To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

2018 California Proposition 68

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposition 68
Natural Resources Bond
Results
Response
Votes %
Yes 3,808,000 57.35%
No 2,831,899 42.65%
Valid votes 6,639,899 100.00%
Invalid or blank votes 0 0.00%
Total votes 6,639,899 100.00%

California Proposition 68 (also the Natural Resources Bond or the California Drought, Water, Parks, Climate, Coastal Protection, and Outdoor Access for All Act of 2018) was a legislatively referred constitutional amendment that appeared on ballots in California in the June primary election in 2018. It was a $4.1bn bond measure to fund parks, environmental projects, water infrastructure projects and flood protection measures throughout California.

Proposal

The Proposition would allow the State of California to borrow $4.1bn using a municipal bond scheme in order to fund parks, water and flood protection infrastructure and various environmental projects. The Proposition set allocation of these funds between different strategies:[1]

The cost to the public was estimated to be $7.8bn after paying off interest, or an average annual repayment of $200m for forty years.[1]

Campaign

Support

Proposition 68 was authored by State Senator Kevin de León.[2] The 'Yes' campaign focused mainly on the improvements the Proposition would bring to parks, saying that it would remedy years of "under-investment" in environmental infrastructure in poorer communities.[3] 'Yes' supporters spent more than $9m throughout the campaign.[4]

Endorsements

Opposition

Opposition to Proposition 68 mainly argued that instead of issuing debt, the state should fund parks and environmental projects through California's general fund.[12] It was also noted that although the 'Yes' campaign was promoting the Proposition on its benefits to parks, less than one third of the money would actually go towards parks and recreation.[13]

Endorsements

Results

Yes/No Statement

A "yes" vote on Proposition 68 proposes: The state could sell $4.1 billion in general obligation bonds to fund various natural resources-related programs such as for habitat conservation, parks, and water-related projects. A "no" vote on Proposition 68 proposes: The state could not sell $4.1 billion in general obligation bonds to fund various natural resources-related programs.[1]

Results

Proposition 68 gained 3,808,000 yes votes and 2,831,899 no votes (a total of 6,639,899 votes), so passing with 57.35% approval

References

  1. ^ a b c "Proposition 68". Legislative Analyst's Office. 5 June 2018. Retrieved 8 May 2020.
  2. ^ "California's Prop 68". National Recreation and Park Association. Retrieved 8 May 2020.
  3. ^ Ravani, Sarah; Garofoli, Joe (6 June 2018). "Prop. 68 passes to inject $4.1 billion into CA water, land conservation projects". SFGate. Retrieved 8 May 2020.
  4. ^ Cart, Julie (30 May 2018). "Parks and politics: What you need to know about Propositions 68 and 70". CalMatters. Retrieved 9 May 2020.
  5. ^ a b c d e f Austin, Paige (18 May 2018). "What Is Proposition 68? Voter Guide for 2018 California Measures". Patch.com. Retrieved 8 May 2020.
  6. ^ "California Newspapers Endorse League-Supported Propositions 68, 69 and 72 on the June Ballot". League of California Cities. 15 May 2018. Retrieved 8 May 2020.
  7. ^ "Endorsement: Yes on Proposition 68 to preserve parks, protect water supply and enhance our climate resilience". Los Angeles Times. 26 April 2018. Retrieved 8 May 2020.
  8. ^ "Vote 'yes' on all the June 2018 ballot measures but one". The Sacramento Bee. 22 March 2018. Retrieved 8 May 2020.
  9. ^ "California 2018 primary election: Yes on Proposition 68". Daily Bruin. 3 June 2018. Retrieved 9 May 2020.
  10. ^ "Editorial: Prop. 68 water, parks bond deserves Californians' support". The Mercury News. 10 March 2018. Retrieved 9 May 2020.
  11. ^ "California Proposition 68, Parks, Environment, and Water Bond". Outdoor Industry Association. Retrieved 8 May 2020.
  12. ^ a b c Rogers, Paul (21 May 2018). "Proposition 68: Will voters approve $4.1 billion for parks and water projects?". The Mercury News. Retrieved 8 May 2020.
  13. ^ a b "Editorial: Vote no on Proposition 68, state's parks and water bond". Chico Enterprise-Record. 21 May 2018. Retrieved 9 May 2020.
  14. ^ "Election 2018: Peace and Freedom Party endorsements for ballot propositions 68, 69, 70, 71 and 72". Peace and Freedom Party. 14 May 2018. Retrieved 8 May 2020.
This page was last edited on 19 September 2020, at 16:39
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.