To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Annexation movements of Canada

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

From the independence of the United States until today, various movements within Canada have campaigned in favour of U.S. annexation of parts or all of Canada. Historical studies have focused on numerous small-scale movements which are helpful in comparisons of Canadian and American politics.

In the early years of the United States, many American political figures were in favour of invading and annexing Canada, and even pre-approved Canada's admission to the U.S. in the Articles of Confederation in 1777. The defeat of American attempts to achieve this goal, both in the American Revolution and the War of 1812, gradually led to the abandonment in the U.S. of any serious push toward annexation. As historian Joseph Levitt notes:

Since the Treaty of Washington in 1871, when it first de facto recognized the new Dominion of Canada, the United States has never suggested or promoted an annexationist movement in Canada. No serious force has appeared on the American political scene that aimed to persuade or coerce Canadians into joining the United States. And, in fact, no serious initiative for any move in this direction has come from the Canadian side either.[1]

Surveys have suggested that a minority of Canadians would potentially support annexation, ranging from as many as 20 percent in a survey by Léger Marketing in 2001[2] to as few as seven percent in another survey by the same company in 2004.[3]

No elected member of any federal or provincial assembly in Canada, nor any mainstream politician in the United States, openly advocates annexation. Two minor provincial political parties in Canada promoted the concept in the 1980s, but neither attracted widespread support or attention.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    3 446
    15 909
    2 013 569
    464 577
    46 018
  • ✪ What if the United States annexed Mexico?
  • ✪ The Time Canada Almost Broke Up
  • ✪ Westward Expansion: Crash Course US History #24
  • ✪ Expansion of the United States Map 1763 - Present
  • ✪ The Alaska Purchase Explained

