To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

Agip (Africa) Ltd v Jackson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Agip (Africa) Ltd v Jackson
CourtCourt of Appeal
Full case nameAgip (Africa) Limited v (1) Barry Kingsley Jackson and Edward Norman Bowers (both practising as Jackson & Co. a firm) and (2) Ian Duncan Griffin
Decided21 December 1990
Citation(s)[1990] EWCA Civ 2
[1990] Ch 265
Transcript(s)BAILII
Court membership
Judge(s) sittingFox LJ
Butler-Sloss LJ
Beldam LJ
Case opinions
Fox LJ
Keywords

Agip (Africa) Ltd v Jackson [1990] EWCA Civ 2 is an English trusts law case concerning the common law remedies for receipt of trust property.

Facts

Mr Zdiri, an Agip Ltd employee, changed the name on a payment order of $518,000 to Baker Oil Services Ltd, a puppet controlled by Mr Jackson and other accountants, who acted on clients’ instructions. The money was transferred from Banque du Sud in Tunisia to Baker Oil’s account with Lloyds Bank in London. All but $43,000 was then paid on to unknown parties. Agip Ltd sued Mr Jackson for return of the money.

Judgment

High Court

Judge Peter Millett held that Agip Ltd was entitled to an equitable proprietary claim for the $43,000 from Jackson, and that the accountants were liable for 'knowing assistance in a breach of trust'. However, Agip Ltd could not succeed for receipt of the money at common law (which did not allow electronic rather than physical tracing) or in equity (because the money was not transferred for the accountants' benefit). Banks can be liable in knowing receipt only if they receive and apply trust money to reduce or discharge a customer's overdraft.[1] Otherwise, banks merely pay and receive money as agents of their customers. It must be for their own 'use and benefit'. He suggested that the liability for knowing receipt could be imposed if the circumstances would put an honest and reasonable person on inquiry. Agip Ltd appealed on the common law point.

Court of Appeal

The Court of Appeal upheld Judge Millett's decision. Michael Fox gave judgement, while Elizabeth Butler-Sloss  and Roy Beldam concurred.

Notes

  1. ^ [1990] Ch 265, 292

References

External links

This page was last edited on 1 May 2023, at 19:46
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.