unrealistic foreign policy moves, such as the annexation of Luxembourg or a slice of the Netherlands after the war.[23]

Belgium was not officially one of the Allies. In turn they did not consult with Belgium, but Britain, France and Russia formally pledged in 1916 that "when the moment comes, the Belgian government will be called to participate in the peace negotiations and that they will not put an end to the hostilities unless Belgium is re-established in its political and economic independence and largely indemnified for the damage which she has undergone. They will lend their aid to Belgium to assure her commercial and financial rehabilitation."[24]

Flemish identity

Flemish consciousness of their national identity grew through the events and experiences of war. The German occupying authorities, under Von Bissing and influenced by pre-war Pan-Germanism, viewed the Flemish as an oppressed people and launched a policy to appeal to the demands of the Flemish Movement which had emerged in the late 19th century. These measures were collectively known as the Flamenpolitik ("Flemish Policy"). From 1916, the Germans sponsored the creation of "Von Bissing University" which was the first university that taught in Dutch language. Dutch was also introduced as the language of instruction in all state-supported schools in Flanders in 1918. The German measures split the Movement between the "activists" or "maximalists", who believed that using German support was their only chance to realize their objectives, and the "passivists" who opposed German involvement. In 1917, the Germans created the Raad van Vlaanderen ("Council of Flanders") as a quasi autonomous government in Flanders composed of "activists". In December 1917, the council attempted to achieve Flemish independence from Belgium but the defeat of Germany in the war meant that they never achieved success. After the war, many "activists" were arrested for collaboration.

Independently, among the Belgian soldiers on the Yser Front, the Flemish Frontbeweging ("Front Movement") was formed from Flemish soldiers in the Belgian army to campaign for greater use of the Dutch language in education and government, although it was not separatist.[25] Kossmann concludes that the German policy of fostering separatism in Flanders was a failure because it did not win popular support.[26]

Belgian military operations

Belgian soldier at the front line, 1918
Belgian soldier at the front line, 1918

Belgium was poorly prepared for war. Strict neutrality meant there was no coordination of any kind with anyone. It had a new, inexperienced general staff. It started compulsory service in 1909; the plan was to have an army of 340,000 men by 1926. In 1914 the old system had been abandoned and the new one was unready, lacking trained officers and sergeants, as well as modern equipment. The army had 102 machine guns and no heavy artillery. The strategy was to concentrate near Brussels and delay a German invasion as long as possible—a strategy that in the event proved highly effective as it disrupted the German timetable. For example, the German timetable required the capture of the railway center of Liège in two days; it took 11.[27][28]

Much of the small army was captured early on as the frontier forts surrendered. In late 1914 the king had only 60,000 soldiers left.[29] During the war a few young men volunteered to serve, so by 1918 the total force had returned to 170,000. That was far too few to launch a major offensive. The Germans had nothing to gain from an attack, so the short Belgian front was an island of relative calm as gigantic battles raged elsewhere on the Western Front. The total of Belgian soldiers killed came to about 2.0% of its eligible young men (compared to 13.3% in France and 12.5% in Germany).[30]

Yser Front

The ruins of Ypres, after its three battles.
The ruins of Ypres, after its three battles.

King Albert I stayed in the Yser as commander of the military to lead the army while the Belgian government, under Charles de Broqueville withdrew to Le Havre in France.

Belgian soldiers fought a number of significant delaying actions in 1914 during the initial invasion. At the Battle of Liège, the town's fortifications held off the invaders for over a week, buying valuable time for Allied troops to arrive in the area. Additionally, the German "Race to the Sea" was stopped dead by exhausted Belgian forces at the Battle of the Yser. The dual significance of the battle was that the Germans were unable to complete their occupation of the entire country, and the Yser area remained unoccupied. The success was a propaganda coup for the Belgian army.[31]

Belgian troops continued to hold the same sector of frontline, known as the Yser Front and by now a part of the main Western Front, until 1918, a fact that provided a propaganda coup to the Belgian forces on the Western Front for the duration of the war.[31]

Final Offensive (Autumn 1918)

By 28 September 1918, the Belgian Army had been reorganized in 12 infantry divisions. They formed part of the Belgian-French-British Army Group Flanders under command of King Albert I of Belgium and his French Chief of Staff General Jean Degoutte. They played an important part in the Fifth Battle of Ypres, in which they breached the German lines at Houthulst and conquered Passchendaele, Langemark and Zonnebeke. After a pause between 2 and 14 October, the Belgian Army also participated in the Battle of Courtai, in which it liberated Bruges and Ostend. Between 20 October and 11 November, it fought in the Battle of the Lys and the Escaut and reached the outskirts of Ghent by 11 November.
The Final Offensive had been very costly for the Belgian Army. It lost one-fifth of its forces in casualties, one-third of all the losses it sustained throughout the whole War.[32]

Belgian Congo and the East Africa Campaign

Native soldiers from the Belgian Congo ford a river during the African Campaign, 1916
Native soldiers from the Belgian Congo ford a river during the African Campaign, 1916

German presence in Africa posed no direct threat to the Belgian Congo; however, in 1914 a German gunboat sank a number of Belgian vessels on Lake Tanganyika.[33] Congolese forces, under Belgian officers, fought German colonial forces in the Cameroons and seized control of the western third of German East Africa, advancing as far as the town at Tabora. The League of Nations in 1925 made Belgium the trustee of this territory (modern Rwanda and Burundi) as the mandate of Ruanda-Urundi.

