A Philosophical View of Reform is a major prose work by Percy Bysshe Shelley written in 1819-20 and first published in 1920 by Oxford University Press. The political essay is Shelley's longest prose work.
YouTube Encyclopedic
-
1/3Views:2 429 8662 394 49673 407
-
PHILOSOPHY - Plato
-
Luther and the Protestant Reformation: Crash Course World History #218
-
Martin Luther's Doctrines (Reformation Theology)
Transcription
Athens, 2400 years ago. It’s a compact place: only about a quarter of a million people live here. There are fine baths, theatres, temples, shopping arcades and gymnasiums It’s warm for more than half the year. This is also home to the world’s first true – and probably greatest – philosopher: Plato Born into a prominent and wealthy family in the city, Plato devoted his life to one goal: helping people to reach a state of what he termed: εὐδαιμονία (Eudaimonia) or fulfilment. Plato is often confused with Socrates Socrates was an older friend, who taught Plato a lot but didn’t write any books. Plato wrote lots of them: 36, all dialogues: beautifully crafted scripts of imaginary discussions in which Socrates is always alotted a starring role - among them: The Republic The Symposium The Laws The Meno and The Apology Plato had four big ideas for making life more fulfilled. First big idea: Think more We rarely give ourselves time to think carefully and logically about our lives and how to live them. Sometimes we just go along with what the the Greeks called ‘doxa’: ‘popular opinions’. In the the 36 books he wrote, Plato showed this ‘common-sense’ to be riddled with errors, prejudice and superstition. Fame is great Follow your heart Money is the key to a good life The problem is, popular opinions edge us towards the wrong values, careers and relationships. Plato’s answer is ‘Know yourself.’ It means doing a special kind of therapy, philosophy: Subjecting your ideas to examination rather than acting on impulse. If you strengthen your self-knowledge, you don’t get so pulled around by feelings. Plato compared the role of our feelings to being dragged dangerously along by a group of wild horses. In honour of his mentor and friend, Socrates, this kind of examination is called a Socratic discussion. You can have it with yourself or ideally, with another person who isn’t trying to catch you out but wants to help you clarify your own ideas. Second Big idea: Let your lover change you. That sounds weird, if you think that love means finding someone who wants you just the way you are. In The Symposium , Plato’s play about a dinner party where a group of friends drink too much and get talking about love, sex and relationships, Plato says: “True love is admiration.” In other words, the person you need to get together with should have very good qualities … which you yourself lack. Let’s say, they should be really brave Or organised. Or warm and sincere By getting close to this person, you can become a little like they are. The right person for us helps us grow to our full potential. For Plato, in a good relationship, a couple shouldn’t love each other exactly as they are right now. They should be committed to educating each other – and to enduring the stormy passages this inevitably involves. Each person should want to seduce the other into becoming a better version of themselves. Three: decode the message of beauty. Everyone – pretty much – likes beautiful things Plato was the first to ask why do we like them? He found a fascinating reason: Beautiful objects are whispering important truths to us about the good life … We find things beautiful when we unconsciously sense in them qualities we need but are missing in our lives. gentleness harmony balance peace strength Beautiful objects therefore have a really important function. They help to educate our souls. Ugliness is a serious matter too. it parades dangerous and damaged characteristics in front of us. It makes it harder to be wise, kind and calm. Plato sees art as therapeutic: it is the duty of poets and painters (and nowadays, novelists, television producers and designers) to help us live good lives. Four: Reform society. Plato spent a lot of time thinking how the government and society should ideally be. He was the world’s first utopian thinker. In this, he was inspired by Athens’s great rival: Sparta. This was a city-sized machine for turning out great soldiers Everything the Spartans did – how they raised their children, how their economy was organised, whom they admired, how they had sex, what they ate – was tailored to that one goal. And Sparta was hugely successful, from a military point of view. But that wasn’t Plato’s concern. He wanted to know: how could a society get better at producing not military power but fulfilled people? In his book, The Republic, Plato identifies a number of changes that should be made: Athenian society was very focused on the rich, like the louche aristocrat Alcibiades, and sports celebrities, like the boxer Milo of Croton. Plato wasn’t impressed: it really matters who we admire, because celebrities influence our outlook, ideas and conduct. And bad heroes give glamour to flaws of character. Plato therefore wanted to give Athens new celebrities, replacing the current crop with ideally wise and good people he called Guardians models for everyone’s good development. These people would be distinguished by their record of public service, their modesty and simple habits, their dislike of the limelight and their wide and deep experience. They would be the most honoured and admired people in society. He also wanted to end democracy in Athens. He wasn’t crazy. He just observed how few people think properly before they vote and therefore we get very substandard rulers. He didn’t want to replace democracy with horrid dictatorship; but wanted to prevent people from voting until they had started to think rationally. Until they had become philosophers. Otherwise, government would just be a kind of mob rule [back to those horses]. To help the process, Plato started a school, The Academy, in Athens, which lasted a good 300 years. There, pupils learnt not just maths and spelling, but also how to be good and kind. His ultimate goal was that politicians should become philosophers: ‘The world will not be right,’ he said, ‘until kings become philosophers or philosophers kings.’ [show Hollande, Merkel, Cameron all trooping into a uni- then coming out as philosophers] Plato’s ideas remain deeply provocative and fascinating. What unites them is their ambition and their idealism. He wanted philosophy to be a tool to help us change the world. We should continue to be inspired by his example.
