To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.

1994 United States Senate election in Massachusetts

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1994 United States Senate election in Massachusetts

← 1988 November 8, 1994 2000 →
Romney 1994 No Watermark (cropped).jpg
Nominee Ted Kennedy Mitt Romney
Party Democratic Republican
Popular vote 1,266,011 894,005
Percentage 58.1% 41.0%

1994 US Senate election in Massachusetts results by municipality.svg
Results by municipality

U.S. Senator before election

Ted Kennedy

Elected U.S. Senator

Ted Kennedy

The 1994 United States Senate election in Massachusetts was held November 8, 1994. Incumbent Democratic U.S. Senator Ted Kennedy won re-election to his sixth full term, defeating the Republican Party nominee, Mitt Romney, a businessman who eventually became the Governor of Massachusetts 8 years later, the Republican nominee for President of the United States 18 years later, in which he lost the presidency to then-incumbent President Barack Obama, and ultimately a U.S. Senator from Utah in 2018, 24 years later.

Romney defeated his closest competitor, John Lakian, to win the Republican primary with over 80% of the vote. He campaigned as a political moderate and Washington outsider, and posed the greatest challenge ever made against Kennedy for the Senate seat since he first took office in 1962. Democratic congressmen across the country were struggling to maintain their seats, and Kennedy in particular was damaged by character concerns and an ongoing divorce controversy. The contest became very close.

Kennedy launched ads criticizing Romney's tenure as the leader of the company known as Bain Capital, accusing him of treating workers unfairly and taking away jobs, while also criticizing what were widely considered to be Romney's shifting political views. Romney also performed inadequately in the debates between the two candidates, and made a number of poorly received statements that reduced his standing in the polls.

In the closest Senate election of his career since after 1962, Kennedy won by a reasonably comfortable margin, despite a series of losses for Democrats around the country, including control of the US Senate.

Despite Romney's loss in this race, this would not be his last Senatorial bid. After reestablishing residence in Utah and nearly 24 years after the loss, Romney won the 2018 U.S. Senate election in Utah for the open seat vacated by Senator Orrin Hatch.[1]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/4
    10 642
    61 629
  • ✪ Can Congress Have Term Limits? | U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton
  • ✪ 2005 - Electing the New President of the United States: Senator Ted Kennedy & Ted Sorensen
  • ✪ Snow College Convocations: Mitt Romney 9-13-2018
  • ✪ The American Presidential Election of 2012


Mr. Beat presents Supreme Court Briefs Arkansas November 3, 1992 Citizens vote to approve Amendment 73 to the Arkansas Constitution, which says any federal Congressional candidate who has already served three terms in the U.S. House of Representatives or two terms in the U.S. Senate can’t be on the ballot in elections. Now, representatives could still run for a fourth term and Senators could still run for a third term- their names would just have to be written-in on the ballot. For people who can’t spell, though, this might be a problem. Anyway, Bobbie Hill, a member representing the League of Women Voters, was not happy Amendment 73 passed. She sued Arkansas, arguing the amendment went against the United State Constitution, yo. Specifically, it’s Article 1, Section II No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen But wait, there’s more. It’s Article 1, Section III: No Person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty Years, and been nine Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State for which he shall be chosen. And of course Hill brought up the 17th Amendment as well. Ray Thornton, a U.S. Congressman representing the 2nd district of Arkansas, was one of the folks who would not have his name on the ballot in the next election. He joined Hill and the League of Women Voters with another lawsuit. Representing Arkansas in the lawsuit by Hill was Attorney General Winston Bryant. Representing Arkansas in the lawsuit by Thornton was U.S. Term Limits, the organization who helped get Amendment 73 to pass to begin with. The Arkansas Circuit Court sided with Thornton and Hill. On appeal, the Arkansas Supreme Court also ruled in favor of Thornton and Hill. U.S. Term Limits and Bryant appealed yet again to the Supreme Court, who agreed to hear both cases, hearing oral arguments on November 29, 1994. U.S. Term Limits argued that Amendment 73 didn’t actually prevent anyone from running for an additional term- she or he could run as a write-in candidate. But Thornton and Hill argued this additional obstacle was enough to overstep Article 1, sections 2 and 3 of the U.S. Constitution. So, could states do that as indirect way to prevent career politicians being in government? The Court said “no.” On May 22, 1995, they announced they had sided with Thornton and Hill. It was a close one. 5-4, and split based on political ideology. The more conservative justices sided with U.S. Term Limits. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the majority opinion, using the 17th Amendment to back it up. “The Congress of the United not a confederation of nations in which separate sovereigns are represented by appointed delegates, but is instead a body composed of representatives of the people.” Writing for the dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote...wait a second Justice Thomas? Holy crap we never hear from that dude. Anyway, he wrote, “Nothing in the Constitution deprives the people of each State of the power to prescribe eligibility requirements for the candidates who seek to represent them in Congress.” In other words, this seemed like a state’s rights issue for the dissent. Regardless, U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton made it clear that if people wanted there to be term limits for members of U.S. Congress, there would have to be a constitutional amendment, and we all know how easy it is to pass those, amiright? Now, SHOULD Congress have term limits? I’m going to redirect you Peter of the channel Professor Politics to answer that question. Go ahead, check out the video and come on right back. So, what'd you think? I can't hear you, but 82% of Americans in a recent poll said they thought members of Congress should have term limits. Texas Senator Ted Cruz and Florida Congressman Francis Rooney Hold on, let me get a better picture of Ted Cruz. That's better. recently introduced an amendment to the Constitution to restrict Senators to 2 six-year terms and Representatives to 3 two-year terms, and President Trump and both Democrats and Republican have expressed support for it. That said, that doesn’t mean term limits are coming to Congress any time soon. I’ll see you for the next Supreme Court case, jury! What do you think? So should Congress have term limits? Let me know in the comments below. And thanks to my Patreon supporter Casper for suggesting this topic. I made the video because he donates at least $10 or more a month to me on Patreon. So thanks Casper! And if you want your Supreme Court case suggestions made into a video, that's probably the quickest way to make it happen. Don’t forget to check out the Professor Politics video about why term limits may not be such a great idea. He has a great channel so go subscribe, too. Eh? Eh? Eh? Thanks for watching, Beatniks. My wife, Mrs. Beat, wants me to tell you all to check out my Instagram. I need more Instagram followers apparently.


