To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Barnes v. Gorman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Barnes v. Gorman
Argued April 23, 2002
Decided June 17, 2002
Full case nameBarnes, in her official capacity as Member of the Board of Police Commissioners of Kansas City Missouri, et al. v. Gorman
Docket no.01-682
Citations536 U.S. 181 (more)
Court membership
Chief Justice
William Rehnquist
Associate Justices
John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
David Souter · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Case opinion
MajorityScalia, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990

Rehabilitation Act of 1973

Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Barnes v. Gorman, 536 U.S. 181 (2002), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 17, 2002. The court decided that punitive damages may not be awarded in private lawsuits brought under § 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) and § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act.[1][2]

Background

Gorman, a paraplegic, suffered serious injuries when he was transported to a Kansas City police station in a vehicle that was not equipped to accommodate people with disabilities. Gorman sued several police officials and officers for disability discrimination, in violation of § 202 of the ADA and § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. At trial, a jury awarded Gorman compensatory and punitive damages. The District Court, however, vacated the jury award as to punitive damages, holding that such damages are not available in private lawsuits brought under the two statutes. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reversed.[2][3]

Decision

In a unanimous decision delivered by Justice Scalia, the Supreme Court held that punitive damages are not available under § 202 of the ADA and § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, because remedies for private actions under these sections are coextensive with the remedies available under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, under which punitive damages are not available in private suits.[2][3]

See also

References

  1. ^ Barnes v. Gorman, 536 U.S.181 (2002)
  2. ^ a b c "Barnes v. Gorman, 536 U.S. 181 (2002)". Justia Law. Retrieved September 5, 2023.
  3. ^ a b "Barnes v. Gorman." Oyez, www.oyez.org/cases/2001/01-682. Accessed 5 Sep. 2023.

External links

This page was last edited on 24 September 2023, at 23:29
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.