Transcription

Ever since Mexico attained independence from Spain in 1821 the nation has been rife with near constant wars and conflicts and twice The nation could have been observed by a foreign power once by the French in the 1860s and another by the United States during the mexican-american war this word was considered by many as unjust and merely Expansion at the price of another weaker power a ploy to get land to the Pacific But someone and more the all Mexico movement was a plan to conquer all of Mexico This ruse propelled and promoted as a further expansion of manifest destiny But most members of Congress knew that such a proposal would be far more costly and complex than they are willing to see through But for the sake of alternate history, I was like what would happen if the United States annex the whole of Mexico But first we need some history Mexico ahead gains independence from Spain in 1821 as the first Mexican Empire This empire led by Emperor Agustin the first quickly had massive stability issues in August of the following year a plan to overthrow Agustin was discovered which encompassed 16 members of Congress in late October of the same year Agustin had dissolved Congress as they were heavily criticizing him and his Policies this led to revolts all across the Empire and him eventually being deposed this also led to the formation of the Central American Republic which encompass all lands between Mexico and Panama which had been unofficial provinces within the empire from there Mexico was formed as a republic with new constitution put into place in 1824 this constitution was repealed in 1835 putting in the era of a centralist government Which only further increased social unrest and armed uprisings in the Yucatan the Rio Grande and Texas with the failure of keeping? Texas within the Federation and the annexation of the land into the United States Tenzin's between the u.s.. And Mexico were extremely tense this boiled over into the mexican-american war and while the u.s. Won every major bout during the war it was still very costly to pursue much more than what was originally intended The civility in mexico fell apart soon after the invasion and nearly prevented a peace deal from being established But one was and Mexico had to see the whole of OB, Arizona, New Mexico come on California Plus drop the claim for Texas and the land ceded bow of the United States trade to occupying annex the whole of Mexico Well, let's look at three main problems that would complicate the occupation the first problem Is that the US would encounter would be trying to occupy such a large territory and keep it supplied? Mexico before the start of the war was in equal sized United States and of all the occupied Territories in our time line required few supplies and guards use because there are very few people that lived in there in Alta, California They're around 160 thousand people which included Native American tribes and in New Mexico the number was 120 thousand the population was too small to cause any major issues for the occupiers and the occupiers themselves were largely sympathetic to the Union cause Mexico proper contains six million people a quarter that of the US population Simply trying to keep a garrison and population supplied, which stretched the u.s. logistics to the limit And it wouldn't take long for them to snap Especially with Raiders hitting the lines all along the cherem a the men needed for this task would make the process nearly impossible since the army of 100,000 men had to buy a good amount of their supplies from the local citizens and Until adequate roads or railways could be constructed supply would be a constant problem Especially in the in Lyons the second problem would be a political and difference of religion Mexico was largely a Catholic nation compared to across in United States and Damaged a church land and property was rampant as the invading armies marched through Mexico No matter what the generals tried to do stop it a good amount of regulars in the US Army War Catholics But the bulk of the volunteers were Protestant and from the southern states and many in the Polk Administration and Army fear that this could actually turn to him all-out religious war the politicians in the US also would create a problem as Anti-slavery and a Western Southern elements were heavily opposed to the idea Anti-slavery support Assam Mexico as a way to expand the power of slave wielders in Congress with new states being emitted from the newly conquered Territories and slavery supporters were very well aware that trying to improve savory back into Mexico would be nearly impossible in many of the provinces Mexico had declared slavery illegal in 1824 slavery needed settlers moving into new territories in large enough numbers that they can exercise a Majority of the wealth of a given area and the only places that were even suitable for cotton crops or cash crops Would be along the Central Coast originally populated and not very much open to settlers a third problem is time to deal with Mexico's pre-existing problems a Revolution in the Yucatan was occurring and the Republic of Rio Grande had only been suppressed for a few years and countless more Revolutions could rise up once American influence was introduced into the region Mexico's there would also be a large palm for the u.s.. As Mexico had been let heavily indebted by the British and French governments who had nearly 100 million Dollars loaned to Mexico within our time line the American economy couldn't stand having to pay off such a large debt Combining with the expenses of need to have a large occupying force More division would be created in the government and this could accelerate the start of the Civil War depending on the political aftermath of attempting to enforce the Occupation the outcome in the scenario would be a gradual withdrawal from most of Mexico as the political will and cost gradually became too much For the u.s. To provide it is possible that the provinces of Baja, California Samara and Chihuahua could be annexed into the US as those provinces were lightly populated and open to sellers from the states This would cause considerable tensions in regards to the balance between slave and free states within the Union as slavery may be Reintroduced into the air is taken over But the admission of these areas of states will likely taken surmount a time due to the need to keep the area's under heavy eteri Occupation as the public unrest could very well. Be high especially as slavery was being reintroduced The occupation could very well last years, but in the end it would simply attach those far too difficult Too costly and the political bull just wasn't there Eva the u.s. Manages to occupy the whole country the amount of rebels would be devastating using the occupation and religious persecution As a cry for unity for the Mexican people a way to call for out state the foreign power This step will largely bankrupt the United States and impose a very long term enemy on the southern border This would spell even worse strike within the US as well after such a costly project The wolf for a civil war may or may not exist as the anti-slavery movement will likely have more support among the ones Undecided since this whole fiasco would almost certainly be seen as a stunt to appease some of the southern aristocrats But beyond that it's impossible to tell if you'd like to watch more alternate history scenarios click here for the playlist That contains all of the ulting history scenarios that I have on my channel And if you'd like to learn a little bit more about Mexico click here for a video about Mexico during the first world war Don't forget to like the subscribe and I'll go ahead and catch you guys next time

Contents

Historical annexationist groups

1837

Historical annexationist movements inside Canada were usually inspired by dissatisfaction with Britain's colonial government of Canada. Groups of Irish immigrants took the route of armed struggle, attempting to annex the peninsula between the Detroit and Niagara Rivers to the U.S. by force in the minor and short-lived Patriot War in 1837-1838.

Although the Rebellions of 1837 were motivated in part by this type of dissatisfaction, Canadian resentment of British rule never reached the degree that led to the American Revolution in 1775. Notably, Canada's population growth in the late 18th and early 19th centuries was spurred largely by United Empire Loyalists, who left the American colonies during the Revolution because of their loyalty to Great Britain. In the period from 1790 to 1837, imperial officials repeatedly denounced American-style republicanism and tried to suppress it. The Rebellions themselves were not fought with the goal of annexation, however, but were launched in pursuit of political independence from Britain and liberal social reforms.

