Alan Cornwall (priest)

Transcription

One of the major things that we've done in our studies is to delve into the ancient history of the Brits. Now in delving into ancient British history we found a peculiarity, in modern times it's been regarded as a bogus history and the reason for it being a bogus history comes out of Oxford and Cambridge and London in England and the theory was that Troy never existed other than in the mind of Homer and as Homer wrote a fictitious poem about Troy, Troy was a fictitious place, it had no foundation in fact or truth and was none existent, therefore a history which based itself upon the first King of Britain being Brutus the great-grandson of Anchises and grandson of Aeneas of Troy and that the whole of the British nation or a large part of them were originally Trojan had to be a false history. As it was a false history based on Homer's fictional epic therefore you throw out British history and this actually was done and you will find books by these supposed scholars from Oxford and elsewhere stating this in the words that I've just stated; that it's a bogus history based on a bogus fiction by Homer, that this (the British) is a brutal primitive race who have no real history of their own, bunch of savages and they decided they would claim decent from Troy. Now how this lunacy could have taken route in the 19th century is perhaps hard to understand but you've got to realise that in the United Kingdom the word United doesn't really apply, it's a very fragmented fratricidal place where all sorts of petty jealousies and major jealousies are consistently at the fore in the relations between the Scots, the Irish and the Welsh and the English. Everybody seeks primacy and jealously attacks and niggles at the others. So what you start with in British history is a situation that the history is thoroughly derided before William the Conquer and this is the well-known phrase in Britain of "It all began in 1066" in other words you couldn't believe anything that happened before 1066. Now this leads to a peculiar situation, you've got modern professors, I've read a book recently, I've read several but one last year where a professor of archaeology actually states we know nothing of British history whatsoever other than the snippets and small comments made by various Greek and Roman writers. Now that is an inconceivably stupid statement. You can equally say we know nothing of what the Jews or the history of the Jews other than what Roman or Greek writers said about the Jews. In other words you know nothing about the Jews. Well we know about the Jews because we know about the various histories and documents preserved by the Jews. The Bible, the Talmud, Flavius Josephus and so on and we don't say to the Jews you have no history because the Greeks and the Romans didn't mention you and we don't go to China and say to the Chinese you have no history because the Greeks and the Romans didn't write about you nor do we do it to the Japanese, each nation preserves its own history and really if you dig in ancient Assyria and you find monuments of Assyria with the inscriptions and the libraries of various kings on cuneiform clay tablets you are reading the self-preserved histories of Assyria and the same in Chaldean Babylonia so why Britain should be singled out and put into a bracket where we are told you cannot have original British records and British inscribed stones of antiquity, British coins and British artifacts, the whole archaeology of Britain and history of Britain unless it's verified by some Roman or Greek who did not visit the country and wrote three to five hundred years after the events he's describing. It's very difficult to understand. So it's a double standard which has come in and it's come in through pretty political jealousies and political motivations in the United Kingdom. Now what was happening when this Trojan epic had to be abandoned in Britain was that it was in the early 1800's beginning of the 19th century. You'd just had the American Revolution or War of Independence tearing itself away from the Brits, on the British throne was a very unpopular German monarchy, George III was stark raving mad although they tried to portray him otherwise, he six debauched sons whose performance around London with loose women morganatic marriages and gross behaviour was very unpopular. The whole damn monarchy was in disrepute, the ruling elite, the ruling class needed a puppet monarchy, they were still smarting under the effect of the Jacobite rebellion where Bonnie Prince Charlie attempted to oust these Hanoverians in the 1745-1750 era. The French had risen on their hind legs and finally got rid of the aristocracy and they'd got rid of the king and there were guillotines everywhere and it was in this frantic environment in Britain that the decision was taken to get rid of past British history because it was very