Argumentum ad baculum (Latin for "argument to the cudgel" or "appeal to the stick") is the fallacy committed when one makes an appeal to force[1] to bring about the acceptance of a conclusion.[2][3] One participates in argumentum ad baculum when one emphasizes the negative consequences of holding the contrary position, regardless of the contrary position's truth value—particularly when the argument-maker himself causes (or threatens to cause) those negative consequences. It is a special case of the appeal to consequences.
YouTube Encyclopedic
-
1/3Views:7 2981 3218 704
-
Appeal to Force (See links below for more video lectures on Types of Informal Fallacies)
-
Appeal to Force or Argumentum Ad Baculum
-
Ad Baculum (Appeal to Force)
Transcription
Examples
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy gives this example of argumentum ad baculum:
- If you don't join our demonstration against the expansion of the park, we will evict you from your apartment;
- So, you should join our demonstration against the expansion of the park.[4]
The phrase has also been used to describe the 1856 caning of Charles Sumner, an abolitionist Senator, by one of his pro-slavery opponents, Preston Brooks, on the floor of the United States Senate.[5]
See also
- Argument from authority
- Conformity
- Formal fallacy
- In terrorem
- Legal threat
- Management by perkele
- Might makes right
- Proof by intimidation
References
- ^ Curtis, Gary N. (2018). "Logical Fallacy: Appeal to Force". The Fallacy Files. Retrieved 24 June 2021.
- ^ "Argumentum ad Baculum". philosophy.lander.edu. Lander University. Retrieved 23 July 2022.
- ^ Woods, John (November 1998). "Argumentum ad baculum" (PDF). Argumentation. 12 (4): 493–504. doi:10.1023/A:1007779930624. S2CID 143386357. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 November 2016. Retrieved 16 May 2023.
- ^ Hansen, Hans (2020). "Fallacies". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020 ed.). Retrieved 16 May 2023.
- ^ "American Notes". The Illustrated London News. Vol. LXXI, no. 2009. 29 December 1877. p. 622. Retrieved 24 June 2021.
...that uncompromising Sumner whose eloquence exasperated a fiery Southerner into the employment of the argumentum ad baculum...
| Formal |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Informal |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
 | This logic-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
This page was last edited on 16 May 2023, at 19:56