Between 1848 and 1854, a significant and articulate minority of conservatives in Upper Canada advocated constitutional changes modelled on the American federal-state system and the US Constitution. They critiqued Canada's imitation of British parliamentary government as both too democratic and too tyrannical. It destroyed the independence of the appointed governor and Legislative Council and further concentrated power in the Cabinet. This critique led many conservatives to argue that the American model of checks and balances offered Canada a more balanced and conservative form of democracy than did British parliamentary government. These "republican conservatives" debated a series of constitutional changes, including annexation to the United States, an elected governor, an elected Legislative Council, a federal union of British North America, and imperial federation, within this framework. These conservatives had accepted "government by discussion" as the appropriate basis for political order.[4]

1850s

Around 1850 there was a serious annexationist movement on the border region of Quebec's Eastern Townships, where the American-descended majority felt that union with the United States would end their economic isolation and stagnation as well as remove them from the growing threat of French Canadian political domination. Leading proponents of this genuinely bipartisan movement were careful not to appear disloyal to Britain, however, and they actively discouraged popular protest at the local level. Fearful of American-style democracy, the local elite also expressed revulsion toward American slavery and militaristic expansionism. Consequently, the movement died as quickly in the Eastern Townships as it did in Montreal after Britain expressed its official disapproval and trade with the United States began to increase.[5]

In Montreal at midcentury, with little immigration and complaints that the repeal of the Corn Laws had cut the region off from its British trade links, a small but organized group supported integrating the colonies into the United States. The leading organization advocating merger was the Annexation Association, founded in 1849 by an alliance of French Canadian nationalists and Anglophone businessmen in Montreal who had a common interest in the republic. Many of its members, including Louis-Joseph Papineau, were participants in the 1837-38 rebellions.

The Montreal Annexation Manifesto was published in 1849. It was hoped a merger with the United States would give Canada markets for its goods, ensure national security, and provide the finances to develop the west. A half measure was the in 1854 Canadian-American Reciprocity Treaty that linked the two areas economically.

However, the movement died out in 1854. Annexation was never a very popular choice. Many Canadians were loyal to the Crown and Great Britain, especially the descendants of the United Empire Loyalists. French Canadians worried about being an even smaller minority in a larger union, and were concerned about American anti-Catholicism. The American Civil War, further, convinced many Canadians that the American experiment was a failure.

1860s

British Columbia

United States Secretary of State William Seward predicted in 1860 that western British North America, from Manitoba to British Columbia, would with Russian Alaska join the United States. Many in Britain, such as Goldwin Smith and the Times of London, were pessimistic about the future of British North America and agreed with Seward; the Times said that Britain would only object if the United States attempted to take the territory by force.[6] In the late 1860s, residents of British Columbia, which was not yet a Canadian province, responded to the United States' purchase of Alaska with fear of being surrounded by American territory. Some residents wanted the colony the next American purchase. Local opinion was divided, as the three Vancouver Island newspapers supported annexation to the United States, while the three mainland newspapers rejected the idea. Even opponents of the annexation scheme admitted that Great Britain had neglected the region and that grievances were justified. Nonetheless, annexation sentiment disappeared within a few months and prominent leaders moved toward confederation with Canada.[7]

Petitions circulated in favour of American annexation. The first, in 1867, was addressed to Queen Victoria, demanding that the British government assume the colony's debts and establish a steamer link, or allow the colony to join the U.S. In 1869, a second petition was addressed to President Ulysses S. Grant, asking him to negotiate American annexation of the territory from Britain. It was delivered to Grant by Vincent Colyer, Indian Commissioner for Alaska, on December 29, 1869. Both petitions were signed by only a small fraction of the colony's population, and British Columbia was ultimately admitted as a Canadian province in 1871.

Nova Scotia

Most Canadians were strongly opposed to the prospect of American annexation. Reports of the Annexation Bill of 1866 — a bill that, contrary to myth, never came to a vote — might have been one of the many factors behind Canadian Confederation in 1867. Much more serious were the Fenian raids made by Irish Americans across the border in 1866, which spurred a wave of patriotic feeling that helped the cause of Confederation.[8]

Nonetheless, a substantial annexation movement existed in Nova Scotia, and to a lesser degree in New Brunswick, Quebec, and Ontario, during the 1860s. Nova Scotia anti-confederationists led by Joseph Howe felt that pro-confederation premier Charles Tupper had caused the province to agree to join Canada without popular support. Howe in London unsuccessfully attempted to persuade the government to free Nova Scotia from the pending British North America Act by threatening American annexation. A significant economic downturn occurred after the end after 1866 of the Reciprocity Treaty of 1854; the colony was heavily dependent on selling fish to Americans, causing many to believe that free trade with the United States was necessary for prosperity. Anti-confederationists won all but two seats in the 1867 provincial election; as in British Columbia they did not necessarily support annexation. They again sent Howe to London to free Nova Scotia but in 1868 the British government again refused, believing that New Brunswick would likely follow Nova Scotia out of the dominion and cause the new nation to collapse.[9]

