To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Assembly for the Sovereignty of the Peoples

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Assembly for the Sovereignty of the Peoples (Spanish: Asamblea por la Soberanía de los Pueblos, ASP) was a political organization in Bolivia. It was formed as a "political instrument" of the popular movements of the country. Alejo Véliz was the national president of ASP.[1]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    4 739
    17 069
    13 129
  • Polity Lecture (IAS) : Sovereignty And The Constitution Of India (Preamble)
  • Transfer of sovereignty over Indonesia 1949
  • European Union knowingly deceiving and betraying the British people into European rule

Transcription

Sovereignty and the Constitution of India. Let's see the meaning of the word Sovereignty first. sovereignty literally means to possess supreme or ultimate power Over a state; to have a kind of authority over the state; to have authority over it. its a quality that whatever decision that you want to make there's no one to question you that is what you should do? or what you should not do? or how you are doing it and why you are not doing it? it is something like that. In the Constitution of India on the first thing that is the preamble we have this word written as the first keyword "Sovereign". India is neither a dependency and nor a Dominion. Now the meaning of dependency is to be up colony of some other country and to be a Dominion means, to be controlled by any other country. for example if we have Let's say a country 'A' and then we have another country 'B'. let's say these are the two countries than if the country 'A' is using country 'B' for its resources and taking all these resources back than country B is the colony of country A and the other case is, when the country 'A' is using his control, its political control over country 'B' to dictate its Polity, then it will be called as the Dominion so in that sense we can say that India is neither a dependency nor a Dominion but rather and independent state which can take its decision by its own, and there's no one that they should ask for. Well, we can not say that India was always Sovereign, but rather we should say that it was a Colony or a Dependency before 15th of August that is India's Independence Day or rather we can see till the passage of the Indian Independence Act which was passed by the British Parliament in 1947 India used to be a colony or rather dependency of Britain or British Empire. Then later on after the Passage of this Bill. India became a dominion of the British empire. in between this era it was Dominion till 26th of January 1950 when the Constitution of India actually got passed. When it was accepted and enacted, a real sovereign and where when it was ready to take all its decision by its own and there was no role of the British Empire or British government in that so in simple words we can say, India ceased to be a British dominion on January 26th 1950 by declaring herself a sovereign Republic a Sovereign Republic as written in the preamble here. We'll be discussing these terms Socialist, Secular and Democratic and all other things or other keywords in preamble, in the later videos. well it is notable to mention that the Pakistan the country Pakistan which also got Independent on 15th of August or rather on 14th of August as they celebrate it on that day. so after fourteenth of August 1947 they were still a dominion of the British Empire until 1956 they still were under the British dominion. Although we can say that sovereignty means to have full control or full authority over something but we cannot rule out pressure or influences by the outer media for example, if we are a country. Let's say so let's say we have a Government. Let us say this is our country 'A' and we have this Government, and there's another country 'B' or another Government 'B' and than another country let's say C or there could be a political group or a political or a pressure group let us say it to be 'D'. So this is the main country what we are saying as Sovereign. and it is taking all her decisions by her on. but yes the country "B" can always influence the country 'C'. Let us say the country B has a good kind of infrastructure. so if country 'B', have a good kind of infrastructure. Than the country 'A' can always check or they can copy or they can always get influenced by the infrastructure of the country 'B'. or if, This country 'C', let's say, or there is a Government institution, like or rather an international institution like UNO: United Nation organization then it can say that the country 'A' what is doing in your country is not good for the whole society or for the whole mankind and you should stop it or you should not do. We can just said waz you for that and or other in in that sense country D can also say OK if you are doing that thing what kind what do you enjoy suggesting that you should not do it and if you still do it then I will not go for any kind of business with you so I won't do any piano business with you so we can see that in such a case dick are creating pressure or them so it's an external pressure that these countries are creating what the golan institutions are creating were country so this is what we can see that instead up that country is a sovereign country and it can take wallets it can manage all its decision but yes we cannot rule out the word influence and the work pressure from taking its decisions well it is interesting to note that although India what independence in 1947 but is still continued all rather it went ahead to have a membership bid the British Commonwealth of Nations and it was already a member of the United Nations Organization since 1945 it was a member of the UN which is an international organization and it became up partner or it became a member of the British Commonwealth of Nations in 1949 as India was a young country which we just got out from the rules of colonial powers then the imperial powers it became highly debatable it became highly questionable that way India has joined the British Commonwealth of Nations once again and with that is way they have acquired the membership of the Commonwealth of Nations and and accepted the British Crown as the head of the commonwealth of nations with this was always a question on to be a tender in the Constituent Assembly in those times as India was a new country AP they've just got independence from the British government and now they have accepted the British Pound once again as the head up from the Commonwealth of Nations where it is a member by in itself well it is worthy enough to mention here that the acceptance of commonwealth of nation in Norway constitutional any way or another we can say it extra-constitutional it is extra constitution and that it is not mentioned in the Constitution of India and knew it and to diminish the fear solved the Constituent Assembly in those times the Prime Minister of India at that time that is Joe are lower level the former prime minister he said on the question of serenity that we have achieved it doesn't nation lose its independence by an alliance with another country Alliance normally means commitments the free association of the solvent Commonwealth of Nations does not in one such commitments its very strength delays in its flexibility and its complete freedom it is well known that it is open to any member nation to go out on the Commonwealth if it so chooses it isn't agreement by free you will to be terminated by Fri when will these other phone famous quote by Jo Harlow Nehru on the question of joining though membership of the Commonwealth of Nations and also we can see that the joining of the UN or the International Organization is also a Norway question on the serenity of India as many a times India has opposed the rulings or oppose the decisions made by UN tal in the past fifty or sixty years after the independence so we can say that India's membership in the UN no also is Norway constitutes a limitation on her serenity when the above what we have said was all technical let's see what's already actually means in layman's term it simply means that being a soul and country India can a quiet attended to the and acquire a foreign territory or eat concede a foreign territory it can you can just do we its own territory to some other country by its own free will there need not take any kind of decision early any kind of help from any other person or any other country or go home and for example the case of sick im sick im used to be a foreign territory and 1947 when India actually game to independence but but in 1975 sick game got incorporated in into the main political map of India and it became an integral part of India so this was requiring that a victory that what India has done with second which is in the north eastern side of Indy on donder global map as we know that India what independence in 1947 and before that it was drool by the British government and by all its acts and created by the British Parliament but unlike that as the constitutional in the old ordained by the people of India through their representatives assembled in the sole run Constituent Assembly which was competent to determine the political future of the country in any manner that that the lake so the worst late we the people of India do hair by adopt in act and give to ourselves this Constitution it simply determines that the the people of India does declared the other team it's all run T and the Constitution less on the authority well this was the concept of sovereignty with respect to the constitutional