necessary to create a bogus history to eliminate anything that was a threat to the regime and the monarchy. Now you've got to realise also that fifty percent of the British population are estimated to have supported the French Revolution and at least fifty percent if not more were fully in support of the American Revolution and this probably is not realised outside of the UK. So one of the targets was to abandon the ancient history of the country and create a history that would sure up the monarchy and protect the establishment. So having gone into that in that way the detail can be researched by anybody. In particular there was an assault upon the Welsh because it was in Wales that the histories were mainly preserved. The Welsh had been in their territories for 3600 years and they said very firmly as did many of the Brits in England that they were people of two migrations. One a vast migration by sea from Syria about 1600 years BC coming from presumably from Ur from Diocletian who turns out to be Dungi of Ur and the second migration about 500 BC from a Trojan remnant in the western Asia-Minor area of Phrygian Troja and so we had two migrations one 3600 years ago, one 2500 years ago coming into the UK bringing these influences from that area. These histories were forthwith abandoned purely on the basis that Troy never existed. Now about 130 years after they abandoned the Albion legend, the coming of Albyne from Syria, Leonard Woolley dug up Ur of the Chaldees and he dug up the Royal Acropolis and in digging up the Royal Acropolis he dug up the vast tombs of the Emperors of Ur and one of them is of interest to us in that it's the greatest of the emperors of who they think is of the 3rd Dynasty named Dungi who appears to be the British Diocletian. The interesting thing is that in the British record written in manuscripts certainly a thousand years old the idea was that Diocletian ruled thirty-three other nations. He also made his daughters rulers of nations or territories and he had a great enemy named Lebanor. When Leonard Woolley dug up Ur he found the votive area of Diocletian and he also found the Diocletian of Dungi ruled thirty-three other countries, he made some of his daughters rulers of countries and he had a great enemy named Lebanor. Lebanor turns out to be the first king of the Hittites, emperor of the Hittites up in Anatolia in Turkey who did actually attack the Chaldean Euphrates civilization and he conquered it. Every subsequent king of the Hittites took the throne name of Lebanor in the same way the Caesars in Rome became Caesar after Julius Caesar. In other words Caesar became a titular name as a personal name, everybody used it. Not until around 1880 was the Hittite Empire rediscovered and so nobody in Europe would have known anything about Lebanor yet the British knew all about Lebanor a thousand years ago when Woolley dug up the votive area in the tomb of Dungi he found metal tables, on the metal tables he found that there were certain items, reclining models of rams, reclining models of bulls, standing lambs, round balls. When they dug up the Lexton Mound in Cambridgeshire England said to be the tomb of King Kinvelin are within the Lexton Mound they found a metal table in the votive area, reclining bulls, reclining model rams, reclining and standing lambs and round balls again. In other words a complete identical paraphernalia in the religious area. All these items are still in the Colchester museum but it seems not to have occurred to anybody to make the comparison. So there is some truth in the first legend and you can take it further you can compare the ancient measurements, jurisprudence, pottery and in Britain at the time of this invasion 1600 BC a marvellous metal working culture burst out from nowhere, it had no antecedents, it had no precedents, there was no way that it could be traced back to a sort of development it just came out of nowhere and it's not unlikely that this metal working culture known as the Wessex culture is a direct emanation of this invasion from Ur of the Chaldees and if you begin to compare some of the marvellous gold and other bronze finds that they've made in ancient mounds and so in Britain if you make the comparison with ancient Syrian Ur of the Chaldees you will see that there is remarkable similarity. So you have an imported culture, an imported civilisation, imported technology and the same thing has happened to the United States in the last 200 years or more. Taking this a stage further if there appears to be some basic truth in the Syrian migration, you also have mentions in the odyssey of...said again to be by Homer but I doubt...where Ulysses talks to man who said his homeland is a great island in the western ocean beyond the Pillars of Hercules, Gibraltar which can only be Britain and he called it Syrie, the name Syrie still endures in Britain it's Surrey a large county