Angry Nova Scotians began talking seriously of annexation. An alarmed Howe—who wished Nova Scotia to be free of Canada but still with Britain—warned his supporters against disloyalty, dividing anti-confederationists. The provincial government, dominated by extremists who now also opposed Howe, decided that if another appeal to London failed it would seize federal offices and unilaterally declare annexation, believing that Britain would not use force to stop Nova Scotia. Believing he had no choice, Howe left the anti-confederationists. Although he narrowly won reelection to his federal parliamentary seat in March 1869 as a confederationist, support for secession and annexation grew that year; however, by 1871 the movement had mostly disappeared. The federal government promised changes to taxes and tariffs, the economy revived, and the United States agreed to free trade for Canadian fish.[9]

1880s

Canadian author Prosper Bender wrote in the North American Review in 1883 that many Canadians believed that annexation by the United States would occur "within the present generation, if not sooner". He believed that Irish Catholics—about one quarter of Canada's population—would prefer annexation because of the British rule of Ireland. They would be joined by the majority of those under 40, who viewed the United States as a prosperous, fast-growing neighbor providing many opportunities. (The author attributed the absence of an active annexation movement in part to many who would favor such an effort taking the "easiest and quietest method of securing the benefits of annexation, by themselves silently migrating to the Republic", as more than a million already had.)[10]

Bender believed that Prime Minister John A. Macdonald's promise of a transcontinental railway linking eastern Canada to British Columbia to be overambitious and too expensive, and unfavourably compared the Canadian government's growing debt to the United States' rapid reduction of its Civil War debt. He stated that Canadian businesses would benefit from duty-free access to the American market, while "wondrous American enterprise, supported by illimitable capital" would rapidly prosper Canada, especially its vast undeveloped interior. Bender concluded with pessimism about the likelihood of success of a nation divided in two parts by 1,200 miles of "forbidding, silent wilderness stretching from the head-waters of the Ottawa to Thunder Bay, and thence to Manitoba".[10]

1890s

In 1891, Goldwin Smith posited in his book Canada and the Canadian Question that Canada's eventual annexation by the United States was inevitable, and should be welcomed if Canadians genuinely believed in the ideal of democracy. His view did not receive widespread support.[11]

In January 1893, concerned about Canada's possible annexation, a goal then being pursued by the Continental Union Association, a group of Ontario and Quebec Liberals, Prime Minister Sir John Thompson delivered a speech on tolerance, Canadian nationalism and continued loyalty to Britain. Thompson eventually learned that the desire to make Canada part of the U.S. was confined to a small minority amongst the Liberals.

1900s

In 1901 W. T. Stead, a newspaper editor in London, England, discussed in The Americanization of the World possible annexations of Canada and Newfoundland. He believed that because of its size and strength Canada would likely be the last of Britain's possessions in the Americas to join the United States. Stead cited several reasons for why he believed annexation seemed "inevitable", however, including rapidly growing economic ties and migration between the two countries, the French Shore, and disputes over the Alaska boundary and fishing rights in the Atlantic.[12]

After the discovery of gold in the Yukon, many Canadians propose to annex parts of Alaska currently controlled by the United States, by calling for a revision in the original map of the boundary line between the Russian Empire and the United States. The US offered to lease the territory but not to give it back. London and Washington agreed on arbitration, with one member of the panel from Canada. In 1903 the Chief Justice of Britain sided with the Americans to resolve the map dispute in favor of the United States. Many Canadians felt a sense of betrayal on the part of the British government, whose own national interest required close ties to the United States, regardless of the interests of Canada.[13]

The 1932 establishment of the International Peace Garden on the North Dakota-Manitoba border honored the long lasting friendship between the two countries rather than attempts at annexation.

Newfoundland in the mid-twentieth century

While the Dominion of Newfoundland was still separate from Canada, during World War II, a party known as the Economic Union Party sought closer ties with the United States. However, Canada objected to the possibility, and the British government, which controlled Newfoundland as a colony, would not allow it to consider annexation with the United States in any referendum. Instead, the EUP sought an independent "responsible government" that would then explore American annexation.[14] A referendum showed a plurality in support of independence, but not a majority; a runoff referendum resulted in Newfoundland instead confederating with Canada to become the tenth province.