Eastern Front

The Belgian Expeditionary Corps was a small armoured car unit; it was sent to Russia in 1915 and fought on the Eastern Front. The Minerva armoured car was used for reconnaissance, long distance messaging and carrying out raids and small scale engagements. 16 Belgians were killed in action.[34]

Aftermath

Postwar settlements

King Albert I went to the Paris Peace Conference in April 1919, where he met with the Big Four and the other leaders of France, Italy, Britain and the United States. He had four strategic goals: 1) to restore and expand the Belgian economy, using cash reparations from Germany; 2) to assure Belgium's security by the creation of a new buffer state on the left bank of the Rhine; 3) to revise the obsolete treaty of 1839; and 4) to promote a 'rapprochement' between Belgium and the Grand duchy of Luxembourg.

A typical municipal war memorial in Poperinge, Flanders. The words on it translate to English as "To our heroes in 1914-1918 and 1940-1945"
A typical municipal war memorial in Poperinge, Flanders. The words on it translate to English as "To our heroes in 1914-1918 and 1940-1945"

He strongly advised against a harsh, punitive treaty against Germany that would eventually provoke German revenge.[35] He also considered that the dethronement of the princes of Central Europe and, in particular, the dissolution of the Habsburg Empire would constitute a serious menace to peace and stability on the continent.[36] The Allies considered Belgium to be the chief victim of the war, and it aroused enormous popular sympathy, but the King's advice played a small role in Paris.[37]

Belgium was given much less than it wanted, with a total payment of three billion German gold marks ($500 million in 1919; $7,226,000,000 in 2019);[citation needed] the money did not stimulate the lethargic Belgian economy of the 1920s. Belgium also received a small slice of territory in the east of the country (known as Eupen-Malmedy) from Germany, which remains part of the country to this day. Its demands for a slice of Zeeland in the Netherlands (which had remained neutral during the conflict), were rejected and led to ill-will. Britain was willing to guarantee Belgian borders only if it committed to neutrality, which Albert rejected. Instead, Belgium became a junior partner with France in an occupation of part of Germany under a 1920 Treaty. As outlined in the Treaty of Versailles, Belgium was also given a League of Nations mandate over the former German colonies in Africa of Rwanda and Burundi.[38] On the whole, Belgian diplomacy was poorly handled and ineffective.[39]

Between 1923 and 1925, Belgian and French soldiers occupied the Ruhr to force the Weimar government to maintain payment of reparations.

Commemoration

Typical Belgian war graves at Houthulst, near the former Yser Front
Typical Belgian war graves at Houthulst, near the former Yser Front

Due to the hundreds of thousands of British and Canadian casualties, the blood-red red poppies that sprang up in no man's land when fields were torn up by artillery were immortalized in the 1915 poem In Flanders Fields. In the British Empire and America, poppies became a symbol of human life lost in war and were adopted as an emblem of remembrance from 1921.

The suffering of Flanders is still remembered by Flemish organizations during the yearly Yser pilgrimage and "Wake of the Yser" in Diksmuide at the monument of The Yser tower.