on the south bank of the Thames and London stands on most of it. You have mentions in old documents Caradoc of Llancarfan describing people of the midlands of England and speaking of the territories of the Ealde Cyrcenas in 1156 -- the Old Syrians in modern English. So the idea that the Old Syrians came to Britain was well established and well-remembered. In Ur they were known as the Gutians. When Brutus came to Britain the people who were recorded as being there were called Giantess -- exactly the same name as the people who were found in Ur -- Giantess. Later they became the Gewissae and in medieval manuscripts, Anglo-Saxon chronicles and so on they're Gewissae and it's fairly clear that the Gutians and Giantess are the Gewissae and later they dropped the "GE" and called them the Wesse or Wessex people and (the historians) said "ah Wessex west Saxons isn't that beautiful". Complete misnomer and another part of the general political ploy to get rid of the history. They actually translated the Giantess of Britain as being giants as if they were a mythical giant race there and another attempt to create a myth out of fact. So having dealt with them we then thought it wise to possibly look at the Brutus legend. Now the Brutus legend is firmly embedded in Britain and you have to realise that the main line of kings of Britain always claims in history decent from Brutus and it doesn't matter if you can claim decent from the Holy Family or Jesus Christ or whatever you have to be able to claim decent from Brutus to be king. There's no doubt about this. So Brutus had to be got rid of on the Trojan War being a fiction and the city of Troy being a fiction, Brutus is a fiction. We decided that as the history was proving out in a number of other fields, we were getting all manner of evidence to prove it correct and reliable history and honourable history honestly recorded in detail that it was worth looking at the alphabet of the people. Now in the same way as the Greeks have an alphabet, the Arabs have an alphabet which is different and the Egyptians had a pictorial alphabet and the Chinese have a pictorial alphabet so we also have a peculiar alphabet peculiar to the British. Again this alphabet has been thoroughly derided and they have called the alphabet a forgery, a fake and a fiction invented by a man named Edward Williams around 1800. Difficult to believe that because it's in a manuscript in the Bodleian Library in Oxford which dates around 1520. It's also mentioned in a book that was written for and on behalf on the Prince of Wales in 1794 and the author states this alphabet I find in a very ancient manuscript in the Bodleian Library. Equally difficult as Dafydd ap Gwilym probably the best of the Welsh poets is describing the alphabet in his poems in 1370. Another poet Ieuan Llawdden is describing the alphabet in 1425 roughly and a further poet is describing the alphabet Guto'r Glyn in roughly 1450. Equally it's well known that the alphabet was brought back into use to send messages on sticks around 1400 when Owain Glyndŵr the Welsh Prince was fighting Henry IV of England. It goes on and on there is a satirical poem in existence by a man named Rhys Cain, Rhys Cain was from Oswestry and he went to an eisteddfod in 1580 and met a Welsh Bard from Glamorgan who had a peithynen -- in other words a frame of wood with wooden staves in it on which was cut with a knife the straight strokes of the Coelbren alphabet and Rhys Cain kindly wrote a satirical mocking poem about the alphabet. We also find that in 1946 in Nag Hammadi in Egypt, Chenoboskion it's called a peasant named Mohammed Ali was looking for firewood and he found a 5ft clay jar in an old cemetery. He dragged the jar out, took it home and inside were 14 leather satchels, in the 14 leather satchels were 128 Gnostic books, a complete Gnostic library of the Gnostic Christian Church. Now for 1500 years people have only really known about the Gnostics what their enemies the Church of Rome chose to write about them and it's not very polite but here was an intact Gnostic library. In amongst these 128 books is the book of Massanes which gives a complete detailed description of the Coelbren British alphabet, how it is, what it is, and how it works. The same descriptions were published almost exactly the same in 1840 in Wales. So we had signs that the alphabet would work. Now if we look at the Brutus legend we have this, the British finally come from western Turkey, Troy to Britain under Brutus. They pick up people along the way, in other words they stop at Spain the Iberian Peninsula pick up more of their countrymen from Troy and proceed to Britain. So you can possibly link a common alphabet in Britain, Iberia Spain and Troy. We also know that shortly before the Brits came from Troy the Etruscans moved out and they moved out around 650-600 BC and from the same area Phrygia in the Trojan area