Modern annexationist groups

Two modern provincial political parties have proposed that their province secede from Canada to join the United States. Neither attracted significant support.

The Unionest Party was a provincial political party in Saskatchewan in 1980 that promoted the union of the western provinces with the United States. It was the most politically successful annexationist group, but its success was both short-lived and extremely limited in scope. The party briefly had two members in the Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan, both of whom crossed the floor from another party, but dissolved within a few weeks after failing to qualify for official party status.[15]

The original Parti 51 was a short-lived political party in Quebec in the 1980s that advocated Quebec's admission to the United States as the 51st state. The party won just 3,846 votes, or 0.11 per cent of the popular vote in the province, in the 1989 election — fewer votes than the Marxist-Leninists or the satirical Lemon Party — and was dissolved the following year.[16] In 2016 Hans Mercier, a pro-American lawyer from Saint-Georges, Quebec, revived the party for second time.[17] Mercier told La Presse that the times have changed since the party's previous era, as Quebec sovereigntism has waned in popularity. Mercier argued that Americans would be welcoming of a new Quebec state, and pointed to a survey taken during the administration of George W. Bush that suggested nearly 34 per cent of Quebecers would support joining the United States.[18]

Anti-annexation rhetoric

In modern Canadian political discourse, the idea of Canada becoming the "51st state" of the United States is much more often used as a scare tactic against political courses of action that may be seen as too "Americanizing". The use of this type of rhetoric may occur even if the proponents of such a course of action have not endorsed or proposed annexation.

In the 1911 federal election, the Conservative response to the proposed reciprocity treaty negotiated by the Liberals was to denounce it as equivalent to an American economic takeover, with annexation likely to follow. The parties swapped position in the later 1988 federal election, when the Liberals used the same type of rhetoric to denounce the Progressive Conservatives' proposed Canada – United States Free Trade Agreement, although the Progressive Conservatives won that election and the agreement was implemented.

Annexation fears can be found throughout Canadian History for Dummies, in which humourist Will Ferguson stated that for "John L. O'Sullivan, it was the "manifest destiny" of the United States to annex and possess all of North America".[19] In fact, O'Sullivan's use of the term never extended beyond potential American annexation of Texas and the Oregon Territory; he explicitly wrote that he did not believe that the United States had a destiny to annex Canada.[20]

Reverse annexation

Political satirists, including the Rhinoceros Party of Canada, have occasionally proposed reverse annexation, whereby all or part the United States would be annexed into an expanded Canadian federation.[21] Following the 2004 American election, some Americans distributed the satirical Jesusland map on the Internet, depicting a similar proposal under which the "blue states" were part of a new political entity called "The United States of Canada".

Notes

  1. ^ Neuhold and Von Riekhoff, p. 94
  2. ^ Leger Marketing survey, 2001. Archived October 20, 2006, at the Wayback Machine
  3. ^ Leger Marketing survey, 2004. Archived 2012-02-19 at the Wayback Machine
  4. ^ McNairn, Jeffrey L. "Publius of the North: Tory Republicanism and the American Constitution in Upper Canada, 1848-54." Canadian Historical Review 1996 77(4): 504-537. ISSN 0008-3755.
  5. ^ Little, 1992
  6. ^ Shi, David E. (1978). "Seward's Attempt to Annex British Columbia, 1865-1869". Pacific Historical Review. 47 (2): 217–238. doi:10.2307/3637972. JSTOR 3637972.
  7. ^ Neunherz, R. E. (1989). ""Hemmed In": Reactions in British Columbia to the Purchase of Russian America". The Pacific Northwest Quarterly. 80 (3): 101–111. doi:10.2307/40491056. JSTOR 40491056.
  8. ^ Donald Creighton, John A. Macdonald: The Young Politician 1952 pp 438-43
  9. ^ a b Warner, Donald F. (1960). The Idea of Continental Union: Agitation for the Annexation of Canada to the United States, 1849-1893. University of Kentucky Press. pp. 54–57, 67–93.
  10. ^ a b Bender, P. (1883). "A Canadian View of Annexation". The North American Review. 136 (317): 326–336. JSTOR 25118257.
  11. ^ Kelly, Stéphane. "The Republic of Northern America." Toronto Star; Opinion (Canada 2020). 26 December 2006.
  12. ^ Stead, W. T. (1901). The Americanization of the World. Horace Markley. pp. 83–122.
  13. ^ F. W. Gibson, "The Alaskan Boundary Dispute," Canadian Historical Association Report (1945) pp 25-40 at note 57
  14. ^ Karl McNeil Earle, "Cousins of a Kind: The Newfoundland and Labrador Relationship with the United States" American Review of Canadian Studies, Vol. 28, 1998
  15. ^ Stephen LaRose, "It's All About the Crude". Planet S, March 26, 2009.
  16. ^ Jean Crête, "La vie des partis". L'année politique au Québec 1989-1990, Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal.
  17. ^ "L'avocat beauceron Hans Mercier relance le Parti 51". L'Éclaireur Progrès (in French). Retrieved 28 October 2017.
  18. ^ Guidara, Amin (27 August 2018). "Voter pour un Québec américain - La Presse+". La Presse+ (in French). La Presse. Retrieved 16 September 2018.
  19. ^ Will Ferguson, Canadian History for Dummies. pp. 211, 206, 220, 269.
  20. ^ New York Morning News, December 27, 1845.
  21. ^ 1979 campaign brochure of Judi Skuce Archived September 12, 2008, at the Wayback Machine

