To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

2009 reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The table below lists the decisions (known as reasons) delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2009. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.[1]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    45 346
    8 188
    388
    651
    3 909 454
  • Why the US Supreme Court Will Never Be Reformed
  • Supreme Court: The Term in Review (2009-2010) Part 1 of 2
  • Supreme Court Preview 2009
  • Supreme Court of Canada Justice Visit to MMC
  • Iran's Revolutions: Crash Course World History 226

Transcription

Reasons

  Delivered the Court's reason
  Joined the Court's reason
  Filed a concurrence
  Joined a concurrence
  Filed a dissent
  Joined a dissent
  Filed a concurrence/dissent
  Joined a concurrence/dissent
  Did not participate in the judgment
  Did not participate in the final disposition of the judgment
  Not a member of the Court at the time of hearing or delivering
  • Decisions that do not note a Justice delivering the Court's reason are per coram.
  • Multiple concurrences and dissents within a case are numbered, with joining votes numbered accordingly. Justices occasionally join multiple reasons in a single case; each vote is subdivided accordingly.
  • Multiple unnumbered reasons are jointly written or delivered.
  • Decisions that are given orally from the bench are denoted by a "V"; per coram decisions delivered orally from the bench only note a "V" on the most senior justice on the panel.
  • An asterisk ( * ) in the Court's opinion denotes that it was only a majority in part or a plurality.
Case name Argued Decided McLachlin Binnie LeBel Deschamps Fish Abella Charron Rothstein Cromwell
Lipson v Canada, 2009 SCC 1, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 3 [1] April 23, 2009 January 8, 2009 1 1 2
R v Strecko, 2009 SCC 2, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 64 [2] January 14, 2009 V
R v McNeil, 2009 SCC 3, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 66 [3] March 19, 2008 January 16, 2009
R v Khela, 2009 SCC 4, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 104 [4] March 28, 2008 January 22, 2009
R v Smith, 2009 SCC 5, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 146 [5] March 28, 2008 January 22, 2009
Shafron v KRG Insurance Brokers (Western) Inc, 2009 SCC 6, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 157 [6] October 16, 2008 January 23, 2009
Ravndahl v Saskatchewan, 2009 SCC 7, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 181 [7] December 17, 2008 January 29, 2009
DesRochers v Canada (Industry), 2009 SCC 8, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 194 [8] May 20, 2008 February 5, 2009
Ermineskin Indian Band and Nation v Canada, 2009 SCC 9, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 222 [9] May 22, 2008 February 13, 2009
Rick v Brandsema, 2009 SCC 10, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 295 [10] October 14, 2008 February 19, 2009
Case name Argued Decided McLachlin Binnie LeBel Deschamps Fish Abella Charron Rothstein Cromwell
Teck Cominco Metals Ltd v Lloyd's Underwriters, 2009 SCC 11, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 321 [11] November 17, 2008 February 20, 2009
Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Khosa, 2009 SCC 12, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 339 [12] March 20, 2008 February 6, 2009 1 2
R v Royz, 2009 SCC 13 [13] March 25, 2009 V
R v SJL, 2009 SCC 13 [14] December 16, 2008 March 27, 2009
BMP Global Distribution Inc v Bank of Nova Scotia, 2009 SCC 15, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 504 [15] May 15, 2008 April 2, 2009
Canada Post Corp v Lépine, 2009 SCC 16, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 549 [16] November 17, 2008 April 2, 2009
R v Patrick, 2009 SCC 17, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 579 [17] October 10, 2008 April 9, 2009
Chatterjee v Ontario (AG), 2009 SCC 19, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 624 [18] November 12, 2008 April 17, 2009
United Parcel Service Canada Ltd v Canada, 2009 SCC 20, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 657 [19] January 15, 2009 April 23, 2009
R v Middleton, 2009 SCC 21, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 674 [20] January 20, 2009 May 22, 2009
Case name Argued Decided McLachlin Binnie LeBel Deschamps Fish Abella Charron Rothstein Cromwell
R v Van, 2009 SCC 22, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 716 [21] January 13, 2009 May 28, 2009
R v Craig, 2009 SCC 23, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 762 [22] November 13, 2009 May 29, 2009
R v Ouellette, 2009 SCC 24, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 818 [23] November 13, 2009 May 29, 2009 1 2 1
R v Nguyen, 2009 SCC 25, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 826 [24] November 13, 2009 May 29, 2009
R v Godin, 2009 SCC 26, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 3 [25] February 12, 2009 June 4, 2009
R v Ellard, 2009 SCC 27, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 19 [26] April 20, 2009 June 12, 2009
R v Griffin, 2009 SCC 28, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 42 [27] November 14, 2008 June 18, 2009 1 2