British veterans and civilians in the 1920s created a shrine of sacrifice in Belgium. The city of Ypres was made the symbol of all Britain was fighting for and was given an almost sacred aura. The Ypres League transformed the horrors of trench warfare into a spiritual quest in which British and imperial troops were purified by their sacrifice. After the war Ypres became a pilgrimage destination for Britons to imagine and share the sufferings of their men and gain a spiritual benefit.[40]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ "German Request for Free Passage through Belgium, and the Belgian Response, 2–3 August 1914". www.firstworldwar.com. Retrieved 31 December 2012.
  2. ^ a b Fox, Sir Frank (1914). The Agony of Belgium The Invasion of Belgium in WWI August-December 1914. Beaumont Fox 2nd edition 2014. p. 19.
  3. ^ "World War I: Belgium". histclo.com. Retrieved 1 January 2013.
  4. ^ Barbara W. Tuchman, The Guns of August (1962) pp 191–214
  5. ^ Donnell, C. (2013). Breaking the Fortress Line 1914. Pen and Sword, pp196-200.
  6. ^ Spencer Tucker, ed., The European Powers in the First World War (1999) pp 114–20
  7. ^ Léon van der Essen, A short history of Belgium (1920) pp 174–5
  8. ^ Pierre Purseigle, "'A Wave on to Our Shores': The Exile and Resettlement of Refugees from the Western Front, 1914–1918," Contemporary European History (2007): 16#4 pp 427–444, [online at Proquest]
  9. ^ Peter Cahalan, Belgian Refugee Relief in England during the Great War (New York: Garland, 1982);
  10. ^ "De Dodendraad - Wereldoorlog I". Bunkergordel.be. Retrieved 19 March 2013.
  11. ^ E.H. Kossmann, The Low Countries: 1780–1940(1978) p 525, 528–9
  12. ^ Bernard A. Cook, Belgium: a history (2002) pp. 102–7
  13. ^ John Horne and Alan Kramer, German Atrocities, 1914: A History of Denial (Yale U.P. 2001)
  14. ^ Horne and Kramer. German Atrocities 1914. pp. 74–75.
  15. ^ Horne and Kramer. German Atrocities 1914. p. 77.
  16. ^ Patrick J. Quinn (2001). The Conning of America: The Great War and American Popular Literature. Rodopi. p. 39.
  17. ^ Trevor Wilson, "Lord Bryce's Investigation into Alleged German Atrocities in Belgium, 1914–1915," Journal of Contemporary History (1979) 14#3 pp 369–383.
  18. ^ John Horne and Alan Kramer, German Atrocities, 1914: A History of Denial (Yale University Press, 2002); Larry Zuckerman, The Rape of Belgium: The Untold Story of World War I (NYU Press, 2004); Jeff Lipkes, Rehearsals: The German Army in Belgium, August 1914 (Leuven University Press, 2007)
  19. ^ George H. Nash, The Life of Herbert Hoover: The Humanitarian, 1914–1917 (1988)
  20. ^ David Burner, Herbert Hoover: A Public Life (1996) p. 74.
  21. ^ Burner, Herbert Hoover p. 79.
  22. ^ Burner, p. 82.
  23. ^ Sally Marks, Innocent Abroad p 21-35
  24. ^ Sally Marks, Innocent Abroad p 24
  25. ^ Cook, Belgium: a history pp. 104–5
  26. ^ Kossmann, The Low Countries: 1780–1940 (1978) p 528
  27. ^ Hew Strachen, The First World War: Volume I: To Arms (2001) 1:208-12, 216
  28. ^ Emile Joseph Galet and Ernest Swinton, Albert King of the Belgians in the Great War (1931), pp 73–106
  29. ^ Kossmann, Low Countries(1978) pp 523–4
  30. ^ Niall Ferguson, The Pity of War (1999) p 299
  31. ^ a b Spencer Tucker, ed., The European Powers in the First World War (1999) pp 116–8
  32. ^ Osprey Publishing, The Belgian Army in World War I (2009) pp 36-37
  33. ^ Spencer C. Tucker and Priscilla Mary Roberts, eds. (2005). World War I : A Student Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. p. 1056.CS1 maint: Extra text: authors list (link)
  34. ^ "Belgian Armoured Cars in Russia". Retrieved 3 November 2012.
  35. ^ Vincent Dujardin, Mark van den Wijngaert, et al. Léopold III
  36. ^ Charles d'Ydewalle. Albert and the Belgians: Portrait of a King.
  37. ^ Margaret MacMillan, Paris 1919 (2003) pp 106, 272
  38. ^ Sally Marks, Innocent Abroad: Belgium at the Paris Peace Conference of 1919 (1991)
  39. ^ Kossmann, The Low Countries pp 575–8, 649
  40. ^ Mark Connelly, "The Ypres League and the Commemoration of the Ypres Salient, 1914–1940," War in History (2009) 16#1 pp 51–76, online

Further reading

Primary sources

  • Bryce Report (1915)
  • Galet, Emile Joseph. Albert King of the Belgians in the Great War (1931), detailed memoir by the military visor to the King; covers 1912 to the end of October, 1914
  • Gay, George I., ed. Public Relations of the Commission for Relief in Belgium: Documents (2 vol 1929) online
  • Gibson, Hugh. A Journal from Our Legation in Belgium (1917) online, by American diplomat
  • Gooch, G. P. Recent Revelations of European Diplomacy (1940), pp 333-37 summarizes published memoirs by main participants
  • Hoover, Herbert. An American Epic: Vol. I: The Relief of Belgium and Northern France, 1914–1930 (1959) text search
  • Hoover, Herbert. The Memoirs of Herbert Hoover: Years of Adventure, 1874–1920 (1951) pp 152–237
  • Hunt, Edward Eyre. War Bread: A Personal Narrative of the War and Relief in Belgium (New York: Holt, 1916.) online
  • Whitlock, Brand. Belgium: a personal narrative (1920)], by U.S. ambassador online
  • Charlotte Kellogg, Commission for Relief in Belgium, Women of Belgium turning tragedy to triumph (1917)

External links


This page was last edited on 24 March 2019, at 23:11
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.