References

  • Angus, H. F., and R. M. MacIver; Canada and Her Great Neighbor: Sociological Surveys of Opinions and Attitudes in Canada concerning the United States Toronto: The Ryerson Press, 1938
  • Cros, Laurence. "Le Canada et La Peur De L'annexion Americaine a L'epoque Victorienne, a Travers Les Dessins Politiques Canadiens" International Journal of Canadian Studies 2001 (23): 157-186. ISSN 1180-3991; Canadian cartoons often showed Uncle Same as a long, thin, vulture-like individual wearing striped pants and a starred top hat; Belonging to a generation of Victorians both prudish and fascinated by things erotic, Canadian cartoonists of the time took delight in concocting innumerable scenarios according to which Miss Canada would yield, willingly or unwillingly, to Uncle Sam's advances.
  • Cumming, Carman. "The Toronto Daily Mail, Edward Farrer, and the Question of Canadian-American Union" Journal of Canadian Studies 1989 24(1): 121-139. ISSN 0021-9495 Campaigned for annexation to protect Anglophone Protestants in Quebec.
  • Ellis, L. Ethan. Reciprocity 1911, A Study in Canadian-American Relations (1939)
  • Granatstein, J. L. Yankee Go Home: Canadians and Anti-Americanism (1997)
  • Keenleyside, Hugh, and Gerald S. Brown; Canada and the United States: Some Aspects of Their Historical Relations NY 1952
  • Kilbourn, William. The Firebrand: William Lyon Mackenzie and the Rebellion in Upper Canada Toronto: Clarke, Irwin, 1956 online
  • Levitt, Joseph. A Vision Beyond Reach: A Century of Images of Canadian Destiny Ottawa: 1982, twelve eminent Canadian intellectuals discuss annexation
  • Little, J. I. "The Short Life of a Local Protest Movement: the Annexation Crisis of 1849-50 in the Eastern Townships." Journal of the Canadian Historical Association 1992 3: 45-67. ISSN 0847-4478
  • McNairn, Jeffrey L. "Publius of the North: Tory Republicanism and the American Constitution in Upper Canada, 1848-54." Canadian Historical Review 1996 77(4): 504-537. ISSN 0008-3755
  • Neuhold, Hanspeter, and Harald Von Riekhoff, eds.; Unequal Partners: A Comparative Analysis of Relations between Austria and the Federal Republic of Germany and between Canada and the United States Westview Press. 1993
  • Neunherz, Richard E. "'Hemmed In': Reactions in British Columbia to the Purchase of Russian America". Pacific Northwest Quarterly 1989 80(3): 101-111. ISSN 0030-8803
  • Nevins, Allan. Hamilton Fish: The Inner History of the Grant Administration (vol 2 1936) online
  • Smith, Allan. Canada, An American Nation? (1994) intellectual history essays on continentalism and identity
  • Smith, Goldwin. Canada and the Canadian Question (Toronto: Macmillan, 1891) online
  • Tansill, Charles C. Canadian-American Relations, 1875-1911 (1943)
  • Warner; Donald Frederic. The Idea of Continental Union: Agitation for the Annexation of Canada to the United States, 1849-1893 (University of Kentucky Press, 1960) online
This page was last edited on 18 February 2019, at 16:11
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.