To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
Languages
Recent
Show all languages
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

AE Ursae Majoris

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AE Ursae Majoris

A light curve for AE Ursae Majoris, plotted from TESS data[1]
Observation data
Epoch J2000      Equinox J2000
Constellation Ursa Major
Right ascension 09h 36m 53.155s[2]
Declination +44° 04′ 00.40″[2]
Apparent magnitude (V) 10.86 to 11.52[3]
Characteristics
Evolutionary stage subgiant[4]
Spectral type A9[4]
Variable type SX Phe(?)[3]
Astrometry
Radial velocity (Rv)150±27[4] km/s
Proper motion (μ) RA: −15.755 mas/yr[2]
Dec.: −12.650 mas/yr[2]
Parallax (π)1.3593 ± 0.0332 mas[2]
Distance2,400 ± 60 ly
(740 ± 20 pc)
Details[4]
Mass1.805±0.055 M
Radius2.367±0.046 R
Luminosity24.0+2.8
−2.5
 L
Surface gravity (log g)3.9543±0.0044 cgs
Temperature8,357+195
−190
 K
Metallicity [Fe/H]−0.32±0.23 dex
Age1.055±0.095 Gyr
Other designations
AE UMa, HIP 47181, 2MASS J09365316+4404004[5]
Database references
SIMBADdata

AE Ursae Majoris is a star in the northern circumpolar constellation of Ursa Major, abbreviated AE UMa. It is a variable star that ranges in brightness from a peak apparent visual magnitude of 10.86 down to 11.52.[3] The distance to this star is approximately 2,400 light years based on parallax measurements.[2]

The variability of this star was announced by E. Geyer and associates in 1955.[6] V. P. Tsesevich in 1973 found it to be a dwarf cepheid with a period of 0.086017 days, and he noticed it showed amplitude variations in the light curve.[7] In 1974, B. Szeidl determined a secondary period of 0.066529 days,[8] while P. Broglia and P. Conconi found a beat period of 0.294 days.[9] It belonged to a group of high amplitude, double mode Delta Scuti variables that included SX Phoenicis,[10] and by 1995 it was classified as a SX Phoenicis variable and a possible halo object. However, E. Hintz and associates in 1997 found strong evidence against this classification.[7][4]

In 2001, the overtone pulsation period of this star was shown to change at the rate of −7.3×10−8 y−1.[11] In addition, possible sudden jumps in the period have been observed, a property it has in common with VZ Cancri.[12] With an estimated mass 1.8 times that of the Sun and an age of a billion years, it is an evolved star that has left the main sequence and is generating energy on a hydrogen-burning shell surrounding a helium core. The metallicity suggests it is a population I Delta Scuti variable. Currently it is crossing the Hertzsprung gap.[4]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    115 979
    4 034
    2 338 594
    83 033
    10 893
  • 7 Map Creation Tools for Adobe After Effects 🌎
  • Кози Грамади Резиденцията на Траките | еп 35
  • Only A Glass Of This Juice... Reverse Clogged Arteries & Lower High Blood Pressure - Doctor Reacts
  • Saptarishi (The big Dipper) in hindi
  • Incredibly Powerful Adobe After Effects/Premiere Pro Extension - Nodes 3

Transcription

References

  1. ^ MAST: Barbara A. Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes, Space Telescope Science Institute, retrieved 22 September 2022.
  2. ^ a b c d e Brown, A. G. A.; et al. (Gaia collaboration) (2021). "Gaia Early Data Release 3: Summary of the contents and survey properties". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 649: A1. arXiv:2012.01533. Bibcode:2021A&A...649A...1G. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039657. S2CID 227254300. (Erratum: doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039657e). Gaia EDR3 record for this source at VizieR.
  3. ^ a b c Samus, N. N.; et al. (2017), "General Catalogue of Variable Stars", Astronomy Reports, 5.1, 61 (1): 80–88, Bibcode:2017ARep...61...80S, doi:10.1134/S1063772917010085, S2CID 125853869.
  4. ^ a b c d e f Niu, Jia-Shu; et al. (May 2017), "AE Ursae Majoris - a δ Scuti star in the Hertzsprung Gap", Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 467 (3): 3122–3139, arXiv:1304.3772, Bibcode:2017MNRAS.467.3122N, doi:10.1093/mnras/stx125.
  5. ^ "AE UMa". SIMBAD. Centre de données astronomiques de Strasbourg. Retrieved 2022-09-16.
  6. ^ Geyer, E.; et al. (1955), "Kleine Veroeffentl", Remeis Observatory Bamberg, p. 9.
  7. ^ a b Hintz, E.; et al. (October 1997), "Time-Series Ensemble Photometry of SX Phoenicis Stars. II. AE Ursae Majoris", Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 109: 1073–1076, Bibcode:1997PASP..109.1073H, doi:10.1086/133977, S2CID 122988714.
  8. ^ Szeidl, B. (June 1974), "The Secondary Period of AE UMa", Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 903: 1, Bibcode:1974IBVS..903....1S.
  9. ^ Broglia, P.; Conconi, P. (September 1974), "On the Beat Period of AE UMa", Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 923: 1, Bibcode:1974IBVS..923....1B.
  10. ^ Andreasen, G. K. (May 1983), "Delta Scuti variables. II. Comparisons of theoretical evolution sequences with observational data.", Astronomy and Astrophysics, 121: 250–258, Bibcode:1983A&A...121..250A.
  11. ^ Szeidl, B. (July 2001), "The small period change of the Delta Scuti star AE UMa", Communications in Asteroseismology, 140: 56, Bibcode:2001CoAst.140...56S.
  12. ^ Coates, D. W.; Landes, H. (April 2008), "The beat-curve approach applied to AE UMa", Communications in Asteroseismology, 153: 8–16, Bibcode:2008CoAst.153....8C, doi:10.1553/cia_153s8.

Further reading

This page was last edited on 21 December 2023, at 22:50
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.