of Turkey. So we have another possible link between Turkey, the Etrurian Empire which lasted 650 to 100 BC in Italy and of again in Rhaetia which is now part of Switzerland because Pliny the Elder kindly tells us the Rhaetians were Etruscans. What we did then was to identify that the alphabets in all these areas anciently were very similar you could say near identical. We were encouraged to do this because a man named John Williams in 1846 wrote a book and in this book he exhibited the ancient Coelbren British alphabet and in exhibiting it he gave the cypher in other words what's an A what's a B what's a C and he also said isn't it strange that the British Coelbren alphabet is almost identical with Etruscan and with Pelagian on the coast of Turkey. It's not strange at all if that's where we ancestrally come from and if that's where they Etruscans come from and we are roughly kinsmen. There is a tie-up in that Llywelyn Siôn of Glamorgan in 1560 preserved the alphabet and preserved its cypher in other words he wrote down which sign is A, which is B, which is C, which is D right through. He also wrote down which signs were numerals 1,2,3,4,5,6 and so we have an alphabet and we know the lettering and if we know the lettering obviously if we see a series of signs we put the appropriate letters underneath out will come the word and the word will be in Cymric in Welsh and we should be able to translate it into English or French or German or any other language for people to read. If we look at the name of the people it becomes more interesting. The proper name of the people you know as Welsh is Khumry. In the 20th century it is popular to use the letter "C" but the correct spelling is K-H-U-M-R-Y. In ancient Turkey they were known as the Cimmeroi. C-I-M-M-E-R-O-I. They were known by Herodotus writing around 460 BC as the Cimmerians. They moved out of Iraq and Iran, northern areas, out of Syria I think when Sennacherib was murdered by one of his sons and civil war erupted in the Assyrian Empire. The records of the Assyrian Emperors dug up at Nineveh and taken to the British Museum 25,000 clay tablets exhibit these very same people as the Khumry K-H-U-M-R-Y exactly the spelling and name that they have in Britain. The Assyrian Emperors got these people from a place we would know as Israel and they would appear to be the Ten Tribes. So there is a clear linkage of people right the way back. We decided that we would attempt to translate the ancient stones in Britain which are known to be of the year 200 AD in one instance those in Aberdeen and Angus in Scotland are known to be 6th century, a stone in Galloway said to be 6th century, there are stones in Cumbria North West England again of the same era. There are stones that were dug up in St Paul's churchyard in London from the Dark Age. There are a number of stones in Wales and a number of church fonts, one of them is an ancient oak font, it's made from the stump of an oak tree carved into a font and an inscription round it; it actually names Athrwys which is the Welsh spelling of Arthur. So we've got a number of stones all over the place, we simply applied the alphabet to these stones, in other words that sign is A, that's B, that's C or whatever. We then had under the signs we have a list of modern letters, those modern letters spelled words and we were able to read what the stones were saying. So a stone put up in Nevern in West Wales around 950 turns out to be inscribed with the name of Hywel Rex and in all the manuscripts Hywel Rex is Hywel Dda (English: Hywel the Good) who ruled the area and died in 948 and if the stone was put up around 950 that's right. The ruins of his court and upper court farm and lower court farm are about 6-8 miles away and about 6 miles away is Crug Hywel, the Heap of Hywel his gravemound so he fits. We found another stone in Wales, interesting one, it said "Gorddwfyn the Exile" Gorddwfyn is a bit of a mouthful of a name, hardly inventible. We find around 200 AD a British King named Gorddwfyn was indeed deposed, it says in the records Gorddwfyn was a turbulent, mad and wild king for which reason he was deposed, exiled and his brother Rhrun placed in instead and it goes on right through Britain you can translate all the stones with the correct meaning and naming people and giving to them a little more historical detail. Now this encouraged us to tackle Etruscan inscriptions so we looked for Etruscan inscriptions. Now you'll find in Britain a lot of books not many about Etruria it's not popular in Britain presumably because it's been seen to be Italian. So while the Romans are much publicised the Italians aren't or the Etruscans aren't. We found great volumes of Etruscan pictures of statues and ruined buildings and tombs but it was very hard to get at inscriptions and when we started to get to them we found that they were little ones on wine bottles, on bronze mirrors