Republican primary



Romney was initially behind businessman John Lakian in the battle to win the Massachusetts Republican Party's nomination for the U.S. Senate.[3] However, after using his personal wealth to advertise heavily on television, he gained overwhelming support at the state party convention.[3]

Romney then defeated Lakian easily in the September 1994 Republican Party primary with over 80 percent of the vote.[4][5]


Massachusetts United States Senate Republican primary, 1994[6]
Party Candidate Votes %
Republican Mitt Romney 188,280 82.04
Republican John Lakian 40,898 17.82
Others 318 0.14
Total votes 229,496 100

General election

Man smiling at right with sign in background and parents holding toddler at left
Romney campaigning in Holyoke, Massachusetts




  • William A. Ferguson (LaRouche Was Right)
  • Mary Fridley (Libertarian)


In the general election, Kennedy faced the first serious re-election challenger of his career in the younger, telegenic, and very well-funded Romney.[7] Romney ran as a successful entrepreneur and Washington outsider with a strong family image and moderate stands on social issues.[7] After two decades out of public view, his father George re-emerged during the campaign.[8][9] George Romney had urged Mitt to enter the race and moved into his son's house for its duration, serving as an unofficial advisor.[2][10]

Kennedy was more vulnerable than usual in 1994, in part because of the unpopularity of the Democratic Congress as a whole and also because this was Kennedy's first election since the William Kennedy Smith trial in Florida, in which Kennedy had taken some public relations hits regarding his character.[7] Kennedy was saddled not only with his recent past but the 25th anniversary of the Chappaquiddick incident and his first wife Joan Bennett Kennedy seeking a renegotiated divorce settlement.[7]

Some early polls showed Romney close to Kennedy. By mid-September 1994, polls showed the race to be even.[7][11] One Boston Herald/WCVB-TV poll taken after the September 20, 1994 primary showed Romney ahead 44 percent to 42 percent, within the poll's sampling margin of error.[12] In another September poll, Romney had a 43 to 42 percent lead.[13] President Bill Clinton traveled to Massachusetts to campaign for Kennedy.[14]

Religion became an issue for a while, after Kennedy's campaign said it was fair to ask Romney about his LDS Church's past policy of not allowing blacks into the priesthood.[5] Romney accused Kennedy of having violated Senator John F. Kennedy's famous September 1960 pledge not to allow his own Catholic doctrine to inform policy, made during his ultimately victorious presidential campaign.[5] George Romney forcefully interjected during his son's press conference, "I think it is absolutely wrong to keep hammering on the religious issues. And what Ted is trying to do is bring it into the picture."[5]