History

ASP was founded at a congress in Santa Cruz de la Sierra in 1995 titled 'Land, Territory and Political Instrument'. Present at the congress were CSUTCB, CSCB, the Bartolina Sisa National Federation of Peasant Women of Bolivia and CIDOB. The congress had been convened by CSUTCB following a decision at its congress in 1994. The Cochabamba peasant leader Alejo Véliz became the main leader of ASP with Evo Morales in second position.[2][3]

Internal conflict

From 1996 onwards, Evo Morales began to rise as a prominent leader inside ASP. Soon he became a competitor of Veliz. Internal conflict emerged between the followers of Morales and Veliz, evistas and alejistas, surged.[4] ASP wanted to contest the 1997 national elections, but never obtained the registration of a political party at the National Electoral Court. Instead the group contested the election of the lists of the United Left. Veliz was a candidate for presidency and for parliament (on the proportional representation list). However, many trade unions decided not to support Veliz's candidature, accusing him of having manipulated the candidate lists of the United Left. Four ASP members of the Chamber of Deputies were elected from the Chapare province (the entire United Left group); Evo Morales, Román Loayza Caero, Félix Sanchéz Veizaga and Néstor Guzmán Villarroel.[2][5][6]

After the 1997 elections a split occurred in ASP, and Evo Morales was expelled from the organization.[7] In 1998 the supporters of Evo Morales founded the Political Instrument for the Sovereignty of the Peoples (IPSP). Notably, the majority of the grassroots supporters of ASP sided with Morales in the split.[5] One of the prominent ASP leaders who sided with Morales was Román Loayza Caero, leader of CSUTCB.[8]

1999 elections

Ahead of the 1999 municipal elections, ASP had still not obtained any registration. Contested the elections on the lists of the Communist Party of Bolivia (PCB).[9][10] In Cochabamba Alejo Veliz ran for the post of mayor and received 1.1% of the votes in the city.[11]

2002 elections

Ahead of the 2002 general elections, a sector of ASP led by Hugo Moldiz denounced Veliz and declared their support for the candidacy of Evo Morales.[12]

References

  1. ^ Alejo Veliz fue al Comité Cívico cruceño para coordinar acciones Archived July 6, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
  2. ^ a b Harnecker, Marta. MAS-IPSP: Instrumento político que surge de los movimientos sociales. p. 70
  3. ^ Monasterios, Karin, Pablo Stefanoni, and Hervé do Alto. Reinventando la nación en Bolivia: movimientos sociales, Estado y poscolonialidad. La Paz, Bolivia: CLACSO, 2007. p. 75
  4. ^ Monasterios, Karin, Pablo Stefanoni, and Hervé do Alto. Reinventando la nación en Bolivia: movimientos sociales, Estado y poscolonialidad. La Paz, Bolivia: CLACSO, 2007. p. 77
  5. ^ a b Monasterios, Karin, Pablo Stefanoni, and Hervé do Alto. Reinventando la nación en Bolivia: movimientos sociales, Estado y poscolonialidad. La Paz, Bolivia: CLACSO, 2007. p. 78
  6. ^ Directorio: 1997 - 2002. La Paz: Centro de Investigación del Congreso Nacional (CICON), 2002. pp. 201-202, 209
  7. ^ Harnecker, Marta. MAS-IPSP: Instrumento político que surge de los movimientos sociales. pp. 71-72
  8. ^ Loayza Caero, Román, and Shirley Rasguido. Román Loayza Caero: lider quechua, contribuyó al ascenso campesino indígena del país. Líderes contemporáneos del movimiento campesino indígena de Bolivia, no. 3. La Paz, Bolivia: CIPCA, 2006. Back Cover
  9. ^ Albó, Xavier, and Victor Quispe. Quiénes son indígenas en los gobiernos municipales. Cuadernos de investigación CIPCA, 59. La Paz: CIPCA [u.a., 2004. pp. 103-105
  10. ^ Komadina, Jorge, and Céline Geffroy Komadina. El poder del movimiento político: estrategia, tramas organizativas e identidad del MAS en Cochabamba (1999-2005). La Paz: CESU-UMSS, 2007. p. 22
  11. ^ Komadina, Jorge, and Céline Geffroy Komadina. El poder del movimiento político: estrategia, tramas organizativas e identidad del MAS en Cochabamba (1999-2005). La Paz: CESU-UMSS, 2007. pp. 33-34
  12. ^ Alejo Veliz desconocido por ASP
This page was last edited on 16 April 2023, at 07:45
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.