which were carved with scenes and statements, on the sides of statues, all sorts of minor artifacts that people used would have inscriptions on them. We were able to translate these without any difficulty what so ever and what we did note and it's unmistakable that some of these inscriptions like on the wine bottles are petty little humours statements and they unmistakably have the dry humour and the dry sort of self-depreciating whit that we associate with Jewish people. There's no doubt about this. We therefore went further, we looked at one very famous inscription, they found a tomb of a princess or a great noble lady from one of the Etruscan cemeteries untouched and they found within this tomb a large amount of silver tableware, it's virtually an ancient tea set or dining set in silver and this has been translated if you can use the word "translated" to mean Lathia and they then said "aha Lathia is the woman who owns this stuff" and they even gave her a second name and what they're doing is taking the Etruscan letter finding the nearest Greek letter that matches it and reading it in Latin. Although Pliny and a number of other writers tell them time and time and time again that the Etruscan language is nothing whatsoever remotely like Latin or Greek. Although they are told this they can't resist doing something about it, in other words, the academic can never say "I don't know" and he feels he writing to an uninformed audience or don't know either and he can get away with it. So we translated this Lathia, it's very interesting because it actually says "The gift to lie silent" in the tomb, in words to that effect. It doesn't say Lathia at all. Realising we were on to a winner we translated a lot of the major Etruscan texts. We translated the Perugia Cippus -- a large stone slab, like a great gravestone with 36 lines of detailed writing on it and it tells how 12 clan or tribal units of people are setting up a union and in this unified state they will divide the land equally amongst themselves. They will cooperate to drain the land, to irrigate it, to fertilise it and to make it productive and they will not war with each other they will attempt to cooperate. A constitution in a sense. We then translated other major statements, we found the three gold tables which are known as the Pyrgi Tablets from a temple in the ancient port of Pyrgi. That's the Welsh way of pronouncing it. It was the ancient Etruscan port near Rome, major city area with three ports. These little gold tablets, one's in Carthaginian and two are in Etruscan, they've not been read. We're able to find that they tell of the league of the Etruscans and Carthaginians to provide sixty warships each for a combined fleet to attack the Greek Phocaean pirates who'd settled on the island of Sardinia to get rid of them. The Greeks had been driven out or opted out of Turkey and they come away when Cyrus had become emperor of Persia and they had decided to set-up in Sardinia and to make a living robbing the merchant fleets of the Carthaginians and the Etruscans. It's well known that this league was formed the whole story is well recorded by ancient authors and here we have it repeated on the Pyrgi Tablets so we know that it is authentic history. The other major text we deciphered from Etruria was the Agnone Tablet, in the British museum, a large bronze tablet, 25 lines of writing on one side, a less amount of the other side and it tells who the Etruscans were and where they came from before they got to Etruria and I think therefore it's a very important tablet. It says that they were in a country happily, but there was huge pestilence and plague and all sorts of cosmic disasters, they were lead out of this country and went with the little cabinet in a cart and they follow this little cabinet which is in a cart and they finally arrive at another land which is their own land and they settle there and live there. I'm obviously paraphrasing what it says. Later, on the other side, it says how they are forcibly removed from this land of their own and they are taken to another place which they don't like and again they follow the little cabinet in the cart and the little cart would presumably be drawn by ox's or donkeys and off goes the little cart and they follow it and they come to a place and they take ship and in ships they come to Eturia; it appears the Khumry are moving off from Northern Syria through Asia Minor coming to the Dardanelles and they take ship and then go round to Etruria. That's what it appears to be telling us. Obviously the earlier side, the other side would appear to be that they're in Egypt and there's cataclysms in Egypt at the time of Moses, they are led out by Moses they follow the little arc in the cabinet, whatever it is in the cart and off they go to their own land. So I think it's probably one of the most important documents we've read so far. Now having