After Romney touted his business credentials and his record at creating jobs within his company, Kennedy ran campaign ads showing an Indiana company, Ampad, bought out by Romney's firm, Bain Capital. They showed interviews with its union workers who had been fired and who criticized Romney for the loss of their jobs, with one saying, "I don't think Romney is creating jobs because he took every one of them away."[15] Romney claimed that 10,000 jobs were created because of his work at Bain, but private detectives hired by Kennedy found a factory bought by Bain Capital that had suffered a 350-worker strike after Bain had cut worker pay and benefits.[16] Kennedy's charges were effective, as more voters decided that Romney was interested in profits more than people.[5]

Kennedy campaigning in Lowell
Kennedy campaigning in Lowell

Kennedy's attack ads also focused both on Romney's shifting political views;[7][17] although both Kennedy and Romney supported the abortion rights established under Roe v. Wade, Kennedy accused Romney of being "multiple choice" on the issue, rather than "pro choice."[18] Romney said his stance dated back to his mother, Lenore Romney, and her position during her 1970 U.S. Senate campaign: "My mother and my family have been committed to the belief that we can believe as we want, but we will not force our beliefs on others on that matter. And you will not see me wavering on that."[5] Nevertheless, women's groups and Democrats viewed Romney's position with suspicion.[5] (In subsequent years, Romney became pro-life and opposed Roe.[19])

Kennedy's campaign ran short on money, and belying his image as endlessly wealthy, he was forced to take out a second mortgage on his Virginia home.[20] Romney spent over $7 million of his own money, with Kennedy spending more than $10 million from his campaign fund, mostly in the last weeks of the campaign (this was the second-most expensive race of the 1994 election cycle, after the Dianne FeinsteinMichael Huffington Senate race in California).[21] Kennedy's new wife Vicki Reggie Kennedy proved to be a strong asset in campaigning.[11]

By early October, Kennedy was ahead by 49 to 44 percent in a Boston Globe poll.[5] In their first televised debate, held at Faneuil Hall on October 25, Kennedy came out charging with his aging but still booming voice; regarding the Ampad deal, he said to Romney, "I don't know why you wouldn't meet with the strikers with that flimflam deal of yours out there in Indiana."[5] Romney charged that Kennedy had benefited from a real-estate deal that had been done on a no-bid basis, but Kennedy responded with a rehearsed line: "Mr. Romney, the Kennedys are not in public service to make money. We have paid too high a price in our commitment to the public service of this country."[5] Each candidate was asked to discuss one of their own failings. In a dramatic moment, Kennedy indirectly referred to his personal problems and acknowledged that he was "painfully aware" that on such occasions he had let his supporters down. By contrast, Romney mentioned work for several local charities he was engaged with on a near daily basis. When the moderator reminded him of the question, Romney responded "I guess what I regret is that I'm not able to provide even more help for those less fortunate than myself.... I wish I could do even more." Kennedy won this key debate as he reconnected with his traditional bases of support:[7] two polls of voters conducted afterwards both showed Kennedy as the victor in the debate.[22] One post-debate October general election poll showed Kennedy leading 50 percent to 32,[16] and another by 56 to 36 percent.[5] A second debate, held two days later at Holyoke Community College, focused more on policy details and lacked the intensity of the first one; Romney failed to gain any traction from it.[22]


Pollster Date Kennedy Romney Unsure M.o.E.
Boston Globe/WBZ-TV July 24, 1994
50% 34% 16%
Boston Globe/WBZ-TV September 25, 1994
48% 46% 6% +/- 5%
Opinion Dynamics of Cambridge October 27, 1994[25] 52% 33% 15% +/- 5%


Results by county
Results by county

In the November general election, despite a bad national year for Democrats overall, Kennedy easily won re-election by a 58 percent to 41 percent margin,[26] the closest re-election race of his career; only his initial victory in the 1962 Senate special election in Massachusetts was closer.[27]

Massachusetts United States Senate election, 1994[28]
Party Candidate Votes % ±
Democratic Edward M. Kennedy (Incumbent) 1,266,011 58.07 –6.90
Republican Mitt Romney 894,005 41.01 +7.08
Libertarian Lauraleigh Dozier 14,484 0.66 +0.15
LaRouche Was Right William A. Ferguson, Jr. 4,776 0.22 +0.22
Write-in 688 0.03 +.02
Total votes 2,179,964 71.54
Democratic hold

