To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Alternatives: Global, Local, Political

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Alternatives
DisciplinePolitical science, international relations
LanguageEnglish
Edited byLacin Idil Oztig
Publication details
History1975–present
Publisher
FrequencyQuarterly
1.095 (2020)
Standard abbreviations
ISO 4Alternatives
Indexing
ISSN0304-3754
LCCN76913317
OCLC no.442954314
Links

Alternatives: Global, Local, Political is a peer-reviewed academic journal that covers the field of international relations. The journal's editor-in-chief is Lacin Idil Oztig (Yıldız Technical University). It has been in publication since 1975 and is published by SAGE Publications in association with the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/3
    Views:
    557
    248 204
    2 120
  • Prof. Mark Blyth & Michael Roberts - Europe Economic Crisis and Political Alternatives, 2017
  • Slavoj Žižek: Why There Are No Viable Political Alternatives to Unbridled Capitalism
  • Cornel Ban ─ Ruling Ideas: How Global Neoliberalism Goes Local

Transcription

Abstracting and indexing

The journal is abstracted and indexed in Scopus and the Social Sciences Citation Index. According to the Journal Citation Reports, its 2020 impact factor is 1.095.[1]

Controversy

In 2020, the journal published a controversial journal article claiming that "International Relations (IR) scholars uncritically accept the official narrative regarding the events of 9/11 and refuse to examine the massive body of evidence generated by the 9/11 truth movement."[2] A number of scholars reacted on social media to criticize the claims made in the abstract, the editor's decision to publish, and the editorial board's silence. In a public statement addressing this controversy, the editor of Alternatives defended the publication of the article on free speech grounds.[3]

References

  1. ^ "Alternatives". 2020 Journal Citation Reports. Web of Science (Social Sciences ed.). Clarivate Analytics. 2021.
  2. ^ Hughes, David A. (2020). "9/11 Truth and the Silence of the IR Discipline". Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 45 (2): 55–82. doi:10.1177/0304375419898334. S2CID 214435280.
  3. ^ "Peer Review Vs Trial by Twitter". 8 March 2020.

External links


This page was last edited on 4 December 2022, at 11:05
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.