got that far we then said well what have they got in Phrygian, areas in Turkey and we found one very long inscription straight away, much publicised, over the top of a building which looks like a temple to us and it's described actually as the tomb of Midas and when we looked at this long inscription that went right over the top and right down the side it reads out perfectly into Khumric again and there's no doubt whatsoever about it. Now whether the inscription was added to an existing temple building or whether it was put up by the builders of the building is another matter but there's no doubt whatsoever it's a form of harvest prayer and it's very unlikely that that's a tomb, it's probably a temple. So we were now in a position of translating all the ancient British stones, we were in a position of translating any Etruscan inscription we come across or wish to translate and getting sense, we turned to Rhaetia where certain small inscriptions have been preserved and we mopped them up in no time, they also translate into Khumric and we know from Pliny that the Rhaetians in Switzerland are Etruscans who'd moved north. So you've got a constant fit in the same way that if there was devastation in the world tomorrow and New Zealand was the only place that escaped it's quite possible that in later years New Zealanders would drift into ravaged America and find documents that they could read in their own language, and the same in Canada and they'd finally work their way back to the UK and find what was left there. This is all we are doing. We are doing what Alex Haley did, in a much more, we're not quite in the family genre that he's in, more of an international situation, we're following our national roots right the way back as far as we can. Interestingly the Welsh have always said that their language is the language of the angels and the language and alphabet is the language of heaven and they say that in those words and here we have it called the language of the angels and the language of heaven in the Nag Hammadi scrolls in the Gnostic library. Precisely the same definition they gave to the same alphabet, it's the language of God it's the language of heaven. So we had now accomplished that which had pleased us because really we were verifying the basic and fundamental accuracy of British history as we know it and as it has been flung aside and derided. You've got to realise that the average Englishman has been persuaded that he's an Anglo-Saxon and therefore anything before 500 AD doesn't apply to him and needs to be booted out and got rid in the same way the Americans came and got rid of the Indian culture and histories. The thing is you'd think that they'd have learnt something over there, they've been there longer. Actually very few English people are Angles or Saxons and the phrases that I hear used like an Anglo-American agreement are just absurd it's like saying a British-Minnesota agreement for the USA. Very few people in Britain are Angles. What you're saying is you've got an agreement with the county of Northumberland. It's a completely absurd piece of nomenclature. Tiny numbers of them are Saxons on the coast of Kent and Sussex and Dorset. Certainly the bulk of the population is ancient Gutian, it's Vandal Mercian, it's British, it's Pict and the British are from the Brutus people of Troy, the Trojans the Khumry and from the Assyrians and the idea they are Angles and Saxons is the daftest thing you've ever heard but they've been persuaded that they are and the strange thing is this; the Welsh in the persons of the Khumry attacked Northern France, this is well known, they attacked Europe, the British, in 383 and the two major principalities that endured were Brittany which still does and Ludow/Lugdunensis, Ludow became Normandy in 852 when the Normans were aided by the French king to attack the place and install the rule of Rollo / Hrolf 'the Ganger'. But a Welsh man can go over and speak Welsh to Bretons today and in a very short time they are understanding each other and a Breton can come to Wales and speak to the Welsh and understand each other. But it's very strange that no Angle and no Saxon as we call them, no Englishman can go to Germany and speak to Germans and they never could so there's got to be something wrong. Now Welsh records of 826 say very clearly that the language which prevailed in England and became the national language is the language of the Isinglas. It's the language of the Iceni. The Iceni are the great big tribe who were a tribal nation led by Boudicca in her attack upon the Romans at the time of Nero. So this is the language of England, not Angle and not Saxon and then you've got a question is it Angle or is it Saxon? You can't have Anglo-Saxon it's like saying we've got French-Yugoslavian. What is it? It's neither. So we have a number of fictions in this wonderful home of tradition in England.