Analysis
Shelley composed A Philosophical View of Reform between November, 1819 and 20 May 1820, meant to address political developments in England at that time.[1] He advocated non-violence and a moderate response to the repressive measures imposed by the British government. One of the events he addressed was the Peterloo Massacre, which occurred on 16 August 1819, in St. Peter's Field near Manchester, where a peaceful demonstration seeking parliamentary reform was attacked by militia.
The bookseller Richard Carlile had been found guilty of blasphemy by a jury in November, 1819 for printing an edition of The Age of Reason (1794-6) by Thomas Paine. The “Six Acts” had been promulgated in December which placed restrictions on public gatherings and freedom of the press.
It was during this unstable political period in England in late 1819 when Shelley started writing A Philosophical View of Reform. Shelley told John and Maria Gisborne on 6 November: "I have deserted the odorous gardens of literature to journey across the great sandy desert of Politics."
Shelley proposed five reforms:[2]
- abolish the national debt.
- disband the standing army.
- abolish sinecures.
- abolish tithes, and make all religions, all forms of opinion regarding the origin and government of the universe, equal under the law.
- make justice inexpensive, certain, and speedy, and extend the institution of juries to every possible occasion of jurisprudence.
Shelley opposed revolution, advocating instead gradual change through non-violence. He argued that individual and institutional reform went hand in hand. He maintained that poets, writers, and philosophers would stimulate reforms of the social institutions that would benefit everyone in society.
Shelley informed his publisher Charles Ollier on 19 December 1819 that he sought A Philosophical View of Reform "to be an instructive and readable book, appealing from the passions to the reason of men", informing him that he would not finish it "this season".
On 26 May 1820 he asked Leigh Hunt if he could find a publisher for the work: "Do you know any bookseller who wd publish for me an octavo volume entitled 'A philosophical View of Reform'. It is boldly but temperately written – & I think readable – It is intended for a kind of standard book for the philosophical reformers."
Mary Shelley had a transcript made of the manuscript with plans to publish the work. The political essay remained unpublished, however, until 1920 when it appeared for the first time in print in an edition published by Humphrey Milford, Oxford University Press, with an introduction and appendix by Thomas William Rolleston.
References
- ^ Sandy, Mark. "A Philosophical View of Reform". The Literary Encyclopedia. First published 21 March 2002 accessed 20 July 2011.
- ^ Ripley, Brian. "Percy Bysshe Shelley's 'A Philosophical View of Reform'": www.shelley.235.ca/
Sources
- Sandy, Mark. "A Philosophical View of Reform". The Literary Encyclopedia. First published 21 March 2002 accessed 20 July 2011.
- Ripley, Brian. "Percy Bysshe Shelley's 'A Philosophical View of Reform'": www.shelley.235.ca/
- Shelley's Ghost: Reshaping the Image of a Literary Family: http://shelleysghost.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/a-philosophical-view-of-reform#Description
- "A Philosophical View of Reform." Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Encyclopædia Britannica, 2011. Web. 20 July 2011. <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/456780/A-Philosophical-View-of-Reform>.
- Walker, A. Stanley. "Peterloo, Shelley and Reform." PMLA, Vol. 40, No. 1 (March, 1925), pp. 128–164.
- Cameron, Kenneth Neill. "The Social Philosophy of Shelley." The Sewanee Review, Vol. 50, No. 4 (October–December, 1942), pp. 457–466.
- Pulos, C.E. "Shelley and Malthus". PMLA, Vol. 67, No. 2 (Mar., 1952), pp. 113–124.
- Franta, Andrew. "Shelley and the Poetics of Political Indirection". Poetics Today, 2001, 22, 4, pp. 765–793.
- Abana, Yuxuf Akwo. The Shelleys and empire: 'Prometheus Unbound', 'Frankenstein', 'A Philosophical View of Reform', and the modern African fictions of liberation. PhD. dissertation, University of Arizona, 2006: https://www.scribd.com/doc/22141988/The-Shelleys-and-empire-Prometheus-Unbound-Frankenstein-A-Philosophical-View-of-Reform-and-the-modern-African-fictions-of-liberation-Percy
- Foot, Paul, ed. Shelley's Revolutionary Year: Shelley's Political Poems and the Essay "A Philosophical View of Reform". With an Introduction by Paul Foot. Redwords, 1990.
- Shelley, Percy Bysshe. A Philosophical View of Reform. University Press of the Pacific, 2004.
External links
- Online version of the 1920 Oxford edition of A Philosophical View of Reform by Percy Bysshe Shelley.