Caisse populaire Desjardins de l'Est de Drummond v Canada, 2009 SCC 29, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 94 [28] February 29, 2008 June 19, 2009
AC v Manitoba (Director of Child and Family Services), 2009 SCC 30, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 181 [29] May 20, 2008 June 26, 2009
Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority v Canadian Federation of Students — British Columbia Component, 2009 SCC 31, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 295 [30] March 25, 2008 July 10, 2009
Case name Argued Decided McLachlin Binnie LeBel Deschamps Fish Abella Charron Rothstein Cromwell
R v Grant, 2009 SCC 32, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 353 [31] April 24, 2008 July 17, 2009
R v Suberu, 2009 SCC 33, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 460 [32] April 15, 2008 July 17, 2009
R v Harrison, 2009 SCC 34, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 494 [33] December 9, 2008 July 17, 2009
R v Shepherd, 2009 SCC 35, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 527 [34] April 24, 2008 July 17, 2009
R v Layton, 2009 SCC 36, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 540 [35] April 21, 2009 July 23, 2009
Alberta v Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony, 2009 SCC 37, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 567 [36] October 7, 2008 July 23, 2009 1 2 3
R v Bjelland, 2009 SCC 38, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 651 [37] November 20, 2008 July 30, 2009
Nolan v Kerry (Canada) Inc, 2009 SCC 39, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 678 [38] November 18, 2008 August 7, 2009
Bell Canada v Bell Aliant Regional Communications, 2009 SCC 40, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 764 [39] March 16, 2009 September 18, 2009
United States of America v Anekwu, 2009 SCC 41, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 3 [40] February 10, 2009 September 24, 2009
Case name Argued Decided McLachlin Binnie LeBel Deschamps Fish Abella Charron Rothstein Cromwell
R v Jaw, 2009 SCC 42, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 26 [41] January 13, 2009 September 25, 2009
Marcotte v Longueuil (City), 2009 SCC 43, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 65 [42] January 19, 2009 October 8, 2009
Breslaw v Montreal (City), 2009 SCC 44, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 131 [43] January 19, 2009 October 8, 2009
R v Last, 2009 SCC 45, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 146 [44] March 27, 2009 October 15, 2009
Canada (Justice) v Fischbacher, 2009 SCC 46, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 170 [45] June 16, 2009 October 16, 2009
Nguyen v Quebec (Education, Recreation and Sports), 2009 SCC 47, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 208 [46] December 15, 2008 October 22, 2009
Galambos v Perez, 2009 SCC 48, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 247 [47] April 15, 2009 October 23, 2009
Quebec (Revenue) v Caisse populaire Desjardins de Montmagny, 2009 SCC 49, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 286 [48] March 17, 2009 October 30, 2009
Northrop Grumman Overseas Services Corp v Canada (AG), 2009 SCC 50, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 309 [49] May 19, 2009 November 5, 2009
Miazga v Kvello Estate, 2009 SCC 51, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 339 [50] December 12, 2008 November 6, 2009
Case name Argued Decided McLachlin Binnie LeBel Deschamps Fish Abella Charron Rothstein Cromwell
R v Basi, 2009 SCC 52, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 389 [51] April 22, 2009 November 19, 2009
Consolidated Fastfrate Inc v Western Canada Council of Teamsters, 2009 SCC 53, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 407 [52] February 19, 2009 November 26, 2009
Plourde v Wal‑Mart Canada Corp, 2009 SCC 54, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 465 [53] January 21, 2009 November 27, 2009
Desbiens v Wal‑Mart Canada Corp, 2009 SCC 55, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 540 [54] January 21, 2009 November 27, 2009
R v Legare, 2009 SCC 56, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 551 [55] October 15, 2009 December 3, 2009
R v Burke, 2009 SCC 57, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 566 [56] November 19, 2009 December 4, 2009
R v Dudley, 2009 SCC 58, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 570 [57] March 18, 2009 December 17, 2009
Co‑operators Life Insurance Co v Gibbens, 2009 SCC 59, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 605 [58] April 16, 2009 December 18, 2009
R v Bird, 2009 SCC 60, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 638 [59] December 11, 2009 December 18, 2009
Grant v Torstar Corp, 2009 SCC 61, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 640 [60] April 23, 2009 December 22, 2009
Case name Argued Decided McLachlin Binnie LeBel Deschamps Fish Abella Charron Rothstein Cromwell
Quan v Cusson, 2009 SCC 62, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 712 [61] April 23, 2009 December 22, 2009

Notes

  1. ^ Motions released in 2009: R. v. Laboucan, 2009 SCC 18, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 620

References

This page was last edited on 16 August 2023, at 01:51
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.