See also


  1. ^ "Utah U.S. Senate Election Results". Retrieved 2018-11-10.
  2. ^ a b c Kirkpatrick, David D. (December 18, 2007). "For Romney, a Course Set Long Ago". The New York Times. Retrieved December 19, 2007.
  3. ^ a b Hersh, The Shadow President, pp. 124, 126–127.
  4. ^ "Romney will oppose Sen. Kennedy in Nov". Providence Journal. Associated Press. September 21, 1994. p. B1.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Swidey, Niel; Ebbert, Stephanie (June 27, 2007). "The Making of Mitt Romney: Part 4: Journeys of a shared life: Raising sons, rising expectations bring unexpected turns". The Boston Globe.
  6. ^ "PD43+ >> 1994 U.S. Senate Republican Primary". Massachusetts Elections Division. Retrieved July 23, 2018.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g Kahn, Joseph P. (February 19, 2009). "Chapter 5: Trials & Redemptions: An untidy private life, then a turn to stability". The Boston Globe. Retrieved April 11, 2009.
  8. ^ Rimer, Sara (September 29, 1994). "Religion Is Latest Volatile Issue to Ignite Kennedy Contest". The New York Times. p. A22.
  9. ^ Cooper, Michael (November 6, 1994). "Massachusetts The Last Weekend: Senate Races Where the Battle Has Been Intense; Romney Eclectic In Final Sprint". The New York Times. p. 26.
  10. ^ Martelle, Scott (December 25, 2007). "Romney's running mate – His father, an admired public servant undone by an offhand comment, is both a role model and cautionary example". Los Angeles Times.
  11. ^ a b Rimer, Sarah (September 24, 1994). "Kennedy's Wife Is Giving Him a Political Advantage in a Difficult Contest". The New York Times.
  12. ^ Gordon, Al."Kennedy in Fight Of His Political Life"  Archived 2009-08-30 at the Wayback Machine Newsday (Nassau and Suffoklk edition), pg. A04, October 2, 1994; retrieved October 29, 2006.
  13. ^ Barone, Michael; Grant Ujifusa (1999). The Almanac of American Politics. Washington, DC: National Journal. p. 771. ISBN 0-8129-3194-7.
  14. ^ Ruth Marcus, "Clinton Gets a Sense of the Real Thing; Kennedy and Massachusetts Democrats Put on a Campaign Rally", Washington Post (October 21, 1994): "Clinton stumped for a group of Massachusetts Democrats but concentrated his efforts on Kennedy, who is in the closest race of his career. His challenger is Republican businessman Mitt Romney."
  15. ^ Hall, Mike (May 31, 2007). "Romney's 'Business Experience': Firing Workers, Hiring Them Back at Lower Wages". AFL/CIO. AFL/CIO Blog. Archived from the original on 2007-06-12. Retrieved June 17, 2007.
  16. ^ a b Barone, Michael; Grant Ujifusa (1999). The Almanac of American Politics. Washington, DC: National Journal. p. 772. ISBN 0-8129-3194-7.
  17. ^ Hersh, The Shadow President, pp. 141–142.
  18. ^ R. W. Apple Jr., THE 1994 CAMPAIGN: MASSACHUSETTS; Kennedy and Romney Meet, And the Rancor Flows Freely, New York Times (October 26, 1994).
  19. ^ "America's Culture and Values". Archived from the original on 2008-02-15. Retrieved 2009-08-05.
  20. ^ Hersh, Burton (1997). The Shadow President: Ted Kennedy in Opposition. Steerforth Press. ISBN 1-883642-30-2. pp. 137–139.
  21. ^ Miller, Jerry (April 24, 2000). "Record Fund raising". CNSNews. Archived from the original on December 12, 2007. Retrieved April 20, 2007. According to figures in The Almanac of American Politics 1996, which relies on official campaign finance reports.
  22. ^ a b Adam Clymer (October 28, 1994). "Kennedy and Romney Clash In Second and Final Debate". The New York Times.
  23. ^ Frank Phillips and Scot Lehigh (July 24, 1994). "Poll finds Kennedy's base firm; Challengers trail 16 to 20 points". The Boston Globe. Retrieved August 27, 2009.
  24. ^ Frank Phillips and Scot Lehigh (September 25, 1994). "Article: Kennedy, Romney tied in poll". The Boston Globe. Archived from the original on October 26, 2012. Retrieved August 27, 2009.
  25. ^ Adam Clymer (October 27, 2009). "The 1994 Campaign: Massachusetts; Kennedy and Romney look to Round 2". NY Times. Retrieved August 27, 2009.
  26. ^ Hersh, The Shadow President, pp. 152, 153.
  27. ^ Taranto, James Latter-day President?: A Mitt Romney candidacy would test the religious right The Wall Street Journal Saturday, December 31, 2005; retrieved October 29, 2006.
  28. ^ "PD43+ >> 1994 U.S. Senate General Election". Massachusetts Elections Division. Retrieved July 23, 2018.

External links

This page was last edited on 5 October 2019, at 14:58
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.